RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2003-01193
INDEX CODE: 100.03, 100.06
COUNSEL: NONE
HEARING DESIRED: NO
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:
His reenlistment eligibility (RE) code of “2X” be changed.
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT:
The RE code prevents him from joining the Air Force Reserves. He has
no knowledge why he was given an RE code of 2X when he was discharged.
In support of his request, applicant provided a copy of a printout
from the AFRC Recruiting Service and a copy of his DD 214, Certificate
of Release or Discharge from Active Duty.
Applicant’s complete submission, with attachments, is at Exhibit A.
_________________________________________________________________
STATEMENT OF FACTS:
The applicant enlisted in the Regular Air Force on 17 November 1992
for a term of 4 years. He was denied reenlistment by his commander as
indicated on the Report on Individual Person. He was discharged on 22
April 1996, under the provisions of AFI 36-3208, Administrative
Separation of Airmen. He received an honorable discharge
(Miscellaneous/General Reasons). He served three (3) years, five (5)
months, and six (6) days total active service. He was issued a RE
code of “2X”, First term, second term, or career airman considered but
not selected for reenlistment under the SRP.
_____________________________________________________________
AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
AFPC/DPPAE reviewed applicant’s request and recommends denial. The RE
code of is correct. Per report on individual person (RIP), dated 10
April 1996, the applicant was denied reenlistment by his commander.
Further, the applicant received a referral EPR on 23 January 1996 for
his substandard duty performance. Although his records do not reflect
documentation that specifically show his commander denied
reenlistment, it is concluded that based on the RIP and the referral
EPR the commander did take nonselection for reenlistment actions.
The DPPAE evaluation is at Exhibit C.
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
A complete copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to the
applicant on 11 Jul 03, for review and comment within 30 days.
_________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:
1. The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by existing law
or regulations.
2. The application was timely filed.
3. Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate
the existence of an error or injustice. Evidence has not been
provided in support of his appeal, which would lead us to believe that
a change to his RE code is warranted. Therefore, we agree with the
opinion and recommendation of the Air Force office of primary
responsibility and adopt their rationale as the basis for our
conclusion that the applicant has not been the victim of an error or
injustice. Therefore, in the absence of evidence to the contrary, we
find no compelling basis to recommend granting the relief sought in
this application.
_________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT:
The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did not
demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; that the
application was denied without a personal appearance; and that the
application will only be reconsidered upon the submission of newly
discovered relevant evidence not considered with this application.
_________________________________________________________________
The following members of the Board considered Docket Number 02-01546
in Executive Session on 19 August 2003, under the provisions of AFI 36-
2603:
Mr. Richard A. Peterson, Panel Chair
Mr. Roscoe Hinton, Member
Ms. Cheryl Jacobson, Member
The following documentary evidence was considered:
Exhibit A. DD Form 149, dated 20 Apr 03, w/atchs.
Exhibit B. Applicant's Master Personnel Records.
Exhibit C. Letter, AFPC/DPPAE, dated 2 Jul 03.
Exhibit D. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 11 Jul 03.
RICHARD A. PETERSON
Panel Chair
AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2005-00345
Exhibit C. Letter, HQ AFPC/DPPAE, dated 1 Mar 05. Exhibit D. Letter, SAF/MRBR dated 18 Mar 05. RICHARD A. PETERSON Panel Chair AFBCMR BC-2005-00345 MEMORANDUM FOR THE CHIEF OF STAFF Having received and considered the recommendation of the Air Force Board for Correction of Military Records and under the authority of Section 1552, Title 10, United States Code (70A Stat 116), it is directed that: The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air Force relating to , be corrected to...
AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2005-01989
A resume of applicant’s available enlisted performance reports (EPR) profile follows: PERIOD CLOSING OVERALL EVALUATION 10 Nov 91 4 23 Dec 92 4 23 Dec 93 4 15 Aug 94 2 (Referral Rpt) 15 Aug 95 2 (Referral Rpt) On 14 Feb 96, applicant was honorably released from active duty under the provisions of AFI 36-3208, by reason of completion of required active service, and was issued an RE code of 2X. RICHARD A. PETERSON Panel Chair AFBCMR BC-2005-01989 MEMORANDUM FOR THE CHIEF OF STAFF Having...
AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2004-02091
On 24 Jun 04, the applicant was honorably discharged under the provisions of AFI 36-3208 (Completion of Required Active Service), and furnished an RE code of 2X (First-term, second term, or career airman considered but not selected for reenlistment under the Selective Reenlistment Program (SRP)). ___________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: HQ AFPC/DPPAE recommends the application be denied and states, in part, after a review of his military...
AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2003-00555
His complete submittion is at Exhibit A. _________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPPAE recommends the application be denied and states, in part, that the applicant has not satisfactorily indicated the commander’s action to deny reenlistment was inappropriate or not in compliance with Air Force policy. Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate the existence of error or injustice to warrant upgrading the applicant’s...
Unfortunately, the AF Form 418 denying applicant reenlistment is not on file in his military personnel record. Exhibit E. Letter, Applicant, dated 16 Oct 98, w/atchs; Letter, dated 2 Oct 98; Statement BARBARA A. WESTGATE Panel Chair AFBCMR 98-00035 MEMORANDUM FOR THE CHIEF OF STAFF Having received and considered the recommendation of the Air Force Board for Correction of Military Records and under the authority of Section 1552, Title 10, United States Code (70A Stat 116), it is directed...
AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2003-03361
In May 92, the commander permanently decertified the applicant from the PRP based on the recommendation from the MHC that, although he did not suffer any specific disorder, the applicant’s personality traits, preoccupation with personal problems, difficulty in adjusting to shift changes, and marginal motivation had not improved with treatment. A complete copy of the evaluation is at Exhibit C. HQ AFPC/DPPRSP notes the applicant was discharged involuntarily upon expiration of term of service...
AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2002-02558
The evaluation is at Exhibit C. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: On 10 January 2003, a copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to the applicant for review and response within thirty (30) days. Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate the existence of an error or an injustice warranting a change in the applicant’s RE code. The Board believes that responsible officials...
AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2003-01955
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2003-01955 INDEX CODE: 110.00, 100.03 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: YES _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His reenlistment eligibility (RE) code of 2X be changed to allow eligibility to reenlist in the Air Force. _________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: HQ AFPC/DPPRS recommends...
AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2003-02137
A complete copy of the AFPC/DPPAE evaluation is at Exhibit D. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: Copies of the Air Force evaluations were forwarded to applicant on 21 Nov 03 for review and response. No evidence has been provided which would lead us to believe that the applicant’s evaluators were unable to render an unbiased evaluation of his performance or that the ratings on the contested report were based on...
AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2003-00382
On 11 January 1989, his supervisor did not recommend him for reenlistment. Applicant’s performance profile follows: PERIOD ENDING EVALUATION OF PERFORMANCE 14 Apr 87 8 1 Dec 87 7 1 Dec 88 7 _________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPPAE recommends the application be denied and states, in part, that the applicant has not provided any additional information to indicate that his RE code was erroneously or unfairly assessed to his file. ...