d
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
A R F
C'E B
IN THE MATTER OF:
COUNSEL: None
HEARING DESIRED: No
3 5 {J(j; '1338
.
L.
Applicant requests that her other than honorable conditions
discharge be upgraded to honorable. Applicant's submission is at
Exhibit A.
Applicant's military personnel records were destroyed by fire in
1973. Therefore, the facts surrounding her separation from the
Air Force cannot be verified.
After careful consideration of applicant's request, we note that
there are no records to review and applicant has not provided
documentation revealing the circumstances of her discharge.
Based on the presumption of regularity in the conduct of
government affairs and without evidence to the contrary, we must
assume that the applicant's discharge was proper and in
compliance with appropriate directives. Therefore, we find no
basis upon which to favorably consider this application.
Accordingly, applicant's request is denied.
The Board staff is directed to inform applicant of this decision.
Applicant should also be informed that this decision is final and
will only be reconsidered upon the presentation of new relevant
evidence which was not reasonably available at the time the
application was filed.
Members of the Board Ms. Charlene M. Bradley, Mr. Joseph G.
Diamond, and Ms. Patricia D. Vestal considered this application
on 8 October 1998 in accordance with the provisions of Air Force
Instruction 36-2603, and the governing statute, 10, U.S.C. 1552.
Exhibits:
A. Applicant's DD Form 149
CHARLENE M. BRADLEY
P a n e l Chair
The appropriate Air Force office evaluated applicant's request and provided an advisory opinion to the Board recommending the application be denied (Exhibit C). The advisory opinion was forwarded to the applicant for review and response (Exhibit D). Available Master Personnel Records C. Advisory Opinion D. SAF/MIBR Ltr Forwarding Advisory Opinion D E P A R T M E N T O F T H E A I R F O R C E H E A D Q U A R T E R S AIR FORCE P E R S O N N E L C E N T E R R A N D O L P H AIR FORCE B A S E...
The appropriate Air Force office evaluated applicant's request and provided an advisory opinion to the Board recommending the application be denied (Exhibit C). The applicant’s response to the advisory opinion is at Exhibit E. After careful consideration of applicant's request and the available evidence of record, we find insufficient evidence of error or injustice to warrant corrective action. Accordingly, applicant's request is denied.
A copy of the Record of Proceedings is attached at Exhibit C. The appropriate Defense Finance and Accounting Service off ice evaluated applicant's request and provided an advisory opinion to the Board recommending the application be denied (Exhibit D). The advisory opinion was forwarded to the applicant for review and response (Exhibit E). requested .
The appropriate Air Force office evaluated applicant's request and provided an advisory opinion to the Board recommending the application be denied (Exhibit C). The advisory opinion was forwarded to the applicant for review and response (Exhibit D). The facts and opinions stated in the advisory opinion appear to be based on the evidence of record and have not been rebutted by applicant.
The appropriate Air Force offices evaluated applicant's request and provided advisory opinions to the Board recommending the application be denied (Exhibit C). The advisory opinions were forwarded to the applicant for review and response (Exhibit D). Applicant’s response to the advisory opinions is at Exhibit E. After careful consideration of applicant's request and the available evidence of record, we find insufficient evidence of error or injustice to warrant corrective action.
The appropriate Air Force office evaluated applicant's request and provided an advisory opinion to the Board recommending the application be denied (Exhibit C). The advisory opinion was forwarded to the applicant for review and response (Exhibit D). The facts and opinions stated in the advisory opinion appear to be based on the evidence of record and have not been rebutted by applicant.
The appropriate Air Force office evaluated applicant's request and provided an advisory opinion to the Board recommending the application be denied (Exhibit C). The advisory opinion was forwarded to the applicant for review and response (Exhibit D). The facts and opinions stated in the advisory opinion appear to be based on the evidence of record and have not been rebutted by applicant.
On 19 December 2000, the Air Force Discharge Review Board (AFDRB) considered and denied applicant’s requests for upgrade of discharge to honorable, change of reason for discharge, and change of RE code. A copy of the AFDRB Hearing Record is at Exhibit C. The appropriate Air Force offices evaluated applicant's requests for reinstatement of his former grade of senior airman and change of RE code and provided advisory opinions to the Board (Exhibit D). The AFDRB Hearing Record and advisory...
The appropriate Air Force office evaluated applicant's request and provided an advisory opinion to the Board recommending the application be denied (Exhibit C). The advisory opinion was forwarded to the applicant for review and response (Exhibit D). Applicant should also be informed that this decision is final and will only be reconsidered upon the presentation of new relevant evidence which was not reasonably available at the time the application was filed.
The appropriate Air Force office evaluated applicant's request and provided an advisory opinion to the Board recommending the application be denied (Exhibit C). The advisory opinion was forwarded to the counsel for review and response (Exhibit D). Accordingly, applicant's request is denied.