Search Decisions

Decision Text

AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-03369
Original file (BC-2012-03369.txt) Auto-classification: Denied
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS 

AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS 

 

 

IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-03369 

 COUNSEL: NONE 

 HEARING DESIRED: NO 

 

 

_________________________________________________________________ 

 

APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: 

 

His records be corrected to reflect he added his spouse to his 
Reserve Component Survivor Benefit Plan (RCSBP) election instead 
of “Children Only.” 

_________________________________________________________________ 

 

APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: 

 

He was miscounseled by his servicing Military Personnel Flight 
(MPF) following his 1999 marriage to his current wife and was not 
aware he had to update his RCSBP election within a year of his 
marriage. Further, he filled out the DD Form 2656, Data For 
Payment Of Retirement Personnel, and elected the “Spouse and 
Children” option when he out-processed for his 8 May 11 
retirement. His election was processed through the Air Reserve 
Personnel Center (ARPC) but nothing was mentioned to the 
contrary. However, after reviewing his post-retirement pay 
stubs, he noticed the error in his RCSBP election. DFAS 
researched the issue and verified his election for “Spouse and 
Children” but found an earlier “Child Only” election from 1994. 
At the time, he attained 20 years of service, he was divorced 
from his first wife and had one dependent child. 

 

The applicant's complete submission, with attachments, is at 
Exhibit A. 

_________________________________________________________________ 

 

STATEMENT OF FACTS: 

 

The relevant facts pertaining to this application are described 
in the letter prepared by the Air Force office of primary 
responsibility which is included at Exhibit C. 

 

_________________________________________________________________ 

 

 

 

 


AIR FORCE EVALUATION: 

 

ARPC/DPTT recommends denial, indicating the applicant had one 
year from the date of his marriage to add his spouse to his RCSBP 
election. He was notified of his eligibility to participate in 
the RCSBP and provided the RCSBP Information Package on 12 Aug 94 
via certified mail. On 10 Oct 94, the applicant made a “Child 
Only” election. He married his current spouse on 26 Jan 99; 
however, he failed to notify ARPC of his marriage or request to 
update his election within one year of the marriage as dictated 
by Title 10, USC, Subsection 1448(a)(5)(B). 

 

A complete copy of the ARPC/DPTT evaluation is at Exhibit C. 

 

_________________________________________________________________ 

 

APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: 

 

The applicant indicates there appears to be no evidence that he 
received and signed for the package sent by ARPC in 1994 
outlining the requirement to update marriage records within one 
year. Had he been made aware of the requirement to do so, he 
would have updated his RCSBP election to add his current spouse 
within the required year. While he did go to the MPF in 1994 to 
accomplish his RCSBP election, the visit was not because he 
received the ARPC notification package, but was likely because he 
was scheduled for the visit by MPF personnel or was reminded to 
do so by other squadron members. 

 

Nevertheless, he submitted the appropriate information regarding 
his marriage to DEERS and he does have records that properly 
reflect he did so. Being that DEERS is the primary record 
keeping repository for the Air Force and Air National Guard, he 
rightfully assumed this information would be updated in all 
places. 

 

Lastly, he is unable to provide additional supporting information 
as a substantial portion of his military personnel records were 
destroyed by house fires. He contacted his former servicing MPF, 
but no one had any recollection of his 1994 visit. 

 

_________________________________________________________________ 

 

THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT: 

 

1. The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by existing 
law or regulations. 

 

2. The application timely filed. 

 

3. Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to 
demonstrate the existence of an error or injustice. We took 


notice of the applicant’s complete submission in judging the 
merits of the case; however, we agree with the opinion and 
recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility 
(OPR) and adopt its rationale as the basis for our conclusion the 
applicant has not been the victim of an error or injustice. 
Therefore, in the absence of evidence to the contrary, we find no 
basis to recommend granting the relief sought in this 
application. 

 

_________________________________________________________________ 

 

THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: 

 

The applicant be notified the evidence presented did not 
demonstrate the existence of an error or injustice; the 
application was denied without a personal appearance; and the 
application will only be reconsidered upon the submission of 
newly discovered relevant evidence not considered with this 
application. 

 

_________________________________________________________________ 

 

The following members of the Board considered AFBCMR Docket 
Number BC-2012-03369 in Executive Session on 7 May 2013, under 
the provisions of AFI 36-2603: 

 

 , Panel Chair 

 , Member 

 , Member 

 

The following documentary evidence was considered: 

 

 Exhibit A. DD Form 149, dated 29 Jun 12, w/atchs. 

 Exhibit B. Applicant's Master Personnel Records. 

 Exhibit C. Letter, ARPC/DPTT, dated 6 Sep 12. 

 Exhibit D. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 24 Sep 12. 

 Exhibit E. Letter, Applicant, dated 27 Oct 12,w/atch. 

 

 

 

 

 

 Panel Chair 

 



Similar Decisions

  • AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 00051

    Original file (BC 2014 00051.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    STATEMENT OF FACTS: The RCSBP Information Package that was mailed to the applicant at his initial election point stated: “If you do not have a spouse or dependent children at the time you are entitled to make an RCSBP election, but later acquire a spouse or children, you may elect RCSBP coverage for that spouse or children within one year of acquisition.” AIR FORCE EVALUATION: ARPC/DPTT recommends denial based on the applicant not making the update within one year of his marriage as...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-02535

    Original file (BC-2011-02535.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    In addition, the Board finds the evidence sufficient to give him the benefit of doubt in this matter as it does not appear reasonable that he would have knowingly elected not to elect this important benefit. _________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT: The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air Force relating to APPLICANT, be corrected to show that on 17 February 2009, he elected spouse coverage under the Survivor Benefit...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 00212

    Original file (BC 2013 00212.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the letter prepared by the Air Force office of primary responsibility (OPR), which is attached at Exhibit C. ________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: ARPC/DPTT recommends denial, indicating there is no evidence of an error or injustice. IAW U.S.C., Title 10, Subsection 1448(a)(5)(B) Manner and Time of Election, ”Such an election must be written, signed by the person...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC-2013-00212

    Original file (BC-2013-00212.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the letter prepared by the Air Force office of primary responsibility (OPR), which is attached at Exhibit C. ________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: ARPC/DPTT recommends denial, indicating there is no evidence of an error or injustice. IAW U.S.C., Title 10, Subsection 1448(a)(5)(B) Manner and Time of Election, ”Such an election must be written, signed by the person...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 05474

    Original file (BC 2013 05474.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    On 21 Mar 11, his son was born and he turned in his son’s birth certificate for update in DEERS. Since he had not been married before and was still on Active Reserves, he was told there was nothing else needed and DEERS was updated. ________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did not demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; that that the application will only be...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-00291

    Original file (BC-2012-00291.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Neither the applicant nor his spouse notified HQ ARPC regarding their marriage within one year of the marriage as required by law. ________________________________________________________________ The following members of the Board considered this application BC-2012-00291 in Executive Session on 21 September 2012, under the provisions of AFI 36-2603: The following documentary evidence was considered: Exhibit A. DD Form 149 dated 4 January 2012, w/atchs. Exhibit C. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 00104

    Original file (BC 2014 00104.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant’s complete submission, with attachments, is at Exhibit A. On 3 Jan 14, the applicant signed DD Form 2656-6, Survivor Benefit Plan Election Change Certificate, establishing his children as the beneficiaries of his RCSBP. The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the memorandum prepared by the Air Force office of primary responsibility (OPR), which is attached at Exhibit C. AIR FORCE EVALUATION: ARPC/DPTT recommends denial indicating there is...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 00383

    Original file (BC 2014 00383.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: He elected RCSBP child coverage. The applicant believes the Board should find it in the interest of justice to consider his untimely application as he was unaware he had to elect SBP spouse coverage within one year of marriage. THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did not demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; that that the application...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2012 00362

    Original file (BC 2012 00362.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    On 3 May 93, the member completed an ARPC Form 123, Reserve Component Survivor Benefit Plan Election Certificate, and indicated that he had no eligible spouse or children and deferred participation. The applicant and the member were divorced on 24 Aug 93. As of this date, a response has not been received by this office (Exhibit C).

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 05388

    Original file (BC 2013 05388.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: Her deceased husband and she thought they had complied with the marriage reporting requirements of the Reserve Component Survivor Benefit Plan (RCSBP), when their marriage data was entered in the Defense Enrollment Eligibility Reporting System (DEERS) upon being issued new military ID cards on 4 Feb 11, less than two months after being married on 16 Dec 10. ARPC/DPTT has no record of the deceased member or his spouse reporting the marital change within the required...