AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
IN THE MATTER OF:
DOCKET NUMBER: 98-01908
COUNSEL: NONE
HEARING DESIRED: NO
APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:
She be provided the opportunity to sell 30 days of accrued leave.
APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT:
'
Her intentions were to sell 30 days of leave in conjunction with
her reenlistment. She signed paperwork without reading it, taking
for granted that her intentions to sell leave were clearly
understood. She admits she made a mistake, apologized for it, and
strongly desires to correct it.
In support of applicant's appeal, she submits a personal
statement, Leave Misunderstanding Memo, dated 4 June 1998, Memo
375 MSS/DPMPE, Memo, MPF Commander, dated 30 June 1998, HQ
AFPC/DPPAER message dated 2 July 1998, and AF Form 1089 (Leave
Settlement Option) .
Applicant's complete submission is attached at Exhibit A.
STATEMENT OF FACTS:
On 1 June 1998, the applicant reenlisted for four years. Prior to
this date, the applicant completed an AF Form 1089, Leave
Settlement Option, indicating she would carry forward all accrued
leave upon reenlistment.
AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
The Chief, Skills Management Branch, Directorate of Personnel
Program Management, reviewed this application and states that the
applicant contends she believed the AF Form 1089 authorized her to
sell 30 days leave. However, she has provided no evidence to
corroborate this allegation.
In fact, the evidence submitted
indicates to the contrary. The Military Personnel Flight (MPF)
98-01908
provided two key documents indicating the applicant was well aware
of her option to sell leave but elected to carry it forward. Both
the AF Form 1089 and the statement from the MPF counselor clearly
indicate no misunderstanding occurred, Therefore, they recommend
denial of applicant's request.
A complete copy of the Air Force evaluation is attached at Exhibit
C.
The Chief, Commanders' Programs Branch, HQ AFPC/DPSFC, advises
that the applicant states her desires were to sell 30 days upon
reenlistment on 1 June 1998. She states it was not her intention
to sign the AF Form 1089, Leave Settlement Option, indicating she
would carry forward all accrued leave upon reenlistment. The
applicant contends she believed the AF Form 1089 authorized her to
sell 30 days leave and that the MPF misunderstood her intentions.
Nonetheless, they agree with the earlier advisory and recommend
denial of her request.
A complete copy of the their evaluation is attached at Exhibit D.
APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
The applicant reviewed the advisory opinions and states that she
admits that she is guilty of having somewhat of a mental overload
during the time she signed paperwork to carry leave over, She was
concentrating on things that she needed to do, things that she
wanted to do, and trying to accomplish things that she had to do.
The reason why she wants to sell her leave is she is on her last
enlistment and would like to get things in order for retirement.
Her plan was to sell 30 days of leave in order to resolve an
outstanding Chapter 13 that she is currently in debt due to a
divorce.
Applicant's complete response is attached at Exhibit F.
THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:
1. The applicant has exhausted all remedies
law or regulations.
provided
existing
2. The application was timely filed.
3. Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to
demonstrate the existence of probable error or injustice. We took
notice of the applicant's complete submission in judging the
merits of the case; however, we agree with the opinion and
recommendation of the Air Force and adopt their rationale as the
basis for our conclusion that the applicant has not been the
2
.
.
victim of an error or injustice. Therefore, in the absence of
substantial evidence to the contrary, we find no compelling basis
to recommend granting the relief sought in this application.
98-01908
THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT:
The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did not
demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice;
that the application was denied without a personal appearance; and
that the application will only be reconsidered upon the submission
of newly discovered relevant evidence not considered with this
application.
The following members of the Board considered this application in
Executive Session on 17 December 1998, under the provisions of AFI
36-2603:
Mr. Vaughn E. Schlunz, Panel Chair
Mr. Loren S. Perlstein, Member
Mr. Kenneth L. Reinertson, Member
The following documentary evidence was considered:
Exhibit A. DD Form 149, dated 6 July 1998, w/atchs.
Exhibit B. Applicant's Master Personnel Records.
Exhibit C. Letter, HQ AFPC/DPPAE, dated 1 8 August 1 9 9 8 .
Exhibit D. Letter, HQ AFPC/DPSFC, dated 9 September 1 9 9 8 .
Exhibit E. Letter, SAF/MIBR, dated 21 September 1 9 9 8 .
Exhibit F. Applicant's Response, dated 5 October 1 9 9 8 .
d+f&
I
E. SCHLUNZ
VAUG
Panel Chair
3
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC-2013-00483
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2013-00483 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His reenlistment contract and AF Form 1089, Leave Settlement Option be amended to allow him the opportunity to sell back 30 days of accrued leave. In Jul 12, the Kadena MPF changed the date of his reenlistment contract to reflect 14 Sep 11 (his...
AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 00962
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2014-00962 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: He be allowed to sell back 30 days of accrued leave. The applicants AF Form 1089, dated 28 Oct 13, should be honored and the Defense Finance and Accounting Service (DFAS) should pay the applicant for the 30 days of leave he intended to sell in conjunction with his 17 Sep 13 reenlistment. THE BOARD RECOMMENDS...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-04532
The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the letter prepared by the appropriate office of the Air Force, which is attached at Exhibit C. ________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPSOA recommends denial, indicating there is no evidence the applicant requested or wanted to sell back leave at the time he extended for retraining. Because this was his first extension, he was authorized to sell back a maximum...
DPSFC stated that, if HQ AFPC/DPPRS agrees, the applicant’s retirement date should be changed from 1 Jul to 1 Sep 98. To grant the applicant additional active duty time to use 77 days of leave, his retirement date would have to be extended by 3 full months. Given the lost opportunity, and the change of circumstances, he was not even able to zero out the leave and permissive TDY days prior to 1 Jul 98.
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC-2013-00901
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2013-00901 XXXXXXX COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: YES ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: The sixty (60) days of leave he sold at the time of his reenlistment be rescinded. In support of his request, the applicant provides copies of his AF Form 1089, Leave Settlement Option; DD Form 4, Enlistment/Reenlistment Document Armed...
, ' JUN 3 0 1996 Office of the Assistant Secretary AFBCMR 9 8 - 0 0 0 6 9 MEMORANDUM FOR THE CHIEF OF STAFF Under the authority of Section 1 5 5 2 , Title 10, United States Code, and Air Force Instruction 3 6 - 2 6 0 3 , and having assured compliance with the provisions of the above regulation, the decision of the Air Force Board for Correction of Military Records is announced, and it is directed that: The pertinen Force relating to show that 2 8 days o commencing 2 October 1 9 9 7 ; and, at...
___________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: The Field Operations Branch, AFPC/DPSFM, indicated the applicant stated he did not elect to sell any leave upon his reenlistment on 18 Oct 99 but lost the leave after payment was erroneously made for 37 days leave. _________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT: The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air Force relating to APPLICANT be...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 02662
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2013-02662 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: He be eligible to sell 30 days of leave. As of this date, this office has not received a response (Exhibit D). We took notice of the applicants complete submission in judging the merits of the case; however, we agree with the opinion and...
DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE WASHINGTON, DC OCT 2 7 1998 Office of the Assistant Secretary AFBCMR 98-00086 MEMORANDUM FOR THE CHIEF OF STAFF Having received and considered the recommendation of the Air Force Board for Correction of Military Records and under the authority of Section 1552, Title 10, United States Code (70A Stat 116), it is directed that: itary records of the Department of the Air Force relating t be corrected to show that nine (9) days of leave were add V Air Force Review...
After his retirement, he was informed he could not sell 60 days of leave because he had sold 54 days in 1978/1979 as an enlisted member. A copy of the complete evaluation is at Exhibit C. The Retirements Branch, HQ AFPC/DPPRR, advises that there is no provision in AFI 36-3203 to extend an approved retirement for the sole purpose to be paid for accrued leave or to take terminal leave. After a thorough review of the evidence of record and applicant’s submission, we are not persuaded he...