RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2013-00935
COUNSEL: NONE
HEARING DESIRED: NO
________________________________________________________________
_
APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:
His DD Form 256, Discharge Certificate, dated 22 Apr 78, be
changed to reflect his rank as major rather than captain.
________________________________________________________________
_
APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT:
He should have been discharged as a major in the Air Force
Reserve.
In support of his request, the applicant provides a copy of his
DD Form 256, and a copy of his DD Form 214, Report of Separation
from Active Duty.
His complete submission, with attachments, is at Exhibit A.
________________________________________________________________
_
STATEMENT OF FACTS:
The applicants DD Form 214 reflects he served in the United
States Air Force Reserve-MC (USAFR-MC) in the grade of major*.
Item 27 (Remarks) reflects Item 6a* Captain RESAF (USAFR) (P)
Appointed 1 Dec 71, DOR: 11 Jun 74.
The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are
contained in the letter prepared by the appropriate office of
the Air Force, which is at Exhibit C.
________________________________________________________________
_
AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
ARPC/DPTT recommends denial. The applicant served in the USAFR
as a permanent captain and served on active duty as a temporary
major. He did not have seven years time-in-grade or at least
14 years time-in-service to meet an USAFR majors promotion
board, before he was discharged.
The complete DPTT evaluation is at Exhibit C.
________________________________________________________________
_
APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
A copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to the
applicant on 6 Apr 13 for review and comment within 30 days. As
of this date, this office has received no response.
________________________________________________________________
_
THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:
1. The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by
existing law or regulations.
2. The application was not timely filed; however, it is in the
interest of justice to excuse the failure to timely file.
3. Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to
demonstrate the existence of error or injustice. We took notice
of the applicant's complete submission in judging the merits of
the case; however, we agree with the opinion and recommendation
of the Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt its
rationale as the basis for our conclusion that the applicant has
not been the victim of an error or injustice. Therefore, in the
absence of evidence to the contrary, we find no basis to
recommend granting the relief sought in this application.
________________________________________________________________
_
THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT:
The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did not
demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; that
the application was denied without a personal appearance; and
that the application will only be reconsidered upon the
submission of newly discovered relevant evidence not considered
with this application.
________________________________________________________________
_
The following members of the Board considered AFBCMR Docket
Number BC-2013-00935 in Executive Session on 5 Nov 13, under the
provisions of AFI 36-2603:
, Panel Chair
, Member
, Member
The following documentary evidence for Docket Number BC-2013-00935
was considered:
Exhibit A. DD Form 149, dated8 Feb 13, w/atchs.
Exhibit B. Applicant's Master Personnel Records.
Exhibit C. Letter, ARPC/DPTT, dated 1 Apr 13.
Exhibit D. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 6 Apr 13.
Panel Chair
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC-2013-01156
The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the letter prepared by the appropriate Air Force office of primary responsibility and listed at Exhibit C. _______________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: ARPC/DPTT recommends denial. There are no documents in his master personnel file indicating that he was promoted to airman or airman first class. There was no evidence that the applicant was promoted to airman or airman...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC-2013-00998
In addition, the Air Force Instruction (AFI) stated that an officer transferring into the Air Force should not be given a DOR that subjects them to a promotion board within one year of the transfer or without a completed officer performance report (OPR) on file. The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are described in the letter prepared by the Air Force office of primary responsibility (OPR) which is included at Exhibit...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 00998
In addition, the Air Force Instruction (AFI) stated that an officer transferring into the Air Force should not be given a DOR that subjects them to a promotion board within one year of the transfer or without a completed officer performance report (OPR) on file. The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are described in the letter prepared by the Air Force office of primary responsibility (OPR) which is included at Exhibit...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 01768
________________________________________________________________ STATEMENT OF FACTS: The relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the letter prepared by the Air Force office of primary responsibility (OPR), which is attached at Exhibit C. ________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: ARPC/DPTT recommends denial, indicating there is no evidence of an error or injustice. In addition, in Oct 97 she did not qualify for retirement...
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-04355
As of this date, this office has not received a response. ________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did not demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; that the application was denied without a personal appearance; and that the application will only be reconsidered upon the submission of newly discovered relevant evidence not considered with this application. ...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC-2013-00680
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2013-00680 XXXXXXX XXX COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ THE APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: He be credited with enough retirement points to qualify for Reserve retired pay at age 60. ________________________________________________________________ THE AIR FORCE EVALUATION: ARPC/DPTT recommends denial, stating, in part, that...
AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2006-00500
His date of separation at the time of discharge is not correctly annotated in his records. The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are described in the letter prepared by the Air Force office of primary responsibility, which is attached at Exhibit C. ________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: ARPC/DPTT recommends denial indicating there is no evidence of an error or an injustice. There is insufficient documentation to support...
AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC 2006 00500
His date of separation at the time of discharge is not correctly annotated in his records. The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are described in the letter prepared by the Air Force office of primary responsibility, which is attached at Exhibit C. ________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: ARPC/DPTT recommends denial indicating there is no evidence of an error or an injustice. There is insufficient documentation to support...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC-2013-00169
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2013-00169 COUNSEL: NO HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His second non-selection to the grade of major (O-4) be declared void and removed from his record, and he be granted a Special Selection Board (SSB) for consideration for promotion to O-4. The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 05455
On 26 Oct 04, the applicant was selected for promotion to the Reserve grade of major (O-4) with a date of rank and promotion effective date of 1 Oct 98. On 10 Apr 06, as a result of the applicants request before the AFBCMR (AFBCMR Docket Number BC-2004-03564) to restore lost points, lost pay, compensation for lost promotion opportunities, retirement consideration, correct his DD Form 214, and correct his reserve status after separation from the Regular Air Force, a directive was published...