Search Decisions

Decision Text

AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-03320
Original file (BC-2012-03320.txt) Auto-classification: Approved
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS 

AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS 

 

IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-03320 

 

 COUNSEL: NONE 

 

 HEARING DESIRED: NO 

 

________________________________________________________________ 

 

APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: 

 

1. His 3 Aug 11 and 22 Feb 12 Fitness Assessments (FA) be 
declared void and removed from the Air Force Fitness Management 
System (AFFMS). 

 

2. His Enlisted Performance Reports (EPR), rendered for the 
reporting periods of 10 May 11 through 29 Mar 12 and 10 May 10 
through 9 May 11, be declared void and removed from his military 
personnel record. 

 

________________________________________________________________ 

 

APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: 

 

The medical condition that prevented him from doing the sit-up 
portion of the Air Force FA was not discovered until after his 
fourth failure and recommendation for discharge. Since then, he 
has been evaluated and provided documentation indicating he was 
not properly accommodated for this portion of the FA. His 
commander has since dropped his recommendation for discharge. 
Had he not had to do the sit-up portion of the FA, he would have 
passed and would not have been recommended for discharge. 

 

The contested referral EPRs rendered were unjust due to a pre-
existing medical issue that prevented him from passing the FA 
evaluations during the timeframes of his evaluation perods. 

 

The applicant's complete submission, with attachments, is at 
Exhibit A. 

 

________________________________________________________________ 

 

STATEMENT OF FACTS: 

 

The applicant is currently serving in the Regular Air Force in 
the grade of master sergeant (E-7). 

 

On 3 Aug 11, the applicant participated in the first contested 
FA, attaining a composite score of 72.60, which constituted an 
unsatisfactory assessment. 

 

 


On 22 Feb 12, the applicant participated in the second contested 
FA, attaining a composite score of 67.60, which constituted an 
unsatisfactory assessment.The following is a resume of his EPR 
ratings: 

 

RATING PERIOD PROMOTION RECOMMENDATION 

 

* 29 Mar 12 4 

* 09 May 11 (MSgt) 4 

 09 May 10 5 

 09 May 09 5 

 09 May 08 5 

 20 Jul 07 5 

 20 Jul 06 5 

 20 Jul 05 5 

 03 Jan 05 (TSgt) 5 

 11 Mar 04 5 

 11 Mar 03 5 

 11 Mar 02 5 

 

* Contested Reports 

 

The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are 
contained in the letters prepared by the appropriate offices of 
the Air Force, which are attached at Exhibits C and D. 

 

________________________________________________________________ 

 

AIR FORCE EVALUATION: 

 

AFPC/DPSIM recommends the record be changed to reflect the 
applicant was exempt from the situp component of the contested 
FA, noting the applicant provided an AF Form 422, Notification 
of Air Force Member’s Qualification Status, reflecting 
exemptions from both the cardio and situp components. 

 

A complete copy of the AFPC/DPSIM evaluation, is at Exhibit C. 

 

AFPC/DPSID recommends approval of the request to void the 29 Mar 
12 EPR, contingent upon the Board’s approval to exempt/correct 
the 22 Feb 12 FA failure in AFFMS. Additionally, they indicated 
it is unclear if the medical condition was retroactive and had 
impact on any other evaluation. There appears to be no basis 
for addressing removal of any other reports. 

 

A complete copy of the AFPC/DPSID evaluation is at Exhibit D. 

 

APPLICANT’S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: 

 

Copies of the Air Force evaluations were forwarded to the 
applicant on 1 Jan 13 for review and comment within 30 days. As 
of this date, no response has been received by this office 
(Exhibit E). 

 

________________________________________________________________ 


THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT: 

 

1. The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by 
existing law or regulations. 

 

2. The application was timely filed. 

 

3. Sufficient relevant evidence has been presented to 
demonstrate the existence of an error or injustice with respect 
to the applicant’s request pertaining to his 22 Feb 12 Fitness 
Assessment (FA) score and his referral Enlisted Performance 
Report (EPR) closing on 29 Mar 12. In this respect, we agree 
with the opinion and recommendation of AFPC/DPSIM and adopt 
their rationale as the basis for our conclusion the applicant’s 
medical condition should have rendered him exempt from the 
cardio and sit-up components of his 22 Feb 12 FA. Therefore, we 
believe it appropriate to correct the record to reflect said 
exemptions and remove the resultant referral EPR, since it was 
based on the FA failure. We note the applicant has requested 
that the contested FA score be removed in its entirety; however, 
in our view, the corrections noted above represent full and 
fitting relief. In view of the above, we recommend the 
applicant’s records be corrected to the extent indicated below. 

 

4. Notwithstanding the above, insufficient relevant evidence 
has been presented to demonstrate the existence of an error or 
injustice with respect to the applicant’s request pertaining to 
his 3 Aug 11 FA score and resultant referral EPR closing on 9 
May 11. In this respect, we note the comments of the Air Force 
OPRs indicating that while the evidence presented indicates the 
corrective action described above should be taken, the 
documentation provided does not substantiate that his 3 Aug 11 
FA is an inaccurate assessment of the applicant’s fitness. 
Based on the foregoing and in the absence of evidence the 
contested EPR is an inaccurate assessment of his performance, we 
find no basis to remove it from his records. 

 

________________________________________________________________ 

 

THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT: 

 

The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air 
Force relating to the APPLICANT be corrected to show that: 

 

 a. He was exempt from the cardio and sit-up components of 
his 22 Feb 12 Fitness Assessment (FA). 

 

 b. His referral enlisted performance report (EPR), 
rendered for the period 10 May 2011 through 29 March 2012, be 
declared void and removed from his records. 

 

________________________________________________________________ 

 


The following members of the Board considered AFBCMR Docket 
Number BC-2012-03320 in Executive Session on 20 Feb 13, under 
the provisions of AFI 36-2603: 

 

 , Panel Chair 

 , Member 

 , Member 

 

All members voted to correct the records as recommended. The 
following documentary evidence pertaining to AFBCMR Docket 
Number BC-2012-03320 was considered: 

 

 Exhibit A. DD Form 149, dated 5 Jul 12, w/atchs. 

 Exhibit B. Applicant's Master Personnel Records. 

 Exhibit C. Letter, AFPC/DPSIM, dated 23 Sep 12. 

 Exhibit D. Letter, AFPC/DPSID, dated 6 Dec 12. 

 Exhibit E. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 11 Jan 13. 

 

 

 

 

 

 Panel Chair 


AFBCMR BC-2012-03320 

 

 

 

MEMORANDUM FOR THE CHIEF OF STAFF 

 

 Having received and considered the recommendation of the Air Force Board for 
Correction of Military Records and under the authority of Section 1552, Title 10, United States 
Code (70A Stat 116), it is directed that: 

 

 The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air Force relating to 

APPLICANT be corrected to show that: 

 

 a. The Fitness Assessment, dated 22 February 2012, reflect “exempt” from the 
1.5 mile walk and situps components in the Air Force Fitness Management System. 

 

 b. The AF Form 910, Enlisted Performance Report (AB thru TSgt), rendered for 
the period 10 May 2011 through 29 March 2012 be, and hereby is, declared void and removed 
from his records. 

 

 

 

 

 

 Director 

 Air Force Review Boards Agency 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 



Similar Decisions

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC-2012-00021

    Original file (BC-2012-00021.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the letters prepared by the appropriate offices of the Air Force at Exhibits C, D, E, and G. ________________________________________________________________ THE AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPSIM recommends denial of the applicant’s request to remove his 19 Feb 2010 FA from the AFFMS. DPSIM states the applicant is requesting his FA dated 19 Feb 2010 be removed from the AFFMS. The complete DPSID evaluation, with...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC-2013-01079

    Original file (BC-2013-01079.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    RATING PERIOD OVERALL PERFORMANCE ASSESSMENT * 28 Jul 12 4 28 Nov 11 4 28 Nov 10 5 *Contested Report The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the letters prepared by the appropriate offices of the Air Force, which is at Exhibit C and D. ________________________________________________________________ _ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPSIM recommends denying removing the applicant’s FA test dated 11 Jul 12; however, they recommend exempting his cardio component...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC 2012 05708

    Original file (BC 2012 05708.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    On 23 Mar 2010, the applicant failed his FA with a score of 72.00. The applicant has failed to provide any information from all the rating officials on the contested report. The complete DPSID evaluation is at Exhibit C. _______________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: The EPR did not include his performance for the entire rating period.

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2012 04871

    Original file (BC 2012 04871.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The complete DPSOE evaluation is at Exhibit D. _______________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: He disagrees with the findings of the Air Force offices of primary responsibility. The letter from his Flight Surgeon and 844th Communications Squadron Executive Director states that he was diagnosed with a medical condition that precluded him from achieving a passing fitness score and that he should be exempt from the cardio component...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC 2012 03485

    Original file (BC 2012 03485.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Furthermore, because the failed FAs resulted in the applicant receiving a referral EPR and cancellation of his promotion, to the grade of technical sergeant, we recommend the referral EPR for the period of 29 Feb 2012 to 11 Jul 2012 be declared void and removed from his records and that his promotion to the grade of technical sergeant be reinstated with a date of rank and effective date of 1 Sep 2012. Exhibit C. Letter, AFPC/DPSID, dated 19 Sep 2013. Exhibit D. Letter, AFPC/DPSOE, dated 29...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-05042

    Original file (BC-2011-05042.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the letters prepared by the appropriate office of the Air Force, which are attached at Exhibit C and D. ________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPSID recommends the AFBCMR approve the applicant’s request to void the contested report. A complete copy of the AFPC/DPSIM evaluation is at Exhibit...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-02801

    Original file (BC-2012-02801.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    If she had been on the correct profile when she completed the June 2011 FA, she would have passed the FA with a 75.5 score and would not have received the referral EPR. DPSID states that based on the AFPC/DPSIM advisory to grant the relief sought to exempt the cardio component of the FA dated 8 June 2011, they contend that the fitness assessment failure is an inappropriate comment on the contested referral EPR, and as a result, the referral EPR should be removed from her record. The...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 01291

    Original file (BC 2013 01291.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    His referral EPR dated from 7 Nov 2009 through 6 Nov 2010 was a direct result of the contested FA failures. His referral EPR dated from 18 Jun 11 through 23 Mar 12 was a result of his FA failure and a Letter of Reprimand (LOR) dated 7 Mar 2012, issued for domestic violence. In reference to the EPR rendered 17 Jun 2011, DPSID found that based upon the legal sufficiency of the Article 15, and no evidence the nonjudicial punishment was ever set aside, they find that its mention in the...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-02474

    Original file (BC-2012-02474.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    His Fitness Assessment (FA) dated 10 Apr 12, be removed from the Air Force Fitness Management System (AFFMS). The complete DPSIM evaluation is at Exhibit D. AFPC/DPSID states based on the recommendation from DPSIM to only exempt the cardio portion of the applicant’s FA test and not remove the entire 10 Apr 12 FA, they recommend the AFBCMR deny the applicant’s request to void the contested EPR. ________________________________________________________________ _ THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT: The...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC-2013-00053

    Original file (BC-2013-00053.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    _______________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPSIM recommends denial of the applicant’s request for removal of the contested FAs. The applicant has failed to provide any information from the rating officials on the contested report. ________________________________________________________________ The following members of the Board considered AFBCMR Docket Number BC-2013-00053 in Executive Session on 30 Jan 2014, under the provisions of AFI...