AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-03069
The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the letter prepared by the appropriate office of the Air Force, which is attached at Exhibit C. ________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPSIDRA recommends denial, indicating there is no evidence of error or injustice. According to the applicants official military records, he served in Vietnam from 31 Mar 69 to 24 Sep 69, for a total of 5 months and 24 days. A...
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-03077
There is no evidence the applicant submitted a valid election to voluntarily change spouse to former spouse SBP coverage within the first year following their divorce as the law requires. On 25 May 11, a modification of the applicants Dissolution of Marriage order was filed, instructing him to make his former spouse the sole and irrevocable beneficiary of his SBP annuity. _________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPSIAR indicates that...
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-03079
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2011-03079 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: He be compensated for his personally procured move (PPM) as briefed to him by the Hickam Traffic Management Office (TMO), or in the alternative cover the actual cost of the PPM. He was only compensated $8,370.24, which did not cover the total move...
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-03085
On 30 Oct 03, an Informal Physical Evaluation Board (PEB) recommended the applicant be permanently retired with a 30 percent disability rating for his MS, and the applicant concurred with the IPEB findings on 3 Nov 03. The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are described in the letters prepared by the Air Force offices of primary responsibility, which are included at Exhibits C and E. ________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE...
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-03093
In support of his request, the applicant provides copies of documents extracted from his service medical records, an Air Force Fitness Management report, and extracts from a commercial web site pertaining to the side effects of Pamelor and Elavil. The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the letter prepared by the appropriate office of the Air Force, which is attached at Exhibit C. _________________________________________________________________ AIR...
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-03094
On 20 Dec 72, the base legal office reviewed the case and found it legally sufficient to support the action On 22 Dec 72, the applicant was furnished a general (under honorable conditions) discharge in accordance with AFM 39-12, Separation for Unsuitability, Misconduct, Resignation, or Request for Discharge for the Good of the Service and Procedures for the Rehabilitation Program, for Apathetic Behavior and Defective Attitude. Therefore, in the absence of evidence to the contrary, we...
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-03096
The applicant was honorably discharged, on 19 Sep 08, under the provisions of AFI 36-3208, Administrative Separation of Airmen, paragraph 5-26.1, with a narrative reason for separation of Unsatisfactory Performance (Failure to Meet Minimum Fitness Standards), with an RE code of 2C. Paragraph 8.2.6 of AFI 10-248 requires commander to make a discharge/retain recommendation for members who have either failed four fitness assessments (FAs) within 24 months or have a FA score in the "poor"...
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-03110
The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the letter prepared by the appropriate office of the Air Force, which is attached at Exhibit C. _________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPSIPE recommends denial noting AFI 36-2604, Service Dates and Dates of Rank, Table 1, Rule 1 states that the total active Federal military service date (TAFMSD) for enlisted, officer, or warrant officer personnel is calculated...
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-03112
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2011-03112 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: He be issued DD Forms 256, Honorable Discharge Certificates, for all periods of his enlistments that resulted in discharges for the purpose of immediate reenlistments. In this respect, while we note the opinion and recommendation of the Air Force...
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-03113
Further, it must be noted that the service disability boards must rate disabilities based on the individual's condition at the time of evaluation. _________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPPD recommends the requested relief be denied. _________________________________________________________________ ADDITIONAL AIR FORCE EVALUATION: The AFBCMR Medical Consultant recommends denial noting that while there may have been sufficient evidence...
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-03115
She was under the impression SBP was handled at the time of retirement and had no idea she needed to make an election following the divorce. The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the letter prepared by the appropriate office of the Air Force, which is attached at Exhibit C. _____________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPSIAR does not provide a recommendation because the application involves two potential SBP...
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-03118
_________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: He believes his NGB Form 22 is incorrect, in that, in accordance with Air Force Instruction (AFI) 36-3209, Separation and Retirement Procedures for Air National Guard and Air Force Reserve Members, paragraph 3.18, the reason reflected in Block 23, shall not be used if a member is in an entry-level status. The applicant served more than 180 days as indicated in Block 13 on his NGB 22. We took...
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-03124
The PH is awarded for wounds received as a direct result of enemy actions (i.e., gunshot or shrapnel wounds, hand-to-hand combat wounds, forced aircraft bailout injuries, etc.). On 20 Sep 11, AFPC/DPSIDRA notified the applicant of their determination of his entitlement to four Bronze Service Stars (BSS) to his previously awarded Vietnam Service Medal (VSM), the Republic of Vietnam Gallantry Cross with Palm (RVNGC w/P), the Republic of Vietnam Campaign Medal (RVCM), and their action...
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-03130
The applicant was discharged, on 22 Apr 96, by reason of misconduct, with service characterized as general (under honorable conditions). The applicant has provided no evidence which would lead us to believe the characterization of the service was contrary to the provisions of the governing regulation, unduly harsh, or disproportionate to the offenses committed. Exhibit D. Letter, AFBCMR, dated 30 Apr 12, w/atchs.
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-03132
The applicants DD Form 214 does not reflect that he was awarded a VSM W/1BSS or PUC. ________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air Force relating to APPLICANT be corrected to show that he was discharged on 19 February 1970, with a pay grade of E-5, rather than E-4. ________________________________________________________________ The following members of the Board considered this...
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-03143
His nonjudicial punishment imposed under Article 15 (Art 15) be set aside and removed from his records. The applicant has not filed an appeal through the Evaluation Reports Appeals Board (ERAB). The complete DPSID evaluation is at Exhibit E. ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: The applicant submitted sworn affidavits as additional evidence regarding his case.
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-03149
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2011-03149 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _______________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His records be corrected to show that he was awarded the American Campaign Medal (ACM). The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the letter prepared by the appropriate office of the Air Force, which is attached at...
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-03152
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2011-03152 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NOT INDICATED _____________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His DD Form 214, Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge, be corrected to reflect his service in Vietnam. The complete DPAPP evaluation is at Exhibit...
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-03154
The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the letter prepared by the appropriate office of the Air Force, which is attached at Exhibit C. ________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPSIDR recommends denial of the applicants request for the award of the SAEMR, indicating there is no evidence of an error or injustice. A complete copy of the AFPC/DPSIDR evaluation is at Exhibit...
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-03156 ADDENDUM
________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: A similar appeal was considered and denied by the Board on 5 June 2012. After thoroughly reviewing the additional documentation submitted in support of his appeal and the evidence of record, we do not believe the applicant has overcome the rationale expressed in our previous decision. ________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: The applicant be notified...
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-03158
AFBCMR BC-2011-03158 MEMORANDUM OF CONSIDERATION OF APPLICATION BEFORE THE AFBCMR SUBJECT: XXXXXXX Having carefully reviewed this application, we agree with the recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt the rationale expressed as the basis for our decision that the applicant has been the victim of either an error or an injustice. Therefore, under the authority delegated in AFI 36-2603, the applicant's records will be corrected as set forth in...
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-03159
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2011-03159 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _______________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His records be corrected to reflect award of the Legion of Merit (LOM). The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the letter prepared by the appropriate office of the Air Force, which is attached at Exhibit...
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-03160
The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application, extracted from the applicants master personnel records, are described in the letters prepared by the Air Force offices of responsibility (OPR) which are attached at Exhibits C and D. ________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPSIP recommends denial. By definition, PCS code V is a Low Cost Move member is moving between permanent duty stations. In other words, a member must be on...
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-03164
Upon completion of six months time in grade as an airman she would have been eligible for promotion to the rank of airman first class on 17 May 11, contingent upon the approval of the promotion authority. Sufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate the existence of an error or injustice. ________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT: The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air Force relating to the APPLICANT,...
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-03165
On 5 February 2010, that order was amended to change the reporting time from 1200 to 0800. On 10 February 2010, the order was amended to change the release date to 5 February 2010. ________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did not demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; that the application was denied without a personal appearance; and the application will only be...
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-03169
On 26 March 2012, the applicant was provided an advisory (Exhibit C) prepared by SAF/GCM on similar cases considered by the Board. The Board has been advised that it can consider cases involving potential claims by more than one spouse or former spouse if there is evidence that the member or former spouse timely notified the Government within one year after the divorce was final, or if there are extraordinary circumstances that would justify correction of the record. We took notice of the...
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-03171
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2011-03171 COUNSEL: HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His records be corrected to reflect he was not released from active duty on 28 Mar 10, but was instead retained on active duty for medical continuation (MEDCON) until he was disability retired on 24 Sep 10. The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this...
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-03172
Thus, as a matter of record, the applicants DIERF cannot be prior to the date that he accepted the Oath of Office, i.e., the member is not a Reserve officer until such time as the Oath of Office is executed. We took notice of the applicant's complete submission in judging the merits of the case; however, we agree with the opinion and recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt its rationale as the basis for our conclusion that the applicant has not been the...
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-03176
The complete DPPD evaluation is at Exhibit C. _________________________________________________________________ ADDITIONAL AIR FORCE EVALUATION: The BCMR Medical Consultant recommends rescinding the applicants administrative discharge under the provision of AFI 36-3209, Separation and Retirement Procedures for Air National Guard and Air Force Reserve Members and supplanting it with an order transferring the applicant to the Reserve Retired Section effective the date of discharge (10 Aug...
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-03178
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2011-03178 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NOT INDICATED ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: Her character of discharge be changed from uncharacterized to general on her DD Form 214, Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty. We took notice of the applicant's complete submission in judging the merits of the case;...
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-03186
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2011-03186 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His reentry (RE) code of 2C (Involuntarily separated with an honorable discharge; or entry level separation without characterization of service) be changed to a 1 series code that would allow him to reenlist. DPSOS states airman are given entry...
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-03187
The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application, extracted from the applicants master personnel records, are described in the letters prepared by the Air Force offices of responsibility which are included at Exhibits C and D. ________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFLOA/JAJM recommends denial, indicating there is no evidence of an error or injustice. The author of the legal office opinion noted that the LOD determination was most...
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-03194
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2011-03194 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: He be paid Retroactive STOP LOSS pay for the period 11 September 2001 to 31 October 2004. The members military records do not indicate he applied to separate from his voluntary contract between 2 October 2001 and 22 June 2002, the period AFSC 3S000...
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-03196
AFBCMR BC-2011-03196 MEMORANDUM OF CONSIDERATION OF APPLICATION BEFORE THE AFBCMR SUBJECT: XXXXXXX Having carefully reviewed this application, we agree with the recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt the rationale expressed as the basis for our decision that the applicant has been the victim of either an error or an injustice. Therefore, under the authority delegated in AFI 36-2603, the applicant's records will be corrected as set forth in...
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-03197
AFBCMR BC-2011-03197 MEMORANDUM OF CONSIDERATION OF APPLICATION BEFORE THE AFBCMR SUBJECT: Having carefully reviewed this application, we agree with the recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt the rationale expressed as the basis for our decision that the applicant has been the victim of either an error or an injustice. Therefore, under the authority delegated in AFI 36-2603, the applicant's records will be corrected as set forth in the accompanying...
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-03198
The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application extracted from the applicants military personnel records are contained in the letter prepared by the appropriate Air Force office of primary responsibility (Exhibit B). The applicant has failed to provide any information/support from the rating chain of record on the contested EPR. As a result of this finding, AFPC/DPSIDEP has, in accordance with AFI 36-2406, Officer and Enlisted Evaluation Systems, administratively corrected the...
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-03206
Any member of the Armed Forces, active duty or Selected Reserves, officer, or enlisted, on or after 1 Aug 09, who is eligible for the Post 9/11 GI bill, has at least six years of service in the Armed Forces on the date of election, and agrees to serve a specified additional period of service in the Armed Forces from the date of election, may transfer unused Post-9/11 GI Bill benefits to their dependents. While we note the steps the Air Force office of primary responsibility indicates were...
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-03217
He testified against his wing commander in an Inspector General (IG) investigation and believes he was reprised against when his commander demoted him for having an unprofessional relationship. The original non-judicial punishment (NJP) notification served by the wing commander violated his due process rights when he was pulled back and re-served the NJP based on information directly relating to the Commander-Directed Investigation (CDI). On 8 Oct 09, the NY TAG denied the AGR Removal for...
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-03224
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2011-03224 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ___________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His DD Form 214, Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge, be corrected to reflect: 1. His service in Vietnam. The complete DPSIDR evaluation is at Exhibit...
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-03228
The PH is awarded for wounds received as a direct result of enemy actions (i.e., gunshot or shrapnel wounds, hand-to-hand combat wounds, forced aircraft bail out injuries, etc.). He did not provide a detailed statement describing the circumstances concerning his injury. They were unable to locate medical records describing the scar or any mention of a wound.
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-03234
The temperature at the time of the test was below 20 degrees Fahrenheit and as required by AFI 36-2905, Air Force Fitness Program, the test should not have been administered. The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application, extracted from the applicants military records are contained in the letter prepared by the appropriate office of the Air Force at Exhibit B. Exhibit C. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 6 Jan 12.
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-03235
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2011-03235 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: The unsatisfactory score on his 14 Jul 11 Fitness Assessment (FA) be removed from his records. The applicant's complete submission, with attachments, is at Exhibit A. We took notice of the applicant's complete submission in judging the merits of the...
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-03236
The applicants complete submission, with attachments, is at Exhibit F. ________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: The AFBCMR Medical Consultant recommends denial indicating there is no evidence of an error or injustice. At no time has anyone from the Air Force or the Air National Guard ever stated what that change was. While the Board notes the applicants contention that there was no significant change in his medical condition in Dec 10 and his...
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-03238
In support of his requests, the applicant provides a personal statement, copies of the Memorandum for Non-recommendation for Promotion, his 2 Nov 08 PT score, Member Utilization Questionnaire, email communiques, EPP Eligibility Rosters, DD Form 214, Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty, a Point Credit History Summary, and various other documents associated with his request. The relevant facts pertaining to this application are described in the letters prepared by the Air...
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-03241
He has provided no evidence of an Air Force error or injustice. Absent persuasive evidence the applicant was denied rights to which entitled, appropriate regulations were not followed, or appropriate standards were not applied, we find no basis to disturb the existing record. _________________________________________________________________ The following members of the Board considered Docket Number BC-2011-03241 in Executive Session on 1 Dec 11, under the provisions of AFI 36-2603: ,...
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-03244
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2011-03244 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: Her original date of rank (DOR) to second lieutenant (2Lt) (O-1) be changed to 14 February 2003. The error in her DOR occurred due to her EAD date being recorded as 28 February 2003 rather than 1 March 2003 causing her original DOR to be 16 February...
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-03248
The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application, extracted from the applicants military records are contained in the letters prepared by the appropriate offices of the Air Force at Exhibits C, and D. ________________________________________________________________ THE AIR FORCE EVALUATION: HQ AFPC/DPSID recommends denial of the applicant's request to change or void the contested EPR. DPSID states the applicant did not file an appeal through the Evaluation Report Appeals Board...
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-03251
His DD Form 214 be corrected to reflect his TDY to Vietnam. We note the applicants records have been administratively corrected to reflect his foreign service in Thailand. In this regard, we took notice of the applicant's complete submission in judging the merits of the case; however, we agree with the opinion and recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt its rationale as the basis for our conclusion the applicant has not been the victim of an error or...
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-03258
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2011-03258 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: He would like his discharge characterization upgraded in order to gain access to Department of Veteran Affairs (DVA) medical benefits. As a result, he received punishment consisting of a bad conduct discharge, forfeiture of $70 pay per month for one...
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-03259
The complete AFPC/DPSIDRA evaluation is at Exhibit C. ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF THE AIR FORCE EVALUATION: The applicant provided copies of post-marked envelopes which are the only evidence of locations and time periods he served during the war (Exhibit E). While the documents are not conclusive evidence the applicant was assigned to the units at the time, we find that this provides creditable evidence that is consistent with...