AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-02887
According to the applicants available records, the applicant served on active duty from 11 Jan 56 to 13 Jun 60, and was credited with 3 years, 9 months, and 7 days of Foreign Service. _________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did not demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; that the application was denied without a personal appearance; and that the application will only...
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-02891
DPSIDR states the applicant provided as evidence a personal statement dated 17 May 11, which contains a detailed description of the incident, as well as his visit to the doctor after being evacuated. Also, he provided an eyewitness account dated 17 Jun 11. The eyewitness statement supports the applicants description of the incident; however, neither the applicant nor the eyewitness mention the dates or rank of the applicant at the time of the incident.
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-02892
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2011-02892 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: He be awarded the Air Force Commendation Medal (AFCM) and any other medals he may be entitled to. The AFCM criterion: The AFCM is awarded to members of the Armed Forces of the United States who, while serving in any capacity with the Air Force after...
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-02892 ADDENDUM
________________________________________________________________ _ RESUME OF CASE: On 16 Nov 11, the Board considered and denied the applicants request to award him the AFCM. A complete copy of the Record of Proceedings is attached at Exhibit E (with Exhibits A through C). After thoroughly reviewing the additional documentation submitted in support of his appeal and the evidence of record, we do not find it sufficient to change the Boards earlier determination in this case.
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-02893
He was awarded a decoration in recognition of his long and outstanding service to the Air Force; by amendment the applicant requests award of the Air Force Achievement Medal (AFAM). He wants the Air Force Achievement Medal (AFAM) for his long outstanding service. Since it appears the SDN number is correct as presently constructed and the applicant has not provided sufficient evidence to show otherwise, we find no basis to recommend changing it.
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-02901
There is no evidence of Air Force error or injustice in this case, and no basis in law. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: On 30 September 2011, a copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to the applicant and the former service member for review and comment within 30 days (Exhibit C). Exhibit C. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 30 September 2011.
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-02902
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2011-02902 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NOT INDICATED _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: She be reconsidered for promotion to the grade of major (0-4) by the Calendar Year 2011 (CY11) Line and Health Professions Major Promotion Vacancy (PV) Special Selection Board (SSB). ...
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-02904
___________________________________________________________ APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: The Survivor Benefit Plan Election Certificate was sent during the time they were being transferred to Red River Army Depot, Texas. ___________________________________________________________ THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did not demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; that the application was denied without a personal appearance; and that...
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-02905
AFBCMR BC-2011-02905 MEMORANDUM OF CONSIDERATION OF APPLICATION BEFORE THE AFBCMR SUBJECT: XXXXXXX Having carefully reviewed this application, we agree with the recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt the rationale expressed as the basis for our decision that the applicant has been the victim of either an error or an injustice. Therefore, under the authority delegated in AFI 36-2603, the applicant's records will be corrected as set forth in...
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-02911
The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are described in the letters prepared by the Air Force offices of primary responsibility, which are attached at Exhibits C, D, E, F, and G. ________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFLOA/JAJM recommends denial of her request to remove the Article 15 and states, in part, nonjudicial punishment is authorized by Article 15, UCMJ (10 U.S.C. The complete AFPC/PB evaluation is at Exhibit...
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-02917
AFBCMR BC-2011-02917 MEMORANDUM OF CONSIDERATION OF APPLICATION BEFORE THE AFBCMR SUBJECT: Having carefully reviewed this application, we agree with the recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt the rationale expressed as the basis for our decision that the applicant has been the victim of either an error or an injustice. Therefore, we recommend the applicant's records be corrected to show that: The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air...
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-02921
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2011-02921 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: She be reinstated in the United States Air Force. A commander can determine if a members use of a substance was improper or wrongful based on the circumstances of the use. DPSOS states that based on the documentation on file in the master personnel...
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-02926
_________________________________________________________________ STATEMENT OF FACTS: The Defense Enrollment Eligibility Reporting System (DEERS) reflect the applicant married on 24 June 1994 and he made a valid SBP election for spouse and child coverage based on full retired pay, prior to being placed on the Permanent Disability Retirement List (PDRL) effective 18 April 2006. The applicant was provided a retirement pay estimate of $1,894 with a monthly cost estimate of $126 for full spouse...
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-02929
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2011-02929 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His first promotion nonselection to the grade of major be removed from his records, or in the alternative, his Date of Rank (DOR) to the grade of captain be adjusted to eliminate the time he spent on the Individual Ready Reserve (IRR) beyond...
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-02932
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2011-02932 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: Her fitness assessments, dated 8 September 2010 and 27 October 2010, be removed from the Air Force Fitness Management System (AFFMS). _________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT: The pertinent military...
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-02933
AFBCMR BC-2011-02933 MEMORANDUM OF CONSIDERATION OF APPLICATION BEFORE THE AFBCMR SUBJECT: XXXXXXX Having carefully reviewed this application, we agree with the recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt the rationale expressed as the basis for our decision that the applicant has been the victim of either an error or an injustice. Therefore, under the authority delegated in AFI 36-2603, the applicant's records will be corrected as set forth in...
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-02948
The applicant states he wants back in the military and that his test was unfair, but does not provide any proof of an error or injustice in reference to his RE code. We took notice of the applicant's complete submission in judging the merits of the case; however, we agree with the opinion and recommendation of the Air Force offices of primary responsibility and adopt their rationale as the basis for our conclusion that the applicant has not been the victim of an error or injustice. ...
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-02954
A1K states that in accordance with Air Force Instruction 36-2254, Volume I, Points may only be credited to the date a member actually performed the duty, except in those activities where the cumulative method is authorized, such as telecommuting. Given the applicant did not meet the medical standards to be considered medically qualified to participate in any pay or point gaining activity during the period in question, the commands policy that these periods of service under such conditions...
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-02955
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2011-02955 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: Her narrative reason for separation be changed from personality disorder to medical discharge. She was discharged for a diagnosed personality disorder however, at the time of the diagnosis she was receiving medical treatment from Mental Health and was...
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-02962 ADDENDUM
The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application, extracted from the applicants military records, are contained in the letter prepared by the Air Force office of primary responsibility (OPR) at Exhibit H. ________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFLOA/JAJM recommends denial indicating there is no evidence of an error of injustice with regard to the applicants court- martial or Article 15. A complete copy of AFLOA/JAJM evaluation is...
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-02964
His discharge code of 2C bars him from reenlistment into any component of the US Air Force. The applicant did not provide any evidence of an error or injustice to warrant the requested change to his reenlistment eligibility code. We took notice of the applicant's complete submission in judging the merits of the case; however, we agree with the opinion and recommendation of the Air Force offices of primary responsibility and adopt their rationale as the basis for our conclusion that...
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-02967
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2011-02967 COUNSEL: HEARING DESIRED: YES _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His undesirable discharge be upgraded to a general (under honorable conditions) discharge. On 22 November 1961, the applicant was notified of his commanders intent to recommend the applicant for an undesirable discharge for unfitness under the...
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-02971
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2011-02971 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His undesirable discharge be changed. On 9 Mar 12, a request for information pertaining to his post- service activities was forwarded to the applicant for response within 30 days. In response to our request, applicant provided post-service...
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-02982
AFBCMR BC-2011-02982 MEMORANDUM OF CONSIDERATION OF APPLICATION BEFORE THE AFBCMR SUBJECT: XXXXXXXXXXXX Having carefully reviewed this application, we agree with the recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt the rationale expressed as the basis for our decision that the applicant has been the victim of either an error or an injustice. Therefore, under the authority delegated in AFI 36-2603, the applicant's records will be corrected as set forth in...
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-02988
His Separation Program Designator (SPD) of JBK (completion of required active service denied reenlistment one half separation pay) on his National Guard Bureau (NGB) Form 22, be changed to LBK, (completion of required active service denied reenlistment one half separation pay). The applicant provided additional statements and documentation to substantiate that he was not recommended for reenlistment in accordance with the governing directives; was not given feedback properly;...
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-02994
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2011-02994 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His reenlistment (RE) code of 2C (involuntarily separated with an honorable discharge, or entry level separation without characterization of service) be changed to allow him to reenter military service. On 17 Nov 10, the applicants commander...
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-02995
DPSOA states the applicant does not provide any evidence that supports a correction to his RE code. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: A copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to the applicant on 21 Oct 11 for review and comment within 30 days. _________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT: The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air...
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-02996
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2011-02996 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: YES _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His reentry (RE) code of 2C, which denotes Involuntarily separated with an honorable discharge; or entry level separation without characterization of service, be changed to 1A, which denotes ineligible to reenlist, but condition...
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-03002
Had he received the DFC when the other crew members did, he would have been selected for promotion to master sergeant (E-7) during the 2008 E7 promotion cycle. In support of his request, the applicant provides copies of a photograph of the aircrew in question, special orders reflecting the award of the DFC to the other aircrew members, unsigned documentation related to his submission for the DFC, his weighted airman promotion system score notice for the contested promotion cycle, and...
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-03005
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2011-03005 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His (general) under honorable conditions discharge be upgraded to honorable. He also was informed the commander that discharged him for not meeting weight standards was ultimately discharged for wrongfully discharging individuals. Exhibit D. Letter,...
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-03008
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2011-03008 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His reentry (RE) code of 2C (Involuntarily separated with an honorable discharge, or entry-level separation without characterization of service) be changed to a 1-series RE code to allow him to reenter military service. On 20 Mar 97, the applicants...
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-03010
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2011-03010 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: Her narrative reason for separation be changed from Miscellaneous/General Reasons to For the Convenience of the Government. ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: An injury she received in Jun 93...
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-03012
The applicants complete submission, with attachments, is at Exhibit A. On 15 December 2011, AFPC/DPSIDR (Air Force Recognition Programs) notified the applicant that they were able to verify his entitlement to the AFOUA while serving with the 57th Fighter Interceptor Squadron and the AFLSA for his service from 27 August 1966 to 27 November 1971. The remaining relevant evidence extracted from the applicants master personnel records is contained in the evaluation provided by the Air Force...
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-03013
Item 41 of the applicants DD Form 214 labeled; Service Schools Attended reflects None. On 23 September 2011 AFPC/DPSIT requested the applicant provide additional documentation or evidence to show completion of the courses. The complete AFPC/DPSIT evaluation is at Exhibit C. ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: He did not have copies of records of the schools he attended. ...
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-03016
In accordance with the Army of Occupation of Berlin criteria, members must have completed military service in Berlin, Germany for 30 consecutive days between 9 May 1945 and 2 October 1990 in order to qualify for the AOM. Furthermore, they are unable to locate official documentation verifying the applicant served in Berlin, Germany for 30 consecutive days during the Army of Occupation of Berlin inclusive period; therefore, they are unable to verify the applicants entitlement to the AOM. ...
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-03018
In accordance with Army Regulation (AR) 600-45, Decorations, dated 22 Sep 43, during the period in question, the PH was awarded for wounds received in action against an enemy of the United States, or as a direct result of an act of such enemy, provided such wound necessitated treatment by a medical officer. In addition, the personnel within the Air Force Recognition Programs office have no knowledge of the B-17 design, especially, if their reason for disapproval is based on glass in ass....
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-03020
_________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: HQ AFPC/DPSIDR recommends denial of the applicants requests for the GCM, ACM, and APCM, indicating there is no evidence of an error or injustice. We note the Air Force office of primary responsibility has verified and administratively corrected the former service members record to reflect entitlement to the WWIIVM and AOM- Japan. _________________________________________________________________ THE...
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-03023
_________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: He realizes the badge did not exist at the time he served, but was wondering if it could be added to his records. _________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPSIMC recommends denial. _________________________________________________________________ The following members of the Board considered AFBCMR Docket Number BC-2011-03023 in Executive Session on...
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-03032
Further, it must be noted that the service disability boards must rate disabilities based on the individual's condition at the time of evaluation. A complete copy of the AFPC/DPSD evaluation is at Exhibit C. ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: The evidence indicates at the time of the IPEB the applicant had not received a diagnosis for a personality disorder. After thoroughly reviewing the evidence of record and the...
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-03035
For these actions he received a LOR, which was placed in his UIF. On 2 Feb 12, a copy of the FBI report and a request for post- service information were forwarded to the applicant for review and comment within 30 days (Exhibit D). While the applicant only references his civilian conviction for DUI as the basis for his discharge, it was but one of several issues which formed the basis for his administrative discharge for a pattern of misconduct, to include committing carnal knowledge with a...
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-03037
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2011-03037 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His reentry (RE) code 2X First-term, second term, or career airman considered but not selected for reenlistment under the Selective Reenlistment Program (SRP) be changed to allow reentry in the military. We took notice of the applicant's complete...
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-03042
The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the letters prepared by the appropriate offices of the Air Force, which are attached at Exhibits C and D. _________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: ARPC/DPB recommends denial. The applicant points out occasions when her referral OPR (which includes mention of the Article 15) was used to deny her positions for which she would have otherwise been the number one or number...
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-03051
The applicant appealed to the Air Force Discharge Review Board (AFDRB), requesting a discharge upgrade to honorable, and a change of the reason and authority for his discharge. Therefore, in the absence of such, we conclude that no basis exists to upgrade the applicants general discharge. Exhibit E. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 2 Dec 11.
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-03053
The complete DPSOA evaluation is at Exhibit D. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: Copies of the Air Force evaluation were forwarded to the applicant on 23 Dec 11 for review and comment within 30 days. We took notice of the applicant's complete submission in judging the merits of the case; however, we agree with the opinion and recommendation of the Air Force offices of primary responsibility and adopt their rationale...
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-03062
His service is documented on three separate DD Forms 214, none of which indicate he was awarded the PH or PUC. The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application, extracted from the applicants master personnel records, are described in the letter prepared by the Air Force office of responsibility which is included at Exhibit C. ________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: HQ AFPC/DPSIDRA recommends denial, indicating there is no evidence...
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-03063
________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: Although he was on flying status for ten years, orders awarding him the Enlisted Aircrew Badge were never issued. The applicant does not provide flying status documentation or aeronautical orders qualifying him for an Aircrew Member Badge. ________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT: The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air Force...
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-03064
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2011-03064 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: YES _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His under other than honorable conditions (UOTHC) discharge be upgraded to honorable. At the same time, the applicant was offered an opportunity to provide information pertaining to his activities since leaving the service (Exhibit D). ...
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-03066
On 11 October 2011, the applicant was given an opportunity to submit comments about his post service activities and in response to the FBI Report (Exhibit D). He was told by his Air Force attorney that his discharge would be upgraded automatically in six months after his discharge, but it was not. ________________________________________________________________ The following members of the Board considered AFBCMR Docket Number BC-2011-03066 in Executive Session on 15 March 2012, under the...
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-03067
His military service record be corrected to reflect the time he served in Vietnam. The DVA stated the evidence of record showed he served in the Republic of Vietnam during the Vietnam Era, therefore, exposure to herbicides is conceded. ________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: HQ AFPC/DPAPP recommends denial of his request for service in Vietnam.
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-03068
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2011-03068 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His under other than honorable conditions (UOTHC) discharge be upgraded to general (under honorable conditions). Accordingly, we conclude that it would not be in the interest of justice to excuse the untimely filing of the application. ...