AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
IN THE MATTER OF:
DOCKET NUMBER: 98-02414
COUNSEL: NONE
HEARING DESIRED: NO
DE% 1 0
Applicant requests that his discharge be upgraded from general to
honorable, and the narrative reason for separation be changed to
!'For the convenience of the government". Applicant I s submission
is at Exhibit A.
The Air Force Discharge Review Board (AFDRB) denied applicant's
request on 29 April 1998.
In accordance with policy, the
application was forwarded to this Board for further consideration
(Exhibit C).
The AFDRB brief was forwarded to the applicant for -
review and response (Exhibit D) . As of this date, no response
has been received by this office.
After careful consideration of applicant's request and the
available evidence of record, we find insufficient evidence of
error or injustice to warrant corrective action. The facts and
opinions stated in the AFDRB brief appear to be based on the
evidence of record and have not been rebutted by applicant.
Absent persuasive evidence applicant was denied rights to which
entitled, appropriate regulations were not followed, or
appropriate standards were not applied, we find no basis to
disturb the existing record.
Accordingly, applicant's request is denied.
The Board staff is directed to inform applicant of this decision.
Applicant should also be informed that this decision is final and
will only be reconsidered upon the presentation of new relevant
evidence which was not reasonably available at the time the
application
was filed.
the Board Mrs. Barbara A . Westgate, Mr. Kenneth L.
and Ms. Ann L. Heidig considered this application on
1998, in accordance with the provisions of Air Force
3 6 - 2 6 0 3 and the governing statute, 10 U.S.C. 1552.
Members of
Reinertson,
19 November
Instruction
BARBARA A . WESTGAT@
Panel Chair
Exhibits :
A. Applicant's DD Form 149
B. Available Master Personnel Records
C. AFDRB Brief
D. AFBCMR Ltr Forwarding Advisory Opinion
I denied applicant ' s The Air Force Discharge Review Board request on 26 January 1998. The AFDRB brief was forwarded to the applicant for review and response (Exhibit D). (AFDRB) After careful consideration of applicant's request and the available evidence of record, we find insufficient evidence of error or injustice to warrant corrective action.
The Air Force Discharge Review Board (AFDRB) denied applicant's request on 1 December 1995. The AFDRB brief was forwarded to the applicant for review and response (Exhibit D) . ) After careful consideration of applicant's request and the available evidence of record, we find insufficient evidence of error or injustice to warrant corrective action.
The Air Force Discharge Review Board (AFDRB) denied applicant's request on 16 October 1998. The AFDRB brief was forwarded to the applicant for review and response (Exhibit D). After careful consideration of applicant's request and the available evidence of record, we find insufficient evidence of error or injustice to warrant corrective action.
The Air Force Discharge Review Board (AFDRB) denied applicant’s request on 24 June 1999. The AFDRB Brief was forwarded to the applicant for review and response (Exhibit D). After careful consideration of applicant's request and the available evidence of record, we find insufficient evidence of error or injustice to warrant corrective action.
The Air Force Discharge Review Board (AFDRB) denied applicant's request on 16 June 1999. The AFDRB brief was forwarded to the applicant for review and response (Exhibit D). After careful consideration of applicant's request and the available evidence of record, we find insufficient evidence of error or injustice to warrant corrective action.
The Air Force Discharge Review Board (AFDRB) denied applicant's request to have his discharge upgraded to general on 19 March 1980 (Exhibit B). The appropriate Air Force office evaluated applicant's request and provided an advisory opinion to the Board recommending the application be denied (Exhibit C). Applicant's response to the advisory opinion is at Exhibit E. After careful consideration of applicant's request and the available evidence of record, we find insufficient evidence of error...
The Air Force Discharge Review Board (AFDRB) denied applicant's request for an upgraded discharge and RE code on 26 May 1999 (Exhibit C). The AFDRB Brief was forwarded to the applicant for review and response (Exhibit D). After careful consideration of applicant's request and the available evidence of record, we find insufficient evidence of error or injustice to warrant corrective action.
It appears that the responsible officials applied appropriate standards in effecting the separation, and we do not find persuasive evidence that pertinent regulations were violated or that applicant was not afforded all the rights to which entitled at the time of discharge. Under our broader mandate and after careful consideration of all the facts and circumstances of applicant's case, the majority of the Board is persuaded the applicant has been a productive member of society. Applicant's...
The appropriate Air Force office evaluated applicant's request and provided an advisory opinion to the Board recommending the application be denied (Exhibit C). The advisory opinion was forwarded to the applicant for review and response (Exhibit D). Accordingly, applicant's request is denied.
The appropriate Air Force offices evaluated applicant's request and provided an advisory opinions' to the Board recommending the application be denied (Exhibit C). The advisory opinions were forwarded to the applicant for review and response (Exhibit D ) . Therefore, the request for a hearing is not favorably considered.