Search Decisions

Decision Text

AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-03292
Original file (BC-2012-03292.txt) Auto-classification: Approved
 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS 

 AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS 

 

IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-03292 

 

 COUNSEL: NONE 

 

 HEARING DESIRED: NO 

 

________________________________________________________________ 

 

APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: 

 

His fitness assessment (FA), dated 30 May 2012, be removed from 
the Air Force Fitness Management System (AFFMS). 

 

________________________________________________________________ 

 

APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: 

 

He was instructed to do the 1-mile walk for the cardio component 
of his fitness assessment. He failed the assessment due to his 
elevated heart rate. The officer in charge of flight medicine 
determined that his current medication had a side effect of 
increasing the heart rate and documented this on his AF Form 
108, Physical Fitness Education and Intervention Processing. 

 

The applicant’s complete submission, with attachments, is at 
Exhibit A. 

 

________________________________________________________________ 

 

STATEMENT OF FACTS: 

 

The applicant is currently serving in the Regular Air Force in 
the grade of Technical Sergeant (TSgt), E-6. 

 

________________________________________________________________ 

 

AIR FORCE EVALUATION: 

 

AFPC/DPSIM recommends denial. DPSIM states on 13 August 2012, a 
memorandum was sent to the applicant requesting additional 
documentation be submitted, within 30 days, to substantiate his 
claim. Specifically, a copy of his AF Form 422, Notification of 
Air Force Member’s Qualification Status, documenting his 
medication, limitations and exemptions. The applicant did not 
provide the requested documentation. 

 

The complete AFPC/DPSIM evaluation, with attachments, is at 
Exhibit B. 

 

________________________________________________________________ 

 


APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: 

 

On 15 January 2013, the applicant provided a copy of his 
previously submitted AFBCMR application package along with an AF 
Form 108, dated 7 December 2012, which documented his 
medication, limitations, and exemptions. 

 

The applicant’s complete submission is at Exhibit D. 

 

________________________________________________________________ 

 

THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT: 

 

1. The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by 
existing law or regulations. 

 

2. The application was timely filed. 

 

3. Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to 
demonstrate the existence of error or injustice with respect to 
the applicant’s request for removal of the entire contested FA. 
After thoroughly reviewing the evidence of record and noting the 
applicant's contentions, we are not persuaded the entire 
contested FA is in error or unjust. The AF Form 422, Notification of Air Force Member’s Qualification Status, 
documenting his limitations and duty exemptions is noted; 
however, we also note the Military Medical Provider’s assessment 
on the AF Form 108, Physical Fitness Education and Intervention 
Processing, indicating the applicant should have been exempt 
from the cardio component of the FA due to one of his chronic 
medications. In the absence of documentation indicating the 
applicant should have been exempt from completing the FA, we 
find insufficient evidence to warrant removal of the entire FA. 

 

4 Notwithstanding our determination above, sufficient relevant 
evidence has been presented to demonstrate the existence of 
error or injustice to warrant partial relief. The Board notes 
the Air Force office of primary responsibility recommends 
denial, however, we also note the Military Medical Provider 
determined the applicant should have been exempt from the walk 
component of the contested FA due to one of his chronic 
medications. Based on the medical provider’s assessment and the 
recommendation of the commander to invalidate the contested FA, 
we believe the cardio component should be corrected to reflect 
“exempt” in the AFFMS. Our recommended change will result in an 
overall composite fitness score of 78.75, (Satisfactory). 
Accordingly, we recommend the applicant’s record be corrected to 
the extent indicated below. 

 

________________________________________________________________ 

 

 

 

 


THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT: 

 

The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air 
Force relating to APPLICANT be corrected to show the cardio 
component of the fitness assessment, dated 30 May 2012, be 
amended to reflect “exempt” in the Air Force Fitness Management 
System. 

 

________________________________________________________________ 

 

The following members of the Board considered this application 
in Executive Session on 16 April 2013, under the provisions of 
AFI 36-2603: 

 

 , Panel Chair 

 , Member 

 , Member 

 

The following documentary evidence was considered in AFBCMR 
Docket Number BC-2012-03292: 

 

 Exhibit A. DD Form 149, dated 27 July 2012, w/atchs. 

 Exhibit B. Letter, AFPC/DPSIM, dated 9 November 2012, 
w/atchs 

 Exhibit C. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 26 November 2012. 

 Exhibit D. AF Form 108, dated 7 December 2011. 

 

 

 

 

 

 Panel Chair 




AFBCMR BC-2012-03292 

 

 

 

 

MEMORANDUM FOR THE CHIEF OF STAFF 

 

 Having received and considered the recommendation of the Air Force Board for 
Correction of Military Records and under the authority of Section 1552, Title 10, United States 
Code it is directed that: 

 

 The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air Force relating to be corrected 
to show the cardio component of the fitness assessment, dated 30 May 2012, be and hereby is, 
amended to reflect “exempt” in the Air Force Fitness Management System. 

 

 

 

 

 

 Director 

 Air Force Review Boards Agency 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 



Similar Decisions

  • AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-05541

    Original file (BC-2012-05541.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Although the applicant is not clear on which FA test he would like removed from his records, we believe based on the Air Force office of primary responsibility review of his record and the AF Form 108 provided by the applicant that reflects his FA dated 15 Mar 12 is, in fact, the assessment he is requesting to be removed. The AF Form 422, Notification of Air Force Member’s Qualification Status, documenting his limitations and duty exemptions is noted; however, we also note the Military...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2012 03195

    Original file (BC 2012 03195.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-03195 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: The Fitness Assessments (FAs) dated 30 Sep 11 and 23 Feb 12 be removed from the Air Force Fitness Management System (AFFMS). ________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPSIM recommends partial approval,...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-04056

    Original file (BC-2012-04056.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The evidence provided by the applicant did not include medical provider recommended exemptions for the cardio component. If the medical evaluation validates the illness or injury and provides supporting medical documentation, the Unit Commander may invalidate the FA results by notifying the FAC in writing. ________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT: The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did not demonstrate the existence of...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-03993

    Original file (BC-2012-03993.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-03993 COUNSEL: NO HEARING DESIRED: NO __________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His 25 April 2012 Fitness Assessment (FA) score be declared void and removed from the Air Force Fitness Management System (AFFMS). While we note that said correction will not result in the applicant receiving an overall passing score, given the...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2012 03257

    Original file (BC 2012 03257.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    ________________________________________________________________ THE AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPSIM recommends the sit-up component of the contested FA reflect "exempt" in the AFFMS. ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF THE AIR FORCE EVALUATION: On 29 Aug 2012, a copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to the applicant for review and comment within 30 days. In this respect, we note that while the applicant requests the entire FA be...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 04196

    Original file (BC 2013 04196.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Recommend invalidation of FA in question.” A similar request was considered and denied by the Fitness Assessment Appeals Board (FAAB), on the basis the applicant should not have completed the FA due to injury. NOTE: Original FA will count unless rendered invalid by the Unit Commander.” In accordance with guidance at the time of contested FA, AFI 36-2905 (1 Jul 10), Paragraph 2.3.2., “All members must complete the FSQ prior to FA (Attachment 4).” In accordance with guidance at the time of...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-04970

    Original file (BC-2011-04970.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant's complete submission, with attachments, is at Exhibit A. _________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: HQ AFPC/DPSIM recommends the cardio component of his 7 Jul 11 FA be updated to reflect he was exempt in the AFFMS noting the AF Form 108, Physical Fitness Education and Intervention Processing, indicates the applicant had a preexisting condition which precluded him from achieving a passing fitness score; and the AF Form 422,...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC-2012-05716

    Original file (BC-2012-05716.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Beyond the cardio exemption, there is no evidence that the applicant should have been exempt from any other component. The complete AFPC/DPSIM evaluation, with attachment, is at Exhibit C. ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: In his response the applicant states that after receiving the Air Force advisory opinion it was clear that he did not provide the supporting medical documents, therefore he submits a copy of his...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-02388

    Original file (BC-2012-02388.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: There was a discrepancy between restrictions placed on his AF Form 469, Duty Limiting Condition Report, dated 19 Apr 2012 and the testing exemptions reflected on the AF Form 422, Notification of Air Force Member’s Qualification Status, dated 20 Apr 2012. On 23 Apr 2012, he took his copy of the AF Form 422 to his scheduled FA. ________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-02813

    Original file (BC-2012-02813.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    ________________________________________________________________ THE AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPSIM recommends partial approval. ________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT: The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air Force relating to APPLICANT, be corrected to show that the cardio, sit-up, and push-up components of her FA dated 2 Apr 2012 reflect “exempt” in the AFFMS. Exhibit C. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 30 Oct 2012.