RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2011-03093
COUNSEL: NONE
HEARING DESIRED: NO
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:
His Fitness Assessment (FA) scores for 29 Dec 10 and 30 Mar 11 be
removed from his records.
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT:
He has been under pain management treatment for Rheumatoid
Arthritis since July 2008 and believes the side effects for the
medication he was prescribed caused his weight gain.
In support of his request, the applicant provides copies of
documents extracted from his service medical records, an Air
Force Fitness Management report, and extracts from a commercial
web site pertaining to the side effects of Pamelor and Elavil.
The applicant's complete submission, with attachments, is at
Exhibit A.
_________________________________________________________________
STATEMENT OF FACTS:
The applicant is currently serving on active duty in the grade of
staff sergeant.
The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are
contained in the letter prepared by the appropriate office of the
Air Force, which is attached at Exhibit C.
_________________________________________________________________
AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
HQ USAF/A1PP recommends denial noting the medical subject matter
expert indicates that many medications can potentially result in
weight gain; however, it is the responsibility of the service
member to meet the abdominal circumference standards. The
applicants abdominal circumference measurements have been
consistent throughout his Air Force Fitness Management System
history.
The HQ USAF/A1PP complete evaluation is at Exhibit C.
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
A copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to the applicant
on 2 Sep 11, for review and comment within 30 days. As of this
date, no response has been received by this office (Exhibit D).
_________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:
1. The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by
existing law or regulations.
2. The application was timely filed.
3. Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to
demonstrate the existence of an error or injustice. We took
notice of the applicant's complete submission in judging the
merits of the case; however, we agree with the opinion and the
recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility
and adopt its rationale as the basis for our conclusion the
applicant has not been the victim of an error or injustice.
Therefore, in the absence of evidence to the contrary, we find no
basis to recommend granting the relief sought in this
application.
_________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT:
The applicant be notified the evidence presented did not
demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; the
application was denied without a personal appearance; and the
application will only be reconsidered upon the submission of
newly discovered relevant evidence not considered with this
application.
_________________________________________________________________
The following members of the Board considered AFBCMR Docket
Number BC-2011-03093 in Executive Session on 22 Mar 12, under the
provisions of AFI 36-2603:
, Vice Chair
, Member
, Member
The following documentary evidence pertaining to AFBCMR Docket
Number BC-2011-03093 was considered:
Exhibit A. DD Form 149, dated 16 Jul 11, w/atchs.
Exhibit B. Letter, HQ USAF/A1PP, dated 26 Aug 11.
Exhibit C. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 2 Sep 11.
Vice Chair
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-02702
He asks the Board to consider his medical conditions and complications and how they have negatively impacted his ability to meet the Air Forces fitness requirements in relation to the new abdominal circumference, and how his long term affliction of obstructive sleep apnea has notably affected his fitness assessment scores in previous years. The applicant's complete response, with attachments, is at Exhibit D. _________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD...
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC 2011 03584
He still felt pain in his left knee and the cool weather seemed to intensify the pain level. RMG/CC states, the applicants records indicate he was eligible for promotion with a 1 Jan 2011 effective date. ________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did not demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; that the application was denied without a personal appearance; and that the...
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-03584
He still felt pain in his left knee and the cool weather seemed to intensify the pain level. RMG/CC states, the applicants records indicate he was eligible for promotion with a 1 Jan 2011 effective date. ________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did not demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; that the application was denied without a personal appearance; and that the...
AF | BCMR | CY2010 | BC-2010-03342
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2010-03342 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: YES _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His Enlisted Performance Report (EPR), rendered for the period 10 June 2009 through 9 June 2010 be declared void and removed from his records, and replaced with an AF Form 77, (Letter of Evaluation). Additional relevant facts pertaining to this...
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-02810
The applicant failed the Muscular Fitness portion of the test therefore his overall FA rating was Unsatisfactory. The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the letter prepared by the appropriate office of the Air Force at Exhibit C. Accordingly there is no need to recite these facts in this Record of Proceedings. We took notice of the applicant's complete submission in judging the merits of the case; however, we agree with the opinion and...
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-01118
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2011-01118 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: The fitness assessment (FA) score he received on 31 Jan 11 be removed from the Air Force Fitness Management System (AFFMS). _________________________________________________________________ STATEMENT OF FACTS: The applicant was exempt from 3 of the 4...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 01299
On 06 Oct 2011, the applicant participated in the contested FA and attained a composite score of 71.00, unsatisfactory. The applicants last five FA results are as follows: Date Composite Score Rating 30 Apr 2013 72.00 Unsatisfactory *30 Nov 2012 60.22 Unsatisfactory 30 Mar 2012 90.33 Excellent 09 Nov 2011 83.67 Satisfactory *06 Oct 2011 71.00 Unsatisfactory * Contested FA In accordance with AFI 36-2905, Fitness Program, if an Airman becomes injured or ill during the FA and is unable to...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-03261
DPSIM states per AFI 36-2905, Fitness Program, paragraph 4.2.5, all members will complete abdominal circumference (AC) assessment unless there is a composite exemption or, under rare circumstances, a component exemption determined by the exercise physiologist or fitness program manager upon recommendation by the provider. For someone who had back to back shoulder surgeries and is unable to perform physical activities for over a year, 42 days is not realistic. Exhibit D. Letter, Applicant,...
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-04024
His fitness assessment test dated 3 March 2011 be removed. The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the letters prepared by the appropriate offices of the Air Force which are at Exhibits B through D. _________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: USAF/A1PP recommends denial. _________________________________________________________________ The following members of the Board considered AFBCMR Docket...
AF | BCMR | CY2010 | BC-2010-02102
After a thorough review of the available records, the majority of the Board found no evidence that the applicants referral EPR is unjust or inaccurate. In accordance with Air Force Instruction 36- 2502, table 1.1, Rule 22, receipt of a referral report renders a member ineligible for promotion; therefore, a majority of the Board recommends denying her request to reinstate her line number for promotion to technical sergeant. ...