Search Decisions

Decision Text

AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-03121
Original file (BC-2012-03121.txt) Auto-classification: Approved


AFBCMR BC-2012-03121

MEMORANDUM OF CONSIDERATION OF APPLICATION BEFORE THE 
AFBCMR

SUBJECT:  

	Having carefully reviewed this application, we agree with the recommendation of 
the Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt the rationale expressed as the 
basis for our decision that the applicant has been the victim of either an error or an 
injustice.  Therefore, we recommend that:

	The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air Force relating to the 
APPLICANT be corrected to show that his 07 February 2011, 04 May 2011, and 
16 February 2012 Fitness Assessments (FA) be declared void and removed from the Air 
Force Fitness Management System (AFFMS).  

	Members of the Board considered this application on 12 March 2013.




			
			Panel Chair


Attachment:
Ltr, AFPC/DPSIM, dtd 10 Sep 12






Similar Decisions

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC-2012-02389

    Original file (BC-2012-02389.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: On 1 October 2012, a copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to the applicant for review and response within 30 days (Exhibit C). However, the FA test dated 16 February 2011, the applicant has not provided sufficient evidence that the assessment was unjust. Exhibit C. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 1 October 2012.

  • AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-01097

    Original file (BC-2012-01097.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Members will be eligible for FA 42 days after the expiration date of physical limitations, as annotated on Air Force (AF) Form 469. _________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPSIM recommends the cardio component of the applicant’s FA, dated 29 November 2011, be updated to reflect “exempt” in AFFMS. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: In accordance with AFI 36-2603,...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC-2012-02827

    Original file (BC-2012-02827.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-02827 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO IN THE MATTER OF: _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His Fitness Assessment (FA) dated 29 December 2011 be removed from his records. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: On 14 December 2012, a copy of the Air Force evaluation...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-03505

    Original file (BC-2012-03505.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The complete DPSIM evaluation, with attachments, is at Exhibit B. While the applicant contends his abdominal circumference measurements were inconsistent, we do not find the evidence provided sufficient to conclude that he has been the victim of an error or injustice. In view of this, and noting there was no documentation located or provided that indicates an error or impropriety in the physical fitness test and subsequent fitness assessment score, we agree with the opinion...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC 2012 03202

    Original file (BC 2012 03202.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    AFBCMR BC-2012-03202 MEMORANDUM OF CONSIDERATION OF APPLICATION BEFORE THE AFBCMR SUBJECT: Having carefully reviewed this application, we agree with the recommendations of the Air Force offices of primary responsibility and adopt the rationale expressed as the basis for our decision that the applicant has been the victim of either an error or an injustice. Therefore, we recommend that: The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air Force relating to APPLICANT, be corrected to...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-00554

    Original file (BC-2012-00554.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    AFPC/DPSIM recommended the fitness assessment dated 22 February 2011 be removed. Should the Board deem the fitness assessments date 1 June 2011 and 31 August 2011 invalid and direct the EPR be changed from a referral to a non-referral, the applicant will be entitled to supplemental promotion consideration beginning with cycle 12E6, once tested. The complete DPSOE evaluation is at Exhibit E. ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | bc-2012-02370

    Original file (bc-2012-02370.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE WASHINGTON, DC Office of the Assistant Secretary Having carefully reviewed this application, we agree with the recommendation of the Air AFBCMR BC-2012-02370 MEMORANDUM OF CONSIDERATION OF APPLICATION BEFORE THE AFBCMR SUBJECT: Force office of primary responsibility and adopt the rationale expressed as the basis for our decision that the applicant has been the victim of either an error or an injustice. Therefore, we recommend the former member’s records be...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | bc-2012-02012

    Original file (bc-2012-02012.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE WASHINGTON, DC Office of the Assistant Secretary Having carefully reviewed this application, we agree with the recommendation of the Air AFBCMR BC-2012-02012 MEMORANDUM OF CONSIDERATION OF APPLICATION BEFORE THE AFBCMR SUBJECT: Force office of primary responsibility and adopt the rationale expressed as the basis for our decision that the applicant has been the victim of either an error or an injustice. Therefore, we recommend the former member’s records be...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | bc-2012-02032

    Original file (bc-2012-02032.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE WASHINGTON, DC Office of the Assistant Secretary Having carefully reviewed this application, we agree with the recommendation of the Air AFBCMR BC-2012-02032 MEMORANDUM OF CONSIDERATION OF APPLICATION BEFORE THE AFBCMR SUBJECT: Force office of primary responsibility and adopt the rationale expressed as the basis for our decision that the applicant has been the victim of either an error or an injustice. Therefore, we recommend the former member’s records be...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC-2012-03148

    Original file (BC-2012-03148.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant’s last five FA scores are as follows: DATE 10 November 2010 8 February 2011 13 October 2011 * 25 April 2012 24 July 2012 *Contested FA score. The DPSIM complete evaluation, with attachment, is at Exhibit B. While the applicant contends he had been performing physical therapy and rehabilitation from a previous surgery during his FA on 25 Apr 12, we do not find the evidence provided sufficient to conclude that his alleged medical condition precluded him from receiving a fair FA.