Search Decisions

Decision Text

AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-03165
Original file (BC-2011-03165.txt) Auto-classification: Denied
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS 

AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS 

 

IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2011-03165 

 

 COUNSEL: NO 

 

 HEARING DESIRED: NO 

 

________________________________________________________________ 

 

APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: 

 

Her orders D-00861 be corrected to include the time period of 
5-8 February 2010 and that she be reimbursed $316.40 for hotel, 
travel, per diem and mileage. 

 

_________________________________________________________________ 

 

APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: 

 

She was serving on long term orders in an IMA (Individual 
Mobilized Augmentee) status while transferring to the 
Traditional Reserve program. Once she was accepted into the 
program, her orders were cancelled and she was placed on an 
Annual Tour (AT) from 1 – 12 February 2010. While on the AT, 
she was approved to return home for the weekend to complete her 
ACSC exercise. She planned to return on Sunday; however, her 
husband’s deteriorating medical condition caused her to request 
a pass for the following Monday to drive him to the hospital. 
Her supervisor initially approved the pass; and then it was 
revoked. She was then told her AT was being curtailed to 5 
February 2012. 

 

She has not filed her travel voucher and still seeks 
reimbursement for her travel. 

 

In support of her appeal, the applicant provides a copy of an e-
mail, her leave request and e-mail correspondence from 
AFPC/DPSIMC. 

 

The applicant’s complete submission, with attachments, is at 
Exhibit A. 

 

________________________________________________________________ 

 

STATEMENT OF FACTS: 

 

The applicant is currently a member of the Reserves serving in 
an active duty capacity in the grade of Major (O-4). Pursuant 
to Reserve Order Number D-00861, AF Form 938, Request and 
Authorization for Active Duty Training/Active Duty Tour, the 
applicant was serving her Annual Training tour of duty from 
1 February 2010 to 12 February 2010 at Robins AFB, Georgia. On 


5 February 2010, that order was amended to change the reporting 
time from 1200 to 0800. On 10 February 2010, the order was 
amended to change the release date to 5 February 2010. It also 
changed her per diem from $982.00 to $450.00. The order was 
amended on 28 June 2010, to change the orders to reflect the 
applicant was authorized local mileage in and around Robins AFB, 
GA. It also amended the per diem to $610.00. 

 

________________________________________________________________ 

 

AIR FORCE EVALUATION: 

 

AFRC/A1K recommends denial. AFI 36-3003 reflects that passes 
are authorized to provide respite from the working environment 
or for other purposes. It is within the purview of the 
authority of the member’s supervisor or unit commander to 
authorize, as well as, withdraw a pass when it is determined the 
conditions for which the pass was initially approved no longer 
exist. The information provided outlines a decision was made by 
authorized authority, the supervisor and accompanying chain of 
command. The command has no basis for supporting a change to 
the decision made by the authorized official for this action. 

 

The complete A1K evaluation is at Exhibit B. 

 

________________________________________________________________ 

 

APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: 

 

A copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to the 
applicant on 4 November 2011, for review and comment within 
30 days (Exhibit C). As of this date, this office has received 
no response. 

 

________________________________________________________________ 

 

THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT: 

 

1. The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by 
existing law or regulations. 

 

2. The application was timely filed. 

 

3. Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to 
demonstrate the existence of error or injustice. We took notice 
of the applicant's complete submission in judging the merits of 
the case; however, we agree with the opinion and recommendation 
of the Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt its 
rationale as the basis for our conclusion that the applicant has 
not been the victim of an error or injustice. Therefore, in the 
absence of evidence to the contrary, we find no basis to 
recommend granting the relief sought in this application. 

 


________________________________________________________________ 

 

THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: 

 

The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did not 
demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; that 
the application was denied without a personal appearance; and 
the application will only be reconsidered upon the submission of 
newly discovered relevant evidence not considered with this 
application. 

 

________________________________________________________________ 

 

The following members of the Board considered AFBCMR Docket 
Number BC-2011-03165 in Executive Session on 15 March 2012, 
under the provisions of AFI 36-2603: 

 

 , Panel Chair 

 , Member 

 , Member 

 

The following documentary evidence was considered: 

 

 Exhibit A. DD Form 149, dated 31 Jul 11, w/atchs. 

 Exhibit B. Letter, AFRC/A1K, dated 28 Oct 11. 

 Exhibit C. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 4 Nov 11. 

 

 

 

 

 

 Panel Chair 

 



Similar Decisions

  • AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-03231

    Original file (BC-2012-03231.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    While she received orders for three of her TDY’s related to her MEB processing, she traveled under the verbal orders of her commander to attend her last MEB appointment during the period 27 Mar 12 through 03 Apr 12, but has yet to receive TDY orders or travel reimbursement. ________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT: The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air Force relating to the APPLICANT be corrected to show that during the...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-02423

    Original file (BC-2011-02423.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Furthermore, if the applicant had been granted career status while being assigned to the CMSgt position it would have meant that she could have remained at Scott AFB until 2019 when she becomes eligible for an active duty retirement. We note the applicant’s assertion that she was selected for the superintendent position and subsequently promoted to the grade of CMSgt and due to her selection for the superintendent position her date of separation should be changed to 28 Feb 14. ...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-00436

    Original file (BC-2011-00436.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2011-00436 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _______________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: Her rank of master sergeant (E-7) be reinstated with her original date of rank of 1 January 2008. The discharge board that convened on 27 January 2011 found the applicant did not wrongfully use marijuana and recommended she be retained in the Air Force...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2001 | 0002642

    Original file (0002642.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    IAW the Joint Federal Travel Regulation, Vol 1, par U5705B, “…a member is not entitled to TLE due to a move when entering active duty (except for enlisted members reporting to their first PDS).” The complete evaluation is at Exhibit C. The Traffic Management Division, AFPC/DPAMP, evaluated the applicant’s request for remission of the debt for the unauthorized airline ticket. The Board does not agree with the recommendation made by AF/DPRCC to deny the applicant reimbursement for TLE. ...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2002 | 0102200

    Original file (0102200.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    The complete evaluation is at Exhibit C. _______________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: Applicant’s counsel responded to the Air Force evaluation and indicates that he and the applicant believe that the documents presented by the applicant establish that a clear injustice occurred when the applicant received an Article 15 for allegedly being derelict in the performance of his duties. Counsel’s complete response is at Exhibit...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2010 | BC-2010-01452

    Original file (BC-2010-01452.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2010-01452 INDEX CODE: A94.05/06 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NOT INDICATED ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: While it is not readily apparent, it appears the applicant is requesting that his General (Under Honorable Conditions) discharge be upgraded to honorable and his former rank of technical sergeant (E-6) be restored. On...

  • AF | BCMR | CY1997 | 9700442

    Original file (9700442.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    # DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE WASHINGTON, DC Office of the Assistant Secretary AFBCMR 97-00442 MEMORANDUM FOR THE CHIEF OF STAFF Having received and considered the recommendation of the Air Force Board for Correction of Military Records and under the authority of Section 1552, Title 10, United States Code (70A Stat 116), it is directed that: .. of the Departmeat of the Air Force relating to- e corrected to show that he had no other alternative but to mercial travel office (CTO) not under...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2001 | 0101032

    Original file (0101032.DOC) Auto-classification: Approved

    _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: In 1993, while stationed at Dover AFB, DE, she had an elective surgery procedure that was performed at the Malcolm Grow Medical Center (MGMC) at Andrews AFB, MD. Although the procedure was elective, she was placed on TDY orders and reimbursed for her travel expenses. It is further recommended that she be entitled to full reimbursement of travel expenses that she incurred which are normally authorized...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 03925

    Original file (BC 2013 03925.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    He was finally able to schedule a meeting with the, then, Chief of the Air Force Reserve, on or about 18 May 2011 to attempt to have the decision reversed. Although an AGR personnel brief dated 8 April 2009, and the applicant's AGR Review Board Worksheet for the March 2011 Board reflected that he had attained career status, this data was incorrect at the time of the AGR Review Board in question. ________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: The...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-03164

    Original file (BC-2011-03164.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Upon completion of six months time in grade as an airman she would have been eligible for promotion to the rank of airman first class on 17 May 11, contingent upon the approval of the promotion authority. Sufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate the existence of an error or injustice. ________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT: The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air Force relating to the APPLICANT,...