Search Decisions

Decision Text

AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-03229
Original file (BC-2012-03229.txt) Auto-classification: Denied
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS 

AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS 

 

 

IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-03229 

 COUNSEL: NONE 

 HEARING DESIRED: NO 

 

_________________________________________________________________ 

 

APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: 

 

His DD Form 214, Report of Separation from Active Duty, reflect 
award of the Presidential Unit Citation (PUC). 

 

_________________________________________________________________ 

 

APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: 

 

The contested award is missing from his DD Form 214. 

 

The applicant's complete submission, with attachments, is at 
Exhibit A. 

 

_________________________________________________________________ 

 

STATEMENT OF FACTS: 

 

The applicant with prior service reenlisted in the Regular Air 
Force on 22 July 1975. 

 

On 25 February 1978, the applicant was honorably discharged. He 
served 9 years, 5 months and 14 days on active duty with 2 years, 
7 months and 4 days of foreign and/or sea service. 

 

_________________________________________________________________ 

 

AIR FORCE EVALUATION: 

 

AFPC/DPSID recommends denial of the PUC. DPSID states the PUC is 
conferred on units of the armed forces of the United States and 
of cobelligerent nations, for extraordinary heroism in action 
against an armed enemy on or after 7 December 1941. 

 

After a thorough review of the applicant’s official military 
personnel record, they were able to verify award of the Vietnam 
Campaign Medal and the Republic of Vietnam Gallantry Cross with 
Palm (RVNGC w/P). Upon final board decision, administrative 
correction of the applicant’s official military personnel record 
will be completed by AFPC/DPSOY. 

 

They were unable to verify that any units in which the applicant 
served were awarded the PUC, rendering the applicant ineligible 
for the award. 


 

The DPSID complete evaluation, with attachment, is at Exhibit C. 

 

_________________________________________________________________ 

 

APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: 

 

On 17 September 2012, a copy of the Air Force evaluation was 
forwarded to the applicant for review and response within 30 days 
(Exhibit D). As of this date, no response has been received by 
this office. 

 

_________________________________________________________________ 

 

THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT: 

 

1. The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by existing 
law or regulations. 

 

2. The application was not timely filed; however, it is in the 
interest of justice to excuse the failure to timely file. 

 

3. Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to 
demonstrate the existence of error or injustice. The applicant’s 
contentions are duly noted; however, after reviewing the evidence 
of record, we agree with the opinion and recommendation of the 
Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt its 
rationale as the basis for our conclusion the applicant has not 
provided sufficient evidence to substantiate his entitlement to 
the PUC. Therefore, other than the administrative corrections to 
be completed by AFPC/DPSOY, we find no basis to recommend 
granting the relief sought in this application. 

 

_________________________________________________________________ 

 

The following members of the Board considered AFBCMR Docket 
Number BC-2012-03229 in Executive Session on 14 March 2013, under 
the provisions of AFI 36-2603: 

 

 

 

Although chaired the panel, in view of her unavailability and 
the due date of the case, , has agreed to sign as Acting Panel 
Chair. The following documentary evidence pertaining to AFBCMR 
Docket Number BC-2012-03229 was considered: 

 

 Exhibit A. DD Form 149, dated 7 June 2012, w/atchs. 

 Exhibit B. Applicant’s Master Personnel Record. 

 Exhibit C. Letter, AFPC/DPSID, not dated. 

 Exhibit D. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 17 September 2012. 

 



Similar Decisions

  • AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC 2012 04560

    Original file (BC 2012 04560.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    He be entitled to the Air Force Outstanding Unit Award (AFOUA). In a letter to the applicant dated 14 February 2013, AFPC/DPAPP advised the applicant that they verified and confirmed he had boots on the ground Foreign Service time at Tay Ninh Army Airfield, Republic of Vietnam from 30 May 1968 to 30 May 1969, for one year and one day. Regarding his request to correct his records to reflect Foreign Service in Japan, the applicant has not provided sufficient evidence to persuade us that he...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2012 05393

    Original file (BC 2012 05393.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The SAEMR is awarded to all Air Force service members who, after 1 Jan 1963, qualify as "expert" in small arms marksmanship with either the M-16 rifle or issue handgun. Upon the final board decision, administrative correction of the applicant's official military personnel record will be completed by AFPC/DPSOY. We also note the OPR has administratively corrected the applicant’s records to reflect his entitlement to the PUC, RVNGC w/P, and AFOUA w/V.

  • AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-03900

    Original file (BC-2012-03900.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Based on AFPC/DPSID review of the applicant's official military personnel record, they were able to determine the below Air Force Medals and/or Ribbons should have been awarded during his service from 17 October 1961 to 2 February 1965 and were not reflected in his records. The applicant's active duty service is from 17 October 1961 to 2 February 1965, which would not meet the eligibility requirements for the Air Force Longevity Service Award. The Air Force Longevity Service Medal is...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 00946

    Original file (BC 2013 00946.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2013-00946 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: Her records be corrected to reflect award of the Republic of Korea Presidential Unit Citation (RKPUC), the Vietnam Campaign Medal (VCM), and the Presidential Unit Citation with Valor (PUC w/Valor). The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC-2013-00946

    Original file (BC-2013-00946.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2013-00946 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: Her records be corrected to reflect award of the Republic of Korea Presidential Unit Citation (RKPUC), the Vietnam Campaign Medal (VCM), and the Presidential Unit Citation with Valor (PUC w/Valor). The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-03378

    Original file (BC-2012-03378.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-03378 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: He be awarded decorations for his service in Vietnam to include the Republic of Vietnam Campaign Medal. The applicant’s contentions are duly noted; however, after reviewing the evidence of record, we agree with the opinion and recommendation of...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-03790

    Original file (BC-2012-03790.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: The deceased former service member is entitled to the Army Distinguished Unit Badge and the Navy/Marine Distinguished Unit Badge because he was assigned to the 11th Bombardment Group during World War II during the qualifying period for these awards. The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are described in the letter prepared by the Air Force office of primary responsibility (OPR)...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-01753

    Original file (BC-2012-01753.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    _________________________________________________________________ STATEMENT OF FACTS: The PUC is awarded to units of the United States Armed Forces for outstanding performance in action against an armed enemy occurring on, or after 7 Dec 41, for United States Air Force units. After a thorough review of the applicant's official military personnel record, they were unable to verify he was assigned to any unit that was awarded the PUC during his term of service. We took notice of the...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-04546

    Original file (BC-2012-04546.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-04546 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: He be awarded the Presidential Unit Citation (PUC) and Vietnam Service Medal (VSM). The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are described in the letter prepared by the Air Force office of primary responsibility (OPR) which is...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2012 05470

    Original file (BC 2012 05470.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-05470 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His records be corrected to reflect he was awarded the Presidential Unit Citation (PUC) and any additional awards he may be entitled to for his active duty service. The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the...