Both must be exercised within one year after divorce: the retiree may file an election change, or the former spouse may request the retiree be deemed to have made such a change on his or her behalf. If neither the member nor former spouse requests the election change during the one-year eligibility period, former spouse coverage may not be established thereafter. Recommendation: Although there is no evidence of Air Force error, to preclude a possible injustice, we recommend the member's...
DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE WASHINGTON, DC Office of the Assistant Secretary AFBCMR 98-01404 MEMORANDUM OF CONSIDERATION OF APPLICATION BEFORE THE AFBCMR . P/anel Chair ’ Attachment: Ltr, HQ USAF/DPRC dtd Jun 5, 1998, w/Atch DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE HEADQUARTERS UNITED STATES AIR FORCE WASHINGTON, DC 5 June 1998 MEMORANDUM FOR AFBCMR FROM: HQ USAFDPRC 1040 Air Force Pentagon Washington DC 20330-1040 orrection of Military Record This responds to a request for aSBCMR advisory on records be...
DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE WASHINGTON, DC JUL 2 7 l396 Office of the Assistant Secretary AFBCMR 98-0 1405 MEMORANDUM FOR THE CHIEF OF STAFF Under the authority of Section 1552, Title 10, United States Code, Air Force InstnpAion 36-2603, and having assured compliance with the provisions of the above regulation, the decision of the Air Force Board for Correction of Military Records is announced, and it is directed that: records of the Department of the Air Force relating t m corrected to show...
The appropriate Air Force office evaluated applicant's request and provided an advisory opinion to the Board recommending the application be denied (Exhibit C). The advisory opinion was forwarded to the applicant for review and response (Exhibit D). The records indicate member’s military service was reviewed and appropriate action was taken.
Both must be exercised within one year after divorce: the retiree may file an election change, or the former spouse may request the retiree be deemed to have made such a change on his or her behalf. If neither the member nor former spouse requests the election change during the one-year eligibility period, former spouse coverage may not be established thereafter. Recommendation: Although there is no evidence of Air Force error, to preclude a possible injustice, we recommend the member's...
If neither the member nor former spouse requests the election change during the one-year eligibility period, former spouse coverage may not be established thereafter. Thus, even though a member may not have notified the Defense Finance and Accounting Service (DFAS) of the divorce and continued to pay premiums for spouse coverage after the divorce, the former spouse is not eligible for annuity payments upon the member's death. Recommendation: Although there is no evidence of Air Force...
DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE WASHINGTON, DC Office of the Assistant Secretary AFBCMR 98-01429 MEMORANDUM FOR THE CHIEF OF STAFF Under the authority of Section 1 5 5 2 , Title 1 0 , United States Code, Air Force Instruction 3 6 - 2 6 0 3 , and having assured compliance with the provisions of the above regulation, the decision of the Air Force Board for Correction of Military Records is announced, and it is directed that: I t of the Air The pertinen e corrected Force relating to to show that he...
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NO: 98-01432 COUNSEL : HEARING DESIRED: YES JAN 13m ' Applicant requests that he be awarded the Armed Forces Medal (AFEM) , or other appropriate expeditionary Expeditionary medal, for his service in direct support of operations in Grenada between 23 October 1983 and 21 November 1983. The appropriate Air Force office evaluated applicant's request and provided an advisory opinion to the Board...
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS RECORC OF PROCEEDINGS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: 98-01440 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO Applicant requests his 8 May 1956 undesirable discharge be ubgraded tc honorable. In atcernpting to reconstruct the record, a 4 May 1956 order directing applicant's undesirable discharge was the only document located (Exhibit B ) . The Board staff is directed C G :r,form applicant of this decision.
8 AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS 5 IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: 98-01442 COUNSEL: NONE AUG 2 4 W8 HEARING DESIRED: NO c I. b )P honorable. On 1 Mar 94, the Air Force Discharge Review Board (AFDRB) considered and denied the applicant's request that his general discharge be upgraded to honorable. The Board staff is directed to inform applicant of this decision.
1 DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE WASHINGTON, DC Office of the Assistant Secretary AFBCMR 98-01462 AUG 2 8 MEMORANDUM FOR THE CHIEF OF STAFF Under the authority of Section 1552, Title 10, United States Code and Air Force Instruction 36-2603, and having assured compliance with the provisions of the above regulation, the decision of the Air Force Board for Correction of Military Records is announced, and it is directed that: The pertinen Force relating to show that on 20 N Overseas Housing...
DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE WASHINGTON, DC Office of the Assistant Secretary AFBCMR 98-01463 MEMORANDUM FOR THE CHIEF OF STAFF Under the authority of Section 1552, Title 10, United States Code and Air Force Instruction 3 6 - 2 6 0 3 , and-having assured compliance with the provisions of the above regulation, the decision of the Air Force Board for Correction of Military Records is announced, and it is directed that: The pertine Force relating t show that on 2 0 Overseas Housing Allowance...
DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE WASHINGTON, D. C. Office of the Assistant Secretary AFBCMR 98- 01464 3Uh 2 7 MEMORANDUM FOR THE CHIEF OF STAFF Under the authority of Section 1552, Title 10, United States Code, Air Force Instruction 36- 2603, and having assured compliance with the provisions of the above regulation, the decision of the Air Force Board for Correction of Military Records is announced, and it is directed that: 2. t of the Air be corrected 998 and Chief Examiner Air Force Board for...
Dollars had either received OHA advances t The Per Diem, Travel, and instead of the local currency, in this c as able to implement a solution to the Transportation Allowances Committ problem for members who had received OHA advances but could not devise a similar solution for individuals l had their leases written in U.S. Therefore, we recommend the Board gran to reflect that he received a rental advance and, OHA rate. @ DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE WASHINGTON, DC Office of the Assistant...
DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE WASHINGTON, DC Office of the Assistant Secretary AFBCMR 98-01483 JUL 2 8 1998 MEMORANDUM FOR THE CHIEF OF STAFF Under the authority of Section 1552, Title 10, United States-- Code, Air Force Instruction 36-2603, and having assured compliance with the provisions of the above regulation, the decision of the Air Force Board for Correction of Military Records is announced, and it is directed that: The pertinen Force relating to show that: rtment of the Air be...
Applicant's submission is The appropriate Air Force office evaluated applicant's request and provided an advisory opinion to the Board recommending the application be denied (Exhibit C) . The advisory opinion was forwarded to the applicant for review and response (Exhibit D). Available Master Personnel Records C. Advisory Opinion D. AFBCMR Ltr Forwarding Advisory Opinion DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE AIR FORCE RESERVE COMMAND MEMORANDUM FOR SAFMIBR FROM: HQ AFRCISGPA 155 2nd Street Robins...
The appropriate Air Force offices evaluated applicant’s request and provided advisory opinions to the Board recommending the application be denied (Exhibit C). The applicant is requesting the AFBCMR void her Enlisted Performance Report (EPR) closing 23 Oct 94. In the applicant’s response dated 17 Nov 94 to the referral EPR, she states that she realizes that ‘she has a lot of reprimands in her Personal Information File (PIF) and didn’t consider herself ready for promotion.’ She also states...
DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE WASHINGTON, DC Office of the Assistant Secretary AFBCMR 98-01 506 MEMORANDUM FOR THE CHIEF OF STAFF Under the authority of Section 1552, Title 10, United States Code, Air Force Instruction 36-2603, and having assured compliance with the provisions of the above regulation, the decision of thg Air Force Board for Correction of Military Records is announced, and it is directed that: . two-week annual b. stated that was informed that would be awarded 1 point...
d+ Panel hair f&, Attachment Ltr, AFPCDPPTR, dtd 14 Sep 98 D E P A R T M E N T O F T H E AIR FORCE H E A D Q U A R T E R S AIR F O R C E P E R S O N N E L C E N T E R R A N D O L P H A I R F O R C E B A S E T E X A S 4 SEP 1998 MEMORANDUM FOR AFBCMR FROM: HQ AFPC/DPPTR 550 C Street West Ste 11 Randolph AFB TX 781 50-471 3 SUBJECT: Application for Correction of Military Records Requested Correction: The applicant is requesting corrective action to show he filed a timely election for former...
The appropriate Air Force offices evaluated applicant's request and provided advisory opinions to the Board recommending the application be denied (Exhibit C). Available Master Personnel Records C. Advisory Opinions D. SAF/MIBR Ltr Forwarding Advisory Opinions D E P A R T M E N T OF THE A I R FORCE HEADQUARTERS.. AIR FORCE PERSONNEL CENTER RANDOLPH AIR FORCE BASE TEXAS MEMORANDUM FOR AFBCMR ~ FROM: HQ AFPC/DPPRS 550 C Street West Ste 1 1 Randolph AFB TX 781 50-4713 ;JuN 2 4 398 The...
The appropriate Air Force offices evaluated applicant's request and provided advisory opinions to the Board recommending the application be denied (Exhibit C) . The advisory opinions were forwarded to the applicant/counsel for review and response (Exhibit D) . Applicant's response to the advisory opinion is at Exhibit E .
DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE WASHINGTON, DC Office of the Assistant Secretary AFBCMR 98-01529 JUN 3 0 1998 MEMORANDUM FOR THE CHIEF OF STAFF Under the authority of Section 1552, Title 10, United States Code, Air Force Instruction 36-2603, and having assured the compliance with the provisions of the above regulation, decision of the Air Force Board for Correction of Military Records is announced, and it is directed that: The pertinent militar ment of the Air Force relating to be corrected...
The rater supervised him for 100 days or less, not 132 days as reflected on the EPR. The applicant has provided nothing from the rater to support his claim of insufficient supervision. A copy of the complete Air Force evaluation, with attachments, is at Exhibit D. APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: Applicant reviewed the evaluations and states why he believes the contested EPR should be voided.
DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE WASHINGTON, DC Office of the Assistant Secretary AFBCMR 98-01540 MEMORANDUM FOR THE CHIEF OF STAFF Under the authority of Section 1552, Title 10, United States Code, Air Force Instruction 36-2603, and having assured compliance with the provisions of the above regulation, the decision of the Air Force Board for Correction of Military Records is announced, and it is directed that: The pertinen Force relating to show that On 20 N Overseas Housing Allowance (OHA) for...
Director I/ Air Force Review Boards Agency AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: 98-01544 COUNSEL: None HEARING DESIRED: No APPLICANT REOUESTS THAT: His Air Force Commendation Medal (AFCM), Second Oak Leaf Cluster (20LC), for the period 10 Jul 91 to 1 Jul 96, be considered in the promotion process for cycle 9737 to master sergeant (promotions effective Aug 97 - Jul 98). DPPPWB states that there is no tangible evidence the...
The appropriate Air Force office evaluated applicant's request and provided an advisory opinion to the Board recommending the application be denied (Exhibit C ) . The discharge authority approved the recommendation for discharge on 27 Oct 72 and directed that the applicant be fbrnished an undesirable discharge certificate without probation and rehabilitation. The records indicate member’s military service was reviewed and appropriate action was taken.
The applicant is requesting satisfactory service be granted for Retirement Year Ending (RYE) 23 February 1997. I DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE WASHINGTON, DC Office of the Assistant Secretary AFBCMR 9 8 - 0 1 5 4 9 MEMORANDUM FOR THE CHIEF OF STAFF Under the authority of Section 1552, Title 10, United States Code and Air Force Instruction 3 6 - 2 6 0 3 , and having assured compliance with the provisions of the above regulation, the decision of the Air Force Board for Correction of Military...
In accordance with policy, the application was forwarded to this Board for further consideration (Exhibit C). The decision of the AFDRB was forwarded to the applicant for review and response (Exhibit D). After careful consideration of applicant's request and the available evidence of record, we find insufficient evidence of error or injustice to warrant corrective action.
In accordance with policy, the application was forwarded to this Board for further consideration (Exhibit C). The 'decision of the AFDRB was forwarded to the applicant for review and response (Exhibit D). Counsel s response to the AFDRB Brief is at Exhibit E. After careful consideration of applicant's request and the available evidence of record, we find insufficient evidence of error or injustice to warrant corrective action.
DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE WASHINGTON, DC Office of the Assistant Secretary AFBCMR 98- 01569 MEMORANDUM FOR THE CHIEF OF STAFF Under t h e a u t h o r i t y of S e c t i o n 1552, T i t l e 1 0 , U n i t e d S t a t e s Code, and A i r F o r c e I n s t r u c t i o n 36-2603, and h a v i n g a s s u r e d c o m p l i a n c e w i t h t h e p r o v i s i o n s of t h e above r e g u l a t i o n , t h e d e c i s i o n o f t h e A i r F o r c e Board f o r C o r r e c t i o n of M i l i t a r...
P g&/pf ne1 Chair Attachment: Ltr, AFPC/DPPRS, dtd Jul 7, 1998, w/Atch DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE WASHINGTON, DC JUL 2 4 I998 Office of the Assistant Secretary AFBCMR 98-01571 MEMORANDUM FOR THE CHIEF OF STAFF Under the authority of Section 1552, Title 10, United States Code and Air Force Instruction 36-2603, and having assured compliance with the provisions of the above regulation, the decision of the Air Force Board for Correction of Military Records is announced, and it is directed...
DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE WASHINGTON, DC AUG 2 7 Office of the Assistant Secretary AFBCMR 98-0 1576 MEMORANDUM FOR THE CHIEF OF STAFF Under the authority of Section 1552, Title 10, United States Code, Air Force Instruction 36-2603, and having assured compliance with the provisions of the above regulation, the decision of the Air Force Board for Correction of Military Record6 is announced, and it is directed that: ry records of the Department of the Air Force relating to corrected to show...
* Chief xaminer - Air Force Board for Correction of Military Records DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE WASHINGTON, DC 3UL 0 6 #@ Office of the Assistant Secretary AFBCMR 98-01579 MEMORANDUM OF CONSIDERATION OF APPLICATION BEFORE THE AFBCMR SUBJECT : Having carefully reviewed this application, we agree with the recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt the rationale expressed as the basis for our decision that the applicant has been the victim of either an error or...
The appropriate Air Force offices evaluated applicant’s request and provided advisory opinions to the Board recommending the ‘“application be denied (Exhibit C) . Requested Action. The commander advised applicant that if his recommendation is approved, that his discharge would be described as entry level separation and that he would be ineligible for reenlistment in the Air Force.
The appropriate Air Force office evaluated applicant's request and provided an advisory opinion to the Board recommending the application be denied (Exhibit C ) . The advisory opinion was forwarded to the applicant f o r review and response (Exhibit D). Enlistment grades were determined by the N P S grade policy and DOR was the date of enlistment in the Regular Air Force.
Even though SBP premiums continue to be deducted from retired pay following divorce, the former spouse is not entitled to receive the annuity in the event of the member‘s death. Facts: The member elected reduced spouse only SBP coverage, reduced annuity, prior to his I May 77 retirement. PAT PEEK, DAFC Chief, Retiree Services Branch Directorate of Pers Program Mgmt DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE WASHINGTON, DC Office of the Assistant Secretary AFBCMR 98-01590 SEP 3 0 MEMORANDUM FOR THE CHIEF...
DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE WASHINGTON, DC AUG 2 7 1996 Office of the Assistant Secretary AFBCMR 98-01 592 MEMORANDUM FOR THE CHIEF OF STAFF Under the authority of Section 1552, Title 10, United Staps Code, Air Force Instruction 36-2603, and having assured compliance with the provisions of the above regulation, the decision of the Air Force Board for Correction of Military Records is announced, and it is directed that: Force Reserve effective 15 March 1985 vice 1iMarch 1985. records of the...
DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE WASHINGTON, DC Office of the Assistant Secretary AFBCMR 98-01595 MEMORANDUM FOR THE CHIEF OF STAFF Under the authority of Section 1552, Title 10, United States Code, Air Force Instruction 3 6 - 2 6 0 3 , and having assured compliance with the provisions of the above regulation, the decision of the Air Force Board for Correction of Military Records is announced, and it is directed that: The pertinen Force relating to, to show that on 3 on 1 January 1997, he...
Backwound: When a member fails to complete a valid SBP election prior to retirement, coverage is established for all eligible beneficiary(ies) by operation of law. Discussion: The record indicates the member signed the election form prior to his retirement date, but spouse concurrence was not obtained until after retirement. Recommendation: We recommend the member's record be corrected to show on 30 Apr 97 he declined SBP coverage and his wife concurred in his election.
Therefore, under the authority delegated in AFI 36-2603, the applicant's records will be corrected as set forth in the accompanying Memorandum for the Chief of Staff signed by the Executive Director of the Board or his designee. Attachment: Ltr, HQ AFPC/DPPAE, dtd 23 June 1998 &ne1 Chair' I A D E P A R T M E N T OF THE A I R F O R C E HEADQUARTERS AIR FORCE PERSONNEL CENTER RANDOLPH AIR FORCE BASE TEXAS MEMORANDUM FOR AFBCMR FROM: HQ AFPCDPPAE 550 C Street West, Ste 10 Randolph AFB TX...
They state it appears the applicant's evaluators took their rating responsibilities seriously, and rated her appropriately in not only their evaluation of her performance but in their promotion recommendation when they compared her with others of the same grade and Air Force specialty. Applicant states the contested report is inconsistent With performance feedback she received during the period covered by the report. It appears the applicant’s evaluators took their rating responsibilities...
APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: He was not made aware of nor did he acknowledge acceptance of the three-year ADSC for completion of Initial Qualification Training (IQT) in the C-9. While documentation of the officer's awareness of the ADSC provides ironclad proof the counseling was accomplished in a timely manner and the officer voluntarily accepted the ADSC, it is not the documentation of counseling that establishes the ADSC, but rather the completion of the ADSC- incurring event (in this case,...
DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE WASHINGTON, DC Office of the Assistant Secretary AFBCMR 98-01623 MEMORANDUM FOR THE CHIEF OF STAFF Under the authority of Section 1552, Title 10, United States Code and Air Force Instruction 36-2603, and having assured compliance with the provisions of the above regulation, the decision of the Air Force Board for Correction of Military Records is announced, and it is directed that: ment of the Air The pertinen be corrected to Force relating to show that on 20...
The appropriate Air Force offices evaluated applicant's request and provided advisory opinions to the Board recommending the application be denied (Exhibit C). - After careful consideration of applicant's request and the available evidence of record, we find insufficient evidence of error or injustice to warrant corrective action. Applicant did not identi@ any specific errors in the discharg&progessing nor provide facts which warrant a change in the discharge he received.
The applicant filed two similar appeals under AFI 3 6 - 2 4 0 1 , Correcting Officer and Enlisted Evaluation Reports, which were denied by the Evaluation Reports Appeal Board (ERAB). The applicant requests the Board upgrade his 24 Jun 95 enlisted performance report (EPR) to a “5” in Section IV, Promotion Recommendation. The additional documentation he has submitted still by this “policy” regarding individuals who received an Article 15 (or that it ever existed).
In support of his appeal he submits letters from the rater and the rater's rater. The applicant has not provided a statement from the new rater's rater (reaccomplished EPR) . A complete copy of their evaluation is attached at Exhibit D. APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATIONS: Copies of the Air Force evaluations were forwarded to applicant on 20 July 1998 for review and response within 30 days.
36-2603, the applicant's records will be corrected as set forth in the accompanying Memorandum for the Chief of Staff signed by the Executive Director of the Board or his designee. If the retiree does not request a change to former spouse coverage within a year, former spouse coverage may not be established thereafter. Even though SBP premiums continue to be deducted from retired pay following divorce, the former spouse is not entitled to receive the annuity in the event of the member's death.
f the Department of the Air Force relating to corrected to show that on 1 May 1992, he elected, , to add spouse coverage to his child coverage under h_l)r-n-..L DONNA PITTENGER Chief Examiner Air Force Board for Correction of Military Records '8. Basis for Request: The applicant claims his open enrollment application fell through the cracks during the transition of retired pay from- Background: A member, who is unmarried at retirement, may elect coverage for a newly acquired spouse;...
Accordingly, applicant's request is denied. (Atch 1-3) Copies of the documents to be forwarded to the separation authority in support of this recommendation are attached. Instead of the appointed counsel, you may have another, if the lawyer you request is in the active military service and is reasonably available as determined according to AFI 5 1-201.
What is not addressed by either the applicant or the lone evaluator is what unit mission description was used on the OPRs rendered for other officers assigned to the same unit during the period of the contested report. Since applicant‘s records were not complete and up to date at the time he was considered for promotion to lieutenant colonel, we recommend his corrected record be considered for promotion by SSB for the CY97 board. The applicant requests changing the unit mission description...