Search Decisions

Decision Text

AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-03075
Original file (BC-2012-03075.txt) Auto-classification: Denied
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

IN THE MATTER OF:	DOCKET NUMBER:  BC-2012-03075
		COUNSEL:  NONE
		HEARING DESIRED:  NO

________________________________________________________________
_

APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:

The fitness assessment (FA) failure dated 29 May 12, be 
invalidated and removed from the Air Force Fitness Management 
System (AFFMS).

________________________________________________________________
_

APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT:

He received an AF Form 108, Physical Fitness Education and 
Intervention Processing, signed by his Primary Care Physician 
(PCM) stating that he had a medical condition that precluded him 
from achieving a passing fitness score.  

On 14 Jun 12, he received a two-stage laminectomy to aid in the 
correction of his medical status and is currently on a duty 
limiting condition profile.

The applicant's complete submission, with attachments, is at 
Exhibit A.

________________________________________________________________
_

STATEMENT OF FACTS:

The applicant is currently serving in the Regular Air Force in 
the grade of staff sergeant.  The applicant failed his FA on 
29 May 12, with a score of 62.75. 

The relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained 
in the letter prepared by the appropriate office of the Air 
Force.  Accordingly, there is no need to recite these facts in 
this Record of Proceedings.

________________________________________________________________
_

AIR FORCE EVALUATION:

AFPC/DPSIM recommends denial.  DPSIM states that on 20 Jul 12, a 
memorandum was sent to the applicant requesting additional 
documentation, specifically, his completed AF Form 469, Duty 
Limiting Condition Report; AF Form 422, Physical Profile Serial 
Report; signed score sheet and questionnaire.   The member did 
not provide the requested documentation.  

The applicant did provide a copy of his AF Form 108, dated 7 Jun 
12; however, it has no comments on the preexisting conditions.

The complete DPSIM evaluation is at Exhibit B.

________________________________________________________________
_

APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION:

On 16 Oct 12, a copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded 
to the applicant for review and comment within 30 days.  As of 
this date, a response has not been received by this office 
(Exhibit C).

________________________________________________________________
_

THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:

1.  The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by 
existing law or regulations.

2.  The application was timely filed.

3.  Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to 
demonstrate the existence of error or injustice.  After 
thoroughly reviewing the evidence of record and noting the 
applicant’s contentions, we are not persuaded the contested FA 
is in error or unjust.  The AF Form 108 the applicant provides 
as evidence is noted; however, we find it insufficient to 
warrant disturbing the record.  Should the applicant provide 
copies of a completed AF Form 422 and AF Form 469, we would be 
willing to reconsider his request.  In view of the above and in 
the absence of evidence to the contrary, we find no basis to 
recommend granting the relief sought in this application.

________________________________________________________________
_

THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT:

The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did not 
demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; that 
the application was denied without a personal appearance; and 
that the application will only be reconsidered upon the 
submission of newly discovered relevant evidence not considered 
with this application.

________________________________________________________________
_

The following members of the Board considered Docket Number    
BC-2012-03075 in Executive Session on 14 Feb 13, under the 
provisions of AFI 36-2603:

, Panel Chair
, Member
, Member

The following documentary evidence pertaining to Docket Number 
BC-2012-03075 was considered:

    Exhibit A.  DD Form 149, dated 13 Jul 12, w/atchs.
    Exhibit B.  Letter, AFPC/DPSIM, dated 27 Sep 12.
    Exhibit C.  Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 16 Oct 12.



								
								Panel Chair
2

3

Similar Decisions

  • AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-05541

    Original file (BC-2012-05541.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Although the applicant is not clear on which FA test he would like removed from his records, we believe based on the Air Force office of primary responsibility review of his record and the AF Form 108 provided by the applicant that reflects his FA dated 15 Mar 12 is, in fact, the assessment he is requesting to be removed. The AF Form 422, Notification of Air Force Member’s Qualification Status, documenting his limitations and duty exemptions is noted; however, we also note the Military...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-03146

    Original file (BC-2012-03146.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-03146 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His Fitness Assessment (FA) dated 13 Mar 12 be removed from the Air Force Fitness Management System (AFFMS). However, the Air Force office of primary responsibility has reviewed this evidence and recommends the record not be disturbed since the...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-03766

    Original file (BC-2012-03766.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-03766 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _______________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His 26 Jul 11 Fitness Assessment (FA) be removed from the Air Force Fitness Management System (AFFMS). The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the letter prepared by the appropriate office of the Air Force, which is...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC 2012 02595

    Original file (BC 2012 02595.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    After further review of his fitness history, DPSIM states that he had a passing FA dated 3 Jan 2011, which was in between his failed FAs dated 4 Oct 2010 and 27 Jul 2011. The complete DPSIM evaluation is at Exhibit B. Exhibit C. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 30 Oct 2012.

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC-2012-02006

    Original file (BC-2012-02006.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    His provider’s memorandum for record (MFR) stated he had a medical condition that prevented him from attaining a passing score on the walking component of his FA; however, the test was not removed from his records. Upon expiration of your 42 days reconditioning, you are cleared to test in all components of the AF Fitness Test.” On 29 May 12, a memorandum was sent to applicant requesting additional documentation for removal of his FA dated 29 Oct 10. While he contends that he was...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-02813

    Original file (BC-2012-02813.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    ________________________________________________________________ THE AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPSIM recommends partial approval. ________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT: The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air Force relating to APPLICANT, be corrected to show that the cardio, sit-up, and push-up components of her FA dated 2 Apr 2012 reflect “exempt” in the AFFMS. Exhibit C. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 30 Oct 2012.

  • AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-02227

    Original file (BC-2012-02227.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    DPSIM states that per AFI 36-2905, Air Force Fitness Program, and AFI 10-203, the applicant’s AF Form 422 and AF Form 469 were not in compliance; however, in accordance with a 325 FW/JA Memorandum, dated 3 Aug 2012, the AF Form 469 dated 24 May 2011 and AF Form 422 dated 25 May 2011 underwent an independent Profile Officer Review and all profile officers unanimously agreed that the AF Form 422 dated 25 May 2011 accurately restricted him from the running component of the FA, however he was...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-02388

    Original file (BC-2012-02388.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: There was a discrepancy between restrictions placed on his AF Form 469, Duty Limiting Condition Report, dated 19 Apr 2012 and the testing exemptions reflected on the AF Form 422, Notification of Air Force Member’s Qualification Status, dated 20 Apr 2012. On 23 Apr 2012, he took his copy of the AF Form 422 to his scheduled FA. ________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC-2012-02896

    Original file (BC-2012-02896.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    In accordance with (IAW) AFI 36-2905, Air Force Guidance Memorandum on Fitness Program “if an airman becomes injured or ill during the FA and is unable to complete all required components, he/she will have the option of being evaluated at the Medical Treatment Facility (MTF) but his/her test will still count unless rendered invalid by the unit commander.” In this instance it is clear the applicant did not report to the MTF upon completion of her FA due to the elevated heart rate. We...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-03025

    Original file (BC-2012-03025.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the letter prepared by the appropriate office of the Air Force, which is at Exhibit B. In this case, the applicant was tested in accordance with his AF Form 422, dated 19 Dec 11, which states he is cleared to test on height, weight, and AC only and is exempt from all other components (start date 14 Dec 11 and end date 12 Apr 12). _________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD...