Search Decisions

Decision Text

AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-03046
Original file (BC-2012-03046.txt) Auto-classification: Approved
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS 

AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS 

 

 

IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-03046 

 COUNSEL: NONE 

 HEARING DESIRED: NOT INDICATED 

 

_________________________________________________________________ 

 

APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: 

 

He be allowed to transfer his Post-9/11 GI Bill Educational 
Benefits to his dependents. 

 

_________________________________________________________________ 

 

APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: 

 

He took the required steps to transfer his benefits to his family 
prior to his retirement and never received a reply from the Air 
Force Personnel Center (AFPC) stating he needed to verify 
information. He believes AFPC’s message was sent to his work 
email after his retirement. 

 

The applicant provides no documentation in support of his appeal. 

 

The applicant's complete submission is at Exhibit A. 

 

_________________________________________________________________ 

 

STATEMENT OF FACTS: 

 

The relevant facts pertaining to this application, extracted from 
the applicant’s military records, are contained in the letter 
prepared by the appropriate office of the Air Force at Exhibit B. 

 

_________________________________________________________________ 

 

AIR FORCE EVALUATION: 

 

DPSIT recommends denial. DPSIT states the applicant did not 
provide adequate justification/documentation. The applicant 
first contacted AFPC on 14 June 2010 and was briefed if he 
applied he would not incur an ADSC. The applicant applied for 
Transfer of Education Benefits (TEB) in July 2010, but on 
16 August 2010 AFPC sent a rejection of his application because 
he did not sign his Statement of Understanding (SOU). No further 
attempt was made by the applicant to address the TEB situation 
until 15 June 2012, nearly two years after his initial 
application. 

 

 

 


The DPSIT complete evaluation, with attachments, is at Exhibit B. 

 

_________________________________________________________________ 

 

APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: 

 

On 29 August 2012, a copy of the Air Force evaluation was 
forwarded to the applicant for review and response within 30 days 
(Exhibit C). As of this date, no response has been received by 
this office. 

 

_________________________________________________________________ 

 

THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT: 

 

1. The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by existing 
law or regulations. 

 

2. The application was timely filed. 

 

3. Sufficient relevant evidence has been presented to 
demonstrate the existence of error or injustice. While the Board 
notes the steps the Air Force office of primary responsibility 
indicates were taken to inform eligible personnel of this new 
benefit, it appears that through no fault of the applicant, he 
was not fully aware of the steps necessary to transfer his 
benefits to his dependents. The evidence of record indicates 
that although the applicant applied for TEB in July 2010, he 
failed to complete the SOU. However, we believe this clearly 
establishes his intent to transfer benefits to his dependents 
prior to his retirement. We do not find it reasonable that he 
would have knowingly elected not to pursue use of this important 
entitlement. As such, we find the evidence sufficient to 
conclude that it is in the interest of justice to recommend 
correction of his records as indicated below. 

 

________________________________________________________________ 

 

THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT: 

 

The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air Force 
relating to the APPLICANT, be corrected to show that on 14 June 
2010, he elected to transfer his Post-9/11 GI Bill Educational 
Benefits. 

 

________________________________________________________________ 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 


 

The following members of the Board considered AFBCMR Docket 
Number BC-2012-03046 in Executive Session on 11 February 2013, 
under the provisions of AFI 36-2603: 

 

 

All members voted to correct the records as recommended. The 
following documentary evidence pertaining to AFBCMR Docket Number 
BC-2012-03046 was considered: 

 

 Exhibit A. DD Form 149, dated 18 June 2012. 

 Exhibit B. Letter, AFPC/DPSIT, dated 31 July 2012, w/atchs. 

 Exhibit C. Letter, SAF/MRBR dated 20 August 2012. 

 

 

 

 

 



Similar Decisions

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 02517

    Original file (BC 2013 02517.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: He registered for the Post 9/11 GI Bill and Transfer of Education Benefits (TEB) in Nov 2009 but unfortunately, was not aware he was required to sign a Statement of Understanding (SOU) concurring with the 4 year Active Duty Service Commitment (ADSC) required for TEB. Any member of the Armed Forces, active duty or Selected Reserve, officer or enlisted, on or after 1 Aug 09, who is eligible for the...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-03439

    Original file (BC-2012-03439.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    He was sent an email on 23 February 2010 requesting him to sign and return the SOU. Based on the fact that the applicant signed the ADSC and served the time requirement clearly establishes his intent to transfer benefits to his dependents. ________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT: The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air Force relating to the APPLICANT, be corrected to show that on 10 March 2010, he elected to transfer...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 03316

    Original file (BC 2013 03316.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    At the time, there was no indication of any other required steps to complete. ________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT: The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air Force relating to APPLICANT be corrected to show that on 10 Jul 2009, he signed a Statement of Understanding to start his four year Active Duty Service Commitment for transfer of his Post 9/11 GI Bill Educational Benefits to his dependents. Exhibit C. Letter,...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 03973

    Original file (BC 2013 03973.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2013-03973 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His Active Duty Service Commitment (ADSC) for transfer of his Post-9/11 GI Bill Educational benefits to his dependents be corrected to 9 Apr 2018 [sic]. Post-9/11 GI Bill: Any member of the Armed Forces (active duty or Selected Reserve, officer or...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 04961

    Original file (BC 2013 04961.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2013-04961 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His records be corrected to show he transferred his Post-9/11 GI Bill Education Benefits (TEB) to his dependents while on active duty. The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the letter prepared by the Air Force...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 05219

    Original file (BC 2013 05219.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Transferability of unused benefits to dependents: • Any member of the Armed Forces (active duty and/or Selected Reserve) on or after 1 August 2009 who meets Post-9/11 GI Bill eligibility requirements and at the time of the approval of the member’s request to transfer entitlement to educational assistance the member meets one of the following: o Has at least 6 years of service in the Armed Forces (active duty and/or Selected Reserve, NOAA Corps, or PHS) on the date of application and agrees...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-03898

    Original file (BC-2012-03898.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application, extracted from the applicant’s military records, are contained in the letter prepared by the appropriate office of the Air Force at Exhibit B. DPSIT states the applicant’s application is not supported with evidence that he was a victim of an error or injustice. The applicant’s contentions are duly noted; however, we agree with the opinion and recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt its rationale...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC-2012-05210

    Original file (BC-2012-05210.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    He completed the required application to transfer his Post- 9/11 GI Bill TEB to his dependent. On multiple occasions in the months of January through March, his network administrators worked on his computer multiple times a week sometimes even several times a day. ________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT: The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air Force relating to APPLICANT be corrected to show that on 22 February 2010, he...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-03511

    Original file (BC-2012-03511.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    We also note the comments of the Air Force office of primary responsibility indicating the applicant signed up to transfer his Post-9/11 GI Bill educational benefits to his dependents by going to the DVA website and also extended to obtain the necessary retainability but never received the official Statement of Understanding (SOU) from the Total Force Service Center. ________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT: The pertinent military records of...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-05521

    Original file (BC-2012-05521.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    In order to transfer the benefits now he would incur a 4 year Active Duty Service Commitment (ADSC). On 25 Oct 12, an email was sent to the applicant requesting him to sign the SOU; however, he never signed the SOU or attempted to follow-up by contacting the Total Force Serve Center (TFSC) to see if his application was complete. We took notice of the applicant's complete submission in judging the merits of the case; however, we agree with the opinion and recommendation of the Air Force...