Search Decisions

Decision Text

AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-03362
Original file (BC-2012-03362.txt) Auto-classification: Denied
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS 

AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS 

 

 

IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-03362 

 

 COUNSEL: NONE 

 

 HEARING DESIRED: NO 

 

________________________________________________________________ 

 

APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: 

 

His 23 December 2010 Fitness Assessment (FA) be removed from the 
Air Force Fitness Management System (AFFMS). 

 

________________________________________________________________ 

 

APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: 

 

His abdominal circumference was erroneously measured by a test 
administrator whose administration of FAs has since become the 
subject of several inspector general (IG) complaints. 

 

The applicant’s complete submission, with attachment, is at 
Exhibit A. 

 

________________________________________________________________ 

 

STATEMENT OF FACTS: 

 

The applicant is currently serving in the Regular Air Force in 
the grade of master sergeant (E-7). 

 

On 23 December 2010, the applicant participated in the contested 
FA during which his abdominal circumference component was 
recorded as 41.50 inches, which constituted an unsatisfactory 
assessment. 

 

________________________________________________________________ 

 

AIR FORCE EVALUATION: 

 

AFPC/DPSIM recommends denial, noting that the applicant did not 
provide any documentation to substantiate his assertion. 

 

A complete copy of the AFPC/DPSIM evaluation is at Exhibit C. 

 

________________________________________________________________ 

 

 

 

 


APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: 

 

A copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to the 
applicant on 26 November 2012 for review and comment within 30 
days. As of this date, no response has been received by this 
office (Exhibit D). 

 

________________________________________________________________ 

 

THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT: 

 

1. The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by 
existing law or regulations. 

 

2. The application was timely filed. 

 

3. Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to 
demonstrate the existence of an error or injustice. After 
careful consideration of applicant’s request and the available 
evidence of record, we are not convinced the applicant is the 
victim of an error or injustice. Other than his own 
uncorroborated assertions, he has provided no evidence 
whatsoever for us to consider in evaluating the merits of his 
case. Therefore, in the absence of evidence to the contrary, we 
find no basis to recommend granting the relief sought in this 
application. 

 

________________________________________________________________ 

 

THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT: 

 

The applicant be notified the evidence presented did not 
demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice, the 
application was denied without a personal appearance; and the 
application will only be reconsidered upon the submission of 
newly discovered relevant evidence not considered with this 
application. 

 

________________________________________________________________ 

 

The following members of the Board considered AFBCMR Docket 
Number BC-2012-03362 in Executive Session on 12 March 2013, 
under the provisions of AFI 36-2603: 

 

 Panel Chair 

 Member 

 Member 

 

 

 

 

 

 


The following documentary evidence pertaining to AFBCMR Docket 
Number BC-2012-03362 was considered: 

 

 Exhibit A. DD Form 149, dated 25 Jul 12. 

 Exhibit B. Applicant’s Master Personnel Records. 

 Exhibit c. Letter, AFPC/DPSIM, dated 12 Nov 12, w/atchs 

 Exhibit D. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 26 Nov 12. 

 

 

 

 

 

 Panel Chair 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 



Similar Decisions

  • AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC 2012 05794

    Original file (BC 2012 05794.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    In accordance with AFI 36-2905, Fitness Program, to determine overall fitness, the Air Force uses an overall composite fitness score and minimum scores per three component areas: Aerobic Fitness (1.5 mile run), Body Composition (abdominal circumference measurement), and Muscular Fitness (number of push-ups and sit- ups completed within one minute each). On 24 Aug 12, an AF Form 469, Duty Limiting Condition Report, was issued which restricted the applicant from performing activities that...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2012 05794

    Original file (BC 2012 05794.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    In accordance with AFI 36-2905, Fitness Program, to determine overall fitness, the Air Force uses an overall composite fitness score and minimum scores per three component areas: Aerobic Fitness (1.5 mile run), Body Composition (abdominal circumference measurement), and Muscular Fitness (number of push-ups and sit- ups completed within one minute each). On 24 Aug 12, an AF Form 469, Duty Limiting Condition Report, was issued which restricted the applicant from performing activities that...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC-2012-02592

    Original file (BC-2012-02592.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS DOCKET NUMBERS: BC-2012-02592 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO IN THE MATTER OF: _____________________ _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His Fitness Assessments (FAs), dated 9 August 2011 and 7 June 2012, be removed from the Air Force Fitness Management System (AFFMS). The applicant’s complete submission, with attachments, is at Exhibit A. We also find no...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-05096

    Original file (BC-2012-05096.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-05096 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: Her 31 Aug 12 Fitness Assessment (FA) be declared void and removed from the Air Force Fitness Management System (AFFMS). The applicant’s last five FA results are as follows: Date Composite Score Rating 30 Nov 12 88.00 Satisfactory* 31 Aug...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-02237

    Original file (BC-2012-02237.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Another evaluator measured him for the third measurement, which was 39.5”. However, we believe the applicant has provided sufficient evidence to raise reasonable doubt as to whether or not the abdominal circumference measurement was accurately recorded during the contested fitness assessment. ________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT: The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air Force relating to APPLICANT be corrected to show...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2012 05596

    Original file (BC 2012 05596.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-05596 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: Her Fitness Assessments (FA), dated 11 Jun 12 and 6 Sep 12, be removed from the Air Force Fitness Management System (AFFMS). While we note the applicant’s stated request to have the entire FA removed, the Air Force office of primary responsibility has...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-03509

    Original file (BC-2012-03509.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant’s last five FA results: Date Composite Score Rating 4 Nov 12 30.90 Unsatisfactory 9 Jan 11 63.00 Unsatisfactory 4 Apr 09 82.50 Good 2 Apr 08 82.50 Good 29 May 07 85.50 Good The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are described in the letter prepared by the Air Force office of primary responsibility, which is included at Exhibit C. ________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPSIM recommends denial of the...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2012 03650

    Original file (BC 2012 03650.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    After carefully reviewing this application and the evidence provided in support of the appeal, we are not persuaded that the applicant’s Fitness Assessment (FA) dated 26 Feb 12 should be removed from his records. Exhibit C. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 9 Nov 12. Acting Panel Chair AFBCMR BC-2012-03650 MEMORANDUM FOR THE CHIEF OF STAFF Having received and considered the recommendation of the Air Force Board for Correction of Military Records and under the authority of Section 1552, Title 10,...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2012 04155

    Original file (BC 2012 04155.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Therefore, they recommend the AC component of the FA dated 31 Jul 2012, be updated to reflect "exempt" in AFFMS. The complete DPSIM evaluation, with attachment, is at Exhibit C. ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF THE AIR FORCE EVALUATION: The facts support his assertion that the entire FA should be removed from his record and that he should be granted the opportunity to re-test immediately. ...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC-2012-04155

    Original file (BC-2012-04155.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Therefore, they recommend the AC component of the FA dated 31 Jul 2012, be updated to reflect "exempt" in AFFMS. The complete DPSIM evaluation, with attachment, is at Exhibit C. ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF THE AIR FORCE EVALUATION: The facts support his assertion that the entire FA should be removed from his record and that he should be granted the opportunity to re-test immediately. ...