RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

IN THE MATTER OF:				DOCKET NUMBER:  BC-2013-00845

								COUNSEL: NONE

								HEARING DESIRED:  NO

________________________________________________________________

APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: 

His reentry (RE) code 2X (first-term, second-term or career 
airman considered but not selected for reenlistment under SRP) 
be changed to allow him to reenter the service.

________________________________________________________________

APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT:

He was discharged during the 2010 Force Shaping program.  He 
would like his RE code changed to one that will allow him to 
rejoin the Air Force.

The applicant provides no supporting documentation.

The applicant’s complete submission is at Exhibit A.

________________________________________________________________

STATEMENT OF FACTS:

The applicant is a former member of the Air Force who served 
from 22 August 2006 through 30 June 2010.  His service was 
characterized as honorable.  His narrative reason for separation 
was listed as completion of required active service and his RE 
code was listed as 2X.

________________________________________________________________

AIR FORCE EVALUATION:

AFPC/DPSOA recommends denial.  The applicant was discharged on 
30 June 2010 under the FY10 AF Force Shaping Rollback Program 
after serving 3 years, 10 months and 9 days of active service.  

The applicant was eligible to be separated under the rollback 
after receiving an Article 15 for allowing three compromises of 
security to occur.  These compromises included having a cellular 
phone in the weapons storage area while he was the senior member 
of a response team.  His supervisor non-recommended him for the 
selective reenlistment program and his commander non-selected 
him for reenlistment on 26 March 2010.  The applicant 
acknowledged the commanders non-selection and elected not to 
appeal the decision.

AFI 36-2606, Reenlistment in the USAF, states that commanders 
have selective reenlistment selection or non-selection 
authority.  The Selective Reenlistment Program considers the 
member performance reports, unfavorable information from any 
substantial source, the airman’s willingness to comply with Air 
Force standards and/or the ability, or lack thereof, to meet 
required training and duty performance levels.  

The complete DPSOA evaluation is at Exhibit C.

________________________________________________________________

APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION:

A copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to the 
applicant on 22 March 2013, for review and comment within 
30 days (Exhibit D).  As of this date, this office has received 
no response.

________________________________________________________________

THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:

1.  The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by 
existing law or regulations.

2.  The application was timely filed.

3.  Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to 
demonstrate the existence of error or injustice.  We took notice 
of the applicant’s complete submission in judging the merits of 
the case; however, we are not persuaded by the evidence 
submitted in the appeal that a change in his RE code is 
warranted.  Therefore, we agree with the opinion and 
recommendation of the Air Force office or primary responsibility 
and adopt their rationale as the basis for our conclusion that 
the applicant has not been the victim of an error or injustice.  
Therefore, in the absence of evidence to the contrary, we find 
no basis to disturb the existing record.

________________________________________________________________

THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT:

The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did not 
demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; that 
the application was denied without a personal appearance; and 
that the application will only be reconsidered upon the 
submission of newly discovered relevant evidence not considered 
with this application.

________________________________________________________________

The following members of the Board considered AFBCMR Docket 
Number BC-2013-00845 in Executive Session on 5 November 2013 
under the provisions of AFI 36-2603:


The following documentary evidence was considered:

	Exhibit A.  DD Form 149, dated 10 Feb 13.
	Exhibit B.  Applicant's Master Personnel Records.
	Exhibit C.  Letter, AFPC/DPSOA, dated 18 Mar 13.
	Exhibit D.  Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 22 Mar 13.