DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE
WASHINGTON, D. C.
O f h e of the Assistant Secretary
AFBCMR 98-01814
SEP 04 I998
MEMORANDUM FOR THE CHIEF OF STAFF
Under the authority of Section 1552, Title 10, United States Code, Air Force Instruction
36-2603, and having assured compliance with the provisions of the above regulation, the
decision of the Air Force Board for Correction of Military Records is announced, and it is
directed that:
military records of the Department of the Air Force relating t
corrected to show that on 30 September 1996, he reques
n Date and his request was approved by competent au
to Title 10, United States Code, Section 14701(b), thereby establishing a new Mandatory
Separation Date of 30 May 2006.
R
Cfiief Examiner
Air Force Board for Correction
of Military Records
DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE
WASHINGTON, D. C.
Office of the Assistant Secretary
AFBCMR 98-0 18 14
S E $ 0 4 1998
MEMORANDUM OF CONSIDERATION OF APPLICATION BEFORE THE AFBCMR
SUBJECT:
Having carefully reviewed this application, we agree with the recommendation of the Air
Force and adopt the rationale
the victim of either an error or an
2603, the applicant's records will
the Chief of Staff signed by the Executive
Attachment:
Ltr, ANG/DPPU, dtd 12 Aug 98
I
DEPARTMENT OF THE AIIR FORCE
AIR NATIONAL GUARD READINESS CENTER
MEMORANDUM FOR AFBCMR
FROM: ANG/DPPU
3500 Fetchet Avepue
Andrews AFB, MD 20762-5157
SUBJEC
Correction of Military Record
The attached Appli
a member o f t
ords submitted by
is forwarded for the
Board’s review and action. After review of the attached BCMR, and on the
information provided, relief is recommended.
ecords indicate he was prior service with the USAF,
red to USAFR. He was assigned USAFR Inactive S
List Reserve Section (ISLRS) for a period of 7 years, 5 months, and 24 days. He was
then commissioned as a Chief Warrant Officer with the Army National Guard.
From there he requested reappointment to the A n National Guard for a statutory
tour position (Title 10). At that time of his reappoi
appears to be an error in his appointment p
counseled by his gaining ANG unit, ANGR
be unable to complete 20 years of active du
counseling would have been documented via a signed statement. Without this
statement, the member could enter active duty without the opportunity to obtain
minimum satisfactory active duty necessary to receive active duty retirement
as never briefed that while he was assigned to ISLRS, the
nd then 7 plus years assigned to ISLRS counted aga’
his Total Federal Commissioned Service (TFCSD). As documented by
he made a number of inquiries to the state’s personnel staff concernin
te (MSD) and eligibility for a 20 year active duty
retirement. He was given incorrect guidance from the ANGRCNPPS, Chief of
Sustainment, as to how his MSD was computed. He should have been made aware
of the implementation of ROPMA (effective 1 Oct 96), that his MSD would be
computed 28 years from his TFCSD. Instead, he was told it would be computed
from his Total Active Fed
guidance he was provide
understanding he would qua
should be adjusted to 30 May 2006 (which excludes the time he was assigned to
ISLRS).
d Service (TAFCS). Based on the
de career decisions
duty retirement.
MSD
d
i
..
1
.
-
hould be directed to
ANG/DPPU, DSN
L
FOR THE COMMANDER
BENNIE L. UMSTEAD, Major, USAF
Chief, Special Actions and Personal Affairs
P
_________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: His Total Federal Commissioned Service Date (TFCSD), Total Years Service Date (TYSD), Pay Date, and Mandatory Separation Date (MSD) are in error. With his five years in the active Air Force, he had almost eighteen years of military service when he was informed in Jan 00, that he would be discharged immediately. There was no evidence that the applicant was informed by ARPC of the implications of his...
AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2002-00089
This section states, “…a reserve officer’s years of service include all service, other than constructive service, of the officer as a commissioned officer of any uniformed service (other than service as a warrant officer).” The applicant believes that use of the time as a warrant officer should not count when computing time for establishing MSD. Applicant’s complete response to the additional Air Force evaluation is at Exhibit...
AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2002-03831
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS INDEX CODE 102.06 113.00 135.00 IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBERS: BC-2002-03831 COUNSEL: None HEARING DESIRED: No _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His Total Federal Commissioned Service Date (TFCSD) be adjusted from 19 Apr 73 to 22 Feb 78 by allowing him to resign his US Air Force Reserve (USAFR) commission on 30 Jun 79 and reappointing him on 4 May 84, thereby...
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: 99-00584 (Case 2) INDEX CODE: 100.07 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: YES APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: It appears the applicant is requesting that his elimination from the Fixed- Wing Qualification Training Course (F-V5A-Q) be removed from his records. On 18 Nov 92, the XXst Flying Training Wing (FTW) commander concurred with the FEB’s findings and recommendations that the applicant should be...
Available records reflect that the applicant received a Memorandum of Reprimand, dated 10 June 1994, from the Commander, Headquarters Texas Air National Guard. They recommend the applicant’s records be changed to show constructive participation as a Reserve Officer for the period of time following separation from the Texas Air National Guard through the Mandatory Separation Date. After a thorough review of the evidence of record and applicant’s submission, we are persuaded that the...
AF | BCMR | CY1999 | BC-1996-03288
Available records reflect that the applicant received a Memorandum of Reprimand, dated 10 June 1994, from the Commander, Headquarters Texas Air National Guard. They recommend the applicant’s records be changed to show constructive participation as a Reserve Officer for the period of time following separation from the Texas Air National Guard through the Mandatory Separation Date. After a thorough review of the evidence of record and applicant’s submission, we are persuaded that the...
_________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: Pursuant to the Board’s request, the Personnel Operations Branch, ANG/DPFO, reviewed the additional information submitted and indicated that they are unable to administratively correct the applicant’s military records. The applicant has produced a number of supportive statements from high-level ANG and Air Force officers who support his request. Exhibit G. Letter, ANG/DPFO, dated 4 Aug 00.
AF | BCMR | CY2007 | BC-2006-03439
A member’s Mandatory Separation Date (MSD) is established from their Total Federal Commissioned Service Date (TFCSD) in accordance with Title 10, United States Code (USC), Section 14507, which requires that a Line-of- the Air Force colonel, not selected for promotion to the grade of brigadier general, be separated not later than the first day of the month following completion of 30-years commissioned service. Although applicant contends he had a break in service from November 1982 to...
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2010-01957
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS However, in accordance with 10 USC 12683 and AFI 36-3209, Separation and Retirement Procedures for Air National Guard and Air Force Reserve Members , he should have been discharged from ISLRS after three years, effective 2 Oct 01. Sufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate the existence of an error or injustice to warrant correcting the applicant’s records to show that he was discharged from the Inactive Status List...
AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2005-02405
In the alternative, applicant requests his MSD be changed to reflect 20 March 2010, based on the date he should have been assigned to ISLRS (24 Aug 84) versus the date he was assigned (19 Oct 84). _________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: ARPC/DPP states Reserve officers generally remain assigned to ISLRS for three years after which time they can be screened for an administrative discharge board, tender their resignation, or transfer to a...