RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2003-01074
INDEX CODE: 100.00
COUNSEL: NONE
HEARING DESIRED: NO
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:
His Duty Air Force Specialty Code (DAFSC) be changed from 61S3D to 63A3 on
all Officer Performance Reports (OPRs) rendered between 19 Jul 99 and the
present.
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT:
On 24 Aug 99, his DAFSC was incorrectly changed from 63AX to 61S3D.
In support of his request applicant provided copies of the affected OPRs,
an extract of AFI 36-2401, a memorandum from his commander, and a copy of a
Officer Single Uniform Retrieval Format (SURF). His complete submission,
with attachments, is at Exhibit A.
_________________________________________________________________
STATEMENT OF FACTS:
Applicant was appointed a second lieutenant, Reserve of the Air Force, on 3
May 96 and was voluntarily ordered to extended active duty on that same
date. He has been progressively promoted to the grade of captain, having
assumed that grade effective and with a date of rank of 3 May 00.
Applicant's DAFSC history extracted from the personnel data system reflects
that the applicant was assigned DAFSCs as follows:
DAFSC EFFECTIVE DATE
61S1D 3 Jul 96
61S3D 16 Jan 97
63A1 19 Jul 99
61S3D 24 Aug 99
63A3 15 Jun 02
_________________________________________________________________
AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
AFPC/DPASA states that the applicant's OPRs produced between 19 Jul 99 and
February 2002 reflect the correct AFSC. He was in an authorized 61S3D
position from July 1999 through January 2002. In February 2002, he was
moved to an authorized 63A3 position according to historical manning data
pulled from the personnel data system. The DPASA evaluation is at Exhibit
C.
AFPC/DPPPE recommends denial. DPPPE states that the DAFSC is the unit
manning documents (UMD) authorization the officer is approved for by HQ
AFPC and assigned against as of the "thru" date of the report. The
applicant contends that the DAFSC was incorrectly changed on 24 Aug 99, but
does not state how or why it was changed. Further, the only support he
provided was a memo from his current commander who was not a rater on any
of the reports in question. He did not provide any letters of support from
any of the evaluators on the reports, nor did he provide any evidence, such
as computer products, from the time of the reports to substantiate his
allegations. The DPPPE evaluation is at Exhibit D.
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
Copies of the Air Force evaluations were forwarded to the applicant on 3
Jun 03 for review and comment within 30 days. As of this date, this office
has received no response.
_________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:
1. The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by existing law or
regulations.
2. The application was timely filed.
3. Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate the
existence of error or injustice that would warrant correction of the
contested OPRs. We took notice of the applicant's complete submission in
judging the merits of the case; however, we are not persuaded by his
assertions that his DAFSC during the time period in question was in error.
Therefore, we agree with the opinions and recommendations of the Air Force
offices of primary responsibility and adopt their rationale as the basis
for our conclusion that the applicant has not been the victim of an error
or injustice. Accordingly, in the absence of persuasive evidence to the
contrary, we find no compelling basis to recommend granting the relief
sought in this application.
_________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT:
The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did not demonstrate
the existence of material error or injustice; that the application was
denied without a personal appearance; and that the application will only be
reconsidered upon the submission of newly discovered relevant evidence not
considered with this application.
_________________________________________________________________
The following members of the Board considered AFBCMR Docket Number BC-2003-
01074 in Executive Session on 29 Jul 03, under the provisions of AFI 36-
2603:
Ms. Olga M. Crerar, Panel Chair
Mr. John L. Robuck, Member
Mr. Vaughn E. Schlunz, Member
The following documentary evidence was considered:
Exhibit A. DD Form 149, dated 21 Oct 02.
Exhibit B. Applicant's Master Personnel Records.
Exhibit C. Letter, AFPC/DPASA, dated 17 Apr 03.
Exhibit D. Letter, AFPC/DPPPE, dated 2 Jun 03.
Exhibit E. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 3 Jun 03.
OLGA M. CRERAR
Panel Chair
His military record be changed to indicate he was a member of the Acquisition Corps as of Jan 95 and that his Officer Selection Brief (OSB) reviewed by the CY98 (P0598B) Lieutenant Colonel Selection Board be changed to reflect Acquisition Corps “Yes.” 2. DPPPE stated that the applicant bases his request to insert the 9 Dec 94 AF Form 77 into his record primarily on an Air Force policy change, effective 1 Oct 96, that changed the method of documenting certain training periods. Unbeknownst...
_________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: The Chief, Reports & Queries Section, AFPC/DPAPS1, reviewed this application and indicated that the reviewer for the OPR closing 31 Dec 94 signed as Commander of the USAF Air Warfare Center so “Center” is the correct duty command level for this duty entry. This OPR clearly shows that the duty title was incorrect on the OPB for the 950701 entry; therefore, DPAPS1 changed the duty title for this entry in...
AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2002-00890
His Promotion Recommendation Form (PRF) prepared for consideration by the Calendar Year 1999B Central Lieutenant Colonel Selection Board be voided and replaced with a reaccomplished PRF. A complete copy of the AFPC/DPPPO evaluation is at Exhibit F. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: Applicant reviewed the advisory opinion and furnished a detailed response and additional documentary evidence which are attached...
AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2003-01917
Her corrected records be supplementally considered by supplemental Management Level Review (MLR) boards for the CY99B and CY00A selection boards. The DPPPO evaluation is at Exhibit D. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: Applicant states that the 19 Aug 03 supplemental MLR for the CY00A board failed in that her record alone was sent to the MLR for a promotion recommendation. DPPPE asserts that substitution of the 1999...
AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2003-01906
Copies of the reports of investigation are at Exhibit G. _________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPPPE recommends denial. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: Applicant states his engagement with the AF/IG, CSAF, and Senators came after he attempted to utilize his chain of command and the ROTC/IG, who as the vice commander was in his chain of command. Therefore the...
AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2004-02718
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2004-02718 INDEX CODES: 100.05, 111.02 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO MANDATORY CASE COMPLETION DATE: 4 Mar 06 _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: By amendment, his promotion eligibility be reinstated so his test scores for the 03E6 cycle can be graded; he receive promotion consideration for cycle 04E6; his training status code...
AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2003-01104
Applicant's EPR profile since 1992 follows: PERIOD ENDING EVALUATION 29 Mar 92 5 29 Mar 93 5 29 Mar 94 5 29 Mar 95 5 29 Mar 95 5 29 Mar 96 5 31 Jan 97 5 31 Jan 98 5 31 Jan 99 5 31 Jan 00 5 31 Jan 01 5 * 31 Mar 02 4 (referral) 1 Jan 03 5 * Contested report. He indicated that at the time his EPR would have closed out, the applicant was under investigation for an alleged assault incident that occurred on 25 Jan 02. The evidence of record indicates that a CDI was conducted into allegations...
AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2003-03874
The signature date of 28 July 2003 on his AF Form 475 (Education/Training Report), closing 28 March 2003, be changed to an earlier date so that it may be accepted for filing for the CY03A (8 July 2003) (P0503A) Lieutenant Colonel Central Selection Board (CSB). He was wronged by the excessive period of time it took to complete and file his final Training Report (TR) in his Officer Selection Record (OSR); as well as the time it took to update his current duty history after he arrived at the...
AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2003-00695
A complete copy of the AFPC/DPASA evaluation is at Exhibit C. AFPC/DPPPO recommended denial indicating that although the additional duty title entry of “Program Manager” was incorrectly listed on the applicant's OSB, his duty title effective 17 Apr 01, as “Dep Progm Mngr, JSOW,” was correctly reflected on his P0502B Promotion Recommendation Form (PRF) that met the board. A complete copy of the AFPC/DPPPO evaluation is at Exhibit...
AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2004-03923
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2004-03923 INDEX CODE: 131.01 COUNSEL: None HEARING DESIRED: No MANDATORY CASE COMPLETION DATE: 26 Jun 06 _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: He be afforded Special Selection Board (SSB) consideration for the Calendar Year 2004B (CY04B) Lieutenant Colonel (LTC) Central Selection Board (CSB) with the Officer Selection Brief (OSB)...