AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2003-01194
The former member received an under other than honorable conditions (UOTHC) discharge on 7 February 1969 under the provisions of AFR 36- 12, with a Separation Designator Number (SDN) of “522”, which defined means “Resignation in Lieu of Court-Martial, Triable by Court- Martial.” He had completed a total of five years, three months and two days of active service and was serving in the grade of captain at the time of discharge. The HQ USAF/DPPRS evaluation, with attachments, is at Exhibit...
AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2003-01196
He noted also that his father had been recommended for promotion to MSgt at least 3 years prior to his retirement. _________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPPPWB reviewed this application and recommended that short of the Board denying the case on its merits, DPPPWB recommends applicant’s request be time barred. DPPPWB’s complete evaluation is at Exhibit C. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S...
AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2003-01197
Members of the Board Mr. Thomas S. Markiewicz, Mr. James W. Russell III, and Ms. Cheryl Jacobson considered this application on 8 May 2003. THOMAS S. MARKIEWICZ Vice Chair Attachment: Ltr, HQ AFPC/DPPAE, dtd 22 Apr 03, with attachment AFBCMR BC-2003-01197 INDEX CODE: 128.05 MEMORANDUM FOR THE CHIEF OF STAFF Under the authority of Section 1552, Title 10, United States Code, Air Force Instruction 36-2603, and having assured compliance with the provisions of the above regulation, the decision...
AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2003-01200
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2003-01200 COUNSEL: None HEARING DESIRED: No _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: The Officer Performance Report (OPR) for the period 11 April 1998 through 10 April 1999 be declared void and removed from his records and he receive Special Selection Board (SSB) consideration for promotion to the grade of lieutenant colonel by the...
AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2003-01201
The complete evaluation is at Exhibit D. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: The applicant responded to the Air Force evaluations by reiterating the reasons he believes the SR endorsement on his contested report does not provide an honest, fair, or accurate description and characterization of his performance, achievements, and promotion potential during the respective reporting period. The senior rater endorsement is...
AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2003-01204
Also USPS says that they have no record of his military time. _________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPPRS deferred to the Board to determine if the applicant should be granted relief based on limited supporting documentation in his record. Exhibit C. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 25 Jul 03.
AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2003-01206
He was serving in the grade of Senior Airman (SRA/E-4) and had served for six years, one month, and seventeen days at the time of his discharge. DPPI’s complete evaluation, with attachments, is at Exhibit C. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: A copy of the Air National Guard evaluation was forwarded to the applicant on 8 August 2003 for review and comment within 30 days. ...
AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2003-01211
The initial DD Form 214 issued in conjunction with the applicant’s 15 Jul 91 separation reflected the narrative reason for separation as “Return from overseas within 30 days of expiration term of service,” with separation code “K14,” and RE Code 4D (Grade is senior airman and member has completed at least nine years of total active service and had not yet been selected for staff sergeant). At the time a member is separated from the Air Force, he/she is furnished an RE code predicated upon...
AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2003-01212
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2003-01212 INDEX CODE: 110.02 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: 1. On 11 Jan 01, the Air Force Discharge Review Board (AFDRB) considered applicant's request for upgrade of his discharge to honorable and to change his reason for discharge. The DPPAE evaluation is at Exhibit...
AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2003-01215
Members of the Board Mr. Michael K. Gallogly, Ms. Martha Maust, and Mr. Billy C. Baxter considered this application on 9 April 2003. MICHAEL K. GALLOGLY Panel Chair Attachment: Ltr, SAF/MRBE dtd 9 Apr 03 AFBCMR BC 2003-01215 MEMORANDUM FOR THE CHIEF OF STAFF Under the authority of Section 1552, Title 10, United States Code and AFI 36-2603, and having assured compliance with the provisions of the above regulation, the decision of the Air Force Board for Correction of Military Records is...
AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2003-01217
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2003-01217 INDEX CODE: 108.08 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: YES _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His record be corrected to reflect that his disability was received in the line of duty as a direct result of armed conflict or caused by an instrumentality of war. Evidence has not been presented which would lead us to believe...
AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2003-01218
The Letter of Reprimand (LOR) he received dated 9 Feb 01 be removed from his OSR. The letter of rebuttal that he wrote to the referral OPR was not included in his personnel file and the OPR rendered on him closing 22 Feb 02 was not included in his OSR for the FY03 Line and Health Professions Lieutenant Colonel Selection Board, which convened in Jun 02. However it is not clear as to the date the applicant’s response to the Referral OPR was included in the file.
AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2003-01219
The OPR was not in his OSR at the time the selection board convened on 3 December 2001. Applicant’s contentions are duly noted; however, after thoroughly reviewing the evidence of record, we are not persuaded that his records were incomplete at the time he was considered for promotion to the grade of colonel by the CY01B central colonel selection board. The applicant contends that the Officer Performance Report (OPR) rendered for the period 13 April 2001 through 18 October 2001 was not in...
AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2003-01220
The applicant married on 1 September 2000, but he did not elect SBP coverage for his spouse within the first year following his marriage. There is no record that he submitted a request within the first year of marriage. If the Board’s decision is to grant relief, the applicant’s record should be corrected to show that on 31 August 2001 he elected to add his spouse to his child only coverage based on full-retired pay.
AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2003-01225
_________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: The lack of inclusion of the Letter of Evaluation (LOE) in his Officer Selection Record (OSR) could have had a negative impact on the scoring of his records. The DPPPE evaluation is at Exhibit C. AFPC/DPPPO recommends the application be denied on the basis of timeliness. _________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: The applicant be notified that the...
AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2003-01226
AFBCMR BC-2003-01226 INDEX CODE: 137.00 MEMORANDUM OF CONSIDERATION OF APPLICATION BEFORE THE AFBCMR SUBJECT: APPLICANT Having carefully reviewed this application, we agree with the recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt the rationale expressed as the basis for our decision that the applicant has been the victim of either an error or an injustice. Therefore, under the authority delegated in AFI 36- 2603, the applicant's records will be corrected as set...
AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2003-01230
AFBCMR BC-2003-01230 INDEX CODE: 128.05 MEMORANDUM OF CONSIDERATION OF APPLICATION BEFORE THE AFBCMR SUBJECT: Having carefully reviewed this application, we agree with the recommendation of the Air Force and adopt the rationale expressed as the basis for our decision that the applicant has been the victim of either an error or an injustice. Therefore, under the authority delegated in AFI 36-2603, the applicant's records will be corrected as set forth in the accompanying Memorandum for the...
AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2003-01231
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2003-01231 INDEX CODE: 112.00 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His reenlistment eligibility (RE) code be changed. He recommended a general discharge. _________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPPRS states that they believe the discharge was...
AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2003-01232
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2003-01232 INDEX CODE: 107.00 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: He be awarded the Purple Heart (PH) Medal. After a thorough review of the applicant’s submission and the available evidence of record, the majority of the board was not persuaded that he should be awarded the Purple Heart Medal. ...
AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2003-01237
On 2 April 1944, the applicant was appointed a temporary second lieutenant (2LT), Air Corps, Army of the United States, and was voluntarily ordered to extended active duty. On 23 October 1945, the applicant was recommended for promotion to the grade of first lieutenant (1LT) based on his service record and because it was presumed that if he had not been a POW, he would have been promoted. He was promoted to the grade of captain, Reserve of the Air Force, with an effective date of 1 July 1955.
AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2003-01238
On 5 Feb 01, the Air Force PEB recommended that the applicant be discharged from the Air Force with severance pay with a combined disability rating of 10 percent. The DPPD evaluation is at Exhibit D. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: Copies of the Air Force evaluations were forwarded to the applicant on 19 Sep 03 for review and comment within 30 days. It is our opinion that because of the severity of his condition...
AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2003-01240
On 9 Sep 80, the Air Force PEB recommended that the applicant be discharged from the Air Force based on a diagnosis of depressive neurosis with moderate social and industrial impairment with a combined disability rating of 10%. She is not receiving a check because she is listed as being on the TDRL and not retired. Evidence has not been presented which would lead us to believe that the applicant's disability processing and the rating she received at final disposition was contrary to the...
AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2003-01241
A copy of the Air Force evaluation is attached at Exhibit C. AFPC/DPPAES states the applicant’s reenlistment was processed without her commander’s endorsement and the Military Personnel Flight erroneously issued a $11,442.07 (before tax) SRB to applicant in July 2001. A copy of the Air Force evaluation is attached at Exhibit D. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: The applicant reviewed the Air Force Evaluation and...
AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2003-01244
His wife and son remained hospitalized until 20 September 2002 and the applicant was ordered to return to Malstrom AFB on 21 September 2002. Consequently, the applicant could have been authorized PTDY for the period that his wife was hospitalized: 4 through 15 July 2002. MICHAEL K. GALLOGLY Panel Chair DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE WASHINGTON DC [pic] Office Of The Assistant Secretary AFBCMR BC-2003-01244 MEMORANDUM FOR THE CHIEF OF STAFF Having received and considered the recommendation of...
AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2003-01245
DPS has no record showing the applicant made an election at this time. _________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did not demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; that the application was denied without a personal appearance; and that the application will only be reconsidered upon the submission of newly discovered relevant evidence not considered with this application. ...
AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2003-01246
There is no evidence he made an election at that time. At the end of his 90-day suspense the applicant was automatically enrolled in Option A, “Deferred election until age 60.” ________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: HQ ARPC/DPS reviewed applicant’s request and recommends denial. Additionally, during the RCSBP open enrollment season from 1 March 1999 to 28 February 2000, records indicate the applicant was notified.
AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2003-01257
_________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: He should have been awarded the PH for injuries he received while in Vietnam. Applicant’s response, with attachments, is at Exhibit E. The applicant submitted additional documentation, dated 10 September 2003, with attachments, that is also at Exhibit E. _________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT: 1. PATRICIA D. VESTAL Panel Chair AFBCMR...
AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2003-01261
The discharge was approved on 2 March 2000, and on 6 March 2000, he was discharged with service characterized as general (under honorable conditions) and issued RE Code 2B (Separated with a general or under-other- than-honorable-conditions (UOTHC) discharge). He completed 2 years and 3 days of active service. On 3 October 2002, the Air Force Discharge Review Board (AFDRB) considered and denied his request to upgrade his discharge to honorable.
AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2003-01262
_________________________________________________________________ STATEMENT OF FACTS: The applicant enlisted in the Regular Air Force on 24 August 1994, for a period of four years in the grade of airman first class (E-3). The applicant has provided no evidence showing that his assigned RE code is in error or contrary to the prevailing instruction. _________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: The applicant be notified that the evidence...
AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2003-01263
Members of the Board Mr. Richard A. Peterson, Mr. Laurence M. Groner, and Ms. Jean A. Reynolds, considered this application on 22 May 03. RICHARD A. PETERSON Panel Chair Attachment: Ltr, AFPC/DPPAE, dtd 1 May 03 AFBCMR BC-2003-01263 MEMORANDUM FOR THE CHIEF OF STAFF Under the authority of Section 1552, Title 10, United States Code, Air Force Instruction 36-2603, and having assured compliance with the provisions of the above regulation, the decision of the Air Force Board for Correction of...
AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2003-01269
INDEX CODE: 131.00 AFBCMR BC-2003-01269 MEMORANDUM OF CONSIDERATION OF APPLICATION BEFORE THE AFBCMR SUBJECT: Having carefully reviewed this application, we agree with the recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt the rationale expressed as the basis for our decision that the applicant has been the victim of either an error or an injustice. Therefore, under the authority delegated in AFI 36-2603, the applicant's records will be corrected as set forth in the...
AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2003-01271
AFBCMR BC-2003-01271 INDEX CODE: 131.01 MEMORANDUM OF CONSIDERATION OF APPLICATION BEFORE THE AFBCMR SUBJECT: Having carefully reviewed this application, we agree with the recommendation of the Air Force and adopt the rationale expressed as the basis for our decision that the applicant has been the victim of either an error or an injustice. Therefore, under the authority delegated in AFI 36-2603, the applicant's records will be corrected as set forth in the accompanying Memorandum for the...
AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2003-01275
_________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: He was not told his DOR would be adjusted upon returning to extended active duty under the Voluntary Retired Airman Recall Program (VREAD). The DPPPWB evaluation is at Exhibit C. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: Applicant’s states that prior to his return to active duty he was told that his DOR would not change. Exhibit B.
AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2003-01277
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2003-01277 INDEX NUMBER: 131.06 XXXXXXXXXX (Deceased) COUNSEL: None XXX-XX-XXXX HEARING DESIRED: No _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: Applicant’s widow requests that the applicant’s date of rank (DOR) for his promotion to sergeant, 2 Sep 45, be made retroactive to his date of capture as a prisoner of war (POW), 9 Apr 42. ...
AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2003-01280
Therefore, under the authority delegated in AFI 36-2603, the applicant's records will be corrected as set forth in the accompanying Memorandum for the Chief of Staff signed by the Executive Director or his designee. Members of the Board Mr. John L. Robuck, Mr. Billy C. Baxter, and Mr. Kenneth Dumm considered this application on 20 May 2003. JOHN L. ROBUCK Panel Chair Attachment: Ltr, HQ USAF/DPRCC, dtd 15 Apr 03, with attachment AFBCMR BC-2003-01280 INDEX CODE: 128.00 MEMORANDUM FOR THE...
AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2003-01282
_________________________________________________________________ STATEMENT OF FACTS: The applicant was unmarried and elected child only SBP coverage based on full retired pay prior to his 1 October 1992 retirement date. Records reflect the applicant and N--- married on 13 April 1993, but he failed to elect SBP coverage for her within the first year following their marriage. We took notice of the applicant's complete submission in judging the merits of the case; however, we agree with the...
AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2003-01284
After reviewing applicant’s response to the LOA, his squadron section commander determined that the decision to relieve the applicant from his duties as First Sergeant would stand. He was informed by each that the appropriate action had been taken and his requests were denied. It is DPPPR’s opinion that the applicant’s commander took the appropriate actions, in accordance with the governing Air Force instruction to deny the applicant a retirement decoration, as did the HQ --- commander,...
AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2003-01285
In his rebuttal (Exhibit E), the applicant requests his WD AGO Form 100, Separation Qualification Record, reflect “13 May 45” rather than “2 May 45” in Item 13; his WD AGO Form 53-55, Report of Separation, be corrected to show in Item 7 a date of separation of 12 Oct 45, rather than 12 Nov 45, and in Item 34 that he received flack wounds in his left foot and thigh and frostbite in both feet; and the DD From 215, Correction to DD Form 214, amending his record to reflect receipt of the POW...
AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2003-01286
AFBCMR BC-2003-01286 INDEX NUMBER: 131.00 MEMORANDUM OF CONSIDERATION OF APPLICATION BEFORE THE AFBCMR SUBJECT: XXXXXXXXXXXX, XXX-XX-XXXX Having carefully reviewed this application, we agree with the recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt the rationale expressed as the basis for our decision that the applicant has been the victim of either an error or an injustice. Therefore, under the authority delegated in AFI 36- 2603, the applicant's records will be...
AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2003-01292
AFBCMR BC-2003-01292 MEMORANDUM OF CONSIDERATION OF APPLICATION BEFORE THE AFBCMR SUBJECT: Having carefully reviewed this application, we agree with the recommendation of the Air Staff and adopt the rationale expressed as the basis for our decision that the applicant has been the victim of either an error or an injustice. Therefore, under the authority delegated in AFI 36-2603, the applicant's records will be corrected as set forth in the accompanying Memorandum for the Chief of Staff...
AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2003-01295
Her original reporting date was 31 Dec 01 which required a DOS of 16 Jan 04. PCS retainability requirements are determined by the assignment RNLTD. _________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did not demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; that the application was denied without a personal appearance; and that the application will only be reconsidered upon the submission...
AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2003-01296
His original reporting date was 31 Dec 01 which required a DOS of 16 Jan 04. PCS retainability requirements are determined by the assignment RNLTD. _________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did not demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; that the application was denied without a personal appearance; and that the application will only be reconsidered upon the submission...
AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2003-01297
On 24 March 1994, the applicant enlisted in the Air Force for a period of four years. On 13 February 2002, applicant requested that his enlistment of 1 October 1997 for a period of 4 years be extended for a period of 18 months to qualify for retraining. AF Form 901, Reenlistment Eligibility Annex to DD Form 4, indicates that at the time of his enlistment of 8 November 2002, his Selective Reenlistment Bonus was paid in Zone B, with a Multiple 6.5 based on 4 years and 0 months.
AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2003-01300
The election package was sent by certified mail and signed for by Mrs. D--- K--- on 2 September 1994. _________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: ARPC/DPS states that during their RCSBP open enrollment season, March 1999 to 28 February 2000, their records indicate that the applicant was notified at his home of record. They have no record that the applicant made an election at that time.
AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2003-01301
AFBCMR BC-2003-01301 INDEX CODE: 112.00 MEMORANDUM OF CONSIDERATION OF APPLICATION BEFORE THE AFBCMR SUBJECT: Having carefully reviewed this application, we agree with the recommendation of the Air Force and adopt the rationale expressed as the basis for our decision that the applicant has been the victim of either an error or an injustice. Therefore, under the authority delegated in AFI 36- 2603, the applicant's records will be corrected as set forth in the accompanying Memorandum for the...
AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2003-01305
The applicant was the number one non-select of the seven individuals considered for promotion in his AFSC. There were seven eligibles in the 1A4X0 AFSC at the time selects were run on 29 October 2002, resulting in one promotion quota. The AFPC/DPPPWB evaluation is at Exhibit C. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: He feels the Air Force advisory has not addressed the issue of accountability to written Air Force...
AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2003-01307
The senior rater refused to tell him if he saw his whole record before he signed the in-the- promotion zone (IPZ) PRF. In support of his appeal, the applicant provided a personal statement, a copy of the contested Promotion Recommendation Form prepared for the CY02B Lieutenant Colonel Board, letter from the former 81st Wing Commander, dated 27 March 2003, letter from the former 81st Vice Wing Commander, dated 10 March 2003, and other documentation. The evaluation is at Exhibit...
AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2003-01309
Therefore, under the authority delegated in AFI 36- 2603, the applicant's records will be corrected as set forth in the accompanying Memorandum for the Chief of Staff signed by the Executive Director of the Board or his designee. PATRICIA D. VESTAL Panel Chair Attachment: Ltr, AFPC/DPPPOO, dtd 13 Aug 03 AFBCMR BC-2003-01309 MEMORANDUM FOR THE CHIEF OF STAFF Having received and considered the recommendation of the Air Force Board for Correction of Military Records and under the authority of...
AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2003-01310
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2003-01310 INDEX NUMBER: 123.00 XXXXXXXXXXXXX COUNSEL: None XXX-XX-XXXX HEARING DESIRED: No _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: The 18 days of lost duty time he received as a result of civilian confinement be restored. _________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPW advises that...
AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2003-01311
In accordance with Air Force policy, an evaluation report is accurate as written when it becomes a matter of record. The HQ AFPC/DPPPE evaluation is at Exhibit C. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: A copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to applicant on 4 June 2003 for review and response. After a thorough review of the evidence of record and applicant’s submission, including the statements of support, we...