Search Decisions

Decision Text

AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC-2013-00935
Original file (BC-2013-00935.txt) Auto-classification: Denied
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

IN THE MATTER OF:	DOCKET NUMBER:  BC-2013-00935
		COUNSEL:  NONE
		HEARING DESIRED: NO

	 

________________________________________________________________
_

APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:

His DD Form 256, Discharge Certificate, dated 22 Apr 78, be 
changed to reflect his rank as major rather than captain.

________________________________________________________________
_

APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT:

He should have been discharged as a major in the Air Force 
Reserve.

In support of his request, the applicant provides a copy of his 
DD Form 256, and a copy of his DD Form 214, Report of Separation 
from Active Duty.

His complete submission, with attachments, is at Exhibit A. 

________________________________________________________________
_

STATEMENT OF FACTS:

The applicant’s DD Form 214 reflects he served in the United 
States Air Force Reserve-MC (USAFR-MC) in the grade of major*.  
Item 27 (Remarks) reflects Item 6a* Captain RESAF (USAFR) (P) 
Appointed 1 Dec 71, DOR: 11 Jun 74.

The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are 
contained in the letter prepared by the appropriate office of 
the Air Force, which is at Exhibit C.

________________________________________________________________
_

AIR FORCE EVALUATION:

ARPC/DPTT recommends denial.  The applicant served in the USAFR 
as a permanent captain and served on active duty as a temporary 
major.  He did not have seven years time-in-grade or at least 
14 years time-in-service to meet an USAFR major’s promotion 
board, before he was discharged.  


The complete DPTT evaluation is at Exhibit C.

________________________________________________________________
_

APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION:

A copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to the 
applicant on 6 Apr 13 for review and comment within 30 days.  As 
of this date, this office has received no response.

________________________________________________________________
_

THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:

1.  The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by 
existing law or regulations.

2.  The application was not timely filed; however, it is in the 
interest of justice to excuse the failure to timely file.

3.  Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to 
demonstrate the existence of error or injustice.  We took notice 
of the applicant's complete submission in judging the merits of 
the case; however, we agree with the opinion and recommendation 
of the Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt its 
rationale as the basis for our conclusion that the applicant has 
not been the victim of an error or injustice.  Therefore, in the 
absence of evidence to the contrary, we find no basis to 
recommend granting the relief sought in this application.

________________________________________________________________
_

THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT:

The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did not 
demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; that 
the application was denied without a personal appearance; and 
that the application will only be reconsidered upon the 
submission of newly discovered relevant evidence not considered 
with this application.

________________________________________________________________
_

The following members of the Board considered AFBCMR Docket 
Number BC-2013-00935 in Executive Session on 5 Nov 13, under the 
provisions of AFI 36-2603:

	, Panel Chair
	, Member
	, Member



The following documentary evidence for Docket Number BC-2013-00935 
was considered:

    Exhibit A.  DD Form 149, dated8 Feb 13, w/atchs.
    Exhibit B.  Applicant's Master Personnel Records.
    Exhibit C.  Letter, ARPC/DPTT, dated 1 Apr 13.
    Exhibit D.  Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 6 Apr 13.




                                   
                                   Panel Chair


Similar Decisions

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC-2013-01156

    Original file (BC-2013-01156.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the letter prepared by the appropriate Air Force office of primary responsibility and listed at Exhibit C. _______________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: ARPC/DPTT recommends denial. There are no documents in his master personnel file indicating that he was promoted to airman or airman first class. There was no evidence that the applicant was promoted to airman or airman...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC-2013-00998

    Original file (BC-2013-00998.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    In addition, the Air Force Instruction (AFI) stated that an officer transferring into the Air Force should not be given a DOR that subjects them to a promotion board within one year of the transfer or without a completed officer performance report (OPR) on file. The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are described in the letter prepared by the Air Force office of primary responsibility (OPR) which is included at Exhibit...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 00998

    Original file (BC 2013 00998.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    In addition, the Air Force Instruction (AFI) stated that an officer transferring into the Air Force should not be given a DOR that subjects them to a promotion board within one year of the transfer or without a completed officer performance report (OPR) on file. The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are described in the letter prepared by the Air Force office of primary responsibility (OPR) which is included at Exhibit...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 01768

    Original file (BC 2013 01768.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    ________________________________________________________________ STATEMENT OF FACTS: The relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the letter prepared by the Air Force office of primary responsibility (OPR), which is attached at Exhibit C. ________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: ARPC/DPTT recommends denial, indicating there is no evidence of an error or injustice. In addition, in Oct 97 she did not qualify for retirement...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-04355

    Original file (BC-2011-04355.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    As of this date, this office has not received a response. ________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did not demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; that the application was denied without a personal appearance; and that the application will only be reconsidered upon the submission of newly discovered relevant evidence not considered with this application. ...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC-2013-00680

    Original file (BC-2013-00680.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2013-00680 XXXXXXX XXX COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ THE APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: He be credited with enough retirement points to qualify for Reserve retired pay at age 60. ________________________________________________________________ THE AIR FORCE EVALUATION: ARPC/DPTT recommends denial, stating, in part, that...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2006-00500

    Original file (BC-2006-00500.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    His date of separation at the time of discharge is not correctly annotated in his records. The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are described in the letter prepared by the Air Force office of primary responsibility, which is attached at Exhibit C. ________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: ARPC/DPTT recommends denial indicating there is no evidence of an error or an injustice. There is insufficient documentation to support...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC 2006 00500

    Original file (BC 2006 00500.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    His date of separation at the time of discharge is not correctly annotated in his records. The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are described in the letter prepared by the Air Force office of primary responsibility, which is attached at Exhibit C. ________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: ARPC/DPTT recommends denial indicating there is no evidence of an error or an injustice. There is insufficient documentation to support...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC-2013-00169

    Original file (BC-2013-00169.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2013-00169 COUNSEL: NO HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His second non-selection to the grade of major (O-4) be declared void and removed from his record, and he be granted a Special Selection Board (SSB) for consideration for promotion to O-4. The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 05455

    Original file (BC 2013 05455.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    On 26 Oct 04, the applicant was selected for promotion to the Reserve grade of major (O-4) with a date of rank and promotion effective date of 1 Oct 98. On 10 Apr 06, as a result of the applicant’s request before the AFBCMR (AFBCMR Docket Number BC-2004-03564) to restore lost points, lost pay, compensation for lost promotion opportunities, retirement consideration, correct his DD Form 214, and correct his reserve status after separation from the Regular Air Force, a directive was published...