Search Decisions

Decision Text

AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-03100
Original file (BC-2012-03100.txt) Auto-classification: Denied
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS 

AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS 

 

IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-03100 

 

 COUNSEL: NONE 

 

 HEARING DESIRED: NOT INDICATED 

 

________________________________________________________________ 

 

APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: 

 

His record be corrected to reflect he served in Vietnam and 
Laos. 

 

________________________________________________________________ 

 

APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: 

 

The record showing that he was assigned to the 350th Vehicle 
Squadron, Greenville Air Force Base, Mississippi is incorrect; 
he was in medical training. Additionally, his records are 
missing from June 1963 through September 1963 due to his covert 
mission with the U.S. Marine Corps in Vietnam and Laos. He was 
then reassigned to Patrick AFB, Florida. 

 

The applicant’s complete submission is at Exhibit A. 

 

________________________________________________________________ 

 

STATEMENT OF FACTS: 

 

The applicant enlisted in the Regular Air Force on 10 May 1963. 
He was eliminated from the medical helper course due to academic 
deficiency. He received a direct duty assignment to Patrick 
AFB, FL as a vehicle operator. In a statement, dated 16 October 
1964, the First Sergeant of the 6551st Transportation Squadron 
stated the applicant had been under his direct supervision since 
August 1963. The applicant was discharged on 18 November 1964, 
with an under honorable conditions discharge. He was credited 
with 1 year, 6 months and 9 days of active duty service. He was 
not credited with any Foreign Service. 

 

________________________________________________________________ 

 

AIR FORCE EVALUATION: 

 

AFPC/DPAPP recommends denial. A review of the applicant’s 
Master Personnel Records failed to substantiate any foreign 
service. 

 

The complete DPAPP evaluation is at Exhibit C. 

 


APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: 

 

A copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to the 
applicant on 10 September 2012, for review and comment within 
30 days (Exhibit D). As of this date, this office has received 
no response. 

 

________________________________________________________________ 

 

THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT: 

 

1. The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by 
existing law or regulations. 

 

2. The application was not timely filed; however, it is in the 
interest of justice to excuse the failure to timely file. 

 

3. Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to 
demonstrate the existence of an error or injustice. We took 
notice of the applicant's complete submission and the available 
evidence of record in judging the merits of the case; however, 
we agree with the opinion and recommendation of the Air Force 
office of primary responsibility and adopt its rationale as the 
basis for our conclusion that the applicant has not been the 
victim of an error or injustice. Therefore, in the absence of 
evidence to the contrary, we find no basis to grant the relief 
sought in this application. 

 

4. The applicant's case is adequately documented and it has not 
been shown that a personal appearance with or without counsel 
will materially add to our understanding of the issues involved. 
Therefore, the request for a hearing is not favorably 
considered. 

 

________________________________________________________________ 

 

THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT: 

 

The applicant be notified the evidence presented did not 
demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; the 
application was denied without a personal appearance; and the 
application will only be reconsidered upon the submission of 
newly discovered relevant evidence not considered with this 
application. 

 

________________________________________________________________ 

 

The following members of the Board considered AFBCMR Docket 
Number BC-2012-03100 in Executive Session on 5 March 2013, under 
the provisions of AFI 36-2603: 

 

Panel Chair 

 Member 

 Member 


 

The following documentary evidence pertaining to AFBCMR Docket 
Number BC-2012-03100 was considered: 

 

 Exhibit A. DD Form 149, dated 12 Jul 12. 

 Exhibit B. Applicant's Master Personnel Records. 

 Exhibit C. Letter, AFPC/DPAPP, dated 24 Aug 12. 

 Exhibit D. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 10 Sep 12. 

 

 

 

 

 

 Panel Chair 

 


 



Similar Decisions

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 03553

    Original file (BC 2013 03553 .txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    DPSID states that the Air Force Personnel Center, Directorate of Assignments was unable to verify the applicant's Foreign Service time in Vietnam. Moreover, the applicant’s TDY orders and the Foreign and/or Service time reflected on his DD Form 214 match up perfectly. _______________________________________________________________ THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT: The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air Force relating to APPLICANT be corrected to show that he...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-01746

    Original file (BC-2012-01746.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-01746 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO IN THE MATTER OF: _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His DD Form 214, Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge be corrected to reflect entitlement to the Vietnam Service Medal (VSM). The applicant served in units during their award periods for the RVNGC w/P, which would imply...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-00589

    Original file (BC-2012-00589.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-00589 COUNSEL: HEARING DESIRED: NO IN THE MATTER OF: _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: 1. f. Any unit awards for time served in Vietnam. The applicant’s contentions are duly noted; however, after reviewing the evidence of record, we agree with the opinion and recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2010-03656

    Original file (BC-2010-03656.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2010-03656 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His records be corrected to reflect that he served in Vietnam. DPAPP states a review of the applicant’s master personnel records and the documentation he provided do not substantiate he had foreign service time in Vietnam. Therefore, we agree with...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-03890

    Original file (BC-2012-03890.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-03890 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His record be corrected to reflect he was awarded the following: a. Vietnam Service Medal (VSM). ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: He served in Guam with the 3960th Strategic Wing for 176...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-04655

    Original file (BC-2011-04655.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are described in the letters prepared by the Air Force offices of primary responsibility (OPR) which are included at Exhibits C and D. ________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: HQ AFPC/DPAPP recommends denial, indicating there is no evidence of an error or injustice. A complete copy of the AFPC/DPAPP evaluation is at Exhibit C. AFPC/DPSIDR recommends denial of the applicant’s requests...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-01861

    Original file (BC-2011-01861.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2011-01861 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His DD Form 214, Report of Separation from Active Duty, reflect award of the Vietnam Service Medal (VSM). In support of his request, the applicant submits copies of flight records, personal flight log records and documents extracted from his military...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-01284

    Original file (BC-2012-01284.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-01284 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO IN THE MATTER OF: _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His DD Form 214, Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge, be corrected to reflect he was awarded the Vietnam Service Medal (VSM). The applicant’s records reflect he served on active duty from 9 Jul 63 to 7 Jul 67. There was...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-00578

    Original file (BC-2012-00578.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    While the applicant’s service in Vietnam does not meet the requirement for documentation on the DD Form 214, the Board has found it in the interest of justice to provide similarly situated applicants a “boots-on-the-ground” letter, and therefore recommends the record be corrected as indicated below. ________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT: The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air Force relating to the APPLICANT be...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-01946

    Original file (BC-2012-01946.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    A complete copy of the AFPC/DPSID evaluation is at Exhibit D. ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: The applicant reiterates that he spent time in Vietnam with the 428th Tactical Fighter Squadron in 64 and 65, and identifies his commander. After a thorough review of the evidence of record and the applicant’s complete submission, we believe a preponderance of the evidence indicates the applicant served in the Republic of...