Search Decisions

Decision Text

AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-03110
Original file (BC-2011-03110.txt) Auto-classification: Denied
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS 

AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS 

 

IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2011-03110 

 

 COUNSEL: NONE 

 

 HEARING DESIRED: NO 

 

_________________________________________________________________ 

 

APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: 

 

His records be corrected to reflect his date of entry into 
military service as 13 Sep 95 rather than 12 Sep 96. 

 

_________________________________________________________________ 

 

APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: 

 

According to his Air Force (AF) Form 3007, Guaranteed Training 
Enlistment Agreement Non-Prior Service – United States Air Force, 
his enlistment date is 13 Sep 95. 

 

In support of his request, the applicant provides a copy of his 
AF Form 3007. 

 

The applicant’s complete submission, with attachment, is at 
Exhibit A. 

 

_________________________________________________________________ 

 

STATEMENT OF FACTS: 

 

The applicant is currently serving on active duty in the grade of 
staff sergeant. 

 

The DD Form 4/1, Enlistment/Reenlistment Document, dated 
13 Sep 95, reflects the applicant was in the delayed entry/ 
enlistment program of the Air Force Reserve from 27 Apr 95 until 
he enlisted in the Regular Air Force (RegAF) on 13 Sep 95. He 
served on active duty until his honorable discharge on 17 Feb 05. 
On 17 Feb 06, the applicant reenlisted in the RegAF for a period 
of four years. 

 

The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are 
contained in the letter prepared by the appropriate office of the 
Air Force, which is attached at Exhibit C. 

 

_________________________________________________________________ 

 


AIR FORCE EVALUATION: 

 

AFPC/DPSIPE recommends denial noting AFI 36-2604, Service Dates 
and Dates of Rank, Table 1, Rule 1 states that the total active 
Federal military service date (TAFMSD) for enlisted, officer, or 
warrant officer personnel is calculated based on all periods of 
active Federal military service in commissioned, warrant, flight 
officer, or enlisted status. When there is a break in active 
duty the TAFMSD is adjusted and, as a result, is later than the 
date of original entry on active duty by a period equal to the 
break or breaks in service. The applicant enlisted in the RegAF 
on 13 Sep 95 to 17 Feb 05. He had at this time a total of 9 
years, 5 months, and 5 days of time in service. The applicant 
had a break in service from his separation date of 17 Feb 05 
until his reentry into the RegAF on 17 Feb 06. Therefore, his 
TAFMSD date was adjusted accordingly as a result of his 
approximately one year break in service, the applicant’s adjusted 
TAFMSD date is 12 Sep 96. 

 

The complete AFPC/DPSIPE evaluation is at Exhibit C. 

 

_________________________________________________________________ 

 

APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: 

 

A copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to the applicant 
on 22 Dec 11 for review and comment within 30 days. As of this 
date, no response has been received by this office (Exhibit D). 

 

_________________________________________________________________ 

 

THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT: 

 

1. The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by existing 
law or regulations. 

 

2. The application was timely filed. 

 

3. Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to 
demonstrate the existence of an error or an injustice. We took 
notice of the applicant's complete submission in judging the 
merits of the case; however, we agree with the opinion and the 
recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility 
and adopt its rationale as the basis for our conclusion the 
applicant has not been the victim of an error or injustice. 
Therefore, in the absence of evidence to the contrary, we find no 
basis to recommend granting the relief sought in this 
application. 

 

_________________________________________________________________ 

 


THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: 

 

The applicant be notified the evidence presented did not 
demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; the 
application was denied without a personal appearance; and the 
application will only be reconsidered upon the submission of 
newly discovered relevant evidence not considered with this 
application. 

 

_________________________________________________________________ 

 

The following members of the Board considered AFBCMR Docket 
Number BC-2011-03110 in Executive Session on 22 Mar 12, under the 
provisions of AFI 36-2603: 

 

 , Vice Chair 

 , Member 

 , Member 

 

The following documentary evidence was considered: 

 

 Exhibit A. DD Form 149, dated 6 Jul 11, w/atchs. 

 Exhibit B. Master Military Personnel Records. 

 Exhibit C. Letter, HQ AFPC/DPSIPE, dated 8 Nov 11. 

 Exhibit D. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 22 Dec 11. 

 

 

 

 

 

 Vice Chair 



Similar Decisions

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 05395

    Original file (BC 2013 05395.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2013-05395 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His Date of Rank (DOR) to the grade of Airman First Class (A1C, E-3) of 1 Nov 12 be changed to match his Total Active Federal Military Service Date (TAFMSD) of 18 Jun 11. His TAFMSD was adjusted to 18 Jun 11, to account for his reserve time and his...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 05415

    Original file (BC 2013 05415.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2013-05415 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His AF Form 3008, Supplement to Enlistment Agreement, be corrected to reflect the same enlistment agreement that is contained in his AF Form 3007, Guaranteed Training Enlistment Agreement Non-Prior Service – United States Air Force. The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are described in the...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2002 | 0103025

    Original file (0103025.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: 01-03025 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His Date of Initial Entry Military Service (DIEMS)/Date of Initial Entry Uniformed Services (DIEUS) be changed from 17 July 1986 to 5 January 1987. _________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: HQ AFPC/DPPAOR...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 00479

    Original file (BC 2014 00479.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2014-00479 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: Her initial enlistment grade of E-2 (Airman) be corrected to E-3 (Airman First Class). The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the memorandum prepared by the Air Force office of primary responsibility (OPR), which is attached at Exhibit C. AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPSIPE...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2004-02159

    Original file (BC-2004-02159.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant being an enlisted member at the time of his retirement was retired under the law that applies to Air Force enlisted members. While he did serve on active duty as a commissioned officer from 3 May 79 to 15 Aug 85, he was not entitled to retire as an officer because he had less than 10 years of active commissioned service as required by the applicable law. Applicant wants to know how someone can be retired as an officer and serve on active duty as an enlisted member.

  • AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-02668

    Original file (BC-2012-02668.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    This TIG error prevented him from testing for MSgt in 2011 and 2012, and denied him consideration for promotion on both the FY11 and FY12 Master Sergeant Selection Boards. After a thorough review of his RegAF and ANG records, it is determined the applicant did not hold the rank of TSgt while serving in the RegAF and therefore, this DOR is equal to the date of his enlistment. ________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: The applicant be...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-03674

    Original file (BC-2012-03674.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-03674 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: The top three blocks on his AF IMT 2030, USAF Drug and Alcohol Abuse Certificate, Section II, Certification at Time of Application, be changed to read “Yes.” ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT CONTENDS...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 03312

    Original file (BC 2013 03312.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    His Date of Rank (DOR) to the grade of Airman First Class (A1C) be corrected to 31 Jul 2001 (Administratively Corrected). In a letter dated 10 Jan 2014, AFPC/DPSOE advised the applicant his DOR to the grades of SrA, SSgt, TSgt and MSgt were administratively corrected and that he would receive supplemental promotion consideration for promotion to the grade of SMSgt during the May 2014 Senior Noncommissioned Officer (SNCO) Supplemental Promotion Board. After a thorough review of the...

  • AF | BCMR | CY1999 | 88-02168A

    Original file (88-02168A.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    A complete copy of the DPMAJA evaluation is at Exhibit L. The Officer Appointment/Selective Continuation Section, AFMPC/DPPPOC, reviewed the submissions and recommended denial of the applicant's request that a statement be placed in his OSR reflecting he was not eligible for the CY86 Regular Air Force (RegAF) Appointment Board. A complete copy of the DPPPOC evaluation is at Exhibit M. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2000 | 9603045

    Original file (9603045.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    It was never referred to him nor were its contents made known to him until after it was a matter of record. However, they recommend the report be corrected by transferring its content to an AF Form 707B. Regarding applicant’s contention that he was never given a copy of the report, we note that, unless it is a referral report, the ratee will not be shown the prepared Air Force forms until the report is filed in the UPRG.