RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-03145
COUNSEL: NONE
HEARING DESIRED: YES
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:
His Fitness Assessment (FA) dated 3 Aug 10 be removed from the
Air Force Fitness Management System (AFFMS).
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT:
He was denied the 42 day period for reconditioning before being
administered the FA test.
He received his new profile on 22 Jun 10 that was identical to
his previous profiles; however, his AF Form 422, Notification of
Air Force Members Qualification Status, dated 19 Jul 10,
required him to take the 1 mile walk test, which he was
previously exempt . He was required by his command to take a FA
only 16 days after the change in his profile.
His complete submission, with attachments, is at Exhibit A.
_________________________________________________________________
STATEMENT OF FACTS:
The applicant is currently serving on active duty in the Regular
Air Force in the grade of technical sergeant.
The applicants last five FA scores are as follows:
DATE SCORE
* 3 Aug 10 UNSATISFACTORY
12 Nov 10 UNSATISFACTORY
9 Feb 11 SATISFACTORY
17 Aug 11 UNSATISFACTORY
30 Nov 11 UNSATISFACTORY
13 Jun 12 UNSATISFACTORY
4 Sep 12 EXEMPT
*Contested FA score.
The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are
contained in the letter prepared by the appropriate office of the
Air Force, which is at Exhibit B.
_________________________________________________________________
AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
AFPC/DPSIM recommends denial and states that the governing
regulations state that upon expiration of the exemption or when
the Exercise Physiologist Fitness Program Manager (EP/FPM) clears
the exempted component of an assessment, the member will meet
their next scheduled FA. Further, if the exemption exceeded 30
days, the member is allowed 42 days for training following the
expiration of the component exemption. The applicant tested 46
days after his AF Form 422 expired on 19 Jun 10.
The complete DPSIM evaluation, with attachment, is at Exhibit B.
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
A copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to the applicant
on 29 Oct 12 for review and comment within 30 days. As of this
date, this office has received no response.
_________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:
1. The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by existing
law or regulations.
2. The application was timely filed.
3. Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to
demonstrate the existence of error or injustice. We took notice
of the applicant's complete submission in judging the merits of
the case; however, we agree with the opinion and recommendation
of the Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt its
rationale as the basis for our conclusion that the applicant has
not been the victim of an error or injustice. Therefore, in the
absence of evidence to the contrary, we find no basis to
recommend granting the relief sought in this application.
4. The applicant's case is adequately documented and it has not
been shown that a personal appearance with or without counsel
will materially add to our understanding of the issue involved.
Therefore, the request for a hearing is not favorably considered.
_________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT:
The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did not
demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; that
the application was denied without a personal appearance; and
that the application will only be reconsidered upon the
submission of newly discovered relevant evidence not considered
with this application.
_________________________________________________________________
The following members of the Board considered AFBCMR Docket
Number BC-2012-03145 in Executive Session on 12 Feb 13, under the
provisions of AFI 36-2603:
, Panel Chair
, Member
, Member
The following documentary evidence was considered:
Exhibit A. DD Form 149, dated 17 Jul 12, w/atchs.
Exhibit B. Letter, AFPC/DPSIM, dated 17 Oct 12, w/atch.
Exhibit C. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 29 Oct 12.
Panel Chair
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-03286
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-03286 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His fitness assessment (FA) scores dated 30 March 2012 and 18 June 2012 be removed from the Air Force Fitness Management System (AFFMS). We took note of the Air Force office of primary responsibility recommendation; however, we agree with the BCMR...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC-2012-02006
His providers memorandum for record (MFR) stated he had a medical condition that prevented him from attaining a passing score on the walking component of his FA; however, the test was not removed from his records. Upon expiration of your 42 days reconditioning, you are cleared to test in all components of the AF Fitness Test. On 29 May 12, a memorandum was sent to applicant requesting additional documentation for removal of his FA dated 29 Oct 10. While he contends that he was...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-04153
The service members will be eligible for the FA 42 days after the expiration date of physical limitations, as annotated on AF Form 469. The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the letter prepared by the appropriate office of the Air Force, which is attached at Exhibit C. ________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPSIM recommends denial, indicating there is no evidence of an error or injustice. Service...
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-04664
The complete AFPC/DPSIDE evaluation is at Exhibit C. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: His chronic medical condition affected his Physical Training (PT). The applicant contends his chronic back pain precluded him from passing four fitness assessments (FA) and ultimately resulted in him receiving the contested referral enlisted performance report (EPR). While the applicant has provided a supporting statement from...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-03025
The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the letter prepared by the appropriate office of the Air Force, which is at Exhibit B. In this case, the applicant was tested in accordance with his AF Form 422, dated 19 Dec 11, which states he is cleared to test on height, weight, and AC only and is exempt from all other components (start date 14 Dec 11 and end date 12 Apr 12). _________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC-2012-05347
DPSIM states that on 15 April 2012, the applicant took an FA and received a composite score of 79.20, an unsatisfactory fitness level, because the applicant did not meet the minimum time for the cardio portion of the FA. This allows time for reconditioning, if exempted for greater than 30 days. The applicant did not provide the AF Form 422 nor AF Form 469 indicating when she was placed on profile, what her profile restrictions were, or when she was released from her profile. The complete...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2012 05000
DPSIM further recommends the fitness assessments dated 27 Sep 11, 30 Dec 11, and 28 Mar 12 be corrected to reflect the applicant was exempt from the waist measurement component of these FAs. The complete copy of the AFPC/DPSIM evaluation is at Exhibit C. ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: He was told he had to participate in the abdominal circumference for the 29 Mar 11 FA, not knowing there was an AF Form 422...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-03766
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-03766 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _______________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His 26 Jul 11 Fitness Assessment (FA) be removed from the Air Force Fitness Management System (AFFMS). The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the letter prepared by the appropriate office of the Air Force, which is...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-02364
The applicant’s last five FA scores are as follows: DATE 10 Feb 10 31 Aug 10 * 14 Sep 11 27 Oct 11 2 Feb 12 *Contested FA score. _________________________________________________________________ , Panel Chair , Member , Member THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT: The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air Force relating to APPLICANT be corrected to show that the cardio and sit-up components of the Fitness Assessment dated 14 Sep 11 be amended to reflect “exempt” in the Air Force...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-05541
Although the applicant is not clear on which FA test he would like removed from his records, we believe based on the Air Force office of primary responsibility review of his record and the AF Form 108 provided by the applicant that reflects his FA dated 15 Mar 12 is, in fact, the assessment he is requesting to be removed. The AF Form 422, Notification of Air Force Members Qualification Status, documenting his limitations and duty exemptions is noted; however, we also note the Military...