Search Decisions

Decision Text

AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-03235
Original file (BC-2011-03235.txt) Auto-classification: Denied
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS 

AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS 

 

IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2011-03235 

 

 COUNSEL: NONE 

 

 HEARING DESIRED: NO 

 

_________________________________________________________________ 

 

APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: 

 

The unsatisfactory score on his 14 Jul 11 Fitness Assessment (FA) 
be removed from his records. 

_________________________________________________________________ 

 

APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: 

 

He was prescribed Zofran for nausea and believes this medication 
affected his performance during the FA. 

 

In support of his request, the applicant provides a copy of a 
letter from his physician, medical notes, and a document 
extracted from his medical records. 

 

The applicant's complete submission, with attachments, is at 
Exhibit A. 

 

_________________________________________________________________ 

 

STATEMENT OF FACTS: 

 

The applicant is currently serving on active duty in the grade of 
senior airman (E-4). 

 

On 14 Jul 11, the applicant failed to complete the minimum 
requirement of 42 sit-ups within one minute during the contested 
FA. He completed 40. 

 

The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are 
contained in the letter prepared by the appropriate office of the 
Air Force, which is attached at Exhibit C. 

 

_________________________________________________________________ 

 

AIR FORCE EVALUATION: 

 

HQ USAF/A1PP recommends denial noting that the applicant’s 
request was also reviewed by the Aerospace Medicine Policy 
subject matter expert (SME) from AF/SG3 and they both agree that 
the Zofran he was prescribed for nausea should not have had an 
effect on either his sit-ups or push-ups; his maximum score on 
the push-ups portion of the FA confirms this. 


The complete AF/A1PP evaluation is at Exhibit C. 

 

_________________________________________________________________ 

 

APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: 

 

A copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to the applicant 
on 10 Nov 11, for review and comment within 30 days. As of this 
date, no response has been received by this office (Exhibit D). 

 

_________________________________________________________________ 

 

THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT: 

 

1. The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by 
existing law or regulations. 

 

2. The application was timely filed. 

 

3. Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to 
demonstrate the existence of an error or injustice. We took 
notice of the applicant's complete submission in judging the 
merits of the case; however, we agree with the opinion and the 
recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility 
and adopt its rationale as the basis for our conclusion that the 
applicant has not been the victim of an error or injustice. 
Therefore, in the absence of evidence to the contrary, we find no 
basis to recommend granting the relief sought in this 
application. 

 

_________________________________________________________________ 

 

THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: 

 

The applicant be notified the evidence presented did not 
demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; the 
application was denied without a personal appearance; and the 
application will only be reconsidered upon the submission of 
newly discovered relevant evidence not considered with this 
application. 

 

_________________________________________________________________ 

 

The following members of the Board considered AFBCMR Docket 
Number BC-2011-03235 in Executive Session on 3 Apr 12 under the 
provisions of AFI 36-2603: 

 

 , Panel Chair 

 , Member 

 , Member 

 


The following documentary evidence pertaining to AFBCMR Docket 
Number BC-2011-03235 was considered: 

 

 Exhibit A. DD Form 149, dated 10 Aug 08, w/atchs. 

 Exhibit B. Master Personnel Records. 

 Exhibit C. Letter, HQ USAF/A1PP, undated. 

 Exhibit D. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 10 Nov 11. 

 

 

 

 

 

 Panel Chair 



Similar Decisions

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 03235

    Original file (BC 2013 03235.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant’s last 10 FA results are as follows: Date Composite Score Push Ups Rating 23 Aug 13 92.63 Exempt Excellent 29 May 13 21.38 Exempt Unsatisfactory 5 Feb 13 84.10 21/6.00 Unsatisfactory 19 Jul 12 79.67 22/6.30 Satisfactory 13 Mar 12 Exempt Exempt Exempt 21 Oct 11 85.00 19/5.50 Satisfactory *6 Sep 11 73.67 18/5.00 Unsatisfactory *20 Jul 11 81.00 16/4.30 Unsatisfactory 5 Nov 10 96.25 Exempt Excellent 14 May 10 75.20 25/8.00 Good *Contested FA On 14 Feb 14, a similar request was...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-02810

    Original file (BC-2011-02810.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant failed the Muscular Fitness portion of the test therefore his overall FA rating was “Unsatisfactory.” The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the letter prepared by the appropriate office of the Air Force at Exhibit C. Accordingly there is no need to recite these facts in this Record of Proceedings. We took notice of the applicant's complete submission in judging the merits of the case; however, we agree with the opinion and...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-02104

    Original file (BC-2011-02104.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2011-02104 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: Her 23 May 11 Fitness Assessment (FA) be removed from her records. Additional relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the letters prepared by the appropriate offices of the Air Force. ...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC 2011 03584

    Original file (BC 2011 03584.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    He still felt pain in his left knee and the cool weather seemed to intensify the pain level. RMG/CC states, the applicant’s records indicate he was eligible for promotion with a 1 Jan 2011 effective date. ________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did not demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; that the application was denied without a personal appearance; and that the...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-03584

    Original file (BC-2011-03584.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    He still felt pain in his left knee and the cool weather seemed to intensify the pain level. RMG/CC states, the applicant’s records indicate he was eligible for promotion with a 1 Jan 2011 effective date. ________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did not demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; that the application was denied without a personal appearance; and that the...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-03831

    Original file (BC-2011-03831.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    _________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: HQ USAF/A1PP cannot make a recommendation based on the evidence provided by the applicant. The Physician Assistant confirms she suffered from these medical conditions and was being treated at the time of her FA test on 29 Jun 11. We note the applicant’s Family Practice Physician Assistant confirms the applicant suffered from a number of debilitating medical conditions during the time of her fitness...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2012 05265

    Original file (BC 2012 05265.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-05265 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His fitness assessment (FA) score recorded on 19 Jul 12 be removed from the Air Force Fitness Management System (AFFMS). The complete AFPC/DPSIM evaluation, with attachment, is at Exhibit...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-03826

    Original file (BC-2011-03826.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the letter prepared by the appropriate office of the Air Force at Exhibit B. A1PP recommends removing the 9 August 2011 FA score from AFFMS due to supporting documentation from the applicant’s evaluating physician and treating physical therapist. ________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT: The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air Force relating to...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-02279

    Original file (BC-2011-02279.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The complete A1PP evaluation is at Exhibit B. AFPC/DPSOE states, should the Board remove the three fitness failures from the applicant’s record, DPSOE recommends revoking the demotion orders and restoring the applicant’s rank to staff sergeant. The complete DPSOE evaluation is at Exhibit C. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: The applicant states at this time he does not have any additional evidence in support of his...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-03754

    Original file (BC-2011-03754.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2011-03754 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: 1. The complete HQ USAF/A1PP evaluation is at Exhibit C. AFPC/DPSID recommends voiding the three contested EPRs,contingent upon the Board approving the applicant’s request to have his FA test results removed from his records. e. His effective date...