Search Decisions

Decision Text

AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-03149
Original file (BC-2011-03149.txt) Auto-classification: Denied
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS 

AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS 

 

 

IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2011-03149 

 

 COUNSEL: NONE 

 

 HEARING DESIRED: NO 

 

_______________________________________________________________ 

 

APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: 

 

His records be corrected to show that he was awarded the 
American Campaign Medal (ACM). 

 

________________________________________________________________ 

 

APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: 

 

The ACM should be included on his WD AGO Form 53, Enlisted 
Record and Report of Separation–Honorable Discharge. 

 

In support of his request, the applicant provides copies of his 
WD AGO Form 53, information related to the ACM, and documents 
extracted from his military personnel records. 

 

The applicant’s complete submission, with attachments, is at 
Exhibit A. 

 

________________________________________________________________ 

 

STATEMENT OF FACTS: 

 

The applicant entered the Air Force on 18 Feb 46 and served on 
active duty until his honorable discharge on 11 Aug 47. 

 

The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are 
contained in the letter prepared by the appropriate office of 
the Air Force, which is attached at Exhibit C. 

 

________________________________________________________________ 

 

AIR FORCE EVALUATION: 

 

AFPC/DPSIDRA recommends denial, indicating there is no evidence 
of error or injustice. The ACM is awarded to service members 
who served between 7 Dec 41 and 2 Mar 46, either outside of the 
continental United States (OCONUS) in the American Theater for 
at least 30 days, or in the CONUS for an aggregate period of one 
year. According to the applicant’s official military records, 
he began active duty service on 18 Feb 46, only 13 days before 
the final date of 2 Mar 46 to qualify for the ACM. Therefore, 
the applicant is ineligible for entitlement to the ACM as he did 


not complete either 30 days of service OCONUS or 1 year of 
service within CONUS before the final eligibility date of 
2 Mar 46. 

 

A complete copy of the AFPC/DPSIDRA evaluation is at Exhibit C. 

 

________________________________________________________________ 

 

APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: 

 

A copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to the 
applicant on 12 Mar 12 for review and comment within 30 days. 
As of this date, no response has been received by this office 
(Exhibit D). 

 

________________________________________________________________ 

 

THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT: 

 

1. The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by 
existing law or regulations. 

 

2. The application was not timely filed; however, it is in the 
interest of justice to excuse the failure to timely file. 

 

3. Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to 
demonstrate the existence of an error or injustice. We took 
notice of the applicant's complete submission in judging the 
merits of the case; however, we agree with the opinion and 
recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility 
(OPR) and adopt its rationale as the basis for our conclusion 
the applicant has not been the victim of an error or injustice. 
Therefore, in absence of evidence to the contrary, we find no 
basis to recommend granting the relief sought in this 
application. 

 

________________________________________________________________ 

 

THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: 

 

The applicant be notified the evidence presented did not 
demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; the 
application was denied without a personal appearance; and the 
application will only be reconsidered upon the submission of 
newly discovered relevant evidence not considered with this 
application. 

 

________________________________________________________________ 

 

 


The following members of the Board considered AFBCMR Docket 
Number BC-2011-03149 in Executive Session on 12 Apr 12, under 
the provisions of AFI 36-2603: 

 

, Panel Chair 

, Member 

, Member 

 

The following documentary evidence was considered: 

 

 Exhibit A. DD Form 149, dated 31 May 11, w/atchs. 

 Exhibit B. Applicant's Master Personnel Records. 

 Exhibit C. Letter, AFPC/DPSIDRA, dated 17 Oct 11. 

 Exhibit D. Letter, AFBCMR, dated 12 Mar 12. 

 

 

 

 

 

 Panel Chair 



Similar Decisions

  • AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-03020

    Original file (BC-2011-03020.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    _________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: HQ AFPC/DPSIDR recommends denial of the applicant’s requests for the GCM, ACM, and APCM, indicating there is no evidence of an error or injustice. We note the Air Force office of primary responsibility has verified and administratively corrected the former service member’s record to reflect entitlement to the WWIIVM and AOM- Japan. _________________________________________________________________ THE...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2010 | BC-2010-00101

    Original file (BC-2010-00101.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2010-00101 INDEX CODE: 107.00 XXXXXXX COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His records be corrected to show he received the following awards: 1. _________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: HQ AFPC/DPSIDR recommends denial of the applicant’s request...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-05033

    Original file (BC-2011-05033.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are described in the letter prepared by the Air Force office of primary responsibility which is included at Exhibit C. ________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPSIDRA recommends denial of the PH Medal and GCM, indicating there is no evidence of an error or injustice. In a subsequent submission, Counsel also provides additional documentation concerning the applicant’s request for...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-03018

    Original file (BC-2011-03018.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    In accordance with Army Regulation (AR) 600-45, Decorations, dated 22 Sep 43, during the period in question, the PH was awarded for wounds received in action against an enemy of the United States, or as a direct result of an act of such enemy, provided such wound necessitated treatment by a medical officer. In addition, the personnel within the Air Force Recognition Programs office have no knowledge of the B-17 design, especially, if their reason for disapproval is based on “glass in ass.”...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2011-05076

    Original file (BC-2011-05076.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2011-05076 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: 1. AFPC/DPSIDR will administratively correct the applicant’s AOM to AOM-G. ________________________________________________________________ THE AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPSIDR recommends denial of the applicant’s request for award of the EAMECM and...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-05131

    Original file (BC-2012-05131.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Furthermore, the several supporting statements she provides are more than sufficient to establish that her deceased father sustained a qualifying injury when his plane was shot down by the enemy. While we note the comments of the Air Force office of primary responsibility indicating that such entries could relate to combat or non-combat related injuries, we find it substantially more likely that these wounds were the result of enemy action and therefore met the criteria for the award of the...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-00108

    Original file (BC-2011-00108.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    By letter dated 25 May 11, HQ AFPC/DPSOAA states there is no evidence to support the applicant’s deceased grandfather enlisted rather than being inducted under the selective service system which was highly active during WWII. His date of induction is recorded in block 22 as 16 Feb 42, matching his date of entry on active duty recorded in block 24. The applicant’s complete submission is at Exhibit E. _________________________________________________________________ ADDITIONAL AIR FORCE...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2002 | 0200430

    Original file (0200430.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant provided an annotated copy of his WD AGO 53-55 at Exhibit A. _________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: HQ AFPC/DPPPR notes that the applicant did not provide any documentation to substantiate his claim for additional campaign credit. DPPRSP also attempted to administratively correct Item 36, Service Outside Continental US and Return, and Item 37, Total Length of Service.

  • AF | BCMR | CY2008 | BC-2007-02835

    Original file (BC-2007-02835.DOC) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2007-02835 INDEX CODE: 100.00 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: Her deceased husband’s records be corrected to reflect award of the Purple Heart (PH). ________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: The applicant be notified that the evidence presented...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 00945

    Original file (BC 2013 00945.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    In support of his request, the applicant provides copies of his birth certificate, WD AGO Form 53-55, Enlisted Record and Report of Separation Honorable Discharge; WD-AGO Form 100, Army of the United States Separation Qualification Record, a witness statement from a lieutenant stating that he was stationed in Tinian, Island, Japan with the applicant and various other documents associated with his request. A review of the applicant’s master personnel records and documentation submitted...