A I R FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
RECORD OF PROCEEDIKGS
DOCKET KZ4BER: 98-02574
*
IN THE MATTER OF:
Applicant requests her late husband's DD Form 214, Armed Forces
of the United States Report sf Transfer or Discharge, Block 5a:
Grade, Rate or Rank, be changed from A1C to S G T .
Applicant's
submission is at Exhibit A.
The appropriate Air Force office evaluated applicant's request
and provided an advisory opixion to the Board recommending the
application be denied (Exhibit C). The advisory opinion was
forwarded to the applicant's counsel and the applicant f o r review
and response (Exhibit D). As of this date, no response has been
received by this office.
After careful consideration of applicant's request and
available evidence of recoro, we find insufficient evidence
error o r inlustice to warrant corrective action. The facts
opinlons stated in the advisor:/ oplnlon appear to be based on
evidence of record and have nct been rebutted by applica
Absent persuaslve evidence apgllzant was cenied fights to wh
entitled, approprlate regulazlcrs were not followed,
appropr-ate standards were zst zp~iied, we fir-d no basis
disturb the exlstlng record.
the
of
and
the
.nt .
.i ch!
or
to
Accordingly-, applicant's request 1s Eenied.
The Board staff is directed to in far^ appkcant of this decision.
Applicant should also be infor-ed zhct this decision is final and
will o n l y be reconsldered ups- t h e gresentation cf new relevant
evidencf? whlch was not reasonabi;; available at the Gime the
applicatlon was filed.
Members of the Board Ms. Rita S. L o m e y , Mr. T e r r y A. Yonkers,
and Ms. Patricia 11. Vestal cocsldered this application on
26 January 1999 in accordance with the provisions of Air Force
Instructlon 36-2603, and the goverxng statute, 10, U.S.C. 1552.
3anel Chair
Exhibits :
A. Applicant's DD Form 149
B. Available Master Personnel Kecor-5s
C. Advlsory Opinion
D. AFBCMR Ltr Forwarding Advisor-y- :i-;-lnlon
The advisory opinions were forwarded to the applicant fcz- xe'~iew and response (Exhibit D). After careful conslderatiop CT applicant's request and ti-le avallahle evldence of record, ~A-C find insufficient evidence of error or in7ustice to warrant zx-rectlve action. Accordingly, applicant's request 1s denied.
The appropriate Air Force offices evaluated applicant's request and provided advisory opinions to the Board recommending the application be denied (Exhibit C). Available Master Personnel Records C. Advisory Opinions D. SAF/MIBR Ltr Forwarding Advisory Opinions D E P A R T M E N T OF THE A I R FORCE H E A D Q U A R T E R S AIR FQRCE P E R S O N N E L C E N T E R R A N D O L P H AIR FORCE B A S E T E X A S -- 21 August 1998 MEMORANDUM FOR AFBCMR FROM: HQ AFPC/DPAPPl 550 C Street West, Ste...
The facts surrounding applicar-z ' s separation f r o x the Air Naticrdl Guard and A i r Force Reserve are m k n o w n inr.srnucli as the discharge correspondence is not available. T h e appropriate Air Force o f f I C E ?--aluated applicant Is request ar,d z 1 p r c m i d e a ar, advisory o p i n i s a t h e Board recommerLdir~: t h e was application be denied (Exhicx 13 . AvaAable Master Personnel Recgl-3s C. Advisory Opinion D. E. Applicant I s Response F. AFBCMR L t r to Applicant, d t...
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS NOV 3 3 IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: 97- 03814 COUNSEL: None HEARING DESIRED: No - Applicant requests that his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of er or Discharge) be corrected to show overseas service in from January 1957 to December 1958 during his four-year enlistment in the Air Force. The appropriate Air Force office evaluated applicant's request and provided an advisory opinion to the...
The appropriate Air Force offices evaluated applicant's request and provided advisory opinions zc the Board recommending the application be denied (Exhibit 0 . The advisory opinions were forwarded to the applicant and counsel on 16 February 1998 for review and response (Exhibit 2 1 . Applicant's response to the advisory opinions is at Exhibit E .
The appropriate Air Force office evaluated applicant's request that his records be corrected to reflect award of the Armed Forces Expeditionary Medal and provided an advisory opinion to the Board recommending the application be denied (Exhibit D). After careful consideration of applicant's request that his records be corrected to reflect award of the Armed Forces Expeditionary Medal, and the available evidence of record, we find insufficient evidence of error or injustice to...
The appropriate Air Force office evaluated applicant's request and provided an advisory opinion to the Board recommending the application be denied (Exhibit C ) . The advisory opinion was forwarded to the applicant for review and response (Exhibit D). Background: During our review we were unable to locate documents that confirmed review his personal file m e r f o r m e d TDYs while assigned overseas.
The appropriate Air Force office evaluated applicant's request and provided an advisory opinion to the Board recommending the application be denied (Exhibit C). The advisory opinion was forwarded to the applicant for review and response (Exhibit D). The records indicate member’s military service was reviewed and appropriate action was taken.
The appropriate Air Force office evaluated applicant's request and provided an advisory opinion to the Board recommending the application be denied (Exhibit C). After careful consideration of applicant's request and the available evidence of record, we find insufficient evidence of error or injustice to warrant corrective action. Applicant is stating t h a t he s o l d 20 days of leave back to the United States Air Force upon separation August 16, 1997, but was never paid for the leave nor...
While at a bar on 27 January 1993, applicant was introduced to the victim by a male acquaintance known by the victim. On 8 March 1994, the HQ Air Mobility Command (AMC) JA found the case legally sufficient to support discharge and recommended applicant's request to retire in lieu of discharge be denied. AIR FORCE EVALUATION: The Retirements Branch at HQ AFPC/DPPRR reviewed this appeal and states that the recommendation by applicant's commander for discharge for civilian conviction was...