RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
         AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

IN THE MATTER OF:	DOCKET NUMBER:  BC-2013-00783

			COUNSEL:  NONE 

			HEARING DESIRED: NO

________________________________________________________________

APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:

His Re-entry (RE) code of “2X” (1st Term, 2nd Term or Career AMN 
Not Selected under Selection Retention Process (SRP)) be changed 
to allow him enlist in the Air National Guard.  

________________________________________________________________

APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT:

He served a full four-year enlistment without incident and was 
promoted on time every time.  After reenlisting, he served two 
more years without incident and attained the rank of Staff 
Sergeant, E-5.  During his last year of service he received an 
Article 15 for dereliction of duty and was honorably discharged 
under the DOS rollback system.  He believes wholeheartedly that 
he can be an asset to the Air National Guard and therefore, 
requests he be granted a reentry code that allows him the 
opportunity to continue serving this great nation.  

The applicant did not provide any documents in support of his 
request.

The applicant’s complete submission is at Exhibit A. 

________________________________________________________________

STATEMENT OF FACTS:

The applicant enlisted in the Regular Air Force on 6 July 2004 
and was released from active duty on 31 May 2011 with an 
honorable character of service and was credited with 6 years, 10 
months, and 25 days of active duty service.  

The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application 
extracted from the applicant’s military personnel records are 
contained in the letter prepared by the appropriate Air Force 
office of primary responsibility at Exhibit C.   

______________________________________________________________

AIR FORCE EVALUATION:

1.  AFPC/DPSOA recommends denial.  DPSOA states the applicant 
was discharged on 31 May 2011 under the FY11 Air Force (AF) 
Force Shaping Rollback Program with an honorable character of 
service and was authorized severance pay.  The applicant's 
commander made a conscious decision to separate him under the 
Rollback guidance by non-selecting him for reenlistment; meaning 
he had to be separated and could not have stayed in the AF.  His 
commander non-selected him on an AF IMT 4I8, Selective 
Reenlistment Program Consideration, on 10 February 2011 and the 
applicant acknowledged his non-selection and rendered his intent 
to appeal the decision on 24 February 2011.

2.  AFI 36-2606, Reenlistment in the USAF, states commanders 
have selective reenlistment selection or non-selection 
authority.  The Selective Reenlistment Program (SRP) considers 
the members Enlisted Performance Report (EPR) ratings, 
unfavorable information from any substantiated source, the 
airman's willingness to comply with Air Force standards and/or 
the airman's ability (or lack of) to meet required training and 
duty performance levels.  The applicant did not provide any 
proof of an error or injustice in reference to his RE code and 
his non-selection was in accordance with current guidance.  The 
applicant stated he had one Article 15 for dereliction of duty, 
however, his commander cited a Letter of Reprimand (LOR), for 
criminal mischief, LOR for falsifying an official document, and 
two Article 15s (30 July 2010) and (4 October 2010) for 
dereliction of duties.  The applicant's non-selection for 
reenlistment is the result of his own pattern of misconduct.  

The complete AFPC/DPSOA evaluation is at Exhibit C. 

________________________________________________________________

APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION:

A copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to the 
applicant on 19 April 2013 for review and comment within 
30 days.  To date, a response has not been received. 

________________________________________________________________

THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:

1.  The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by 
existing law or regulations.

2.  The application was timely filed.  

3.  Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to 
demonstrate the existence of error or injustice.  We took notice 
of the applicant's complete submission in judging the merits of 
the case; however, we agree with the opinion and recommendation 
of the Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt its 
rationale as the basis for our conclusion the applicant has not 
been the victim of an error or injustice.  Therefore, in the 
absence of evidence to the contrary, we find no basis to 
recommend granting the relief sought in this application.

________________________________________________________________

THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT:

The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did not 
demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; that 
the application was denied without a personal appearance; and 
that the application will only be reconsidered upon the 
submission of newly discovered relevant evidence not considered 
with this application.

________________________________________________________________

The following members of the Board considered this application 
in Executive Session on 24 October 2013, under the provisions of 
AFI 36-2603:

			, Panel Chair
			, Member
			, Member

The following documentary evidence was considered in AFBCMR 
Docket Number BC-2013-00783:

    Exhibit A.  DD Form 149 dated 6 Feb 2013.
    Exhibit B.  Applicant’s Master Personnel Records.
    Exhibit C.  Letter, AFPC/DPSOA, dated 19 March 2013.
    Exhibit D.  Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 19 April 2013.