RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2013-00783
COUNSEL: NONE
HEARING DESIRED: NO
________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:
His Re-entry (RE) code of 2X (1st Term, 2nd Term or Career AMN
Not Selected under Selection Retention Process (SRP)) be changed
to allow him enlist in the Air National Guard.
________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT:
He served a full four-year enlistment without incident and was
promoted on time every time. After reenlisting, he served two
more years without incident and attained the rank of Staff
Sergeant, E-5. During his last year of service he received an
Article 15 for dereliction of duty and was honorably discharged
under the DOS rollback system. He believes wholeheartedly that
he can be an asset to the Air National Guard and therefore,
requests he be granted a reentry code that allows him the
opportunity to continue serving this great nation.
The applicant did not provide any documents in support of his
request.
The applicants complete submission is at Exhibit A.
________________________________________________________________
STATEMENT OF FACTS:
The applicant enlisted in the Regular Air Force on 6 July 2004
and was released from active duty on 31 May 2011 with an
honorable character of service and was credited with 6 years, 10
months, and 25 days of active duty service.
The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application
extracted from the applicants military personnel records are
contained in the letter prepared by the appropriate Air Force
office of primary responsibility at Exhibit C.
______________________________________________________________
AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
1. AFPC/DPSOA recommends denial. DPSOA states the applicant
was discharged on 31 May 2011 under the FY11 Air Force (AF)
Force Shaping Rollback Program with an honorable character of
service and was authorized severance pay. The applicant's
commander made a conscious decision to separate him under the
Rollback guidance by non-selecting him for reenlistment; meaning
he had to be separated and could not have stayed in the AF. His
commander non-selected him on an AF IMT 4I8, Selective
Reenlistment Program Consideration, on 10 February 2011 and the
applicant acknowledged his non-selection and rendered his intent
to appeal the decision on 24 February 2011.
2. AFI 36-2606, Reenlistment in the USAF, states commanders
have selective reenlistment selection or non-selection
authority. The Selective Reenlistment Program (SRP) considers
the members Enlisted Performance Report (EPR) ratings,
unfavorable information from any substantiated source, the
airman's willingness to comply with Air Force standards and/or
the airman's ability (or lack of) to meet required training and
duty performance levels. The applicant did not provide any
proof of an error or injustice in reference to his RE code and
his non-selection was in accordance with current guidance. The
applicant stated he had one Article 15 for dereliction of duty,
however, his commander cited a Letter of Reprimand (LOR), for
criminal mischief, LOR for falsifying an official document, and
two Article 15s (30 July 2010) and (4 October 2010) for
dereliction of duties. The applicant's non-selection for
reenlistment is the result of his own pattern of misconduct.
The complete AFPC/DPSOA evaluation is at Exhibit C.
________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
A copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to the
applicant on 19 April 2013 for review and comment within
30 days. To date, a response has not been received.
________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:
1. The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by
existing law or regulations.
2. The application was timely filed.
3. Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to
demonstrate the existence of error or injustice. We took notice
of the applicant's complete submission in judging the merits of
the case; however, we agree with the opinion and recommendation
of the Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt its
rationale as the basis for our conclusion the applicant has not
been the victim of an error or injustice. Therefore, in the
absence of evidence to the contrary, we find no basis to
recommend granting the relief sought in this application.
________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT:
The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did not
demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; that
the application was denied without a personal appearance; and
that the application will only be reconsidered upon the
submission of newly discovered relevant evidence not considered
with this application.
________________________________________________________________
The following members of the Board considered this application
in Executive Session on 24 October 2013, under the provisions of
AFI 36-2603:
, Panel Chair
, Member
, Member
The following documentary evidence was considered in AFBCMR
Docket Number BC-2013-00783:
Exhibit A. DD Form 149 dated 6 Feb 2013.
Exhibit B. Applicants Master Personnel Records.
Exhibit C. Letter, AFPC/DPSOA, dated 19 March 2013.
Exhibit D. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 19 April 2013.
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2012 05487
Block 8b, Station Where Separated, of his DD Form 214, Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty, be corrected to reflect Andrews Air Force Base, Maryland, instead of Randolph Air Force Base, Texas. ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: 1. The applicants commander indicated the applicant identified himself as eligible for separation under the DOS Rollback program and it was his intention to deny the applicant reenlistment...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-02787
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-02787 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ______________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His Reentry (RE) code of 2X, which denotes "1st term, 2nd term or career airman considered but not selected for reenlistment under the selective reenlistment program (SRP)," be changed to allow his reentry into the military. On 17 Feb 2011, the...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC-2013-01348
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2013-01348 COUNSEL: NONE XXXXXXX HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His Reentry (RE) code of 2X, which denotes "1st term, 2nd term or career airman considered but not selected for reenlistment under the Selective Reenlistment Program (SRP)," be changed to 1XY [sic] to allow his reentry into the military. On 16...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 02620
The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are described in the letters prepared by the Air Force offices of primary responsibility, which are attached at Exhibits C and D. ________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFLOA/JAJM recommends denial of the applicants request to set aside his NJP, indicating the applicant has not shown a clear error or injustice. He was later informed that the commander had made his decision to impose...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-04992
On 9 May 2012, the applicant submitted an additional response to his denial of reenlistment and demotion action because he indicated that he just received the ROI. On 19 September 2012, by authority of the Secretary of the Air Force, his 3 August 2012 request for redress filed under Article 138 was denied as the actions taken by the command were determined to be appropriate to the circumstances. The applicants discharge was correctly administered on the basis of his RE code of 2X (denied...
AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 01103
On 23 May 12, his supervisor signed the AF IMT 418, Selective Reenlistment Program (SRP) Consideration for Airmen in the Regular Air Force/Air Force Reserve, indicating he was not recommending him for reenlistment due to his duty performance and multiple disciplinary issues. On 14 May 12, his supervisor presented him with an AF IMT 1058, Unfavorable Information File Action, notifying him that he intended to place him on the control roster for his duty performance and multiple disciplinary...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 03463
He was notified the control roster action automatically placed him on the FY13 Rollback Program. He contacted the Separations office at Joint Base San Antonio (JBSA) Randolph to correct this issue, but they were unable to manually change separation code on DD Form 214, Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty, because the automatic LGH separation code was loaded in their system. On 15 Jul 13, the applicant was separated under the FY13 DOS Rollback Program, with a RE code of 2X;...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 02391
On 7 September 2010, he was notified that his supervisor not recommended him for reenlistment. The applicant was discharged on 31 May 2011 under the FY11 Air Force Shaping Rollback Program after serving 3 years, 9 months and 3 days. The applicant provides no proof of an error or injustice in reference to his RE code and his non-selection for reenlistment was in accordance with current guidance.
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC-2012-02475
The complete DPSOA evaluation is at Exhibit B. He has never done any of the actions he was accused of by the three airmen. Moreover, he has not provided substantial evidence that but for the Article 15 he would have been selected for reenlistment.
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 04879
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2013-04879 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His Reentry (RE) code 2X (First-term, second-term or career airman considered but not selected for reenlistment under the Selective Reenlistment Program (SRP)) be changed to a 1 series. The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the memorandum prepared by the Air Force office...