A I R FORCE BOARD FOX ZCRRECTION OF :v
A C L ~ V E S t a t u s List from t h e K e t i r e d Reser-T,-e ana a s s i g n e d t o ar,
a p p r o p r i a t e Cztegory A o r B ~ G X ~ M L A p p h c a n t ’ s submission IS
at E x h i b i t A.
The appropriste Air Force of?::?
?vallJstec a p p l x a r L t ’ 5 1 - q u e s t
ana p r o v i d e d an a d v i s o r y o p i ~ x x zo the EDard -ecommending t h e
a p p l i c a t i o n be d e n i e d (ExhibiL : .
The a d v i s o r y o p i n i o n was
forwarded t o t k e a p p l i c a n t foi- :-e-”-iew and respcrise (Exhibit 3 ’ .
A s of
t n i s d a t e , n c response 112s c9en r e c e l - x d by : h i s o f f i c e .
After- zareiuL c o n s i d e r a t i o n z5 appl:cz:--: ’ s :-e?uesz
a v x l a b l e e v i c e n c e of
r e c o r d ,
e r r o r o r i n l u s t i c e m warrant
i - e c t l v e > i c t i o n , T h e f a c t s ana
o p i n i o n s s t a t e d i n t h e advisory ;pLnicns 32’pear zo be b a s e d 31;
tne e v i d e n c e ~f recorcl ana
Absent persuasive evidence a p F l x a n t was d e n l e c :-igk.,ts L O which
e n t i t l e d ,
01
a p p r o p r i a t e s t a n d a r d s were
ciisticiu-b the e x l s t i n g Irecorix.
r-zt agpiied, we 5:-5 no basis
ar:: beeri :-?butzE5 by applicar,:.
a p p r o p r l a t e
r e g u l z t i z r - s
3 x 1
w e r e
n o t
f o l l o w e d ,
k c a r d i n g l y , a p p l i c a n t s request 1s denieci.
E x h i b i t - s :
discovered the absence of an AF E'orrr 63 in his records upon receipt of that RIP; however, that ;s irzelevant to The issue that h e i n c u r e d the A D S C . However, we do not find his uncorroborated contentions, in and by themselves, sufficiently compelling to conclude that he unwittingly incurred an ADSC for training he would not have accepted had he been aware of the ADSC prior to entering the training. Exhibit B.
The facts surrounding applicar-z ' s separation f r o x the Air Naticrdl Guard and A i r Force Reserve are m k n o w n inr.srnucli as the discharge correspondence is not available. T h e appropriate Air Force o f f I C E ?--aluated applicant Is request ar,d z 1 p r c m i d e a ar, advisory o p i n i s a t h e Board recommerLdir~: t h e was application be denied (Exhicx 13 . AvaAable Master Personnel Recgl-3s C. Advisory Opinion D. E. Applicant I s Response F. AFBCMR L t r to Applicant, d t...
A complete copy of the evaluation is at Exhibit F , The Chief Medical Consultant, AFBCMR, review the application and states that records clearly show the applicant was fit for duty through all the years of his active duty service, and, while having some residual problems relating to his Korean War experiences, he was well and able zo perform his dEties up to the time of h i s retirement, He is being compensated appropriately by the DVA for his service-connected, but not unfitting,...
The appropriate Air Force o f f i c e evaluated applicarit ‘ s request ana provided an advisory opinion to the Board recommending the application be denied (Exhibit Z The advisory opinion was forwarded to the applicant for review and response (Exhibit D ) . T r. 0 additional evaluation was forwarded to applicant f c r re-Jie+; ar,d comment (Exhibit G ’ i . Applicant’s response to the additional evaluation is at Exhibit H. The appropriate After careful consiaeratio~ cf applicant's r e q u e...
1 s i ., I Office of the Assistant Secretary \1 BC'JlR 98-00007 AIR FORCE BOLL-RD FOP- C O k A ? wclu:d bz a u t h o r i z e d to r e t u r n t o Germany 111 a rwpoi-a:-y d u t y (TDY) s t ; i t u s t o complete z s h i p his EX-*' and HHGs to h i s new d u t y n e c e s s a r y He was a d v i s e d t h a t k I?-auld n o t be s t a t i o n k F Z i . 3 J and H H G s LC h i s new d u t y n e c e s s a r l r a c t i o n s A F B ) aiic -,&:as a d v i s e d t h a t h e would n o t be s t a t l...
NAVY | BCNR | CY1998 | 06956-98
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY . Y o u a r e a d v i s e d t h a t r e c o n s i d e r a t i o n o f t h e c a s e w i l l b e g r a n t e d o n l y u p o n t h e p r e s e n t a t i o n o f n e w a n d m a t e r i a l e v i d e n c e n o t p r e v i o u s l y c o n s i d e r e d b y t h e B o a r d a n d t h e n , o n l y u p o n t h e r e c o m m e n d a t i o n o f t h e B o a r d a n d a p p r o v a l b y t h e A s s i s t a n t S e c r e t a r y DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY RECORDS 18 1. ...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 01368
Applicant? The appropriate Air Force off ices evaluated applicant I s request and provided advisory oplnions to the Board recommending the application be deniec (Exhibit C). The advisory opir2ions were forwarded to the applicart for review and response (Exhibit D1.
NAVY | BCNR | CY1999 | 01251-99
s h i p ' s m o v e m e n t o n t w o o c c a s i o n s , m i s s i n g m u s t e r s a n d d i s o b e d i e n c e . B a s e d o n t h e f o r e g o i n g r e c o r d y o u w e r e p r o c e s s e d f o r a n a d m i n i s t r a t i v e d i s c h a r g e . O n 6 M a r c h 1 9 7 9 y o u a g r e e d t o w a i v e y o u r r i g h t t o a n a d m i n i s t r a t i v e d i s c h a r g e b o a r d i n e x c h a n g e f o r a r e c o m m e n d a t i o n f o r a g e n e r a l d i s c h a r g e .
NAVY | BCNR | CY1999 | 01670-99
; h e B o a r d f i n d s t h e e x i s t e n c e o f a n f o l l o w i n g c o r r e c t i v e a c t i o n . a n d e s p e c i a l l y i n l i g h t o f t h e i n j u s t i c e w a r r a n t i n g t h e ( Z ) , P e t i t i o n e r O s a p p l i c a t i o n h a s c o m m e n t e d t o t h e e f f e c t t h a t t h e r e q u e s t h a s m e r i t a n d w a r r a n t s f a v o r a b l e a c t i o n . ...