DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE
WASHINGTON, DC
Office of the Assistant Secretary
AFBCMR 98-02485
MEMORANDUM FOR THE CHIEF OF STAFF
Under the authority of Section 1552, Title 10, United States
Code and Air Force Instruction 36-2603, and having assured
compliance with the provisions of the above regulation, the
decision of the Air Force Board for Correction of Military Records
is announced, and it is directed that:
nt of the Air
The pertinen
Force relating to
be corrected
de at the time
to show that all r
he was disenrolled f r o m navigator training on 4 July 1997 that he
was not qualified for a career in the aviation community be, and
hereby are, declared void and expunged from his records; and, he
is eligible to compete and be selected for entry into
Undergraduate Flying Training (UFT). ppiw
Chief xaminer
Air Force Board for Correction
of Military Records
DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE
WASHINGTON, DC
Office of the Assistant Secretary
AFBCMR 98-02485
MEMORANDUM OF CONSIDERATION OF APPLICATION BEFORE THE AFBCMR
SUBJECT : ,
Having carefully reviewed this application, we agree with the
recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility
and adopt the rationale expressed as the basis for our decision
that the applicant has been the victim of either an error or an
injustice. Therefore, under the authority delegated in AFI
36-2603, the applicant's records will be corrected as set forth in
the accompanying Memorandum for the Chief of Staff signed by t h e
Executive Director of the Board or his designee.
Attachment:
Ltr, AFPC/DPAOT, dtd Sep 14, 1998,
w/Atch
D E P A R T M E N T OF T H E A I R F O R C E
H E A D Q U A R T E R S AIR F O R C E P E R S O N N E L C E N T E R
R A N D O L P H AIR F O R C E B A S E T E X A S
MEMORANDUM FOR AFBCMR
FROM: HQ AFPCDPAOT
-
1. Requested Action: Change applicants records to indicate that he did not SIE (Self-Initiated
Elimination) from navigator training. Also, change applicants records to indicate that he is
eligible to apply and be selected for pilot training. Applicant does not desire re-entry into
navigator training.
2. Basis for Request:
training before start of training would not be considered an elimination and it would not effect
any future opportunity for applying or being selected for pilot training.
‘nformed the applicant that getting out of navigator
3. Background: Applicant was assigned PCS to Pensacola Naval Air Station for training into
the navigator career field. Upon in-processing, he was counseled that he could depart prior to
start of training and would not be considered an SIE. Applicant exercised that option and was
dropped on request (DOR) (Navy term for SIE).
4. Facts: Applicant was in navigator training (PCS to Pensacola to be trained as a navigator).
bout SIE procedures. His records currently
He was incorrectly counseled b
reflect that he is ineligible for further Undergraduate Flying Training (UFT) due to the SIE in
his records.
5. Recommendation: Applicant not be re-entered into navigator training (per applicant’s
request). Update records to indicate he is now eligible to compete on and be selected for future
UFT selection boards.
cf
AMES B. CARROLL, Lt Col, USAF
Chief, Pipeline and Trainer Assignments Branch
Directorate of Assignments
AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2003-03275
SGPS supports the applicant’s request to have his records corrected to show elimination based on a medical diagnoses rather than SIE. However, if the Board’s decision is to grant the applicant’s request, his record may be changed to show elimination from JSUNT as a medical disqualification. We note that HQ AETC/SGPS (Exhibit B) supports the applicant’s request for correction of his record and the opportunity for him to apply for Undergraduate Pilot Training (UPT) consideration.
ADDENDUM TO RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: 95-03402 INDEX CODE: 134.02 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: YES _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: The Air Training Command (ATC) Form 126A, Record of Commander’s Review Action, dated 2 September 1993, reflecting his self-initiated elimination (SIE) from the United States Air Force Academy (USAFA) T- 41 Pilot...
The appropriate Air Force office evaluated applicant's request and provided an advisory opinion to the Board recommending the application be denied (Exhibit C) The advisory opinion was forwarded to the applicant for review and response (Exhibit D). Applicant has submitted a request for correction of military records in regards to his self- initiated elimination (SIE) from T-4 1 training while attending the United States Air Force Academy (USAFA). However, if the decision is to grant the...
DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE WASHINGTON DC Office of the Assistant Secretary AFBCMR 98- 02883 MEMORANDUM FOR THE CHIEF OF STAFF Under the authority of Section 1552, Title 10, United States Code, and Air Force Instruction 36- 2603, and having assured compliance with the provisions of the above regulation, the decision of the Air Force Board for Correction of Military Records is announced, and it is directed that: The pertinen ment of the Air Force relating to be corrected to with his show that...
While the applicant has provided evidence of his motion sickness during UFT, he was allowed to continue with his training. No error was committed in allowing the applicant to complete UPT, and his resulting ADSC should be completed unless he is released by proper authority for other reasons. The Air Force would receive nearly four years of duty from the date of his graduation from UNT.
AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2004-01709
The HQ AFPC/DPAO evaluation, with attachment, is at Exhibit D. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATIONS: The applicant reviewed the advisory opinions and indicated that the only record stating he was unable to solo within 40 hours due to FTDs and was eliminated from the IFT program if the AETC Form 126A and it is a recommendation. As to the allegation he did not believe he was eliminated from IFT, the applicant signed a...
AF | BCMR | CY2002 | BC-2002-00937
This exam is required for all students being considered for elimination to ensure students are “medically qualified at the time of any non-medical disenrollment.” As a result, the applicant was to be reinstated into training following a Medical Hold status to resolve the medical issue. At the time of her elimination, there was a policy allowing up to 6 months in Medical Hold before students would be considered for elimination. Then following the 3-month Medical Hold, the Flight Surgeon...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 05093
After 4 years and 10 months of waiting, he received a Flying Class I waiver and was medically qualified to attend UPT. Those officers who are eliminated due to long-term (1 year or more) medical reasons may reapply for consideration on the first UFT Selection Board following medical requalification as long as they remain otherwise eligible. The complete A1PPR evaluation is at Exhibit B. As of this date, no response has been received by this office (Exhibit C).
A five-year ADSC? and applicant is not. Training ADSCs ............................................................................................................................................... 1.8.
AF | BCMR | CY2002 | BC-2001-02617
On the applicant’s Commander’s Review Record it clearly states the student should be disenrolled from training and should not be considered for reinstatement at a later date. When he applied for Undergraduate Flying Training (UFT) in 1995, he stated on the AF 215 and he informed his chain of command that he had been eliminated from the T-41 in 1994. The majority also does not understand the applicant’s failure to wear his glasses while in training which was clearly not the fault of the Air Force.