\
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
IN THE MATTER OF:
DOCKET NUMBER: 98-01709
COUNSEL: None
HEARING DESIRED: No
412, 1 3 LW
-
APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:
Her deceased husband's records be corrected to show he made a
spouse only election in the Reserve Component Survivor Benefit
Plan (RCSBP) .
APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT:
Her deceased husband planned to take his Air Force retirement at
age 60. He also planned for her (his wife) to receive survivor
benefit if he died before her after age 60. However, his
untimely death at age 57 did not allow for the final papers to be
added to his file which would have been completed at age 59% and
before age 60. This information is known now but not known in
office and
1995. She received a DD Form 149 from Senator
she went through her husband's papers and disco
e Survivor
Benefit Plan (SBP) election certificate. Had she known about the
DD Form 149 in the beginning, she could have gone through her
husband's papers and submitted the form a long time ago.
Applicant's complete submission is attached at Exhibit A.
STATEMENT OF FACTS:
The deceased m
home address :
8 September 19
received by HQ Air Reserve Personnel Center (ARPC).
1s
on
ncr
2
On 4 December 1981, the ARPC Retirement Branch (ARPC/DPAAR)
notified t h e spouse of the deceased member that he had not made
an RCSBP election and informed her that if it was not received by
11 September 1981, RCSBP coverage would not be in effect.
6
98-01709
On 28 December 1981, ARPC/DPAAR notified the spouse of the
deceased member that an RCSBP election had not been received by
the deadline and informed her that RCSBP coverage was not in
effect and no further election could be made until the member
reached age 60.
During the 1 April 1992 through 31 March 1993 RCSBP open
enrollment, HQ ARPC, using an open season master listing,
notified eligible members of an opportunity to change their RCSBP
election. Again there is no record of an election being received
by the ARPC.
Title 10, United States Code, Section 1448(a) ( 2 ) (B) established
the requirement that a member submit the RCSBP election within 90
days of receipt.
The deceased member would have been eligible to participate in
the SBP on 7 August 1997, when he reached age 60. He died on
14 March 1995 at age 57.
AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
The Deputy Director of Customer Assistance, HQ ARPC/DR, reviewed
this application and states that the member had two opportunities
to participate in the RCSBP and the information sent to him on
both occasions was sufficient to make a RCSBP election. They
recommend relief be denied.
A complete copy of the evaluation is attached at Exhibit C.
APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
The applicant reviewed the advisory opinion and states that not
until she initiated the request for her deceased husband's
survivor benefits, did she realize how very little she understood
about the military retirement system.
She never signed an
agreement waiving her survivor benefits.
In addition, she
thought that her husband chose not to accept his retirement
immediately, but rather chose to start receiving it at age 60.
She did not know that it was the law that forbade his receiving
it until age 60. Her husband kept very extensive records on his
military status. She has several cartons full of old orders,
records, etc., which she didn't understand so she never fully
went through them. She did not know what to look for anyway.
With the help of two retired air national guard friends of her
husband, who knew of her plight, they finally sat down last month
and started the arduous task of going through his records. They
.
98-01709
came across the enclosed SBP Election Certificates. Why there
are three she does not know. She does know that the evidence
points to the fact that he 'fully intended to make the election to
cover her.
In fact, he may have made that election. The
enclosed copies point in that direction. They were married a few
days short of 34 years. In his over 20 years of serving his
country, she supported him and her country fully. She was not in
the military nor did she fly airplanes, but just like him, she
served her country and was very much a part of the military.
Applicant's complete response, with attachments, is attached at
Exhibit E.
THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:
1. The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by
existing law or regulations.
2. The application was not timely filed; however, it is in the
interest of justice to excuse the failure to timely file.
3. Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to
demonstrate the existence of probable error or injustice. We
took notice of the applicant's complete submission in judging the
merits of the case; however, we agree with the opinion and
recommendation of the Air Force and adopt their rationale as the
basis for our conclusion that the applicant has not been the
victim of an error or injustice. Therefore, in the absence of
evidence to the contrary, we find no compelling basis to
recommend granting the relief sought in this application.
THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT:
The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did not
demonstrate the existence of probable material error or
injustice; that the application was denied without a personal
appearance; and that the application will only be reconsidered
upon the submission of newly discovered relevant evidence not
considered with this application.
The following members of the Board considered this application in
Executive Session on 27 October 1998, under the provisions of AFI
36-2603:
Mr. Henry C. Saunders, Panel Chair
Ms. Ann L. Heidig, Member
Mrs. Barbara A. Westgate, Member
Ms. Gloria J. Williams, Examiner (without vote)
3
98-01709
The following documentary evidence was considered:
Exhibit A. DD Form 149, dated 12 June 1998, w/atchs.
Exhibit B. Applicant's Master Personnel Records.
Exhibit C. Letter, ARPC/DR, dated 22 July 1998 w/atchs.
Exhibit D. Letter, AFBCMR, dated 13 August 1998.
Exhibit E. Applicant's Response, dated 4 September 1998
w/atchs.
4
QEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE
HEADQUARTERS AIR RESERVE PERSONNEL CENTER
MEMORANDUM FOR AFBCMR
FROM: HQARPCDR
6760 E Irvington Place #3000
Denver CO 80280-3000
SUBJECT: Application
1. The requested action cannot be accomplished administratively at this headquarters.
2. The applicant is requesting that her spouse's record be corrected to show he made a spouse
only election in the Reserve Component Survivor Benefit Plan (RCSBP) when he was first
eligible.
3. The following is an analysis of the circumstances surrounding the case:
a. The member's RCSBP election package was mailed to his home address-
Sep 81
1 Cente
There is no record of an election being
b. On 4 Dec 81, the ARPC Retirement Branch (ARPCDPAAR) notified the applicant
that her spouse had not made an RCSBP election
11 Dec 81, RCSBP coverage would not be in effec
d her that if it was not received by
.
c. On 28 Dec 8 1 , the ARPC Retirement Branch (ARPCDPAAR) notified the applicant
that an RCSBP election had not been received by the deadline and informed her that RCSBP
not in effect and no further election could be made until the member reached age
d. During the 1 Apr 92 through 31 Mar 93 RCSBP open enrollment, HQ ARPC, using an
open season master listing, notified eligible members of an opportunity to change their RCSBP
election. This information was sent to the member's home address:
s home address as it appeared on the master lis
tion being received by the ARPC.
e. The member had two opportunities to participate in the RCSBP and the information sent to
him on both occasions was sufficient to make a RCSBP election.
f. The requirement that a member submit the RCSBP election within 90 days of receipt is
clearly established by Title 10, United States Code, Section 1448(a)(2)(B). The member would
have been eligible to participate in the Survivor Benefit Plan on 7 Aug 97, when he reached age
60.
g. The member died on 14 Mar 95 at age 57.
4. Recommendation: Recommend the applicant’s request be denied. If the decision is to grant
the relief sought, the member’s record should be corrected to show that he elected full, deferred
coverage for spouse only (Option BA) under the RCSBP, effective 10 Dec 81.
5. Action officer is Mr. Marvin Silva, HQ ARPCDRSE, DSN 926-6438. He can also be
reached by fax at DSN 926-6255 or e-mail msilva@arpcmail.den.disa.mil.
A” C. SHIPPY, Major, USAF
Deputv Mrector of CustMer
AF | BCMR | CY2010 | BC-2009-02505
DPP notes the ARPC Form 123, RCSBP Election Certificate, reflects the servicemember elected Option A, decline to make an election until age 60. The evidence of record shows that the applicant’s deceased husband, upon notification of his eligibility for retired pay at age 60, originally elected Option A under the RCSBP thereby electing not to make a decision regarding coverage for the applicant until he reached age 60. The evidence of record does show the deceased service member requested...
AF | BCMR | CY2007 | BC-2007-00978
Her husband was notified of his eligibility to participate in the RCSBP by letter dated 28 December 1988. He made no election within 90 days of receipt of notification, and was automatically enrolled in Option A, “Deferred Election Until Age 60.” During the RCSBP Open Seasons 1 April 1992 through 31 March 1993, and 1 March 1999 through 29 February 2000, members who had elected less than full coverage or no coverage for their spouse/children were able to change their election to cover their...
The member remained eligible to make the election at age 60. We took notice of the applicant's complete submission in judging the merits of the case; however, we agree with the opinion and recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt their rationale as the basis for our conclusion that the applicant has not been the victim of an error or injustice. Exhibit E. Letter, Applicant’s Congressman statement, dated 31 Jul 02.
AF | BCMR | CY2002 | BC-2002-01652
The member remained eligible to make the election at age 60. We took notice of the applicant's complete submission in judging the merits of the case; however, we agree with the opinion and recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt their rationale as the basis for our conclusion that the applicant has not been the victim of an error or injustice. Exhibit E. Letter, Applicant’s Congressman statement, dated 31 Jul 02.
AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2004-01914
However, the section of law applicable to reserve component members in effect at the time the former member was eligible to participate in the Reserve Component Survivor Benefit Plan did not require spousal notification if the member deferred making an election until age 60. We therefore agree with the opinion and recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt their rationale as the basis for our conclusion that the applicant has not been the victim of an...
AF | BCMR | CY2007 | BC-2007-00035
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2007-00035 INDEX CODE: 137.04 XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO MANDATORY CASE COMPLETION DATE: 12 June 2008 ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: Her late husband’s marital status be changed from “single” to “married” in the year 2001, and that his records be changed to show he elected to participate in the...
AF | BCMR | CY2009 | BC-2009-01017
In support of the application, the applicant submits a letter to her husband’s commander, the Air Reserve Personnel Center’s letter to her late husband, and her late husband’s death certificate. DPP states the former service member was required to make an RCSBP election within 90 days of receipt of notification; however, he did not make an election when eligible in 1990. The applicant’s complete response is at Exhibit...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2012 05676
The complete DPTT evaluation, with attachments, is at Exhibit B. ________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did not demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; that the application was denied without a personal appearance; and that the application will only be reconsidered upon the submission of newly discovered relevant evidence not considered with this application. ...
AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2006-00217
Upon contacting the Air Reserve Personnel Center (ARPC) regarding RCSBP benefits, she was told her spouse had not made an election for coverage at the time of his 20- year letter or during following open enrollment periods. She questions a letter her spouse had received dated 1 March 1999 from HQ ARPC notifying him of an RCSBP Open Enrollment period. The Board noted that the now- deceased former member received the initial RCSBP package at his home on 8 March 1989, and did not respond to it.
AF | BCMR | CY2007 | BC-2007-01076
She retired in June 2004 and noticed she had been given several RCSBP election options that her now deceased spouse would have had but did not. She contends her spouse should have had the same paperwork at his retirement. She notes her husband was retired prior to his death and should have been given the same options all other retired members receive; such as an opportunity to update his election.