Search Decisions

Decision Text

AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-03249
Original file (BC-2012-03249.txt) Auto-classification: Approved
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS 

AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS 

 

IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-03249 

 COUNSEL: NONE 

 HEARING DESIRED: NO 

 

 

 

_________________________________________________________________ 

 

APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: 

 

He be allowed to transfer his Post-9/11 G.I. Bill benefits to his 
dependent (daughter). 

 

_________________________________________________________________ 

 

APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: 

 

He was not offered the option to transfer his Post-9/11 G.I. Bill 
benefits to his daughter. He does not know what office notifies 
retiring military personnel of the option to transfer educational 
benefits and is not sure when the educational benefits began. 
Because of his injuries he had multiple surgeries and was not 
able to participate in the Transition Assistance Program (TAP) 
before he retired on 31 May 10. 

 

His complete submission, with attachments, is at Exhibit A. 

 

_________________________________________________________________ 

 

STATEMENT OF FACTS: 

 

The applicant retired from the Air National Guard on 31 May 10 in 
the grade of master sergeant. 

 

The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are 
contained in the letter prepared by the appropriate office of the 
Air Force, which is at Exhibit B. 

 

_________________________________________________________________ 

 

AIR FORCE EVALUATION: 

 

NGB/A1Y recommends approval. Public Law 111-377, Post-9/11 
Veterans Educational Assistance Improvements Act of 2010, was 
implemented that changed the original Post-9/11 G.I. Bill to 
include Active Guard Reserve (AGR) retroactive to 1 Aug 09. 
Further, the applicant’s retention manager advised him to apply 
for the Post-9/11 G.I. Bill benefit even though the AGR service 
had not been approved as qualifying. 

 

The complete NGB/A1Y evaluation is at Exhibit B. 


 

_________________________________________________________________ 

 

APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: 

 

A copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to the applicant 
on 9 Nov 12 for review and comment within 30 days. As of this 
date, this office has received no response. 

 

_________________________________________________________________ 

 

THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT: 

 

1. The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by existing 
law or regulations. 

 

2. The application was timely filed. 

 

3. Sufficient relevant evidence has been presented to 
demonstrate the existence of error or injustice. We note the 
steps the Air National Guard took indicates they tried to inform 
eligible personnel of this new benefit; however, it appears that 
through no fault of the applicant he was not timely made aware of 
his eligibility and the steps necessary to transfer his benefits 
to his dependents. Based on the evidence of record and the 
recommendation provided by the NGB/A1Y, we find it reasonable to 
believe that had he been properly briefed on the TEB, he would 
have requested a transfer of his education benefits before he 
retired. Consequently, we find the evidence provided sufficient 
to grant the requested relief. Therefore, we recommend the 
applicant’s record be corrected as indicated below. 

 

_________________________________________________________________ 

 

THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT: 

 

The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air Force 
relating to APPLICANT be corrected to show that on 1 May 2010, he 
elected to transfer his Post-9/11 G.I. Bill Educational Benefits 
to his dependent. 

 

_________________________________________________________________ 

 

The following members of the Board considered AFBCMR Docket 
Number BC-2012-03249 in Executive Session on 27 Mar 13, under the 
provisions of AFI 36-2603: 

 

, Panel Chair 

, Member 

, Member 

 


All members voted to correct the records, as recommended. The 
following documentary evidence for Docket Number BC-2012-03249 
was considered: 

 

 Exhibit A. DD Form 149, dated 10 Jul 12, w/atchs. 

 Exhibit B. Letter, NGB/A1Y, dated 4 Oct 12. 

 Exhibit C. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 9 Nov 12. 

 

 

 

 

 

 Panel Chair 

 

 

 


 



Similar Decisions

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC-2012-01346

    Original file (BC-2012-01346.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The complete NGB/A1PS evaluation is at Exhibit C. ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: In an undated letter the applicant responds that he is submitting the letter to provide further explanation of his request to accomplish the Post 9/11 TEB. We note the Air Force office of primary responsibility recommends approval if the Board finds an injustice. However, based on the applicant's complete submission, we find no...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC 2012 01270

    Original file (BC 2012 01270.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-01270 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: He be allowed to transfer his Post 9/11 GI Bill benefits to his dependents. He requests that the TEB be corrected to reflect his daughter and the 18 months of VA benefits he allocated to her in Aug 2009. He retired in Jun 2011 and submitted his...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-03206

    Original file (BC-2012-03206.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    He would have transferred his benefits had he been informed. The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the letter prepared by the appropriate office of the Air Force which is at Exhibit C. ________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: NGB/A1Y recommends denial, indicating the Post-9/11 GI Bill, Chapter 33 became effective 1 Aug 09. ________________________________________________________________ The following...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-04634

    Original file (BC-2012-04634.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: He was not provided guidance or advice regarding the need to adjust or transfer his Post-9/11 GI Bill entitlement prior to his retirement. To date, a response has not been received (Exhibit C). ________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT: The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air Force relating to APPLICANT be corrected to show that he...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 04080

    Original file (BC 2013 04080.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2013-04080 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: YES APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His records be corrected to show he transferred his Post-9/11 GI Bill educational benefits to all his dependents, not just his daughter, while on active duty. The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application is described in the letter prepared by the Air Force office of primary responsibility (OPR),...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-03630

    Original file (BC-2012-03630.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant's complete submission is at Exhibit A. A1Y states that the applicant did not transfer his Post-9/11 GI Bill education benefits to his dependents prior to his retirement as defined in Public Law No 110-252, nor follow the instructions given by his Force Support Squadron (FSS) for retirement out-processing. We took notice of the applicant’s complete submission in judging the merits of the case; however, we agree with the opinion and recommendation of the Air Force office of...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC-2013-00313

    Original file (BC-2013-00313.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    ________________________________________________________________ STATEMENT OF FACTS: Post-9/11 GI Bill Transferability: Any member of the Armed Forces (active duty or Selected Reserve, officer or enlisted) on or after 1 Aug 2009, who is eligible for the Post-9/11 GI Bill. A1Y recommends his records be corrected to show that he transferred his benefits to his dependent on 1 Jan 2010 The complete A1Y evaluation, with attachment, is at Exhibit B. ...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-01867

    Original file (BC-2012-01867.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-01867 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: YES ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: He be authorized to transfer his Post-9/11 GI Bill Educational Benefits from one of his dependents to another. For the first time in history, service members enrolled in the Post-9/11 GI Bill Program are able to transfer unused educational benefits...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-01355

    Original file (BC-2012-01355.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Directive-Type Memorandum (DTM) 09-003- Post-9/11 GI Bill, 22 Jun 2009, (reissued 14 Sep 2011) attachment 2, paragraph 3g (2) (a) 2 states: "An individual may not add dependents after retirement or separation from the Armed Forces, but may modify the number of months of the transferred benefit after retirement or separation for those dependents who had received transferred benefits prior to separation or retirement." To date, a response has not been received (Exhibit C). Exhibit C. Letter,...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 01110

    Original file (BC 2014 01110.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2014-01110 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: YES APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His records be corrected to show he transferred at least one month of his Post-9/11 GI Bill Education Benefits (TEB) to his daughter while on active duty. The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are described in the memorandum prepared by the Air Force office of primary responsibility (OPR),...