AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC-2013-00713
AFBCMR BC-2013-00713 MEMORANDUM OF CONSIDERATION OF APPLICATION BEFORE THE AFBCMR SUBJECT: xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Having carefully reviewed this application, we agree with the recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt the rationale expressed as the basis for our decision that the applicant has been the victim of either an error or an injustice. Therefore, we recommend the applicant's records be corrected to show that: The pertinent military records of the...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC-2013-00724
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2013-00724 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ _ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His reentry (RE) code of 2Q (Personnel Medical Retired or Discharged) be changed in order to reenter the Air Force. The Informal Physical Evaluation Board (IPEB) found the applicants medical condition unfit for duty on 13 Sep 05 and recommended...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC-2013-00728
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2013-00728 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ _ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: 1. His narrative reason for separation (Misconduct Drug Abuse) be changed. ________________________________________________________________ _ THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: The applicant be notified the evidence presented did not demonstrate the...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC-2013-00731
DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE WASHINGTON DC Office of the Assistant Secretary AFBCMR BC-2013-00731 MEMORANDUM OF CONSIDERATION OF APPLICATION BEFORE THE AFBCMR SUBJECT: Having carefully reviewed this application, we agree with the recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt the rationale expressed as the basis for our decision that the applicant has been the victim of either an error or an injustice. Therefore, we recommend that: The pertinent military records...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC-2013-00736
We note that DPSIM recommends denial stating that the applicant has not provided documentation that proves she was pregnant at the time the FA was administered. However, we note the applicant provides a copy of an AF Form 469, dated 26 Nov 2012, stating that she was temporary deferred from Air Force Fitness Assessments. Exhibit C. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 31 Oct 2013.
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC-2013-00744
The AFLSA is awarded to all service members of the United States Air Force who complete 4 years of honorable active or reserve military service. ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: On 25 Apr 2013, a copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to the applicant for review and comment within 30 days. THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT: The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air Force relating to APPLICANT, be...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC-2013-00764
AFBCMR BC-2013-00764 MEMORANDUM FOR THE CHIEF OF STAFF Having received and considered the recommendation of the Air Force Board for Correction of Military Records and under the authority of Section 1552, Title 10, United States Code, it is directed that: The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air Force relating to xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, be corrected to show that his request to receive Basic Allowance of Housing (BAH) for location of dependents, zip code 99701, from 6...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC-2013-00774
The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the letters prepared by the appropriate offices of the Air Force, which is at Exhibit C and D. ________________________________________________________________ _ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPSIPV recommends denial. The complete DPSIPV evaluation, with attachments, is at Exhibit C. APFC/DPSOR recommends the applicants DD Form 214 be corrected to read, Attended Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC-2013-00775
The Medical Consultant found no Line of Duty determinations within the medical records, to support anything other than a "non-duty related impairment or condition." As of this date, no response has been received by this office (Exhibit D). Exhibit C. Letter, BCMR Medical Consultant, dated 20 May 2013.
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC-2013-00778
AFBCMR BC-2013-00778 MEMORANDUM OF CONSIDERATION OF APPLICATION BEFORE THE AFBCMR SUBJECT: Having carefully reviewed this application, we agree with the recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt the rationale expressed as the basis for our decision that the applicant has been the victim of either an error or an injustice. Therefore, we recommend the applicant's records be corrected to show that: The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC-2013-00780
He was furnished a BCD on 13 Jul 03, and credited with 3 years, 4 months, and 17 days of active service. The applicant's sentence was within the legal limits and was an appropriate punishment for the offenses committed. ________________________________________________________________ The following members of the Board considered AFBCMR Docket Number BC-2013-00780 in Executive Session on 19 Dec 13, under the provisions of AFI 36-2603: , Chair , Member , Member The following documentary...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC-2013-00783
The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application extracted from the applicants military personnel records are contained in the letter prepared by the appropriate Air Force office of primary responsibility at Exhibit C. ______________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: 1. AFI 36-2606, Reenlistment in the USAF, states commanders have selective reenlistment selection or non-selection authority. We took notice of the applicant's complete...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC-2013-00787
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2013-00787 COUNSEL: HEARING DESIRED: YES ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: The Referral Officer Performance Report (OPR) dated 11 Oct 12, be declared void and removed from her records. The complete A1PP evaluation is at Exhibit C. ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC-2013-00788
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2013-01301 COUNSEL: HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His DD Form 214, Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge, be corrected to show that he was awarded the Vietnam Service Medal (VSM). DPSID states that while they were able to verify that the applicant served at Udorn Air Base,...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC-2013-00790
On 19 Dec 84, the applicant was discharged by reason of misconduct pattern of minor disciplinary infractions, with service characterized as general (under honorable conditions). We took notice of the applicant's complete submission in judging the merits of the case; however, we find no evidence of an error or injustice that occurred during the discharge process. In the interest of justice, we considered upgrading his discharge based on clemency; however, considering the applicants...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC-2013-00791
He does not think the Air Force really tried to help him not use drugs. On 2 May 2011, the applicant was notified of his commanders intent to discharge him from the Air Force for drug abuse. ________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did not demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; that the application was denied without a personal appearance; and that the application...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC-2013-00794
On 7 August 1961, the Air Force Board for Correction of Military Records denied the applicants request to upgrade his discharge. THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT: The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air Force relating to APPLICANT be corrected to show that on 11 April 1958, he was discharged with service characterized as general (under honorable conditions). Exhibit B.
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC-2013-00795
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2013-00795 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NOT INDICATED ________________________________________________________________ _ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: He receive Incapacitation Pay (INCAP Pay) for the period of 26 Sep 11 to January 2012. The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the letters prepared by the appropriate offices of the Air Force, which is...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC-2013-00798
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2013-00798 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His Reentry (RE) code 4A, which denotes Separated for Hardship or Dependency Reason be changed to a code that will allow him to serve on active duty or in the reserves. After thoroughly reviewing the evidence of record and noting the applicants...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC-2013-00803
The complete A1P evaluation is at Exhibit D. ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANTS REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: He was denied promotion because the MS ANG reneged on his assignment orders without advising him just weeks after arriving on station. The resource to promote him to the grade of SMSgt as reflected on his orders was taken away when another member was placed in his position. ...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC-2013-00805
However, the MEDCON orders were not completed. The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the letter prepared by the appropriate offices of the Air Force at Exhibits C and D. ________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: NGB/SGPF recommends denial. ________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did not demonstrate the...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC-2013-00811
The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are described in the letter prepared by the Air Force office of primary responsibility, which is attached at Exhibit C. ________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPSOR recommends denial, indicating there is no evidence of an error or injustice. Based on the documentation on file in the master personnel records, the discharge was appropriately administered and within the discretion...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC-2013-00816
AFBCMR BC-2013-00816 MEMORANDUM OF CONSIDERATION OF APPLICATION BEFORE THE AFBCMR SUBJECT: Having carefully reviewed this application, we agree with the recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt the rationale expressed as the basis for our decision that the applicant has been the victim of either an error or an injustice. Therefore, we recommend the applicant's records be corrected to show that: The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC-2013-00829
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2013-00829 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His under other than honorable conditions (UOTHC) discharge be upgraded to an honorable or general discharge. On 12 Nov 61, the applicant was furnished an under other than honorable conditions (UOTHC) discharge and was credited with two years, eight...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC-2013-00830
However, the records failed to provide any documents that substantiate Foreign Service time in Vietnam. The complete DPAPP evaluation is at Exhibit C. ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: On 25 Apr 2013, a copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to the applicant for review and comment within 30 days. _______________________________________________________________ THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: The applicant be...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC-2013-00833
His DD Form 214 be corrected to show award of the Korea Service Medal (KSM). Individuals must have been assigned, attached, or mobilized to units operating or serving on the land area of the Republic of Korea, and the contiguous waters out to 12 nautical miles, and all airspace above the stated land and water areas. Upon conclusion and final decision by the Board, AFPC/DPSID will administratively correct the applicants records to show award of the MSM and the KDSM.
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC-2013-00845
The applicants complete submission is at Exhibit A. His supervisor non-recommended him for the selective reenlistment program and his commander non-selected him for reenlistment on 26 March 2010. As of this date, this office has received no response.
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC-2013-00846
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2013-00846 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His DD Form 214, Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty, be corrected to reflect his entitlement to the Vietnam Service Medal (VSM). ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: He traveled to...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC-2013-00847
The applicant has not provided sufficient evidence which would lead us to believe that at the time of her discharge, a physical condition existed that was determined by competent medical authority to be a physical disability which specifically rendered her unfit for continued military service. However, we note that although the Air Force is required to rate disabilities in accordance with the DVA Schedule for Rating Disabilities, the DVA operates under a totally separate system with a...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC-2013-00849
________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: He served in the Air Force from 12 Sep 1954 to 11 Sep 1962 and he does not have a copy of his records which were destroyed in a fire at the National Personnel Records Center (NPRC) in 1973. DPTS states that based on available documents, they can only confirm that the applicant enlisted in the Air Force on 12 Sep 1954 and was discharged on 11 Sep 1962 with 8 years total service. All relevant evidence...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC-2013-00858
AFBCMR BC-2013-00858 MEMORANDUM FOR THE CHIEF OF STAFF Having received and considered the recommendation of the Air Force Board for Correction of Military Records and under the authority of Section 1552, Title 10, United States Code, it is directed that: The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air Force relating to XXXXXXX, XXXXXXX, be corrected to show a Date of Rank (DOR) in the grade of major (O- 4) of 4 February 2012 rather than 3 June 2012 and a Promotion Effective Date...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC-2013-00862
There is no legal authority for the Air Force to pay the applicant an SBP annuity because the member retired before the implementation of the SBP and he did not choose to provide SBP coverage for her when he was eligible to do so. We took notice of the applicant's complete submission in judging the merits of the case; however, we agree with the opinion and recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt its rationale as the basis for our conclusion that the...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC-2013-00863
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2013-00863 XXXXXXX COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: 1. ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: Around the time he received his 20-year Retirement Letter at age 60, he was told that he had to make an election for the RCSBP or he would forfeit his...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC-2013-00864
________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: His name was changed with the Social Security Administration and he would like his Air Force records changed to match. We took notice of the applicant's complete submission in judging the merits of the case; however, we agree with the opinion and recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt its rationale as the basis for our conclusion that the applicant has not been the...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC-2013-00873
On 20 July 1972, the commander approved the discharge and directed he be separated with a general discharge. On 2 December 1980, the Air Force Discharge Review Board Hearing Board considered and denied the applicants request to upgrade his discharge. ________________________________________________________________ The following members of the Board considered AFBCMR Docket Number BC-2013-00873 in Executive Session on 3 December 2013, under the provisions of AFI 36-2603: The following...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC-2013-00874
AFBCMR BC-2013-00874 MEMORANDUM OF CONSIDERATION OF APPLICATION BEFORE THE AFBCMR SUBJECT: Having carefully reviewed this application, we agree with the recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt the rationale expressed as the basis for our decision that the applicant has been the victim of either an error or an injustice. Therefore, we recommend that: The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air Force relating to APPLICANT, be corrected to...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC-2013-00879
The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application, extracted from the applicants military records, are contained in the letter prepared by the appropriate office of the Air Force at Exhibit B. DPSIT states the applicant did not provide sufficient documentation to support his claim. When the applicant applied, the Post-9/11 GI Bill team at DPT sent an email to the applicants vMPF email address of record on 10 November 2010, directing the applicant to complete the required SOU...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC-2013-00884
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2013-00884 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His service connected disabilities of high blood pressure and coronary artery disease (CAD) be re-evaluated under the Combat Related Special Compensation (CRSC) program. As such, we agree with the opinion and recommendation of the Air Force office...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC-2013-00887
On 12 Oct 71, the Air Force Discharge Review Board (AFDRB) reviewed the applicants request to upgrade his discharge, but denied the request because the facts of record in his case did not warrant changing the type of discharge. Therefore, in the absence of evidence to the contrary, we conclude that no basis exists to upgrade the applicants Undesirable discharge. ________________________________________________________________ The following members of the Board considered AFBCMR...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC-2013-00894
AFBCMR BC-2013-00894 MEMORANDUM OF CONSIDERATION OF APPLICATION BEFORE THE AFBCMR SUBJECT: Having carefully reviewed this application, we agree with the recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt its rationale expressed as the basis for our decision that the applicant has been the victim of either an error or an injustice. Therefore, we recommend that: The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air Force relating to the APPLICANT be corrected to...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC-2013-00901
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2013-00901 XXXXXXX COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: YES ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: The sixty (60) days of leave he sold at the time of his reenlistment be rescinded. In support of his request, the applicant provides copies of his AF Form 1089, Leave Settlement Option; DD Form 4, Enlistment/Reenlistment Document Armed...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC-2013-00907
On 26 Nov 97, the applicant was furnished a honorable discharge with a narrative reason for separation of Completion of Required Active Service, along with a separation program designator (SPD) code of KBK (Completion of Active Service) and RE code of 4J. The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are described in the letters prepared by the Air Force offices of primary responsibility (OPR), which are attached at Exhibits C, D, and...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC-2013-00909
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2013-00909 COUNSEL: JERICHO DUTCHOVER, DAV HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His diagnosis of Obstructive Sleep Apnea be added to his AF Form 356, Findings and Recommended Disposition of USAF Physical Evaluation Board, dated 14 Jan 08, and included as part of his overall disability rating. His medical...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC-2013-00915
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2013-00915 HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His under other than honorable conditions (UOTHC) discharge be upgraded. On 24 Dec 64, the applicant was furnished an under other than honorable conditions (UOTHC) discharge and was credited with 3 years, 7 months, and 22 days of active service. ...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC-2013-00918
He has one-year from the date of his remarriage to not resume any SBP coverage for his new spouse. They did not receive his notification until 9 October 2012, stating that he did not want to resume SBP coverage for his new spouse. We took notice of the applicant's complete submission in judging the merits of the case; however, we agree with the opinion and recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt its rationale as the basis for our conclusion the applicant...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC-2013-00924
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2013-00924 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His Bad Conduct Discharge (BCD) be upgraded. We find no evidence which indicates the applicants service characterization, which had its basis in his court-martial and was a part of the sentence of the military court, was improper or that it exceeded...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC-2013-00926
________________________________________________________________ _ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: On 29 October 2013, a copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to the applicant for review and response within 30 days (Exhibit C). In this respect, we note the letter from the applicants medical provider; however, the applicant did not provide documentation from the unit commander recommending the assessments be invalidated. Exhibit C. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 29 October 2013.
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC-2013-00930
The applicants former spouse was also awarded SBP coverage; however, at that time, he did not request that they change his SBP beneficiary from spouse to former spouse. After thoroughly reviewing the circumstances of this case, the Board notes the comments of the DFAS Retirement and Annuitant office, indicating the applicant did not request a change in his SBP beneficiary from spouse to former within one year of his divorce and therefore his request should be denied. Exhibit C. Letter,...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC-2013-00935
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2013-00935 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ _ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His DD Form 256, Discharge Certificate, dated 22 Apr 78, be changed to reflect his rank as major rather than captain. The complete DPTT evaluation is at Exhibit C. ________________________________________________________________ _ APPLICANT'S REVIEW...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC-2013-00942
Additionally, the Department of Defense (DoD) and the DVA disability evaluation systems operate under separate laws. In addition, if the rating reflects a snapshot of the members condition at the time, then the vast disparity between the assessment of the DVA and the assessment of the doctor must be addressed as both examinations occurred during the same time period and addressed the exact same medical condition of Major Depressive Disorder. Further, there is no apparent relationship...