AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2003-01068
Based on the applicant’s statement, in Nov 01, he was advised that he could elect the Career Status Bonus (CSB). Accordingly, we recommend that the records be corrected as indicated below. ___________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT: The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air Force relating to APPLICANT, be corrected to show that: a.
AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2003-01070
_________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPAPP2 states that there are no documents in applicant’s Master Field Personnel Record that support his claim for service in Southwest Asia. We took notice of the applicant's complete submission in judging the merits of the case; however, we agree with the opinion and recommendation of the Air Force and adopt their rationale as the basis for the conclusion that the applicant has not been the victim...
AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2003-01072
Microfiche entries reflect in March 1989, the applicant’s request to change voluntary former spouse coverage to spouse coverage was processed, naming his second spouse as the eligible spouse beneficiary. Evidence provided indicates the applicant chose to elect spouse SBP coverage in March 1989, changing it from former spouse coverage. The applicant has not provided any evidence that he submitted a termination request under Public Law 105-85, allowing members a one-year opportunity to...
AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2003-01073
Applicant states, in part, that he advised the South Carolina Adjutant General (SC AG) of an attempt by another officer in the SC ANG to subvert the AG’s express wishes by having himself (the other officer) assigned to the COS position in the SC ANG; he was asked by the AG to document, by memorandum, the conversation between the two, which he did; the memorandum “found its way to others” and he subsequently became the focus of an AF/IG investigation that eventually found that he had...
AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2003-01074
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2003-01074 INDEX CODE: 100.00 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His Duty Air Force Specialty Code (DAFSC) be changed from 61S3D to 63A3 on all Officer Performance Reports (OPRs) rendered between 19 Jul 99 and the present. He did not provide any letters of support from any of the evaluators on...
AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2003-01075
AFI 36-2606 states that the appeal authority for individuals like the applicant with more than 20 years of service would be his group commander. Based on HQ AFPC/DPPRRP’s advisory (Exhibit E), the group commander’s Military Personnel Flight (MPF) contacted the HQ AFPC retirements section to advise that the group commander was going to complete the AF Form 418. _________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: HQ AFPC/DPPPWB advises the applicant was...
AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2003-01080
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2003-01080 INDEX CODE: 100.00 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His name be changed on his DD Form 214, Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty, from to. On 15 May 2003, an AF Form 281, Notification of Change in Service Member’s Official Records, was inserted in the applicant’s...
AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2003-01083
AFBCMR BC-2003-01083 INDEX CODE: 112.07 MEMORANDUM OF CONSIDERATION OF APPLICATION BEFORE THE AFBCMR SUBJECT: Having carefully reviewed this application, we agree with the recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt the rationale expressed as the basis for our decision that the applicant has been the victim of either an error or an injustice. Therefore, under the authority delegated in AFI 36- 2603, the applicant's records will be corrected as set forth in...
AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2003-01088
AFBCMR BC-2003-01088 MEMORANDUM OF CONSIDERATION OF APPLICATION BEFORE THE AFBCMR SUBJECT: Having carefully reviewed this application, we agree with the recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt the rationale expressed as the basis for our decision that the applicant has been the victim of either an error or an injustice. Therefore, under the authority delegated in AFI 36-2603, the applicant's records will be corrected as set forth in the accompanying...
AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2003-01091
Applicant did not respond or provide the additional information needed to sufficiently evaluate her claim. _________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did not demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; that the application was denied without a personal appearance; and that the application will only be reconsidered upon the submission of newly discovered relevant evidence...
AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2003-01092
INDEX CODE: 128.05 AFBCMR BC-2003-01092 MEMORANDUM OF CONSIDERATION OF APPLICATION BEFORE THE AFBCMR SUBJECT: XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX Having carefully reviewed this application, we agree with the recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt the rationale expressed as the basis for our decision that the applicant has been the victim of either an error or an injustice. Therefore, under the authority delegated in AFI 36-2603, the applicant's records will be...
AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2003-01093
If the dates placed into the official channels were changed, it would not automatically entitle him to be considered for any previous promotion cycles because it was not a matter of record at the time selections were made. On June 10, 2003, the Board considered and denied the applicant’s requests on the basis that the decoration did not meet the criteria for promotion consideration for cycle 02E7. Specifically, Air Force policy dictates for a decoration to be considered in a promotion...
AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2003-01094
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2003-01094 INDEX CODE: 110.03 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: YES _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His discharge order be rescinded so that he may join the New York Air National Guard (NY ANG). A complete copy of his submission is at Exhibit A. _________________________________________________________________ The following...
AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2003-01095
However, his initials are not crossed out on the copy scanned into the Automated Records Management System (ARMS) at HQ AFPC, also dated 6 Aug 02, and provided by the Air Force at Exhibit B. _________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: HQ AFRS/RSO advises that discussion with records section personnel at HQ AFPC indicate the applicant’s military personnel records (MPR) contains a copy of the Form 3008 without the “X.” Consequently, they do not...
AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2003-01099
INDEX CODE: 102.00 AFBCMR BC-2003-01099 MEMORANDUM OF CONSIDERATION OF APPLICATION BEFORE THE AFBCMR SUBJECT: APPLICANT Having carefully reviewed this application, we agree with the recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt the rationale expressed as the basis for our decision that the applicant has been the victim of either an error or an injustice. Therefore, under the authority delegated in AFI 36-2603, the applicant's records will be corrected as set...
AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2003-01102
AFI 36-2502, Table 2.5 states, that supplemental consideration is not authorized if the citation or order was filed or if the decoration was listed on the brief used by the board, was developed through consultation with evaluation board members who determined that either update of the decoration or actual citation filed in the SNCO selection folder was sufficient for a thorough evaluation of the record. A review of the applicant’s selection folder reflects that the MSM (1OLC) was filed in...
AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2003-01103
The Officer Selection Brief (OSB) reviewed by the CY02B board listed the MSM, 1 OLC, awarded in 2001; however, a copy of the certificate/citation was not in his Officer Selection Record (OSR). _________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPPPO recommends the application be denied and states, in part, that although a copy of the citation was missing from his OSR when it met the CY02B board, the decoration was indicated on his OSB. Although...
AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2003-01104
Applicant's EPR profile since 1992 follows: PERIOD ENDING EVALUATION 29 Mar 92 5 29 Mar 93 5 29 Mar 94 5 29 Mar 95 5 29 Mar 95 5 29 Mar 96 5 31 Jan 97 5 31 Jan 98 5 31 Jan 99 5 31 Jan 00 5 31 Jan 01 5 * 31 Mar 02 4 (referral) 1 Jan 03 5 * Contested report. He indicated that at the time his EPR would have closed out, the applicant was under investigation for an alleged assault incident that occurred on 25 Jan 02. The evidence of record indicates that a CDI was conducted into allegations...
AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2003-01106
Included in support is a statement from the 19 Sep 98 OPR rater who recommended the applicant’s duty title be changed to “SQ Pilot Scheduler/C-130H Pilot.” Despite the applicant’s request, the senior rater did not support the changes to the PRF or SSB consideration, asserting that while he regretted the administrative errors, they were minor and did not change the information in Section IV or in the OPRs. A complete copy of the evaluation is at Exhibit...
AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2003-01107
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: 03-01107 INDEX CODE: 110.02 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: YES ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: The Narrative Reason for Separation on her DD Form 214, Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty, be changed so she may enlist in another service. ________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE...
AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2003-01109
Mr. Laurence M. Groner, and Mr. James E. Short, considered this application on 25 Jun 03. PHILIP SHEUERMAN Panel Chair Attachment: Ltr, AFLSA/JAJM, dtd 22 Apr 03, w/Atchs AFBCMR BC-2003-01109 MEMORANDUM FOR THE CHIEF OF STAFF Under the authority of Section 1552, Title 10, United States Code and Air Force Instruction 36-2603, and having assured compliance with the provisions of the above regulation, the decision of the Air Force Board for Correction of Military Records is announced, and it...
AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2003-01111
In support of the appeal, applicant submits a personal statement, a notarized statement from his supervisor at the time, a statement from the Flying Crew Chief Program Manager, a statement from the First Sergeant at the time, a copy of Cycle 01E7 Promotion Score Sheet, AAM with DÉCOR 6, AFPC’s response with promotion selection date, an excerpt of AFI 36-2502, a copy of the AFCM with incorrect date, a copy of the amended AFCM and a copy of the correction of Military Records reply. If the...
AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2003-01112
Therefore, under the authority delegated in AFI 36- 2603, the applicant's records will be corrected as set forth in the accompanying Memorandum for the Chief of Staff signed by the Executive Director of the Board or his designee. Members of the Board, Mrs. Barbara A. Westgate, Mr. Roscoe Hinton, Jr., and Ms. Carolyn B. Willis, considered this application on May 27, 2003. BARBARA A. WESTGATE Chair Attachment: Ltr, AFPC/DPPAE, dtd 1 May 03 AFBCMR BC-2003-01112 INDEX CODE: 112.07 MEMORANDUM...
AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2003-01114
Her overseas duty history was not on her OSB when the CY02B lieutenant colonel board met; however, her current duty has since been updated and does reflect completion of the overseas assignment to Turkey. The DPAMF2 evaluation is at Exhibit C. AFPC/DPPPO recommends denial. DPPPO states that completion of training courses are not reflected on OSBs; however, a training report filed in her Officer Selection Record (OSR) documented her attendance and completion of the course in 1991.
AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2003-01117
Applicant's complete submission, with attachments, is at Exhibit A. During the RCSBP open enrollment, March 1999 to 29 February 2000, records indicate that the member was notified but did not respond within the 90 days as required by law. We therefore agree with the recommendation of the Air Force and adopt the rationale expressed as the basis for our decision that the applicant has failed to sustain her burden of having suffered either an error or an injustice.
AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2003-01118
The remaining relevant facts pertaining to his nonjudicial punishment, extracted from the applicant’s military records, are contained in the letter prepared by the appropriate office of the Air Force at Exhibit C. _________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFLSA/JAJM reviewed this application and recommends denial. DPPPWB states that the applicant’s punishment consisted of a reduction from the grade of MSgt (E-7) to TSgt (E-6) with a new date of...
AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2003-01122
On 22 October 2002, the applicant received a Letter of Reprimand (LOR) for failure to report for mandatory weekend remedial training. _________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPPAE indicated that the reenlistment code 2C, “Involuntarily separated with an honorable discharge; or entry level separation without characterization of service” was properly accessed to the applicant’s record as he was discharged in accordance with Air Force...
AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2003-01124
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBERS: BC-2003-01124 INDEX CODE 110.02 COUNSEL: None HEARING DESIRED: No _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: Her records reflect that she was discharged for the convenience of the government, not due to pregnancy, so she may be eligible for educational benefits under the Montgomery GI Bill (MGIB). (See Exhibit F.) On 13 Aug 02, the...
AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2003-01125
The evaluation officer recommended the applicant receive a general discharge and not be considered for rehabilitation. Pursuant to the Board’s request, the Federal Bureau of investigation, Washington, D.C., indicated on the basis of the data furnished they were unable to locate an arrest record which is attached at Exhibit C. _________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPPRS states the applicant has not submitted any evidence nor identified...
AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2003-01128
The personnel office counted his terminal leave against his time in service. The evidence of record indicates that the applicant requested and was approved for an early separation from active duty, effective 1 Nov 89, which was prior to his ETS. _________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did not demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; that the application was denied...
AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2003-01129
Individuals awarded the Silver Star, the Distinguished Flying Cross (DFC) in a noncombat action, and the Airman’s Medal/Soldier’s Medal for heroism will receive Secretarial review for award of the increase in retired pay. The award was considered for the additional retired pay for extraordinary heroism, by the Secretary of the Air Force Personnel Council; it was not approved and, by law, that determination is final. The award should be considered on the basis of the regulation and action...
AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2003-01131
_________________________________________________________________ STATEMENT OF FACTS: The applicant entered active duty in the Air Force on 26 Apr 95. _________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: The BCMR Medical Consultant recommends denial of the applicant’s request. The complete evaluation is at Exhibit C. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: A copy of the Air Force...
AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2003-01132
INDEX CODE: 124.01, 124.04 AFBCMR BC-2003-01132 MEMORANDUM OF CONSIDERATION OF APPLICATION BEFORE THE AFBCMR SUBJECT: APPLICANT Having carefully reviewed this application, we agree with the recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt the rationale expressed as the basis for our decision that the applicant has been the victim of either an error or an injustice. Therefore, under the authority delegated in AFI 36-2603, the applicant's records will be corrected as...
AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2003-01138
On 28 August 2000, the applicant’s Area Defense Counsel (ADC) requested additional time to respond to the Administrative Discharge action and the commander granted the request. The commander indicated in his recommendation for discharge action that before recommending the discharge, the applicant had been provided every opportunity to correct his behavior. On 12 July 2002 the Air Force Discharge Review Board (AFDRB) considered and denied the applicant’s request to upgrade his general...
AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2003-01148
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2003-01148 INDEX CODE: 107.00 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: The United States Air Force (USAF) Recognition Ribbon, the Air Force Small Arms Expert Ribbon, and the Air Force Achievement Medal/Ribbon (AFAM), be added to his DD Form 214. The applicant stated that he had sent a copy of an Army...
AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2003-01152
INDEX CODE: 112.00 AFBCMR BC-2003-01404 MEMORANDUM OF CONSIDERATION OF APPLICATION BEFORE THE AFBCMR SUBJECT: Having carefully reviewed this application, we agree with the recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt the rationale expressed as the basis for our decision that the applicant has been the victim of either an error or an injustice. Members of the Board, Mr. Thomas J. Topolski, Jr., Ms. Marilyn Thomas, and Ms. Ann-Cecile McDermott, considered...
AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2003-01156
On 26 August 1980, the applicant received notification that he was being recommended for discharge. - 6 August 1980, Notification of Intent to Vacate Suspended 15 May 1980 Nonjudicial Punishment (Article 15) for failure to go to appointed place of duty, on or about 3 August 1980, in violation of Article 86, UCMJ. Applicant's request for upgrade of his discharge to honorable was denied by the Air Force Discharge Review Board (AFDRB) on 28 May 1991.
AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2003-01161
___________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: Applicant states that no documented evidence exists that his performance had been anything less than exceptional. With the exception of the contested EPR closing 25 January 2000, applicant’s performance report from 1992 reflect an overall rating of “5”. ___________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPPPEP reviewed this application and indicates that...
AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2003-01164
AFBCMR BC-2003-01164 INDEX CODE: 137.02 MEMORANDUM OF CONSIDERATION OF APPLICATION BEFORE THE AFBCMR SUBJECT: APPLICANT Having carefully reviewed this application, we agree with the recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt the rationale expressed as the basis for our decision that the applicant has been the victim of either an error or an injustice. Therefore, under the authority delegated in AFI 36- 2603, the applicant's records will be corrected as set...
AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2003-01166
In support of his appeal, the applicant provided AF Form 3008, Supplement to Enlistment Agreement - United States Air Force, dated 27 August 2002, Election Letter and MGIB, dated 27 August 2002, and an Applicant’s Contract Information Form. However, a review of the supplement to his enlistment contract, AF Form 3008, which he apparently voluntarily signed and initialed on 27 August 2002, indicates that he was briefed on the program, understood that his first enlistment was his only...
AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2003-01176
INDEX CODE: 112.05 AFBCMR BC-2003-01176 MEMORANDUM OF CONSIDERATION OF APPLICATION BEFORE THE AFBCMR SUBJECT: XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX Having carefully reviewed this application, we agree with the recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt the rationale expressed as the basis for our decision that the applicant has been the victim of either an error or an injustice. Therefore, under the authority delegated in AFI 36-2603, the applicant's records will...
AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2003-01179
INDEX CODE: 128.00 AFBCMR BC-2003-01179 MEMORANDUM OF CONSIDERATION OF APPLICATION BEFORE THE AFBCMR SUBJECT: Having carefully reviewed this application, we agree with the recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt the rationale expressed as the basis for our decision that the applicant has been the victim of either an error or an injustice. Therefore, under the authority delegated in AFI 36-2603, the applicant's records will be corrected as set forth in the...
AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2003-01180
On 2 Apr 02, the applicant's request for remission of his indebtedness of $2903.50 was considered and denied by the Director, Air Force Review Boards Agency (AFRBA) (Exhibit B). _________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AF/DPPCC noted that as a result of non-availability, the applicant's orders were amended to read "Members auth full per diem, for off base lodging and commercial meals to maintain team integrity. To remedy the error, the...
AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2003-01181
Applicant’s OSB for the CY02B board dated 4 November 2002 incorrectly shows the “M” prefix on her “Duty” AFSC under “Assignment History.” Further, applicant submitted copies of her Officer Preselection Brief (OPB) dated 23 July 2003 for the CY02B board which indicates a duty title on 4 February 2001 as “Ambulatory Procedures/Nurse Anesthetist Chief” which was not shown on her OSB when meeting the CY02B board. Based on AFPC/DPAMF2’s advisory and the evidence provided, they recommend SSB...
AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2003-01182
They indicated that the applicant requests that a SSB view his record as though he had received his master’s degree prior to the board. However, AFI 36-2501, paragraph 6.5.2, states “Consider the records of officers as they would have appeared to the original board had the officers been properly considered.” The master’s degree, which he earned in 2001, was not a matter of record for the CY00A board and therefore does not merit SSB consideration. The only time a letter is withdrawn from...
AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2003-01185
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2003-01185 INDEX CODE: 100.00 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ___________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His Date of Initial Entry Military Service (DIEMS) be changed from 23 Jun 86 to 1 Aug 86. On that same date, he elected to receive the CSB payment, a one-time lump-sum payment, upon his attainment of 15 years of active duty...
AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2003-01186
In a Constructive Service Credit Computation, the applicant was granted 2 years of credit for his Master of Science degree. We took notice of the applicant's complete submission in judging the merits of the case; however, we agree with the opinion and recommendation of the Air Force and adopt their rationale as the basis for the conclusion that the applicant has not been the victim of an error or injustice. The Air Force states that the applicant was misinformed by his recruiter regarding...
AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2003-01189
HQ ARPC/DPB indicates they could not locate the promotion order that advanced him in grade to USAFR captain and advises that the requirements of the Air Force at the time of the USAF appointment dictated the grade in which the applicant could be appointed. A complete copy of the evaluation is at Exhibit C. HQ AFPC/DPPPO asserts neither the applicant’s record nor his submission supports his contention that he should have been promoted to captain when he entered active duty in 1951 and, if he...
AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2003-01190
_________________________________________________________________ STATEMENT OF FACTS: The Military Personnel Database (MilPDS) indicates the applicant has a Total Active Federal Military Service Date of 21 July 1999. On 11 March 2003, the ERAB notified the applicant’s military personnel office that his appeal was reviewed and denied because the applicant did not provide any documentation that proved the report was not a fair assessment of his performance at that time. It is the BCMR...
AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2003-01193
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2003-01193 INDEX CODE: 100.03, 100.06 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His reenlistment eligibility (RE) code of “2X” be changed. The DPPAE evaluation is at Exhibit C. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: A complete copy...