Search Decisions

Decision Text

AF | BCMR | CY1998 | 9801706
Original file (9801706.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved
. 

Office of the Assistant Secretary 

AFBCMR 98-01706 

DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE 

WASHINGTON, DC 

MEMORANDUM FOR THE CHIEF OF STAFF 

Under the authority of Section 1552, Title 10, United States 

Code and Air Force Instruction 36-2603, and"having assured 
compliance with the provisions of the above regulation, the 
decision of the Air Force Board for Correction of Military Records 
is announced, and it is directed that: 

rtment of the Air 
The pertinen 
be corrected to 
Force relating to 
show that she was 
nonpaid inactive 
duty points during the retirement/retention year 20-February 1994 
through 19 February 1995, resulting in 50 total and retirement 
points; and, that the period 20 February 1994 through 19 February 
1995 is a year of satisfactory Federal service for retirement. 

p h i  e f Examiner 

Air Force Board for Correction 
of Military Records 

c 

DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE 

WASHINGTON, DC 

Office of the Assistant Secretary 

AFBCMR 9 8 - 0 1 7 0 6  

AUG  2 8  

MEMORANDUM OF CONSIDERATION OF APPLICATION BEFORE THE AFBCMR 

SUBJECT: 

Having carefully reviewed this application, we agree with the 
recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility 
and adopt the rationale expressed as the basis for our decision 
that the applicant has been.the victim of either an error or an 
injustice.  Therefore, under the authority delegated in AFI 
3 6 - 2 6 0 3 ,   the applicant's records will be corrected as set forth in 
the accompanying Memorandum for the Chief of Staff signed by the 
Executive Director of the Board or his designee. 

Attachment: 
Ltr, HQ ARPC/DP, dtd Jul 27,  1 9 9 8 ,  
w/At chs 

Pphel Chair 
/ 

DEPARTMENT  OF  THE  AIR  FORCE 

HEADQUARTERS  AIR  RESERVE  PERSONNEL  CENTER 

%!a 

MEMORANDUM FOR AFBCMR 

1535 Command Dr., EE Wing, 3rd Floor 
Andrews AFB MD 20762-7002 

FROM:  HQ ARPC/DP 

6760 E. Irvington P1 #1500 
Denver CO  80280-1500 

\ 

1.  The requested correction cannot be accomplished administratively at this headquarters. 

2.  The applicant is requesting 9 Inactive Duty Training (IDT) points and a year of satisfactory 
Federal service for the retentiodretirement (FUR) year 20 February  1994 to  19 February  1995 
(see attached). 

3.  The following is an analysis of the circumstances surrounding this case: 

a.  The applicant had surgery December 1993, to remove a cancerous kidney. 

Medial Squadron (MDS) for the January  1994 Unit Training Assembly (UTA). 

returned to 

reported the surgery on 

annual medical certification. 

b.  The MDS notified the applicant 

informed 
The applicant responded immediately. 

to submit 

was niedically disqualified to attend UTAs.  They also 
doctor’s report and to fill out all the necessary paperwork for review. 

c.  The applicant was informed by the personnel office of the MDS, all 

paperwork was in 
status and fitness for duty would be made by 

order, and the decision by the MDS concerning 
the May 1994 UTAs. 

d.  The May and June UTAs came and went without a response from the MDS.  The applicant 

became concerned about 
began inquiring for an explanation of the delay. 

status and the possibility of not having a satisfactory year. 

e.  The applicant was so frustrated and angr 
enlisted the help o 

(IG) in July of 1994, and 

t with the Inspector Genaal 
ng Commander. 

F 

- 

2 

f.  With the help of 
decision to retain the a 

and the IG office to speed things up, the MDS made the 
r duty. 

returned for the September 1994 UTAs. 

__ 

- - .. 

4. Timely submission of this application is not a factor because the persoimel office and the 
MDS were unsuccessful in resolving the unsatisfactory IUR year. 

5. Recommend this application be approved.  Had 
timely manner the applicant would have performed 

medical records been reviewed in a 
May, June, July and August UTAs. 

6. In order to correct applicant’s record, the board should award 9 non-paid IDT points for R/R 
year 20 February  1994 to 19 February  1995. 
record would then show 2 active duty points, 
33 IDT points, 0 Extension Course Institute points, 15 membership points and 50 total and 
retirement points and a year of satisfactory Federal service. 

7.  If this application is disapproved, no further action is required. 

8.  If you need further assistance please contact 

HQ ARPC/DPKA, at email 

arpcrnail.den.disa.mil or call DSN 926-601 2 or toll free 1-800-525-01 02, ext 403. 

tr 
P 



Similar Decisions

  • AF | BCMR | CY1999 | 9802563

    Original file (9802563.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    f the Department of the Air Force relating t corrected to show that: , Headquarters ARPC, Denver, Colorado, dated 20 April Reserve position and assigning him to the Inactive b. II c d. His record, as corrected, be considered for promotion to the grade of colonel, Air Force Reserve, by a Special Review Board (SRB); and, his records be evaluated in comparison with the records of officers who were and were not selected by the Fiscal Year 1995 (FY95) Reserve of the Air Force Colonel Selection...

  • AF | BCMR | CY1998 | 9802223

    Original file (9802223.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE WASHINGTON, D.C. Office of the Assistant Secretary AFBCMR 98-02223 MEMORANDUM FOR THE CHIEF OF STAFF Under the authority of Section 1552, Title 10, United States Code and AFI 36-2603, and having assured compliance with the provisions of the above regulation, the decision of the Air Force Board for Correction of Military Records is announced, and it is directed that: ary records of the Department of the Air Force relating t be corrected to show that he was credited...

  • AF | BCMR | CY1998 | 9801549

    Original file (9801549.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant is requesting satisfactory service be granted for Retirement Year Ending (RYE) 23 February 1997. I DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE WASHINGTON, DC Office of the Assistant Secretary AFBCMR 9 8 - 0 1 5 4 9 MEMORANDUM FOR THE CHIEF OF STAFF Under the authority of Section 1552, Title 10, United States Code and Air Force Instruction 3 6 - 2 6 0 3 , and having assured compliance with the provisions of the above regulation, the decision of the Air Force Board for Correction of Military...

  • AF | BCMR | CY1998 | 9800991

    Original file (9800991.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    -- AIR FORCE EVALUATION: The Director of Personnel Program Management, HQ ARPC/DP, reviewed the application and states that in early October 1992, the Nonaffiliated Reserve Section after being tr (NARS) from the National Guard, applicant applied dual Mobilization Augmentee (IMA) and was approve program assignment. However, when the process of reassignment started, there was a four-month delay causing the applicant's inability to perform in his unit and earn the required number of retirement...

  • AF | BCMR | CY1997 | 9801726

    I DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE WASHINGTON, D.C. Office of the Assistant Secretary AFBCMR 98-0 1726 MEMORANDUM FOR THE CHIEF OF STAFF Under the authority of Section 1552, Title 10, United States Code and AFI 36-2603, and having assured compliance with the provisions of the above regulation, the decision of the Air Force Board for Correction of Military Records is announced, and it is directed that: ords of the Department of the Air Force relating t- corrected to show that he was credited with...

  • AF | BCMR | CY1998 | 9801726

    Original file (9801726.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    I DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE WASHINGTON, D.C. Office of the Assistant Secretary AFBCMR 98-0 1726 MEMORANDUM FOR THE CHIEF OF STAFF Under the authority of Section 1552, Title 10, United States Code and AFI 36-2603, and having assured compliance with the provisions of the above regulation, the decision of the Air Force Board for Correction of Military Records is announced, and it is directed that: ords of the Department of the Air Force relating t- corrected to show that he was credited with...

  • AF | BCMR | CY1998 | 9802146

    Original file (9802146.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE WASHINGTON, DC 9 1998 Office of the Assistant Secretary AFBCMR 98-02 146 MEMORANDUM FOR THE CHIEF OF STAFF Under the authority of Section 1552, Title 10, United States Code, Air Force Instruction 36-2603, and having assured compliance with the provisions of the above regulation, the decision of the Air Force Board for Correction of Military Records is announced, and it is directed that: cords of the Department of the Air Force relating e corrected to show that he...

  • AF | BCMR | CY1998 | 9802715

    Original file (9802715.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    AFBCMR 98-02715 MEMORANDUM FOR THE CHIEF OF STAFF Under the authority of Section 1552, Title 10, United States Code, Air Force Instruction 36-2603, and having assured compliance with the provisions of the above regulation, the decision of the Air Force Board for Corr'ection of Military Records is announced, and it is directed that: The pertinen Force relating to show that he was c inactive duty trainlng points during the retirement/retention year 20 August 1997 through 19 August 1998,...

  • AF | BCMR | CY1998 | 9802281

    Original file (9802281.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE WASHINGTON, DC D&C 1 4 1998 Office of the Assistant Secretary AFBCMR 98-0228 1 MEMORANDUM FOR THE CHIEF OF STAFF Under the authority.of Section 1552, Title 10, United States Code, Air Force Instruction 36-2603, and having assured compliance with the provisions of the above regulation, the decision of the Air Force Board for Correction of Military Records is announced, and it is directed that: records of the Department of the Air Force relating t e corrected to...

  • AF | BCMR | CY1999 | 9703257

    Original file (9703257.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    She be retroactive promoted to the grade of 0-4 (major), which should have occurred during the Fiscal Year 1996 (FY96) Reserve of the Air Force Line/Health Professionals Board, that convened at Headquarters Air Reserve Personnel Center (HQ ARPC) on 6 - 10 March 1995. The investigation did in fact conclude and recommend in your favor.” In support of the appeal, applicant submits HQ ARPC/IG Letter, Request for TIG investigation, and Investigating Officer’s Reports. While this Board agrees...