AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
IN THE MATTER OF:
DOCKET NO: 98-02267 !?JE
COUNSEL: NONE
HEARING DESIRED: NO
Applicant requests that her entry level separation be changed,
her uncharacterized discharge changed to honorable, and narrative
rea%on for separation changed.
Applicant's submission is at
Exhibit A.
The appropriate Air Force office evaluated applicant's request
and provided an advisory opinion to the Board recommending the
application be denied (Exhibit C).
The advisory opinion was
forwarded to the applicant for review and response (Exhibit D).
As of this date, no response has been received by this office.
After careful consideration of applicant's request and the
available evidence of record, we find insufficient evidence of
error or injustice to warrant corrective action. The facts and
opinions stated in the advisory opinion appear to be based on the
evidence of record and have not been rebutted by applicant.
Absent persuasive evidence applicant was denied rights to which
entitled, appropriate regulations were not followed, or
appropriate standards were not applied, we find no basis to
disturb the existing record.
Accordingly, applicant's request is denied.
The Board staff is directed to inform applicant of this decision.
Applicant should also be informed that this decision is final and
will only be reconsidered upon the presentation of new relevant
evidence which was not reasonably available at the time the
application was filed.
Members of the Board, Ms. Charlene M. Bradley, Ms. Peggy E.
Gordon, and Mr. Terry A. Yonkers considered this application on
16 December 1998, in accordance with the provisions of Air Force
Instruction 36-2603, and the governing statute, 10 U.S.C. 1552.
/- 7
Qkaq 12 &(
CHARLENE M. BRADLEY
Panel Chair
Lki-4J
Exhibits :
A. Applicant's DD Form 149
B. Available Master Personnel Records
C. Advisory Opinion
D. SAF/MIBR Ltr Forwarding Advisory Opinion
D E P A R T M E N T O F T H E A I R F O R C E
H E A D Q U A R T E R S AIR FORCE P E R S O N N E L C E N T E R
R A N D O L P H AIR FORCE B A S E TEXAS
MEMORANDUM FOR AFBCMR
FROM: HQ AFPCDPPRS
550 C Street West, Suite 1 1
Randolph AFB TX 78150-4713
The applicant, while serving in the grade of airman first class, was separated from the Air
Force on 06 Mar 97 under the provisions of AFI 36-3212 (Entry Level Separation-Disability,
Severance Pay) with an uncharacterized discharge. She served 04 months 28 days active service.
Requested Action. The applicant is requesting her entry level separation be changed to
discharged since she had to wait two months in order to be discharged due to the Medical Review
Board. She request her uncharacterized discharge be changed to honorable discharge because she
did nothing wrong. In addition, she request her narrative reason for separation be changed since
she did not receive disability severance pay.
Conclusion and Recommendation. Denial. Airmen are given entry level
separatioduncharacterized service characterization when separation action is initiated in the first
180 days of continuous active service. Air Force and Department of Defense Instructions require
each item on the DD Form 214 to be entered as correctly shown on applicant’s DD Form 214. In
severance
addition, her narrative reason for separation is correct although she was not entitled to
pay authorized under Title 10 USC 1212 since she served less than six months service.
She has
filed a timely request.
JOHN C. WOOTEN, DAF
Mil Personnel Mgt Spcl
Separations Branch
Dir of Personnel Program Mgt
The appropriate Air Force offices evaluated applicant’s request and provided advisory opinions to the Board recommending the ‘“application be denied (Exhibit C) . Requested Action. The commander advised applicant that if his recommendation is approved, that his discharge would be described as entry level separation and that he would be ineligible for reenlistment in the Air Force.
The appropriate Air Force office evaluated applicant's request and provided an advisory opinion to the Board recommending the application be denied (Exhibit C) . Applicant should also be informed that this decision is final and will only be reconsidered upon the presentation of new relevant evidence which was not reasonably available at the time the application was filed. The applicant is requesting his uncharacterized character of service be changed to honorable.
The appropriate Air Force office evaluated applicant's request and provided an advisory opinion to the Board recommending the application be denied (Exhibit C) . Applicant should also be informed that this decision is final and will only be reconsidered upon the presentation of new relevant evidence which was not reasonably available at the time the application was filed. The applicant is requesting his uncharacterized character of service be changed to honorable.
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: 98-01185 SEP 2 9 1998 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: YES Applicant requests that (1) her Calendar Year 1998 (CY981 Lieutenant Colonel, Nurse Corp, Promotion Recommendation Form (PRF) be replaced with a new PRF and (2) she be considered for promotion to the grade of lieutenant colonel by Special Selection Board (SSB) for the CY98 Lieutenant Colonel Selection Board. The appropriate Air...
The appropriate Air Force offices evaluated applicant's request and provided advisory opinions to the Board recommending the application be denied (Exhibit C) . RECOMMENDATION: None; -oes not have the required time on active duty to qualify for educational benefits through the Department of Veterans Affairs. The applicant is requesting her DD Form 214 to state that her discharge was for the good of the government.
The appropriate Air Force offices evaluated applicant's request and provided advisory opinions to the Board recommending the application be denied (Exhibit C) . No other characterization of service is possible under law for service members separated within the first 6 months of entry. Applicant served only 20 days and therefore, the uncharacterized discharge is correct and in accordance with Department of Defense and Air Force directives.
4 DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE WASHINGTON, DC Office of the Assistant Secretary AFBCMR 98-02601 MEMORANDUM FOR THE CHIEF OF STAFF Under the authority of Section 1552, Title 10, United States Code and Air Force Instruction 36-2603, and having assured compliance with the provisions of the above regulation, the decision of the Air Force Board for Correction of Military Records is announced, and it is directed that: The pertinent mil' Force relating to show that his lett Central Selection removed...
The appropriate Air Force offices evaluated applicant’s request and provided advisory opinions to the Board recommending the application be denied (Exhibit C). The applicant is requesting the AFBCMR void her Enlisted Performance Report (EPR) closing 23 Oct 94. In the applicant’s response dated 17 Nov 94 to the referral EPR, she states that she realizes that ‘she has a lot of reprimands in her Personal Information File (PIF) and didn’t consider herself ready for promotion.’ She also states...
The appropriate Air Force offices evaluated applicant's request and provided advisory opinions to the Board recommending the application be denied (Exhibit C). While the applicant may believe he received unfair treatment due to not fitting the perceptions of his senior rater, the Performance Recommendation Form PRF) rendered for the CY94 major selection board appears appropriate in both narrative and overall recommendation and comments were congxuent with%he applicant’s record of...
Ltr, AFPC/DPPAE, dtd 31 Aug 98 D E P A R T M E N T OF T H E AIR FORCE H E A D Q U A R T E R S AIR F O R C E P E R S O N N E L C E N T E R R A N D O L P H AIR F O R C E B A S E T E X A S MEMORANDUM FOR AFBCMR FROM: HQ AFPCDPPRS 550 C Street West, Suite 11 Randolph AFB TX 78150-4713 SUBJECT: Application for Correction of Military R e c o r d 1 The applicant, while serving in the grade of senior Airman, was discharged from the Air Force on 21 Jun 96 under the provisions of AFI 36-3208...