RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2011-03241
COUNSEL: NONE
HEARING DESIRED: NO
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:
His reentry (RE) code 2X First-term, second term, or career
airman considered but not selected for reenlistment under the
Selective Reenlistment Program (SRP) be changed to allow reentry
into another branch of the military.
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT:
He was briefed at the time of his separation that he was denied
reenlistment in the Air Force. He found out that RE code 2X is
preventing him from enlisting in the Marine Corps.
It is unjust that a mistake he made in one service is preventing
him from supporting his country in another. He received an
honorable discharge; therefore, reenlistment in another branch of
service should not be an issue.
In support of his request, the applicant provides a copy of his
DD Form 214, Certificate of Release and Discharge from Active
Duty.
The applicant's complete submission, with attachment, is at
Exhibit A.
_________________________________________________________________
STATEMENT OF FACTS:
The applicant served in the Air Force from 4 Nov 08 until 31 May
11.
On 22 Feb 11, the applicant was considered for reenlistment under
the SRP; however, his supervisor did not recommend him for
reenlistment based on his performance being substandard. His
supervisor stated that after several corrective measures were
taken against the member and a Control Roster action was
established, he failed to adapt.
The unit commander concurred with the supervisors recommendation
and added that the applicants conduct was not conducive with his
service, and he was not selected for reenlistment under the SRP.
On 31 May 11, the applicant was honorably discharged and received
an RE Code of 2X. He served on active duty for a period of
2 years, 6 months, and 27 days.
_________________________________________________________________
AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
AFPC/DPSOA recommends denial. DPSOA states the applicants 2X
RE code is appropriate based on the applicant being denied
reenlistment and having to separate from the military. He has
provided no evidence of an Air Force error or injustice. The
applicant seems to be assuming an honorable character of service
means a member should be reenlistment eligible; however, that is
not the case.
DPSOS states that commanders have selective reenlistment
selection or non-selection authority, and the SRP considers a
members enlisted performance report ratings, unfavorable
information from a substantiated source, the airmans willingness
to comply with Air Force standards, and the airmans ability (or
lack of) to meet required training and duty performance levels.
The complete DPSOA evaluation is at Exhibit C.
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
On 28 Oct 11, a copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to
the applicant for review and comment within 30 days. To date, a
response has not been received (Exhibit D).
_________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:
1. The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by existing
law or regulations.
2. The application was timely filed.
3. Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to
demonstrate the existence of error or injustice. We took notice
of the applicant's complete submission in judging the merits of
the case; however, we agree with the opinion and recommendation
of the Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt its
rationale as the basis for our conclusion that the applicant has
not been the victim of an error or injustice. No evidence has
been provided to reflect he was not treated fairly and properly
by the Air Force. Absent persuasive evidence the applicant was
denied rights to which entitled, appropriate regulations were not
followed, or appropriate standards were not applied, we find no
basis to disturb the existing record. Additionally, we note the
applicants desire to serve in the Marine Corps, and would like
to point out that his RE code of 2X while barring him from
reenlistment with the Air Force, may be waived by another branch
of the military service. In view of the above and absent
evidence to the contrary, we find no basis to recommend granting
the relief sought in this application.
_________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT:
The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did not
demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; that
the application was denied without a personal appearance; and
that the application will only be reconsidered upon the
submission of newly discovered relevant evidence not considered
with this application.
_________________________________________________________________
The following members of the Board considered Docket Number
BC-2011-03241 in Executive Session on 1 Dec 11, under the
provisions of AFI 36-2603:
, Panel Chair
, Member
, Member
The following documentary evidence was considered:
Exhibit A. DD Form 149, dated 18 Jul 11, w/atch.
Exhibit B. Applicant's Master Personnel Records.
Exhibit C. Letter, AFPC/DPSOA, dated 6 Oct 11.
Exhibit D. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 28 Oct 11.
Panel Chair
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-03414
________________________________________________________________ THE AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPSOA recommends denial stating, in part, the applicant did not provide any evidence of an error or injustice that would warrant a change of his RE code. At the time members are separated from the Air Force, they are furnished an RE code predicated upon the quality of their service and the circumstances of their separation. ________________________________________________________________ The...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 02391
On 7 September 2010, he was notified that his supervisor not recommended him for reenlistment. The applicant was discharged on 31 May 2011 under the FY11 Air Force Shaping Rollback Program after serving 3 years, 9 months and 3 days. The applicant provides no proof of an error or injustice in reference to his RE code and his non-selection for reenlistment was in accordance with current guidance.
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 03668
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2013-03668 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His Reentry (RE) code of 2X (First-term, second-term or career airman considered but not selected for reenlistment under the Selective Re-enlistment Program (SRP)) be changed to allow him to enlist in the Air National Guard. On 28 Mar 13, the...
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-03876
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2011-03876 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His reentry (RE) code of 2X (First-term, second-term, or career airman considered but not selected for reenlistment under the Selective Reenlistment Program (SRP)) be changed to allow him to reenter the Air Force. ...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 04859
AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPSOA recommends denial indicating there is no evidence of an error or an injustice. Exhibit C. Letter, AFPC/DPSOA, dated 21 Jan 14. Exhibit D. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 31 Mar 14.
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-03037
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2011-03037 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His reentry (RE) code 2X First-term, second term, or career airman considered but not selected for reenlistment under the Selective Reenlistment Program (SRP) be changed to allow reentry in the military. We took notice of the applicant's complete...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC-2013-00175
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2013-00175 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His reenlistment (RE) code of 2X (first-term, second-term, or career airman considered but not selected for reenlistment under the Selective Reenlistment Program (SRP)) be changed to an RE code which will allow him to reenlist. On 1 Jul 11, the...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 00175
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2013-00175 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His reenlistment (RE) code of 2X (first-term, second-term, or career airman considered but not selected for reenlistment under the Selective Reenlistment Program (SRP)) be changed to an RE code which will allow him to reenlist. On 1 Jul 11, the...
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-00382
_________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPSOA recommends denial. At the time of the applicants discharge he received an erroneous RE code of 4I. While the 4I RE code is technically incorrect, the applicant has provided no evidence to support his request for a code that would allow him to reenlist.
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 04879
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2013-04879 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His Reentry (RE) code 2X (First-term, second-term or career airman considered but not selected for reenlistment under the Selective Reenlistment Program (SRP)) be changed to a 1 series. The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the memorandum prepared by the Air Force office...