Search Decisions

Decision Text

AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC-2013-00774
Original file (BC-2013-00774.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

IN THE MATTER OF:	DOCKET NUMBER:  BC-2013-00774
		COUNSEL:  NONE
		HEARING DESIRED: NO

	 

________________________________________________________________
_

APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:

His DD Form 214, Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active 
Duty, Block 12d (Record of Service), be corrected to reflect his 
total prior active duty service of 5 [sic] years, 9 months, and 
15 days.

________________________________________________________________
_

APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT:

His DD Form 214 does not reflect his prior active service 
despite serving on active duty for 4 years, 9 months, and 
15 days (3 Aug 86 to 18 May 91).  During this period, he was 
commissioned a second lieutenant and graduated from the 
Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences (USUHS), 
and then promoted to the grade of captain.

In support of his request, the applicant provides a copy of his 
USUHS Certificate, a copy of the Memorandum on Credit for Time 
Served at the USUHS in Computing Military Retired and Retainer 
Pay, a copy of his AF Form 766, Extended Active Duty Order, and 
a copy of his Reserve Order D-1179.

His complete submission, with attachments, is at Exhibit A. 

________________________________________________________________
_

STATEMENT OF FACTS:

The applicant retired from the Regular Air Force in the grade of 
colonel after serving 20 years, 2 months, and 13 days on active 
duty.

The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are 
contained in the letters prepared by the appropriate offices of 
the Air Force, which is at Exhibit C and D.

________________________________________________________________
_


AIR FORCE EVALUATION:

AFPC/DPSIPV recommends denial.  The applicant signed a USUHS 
Military Service Obligation Contract on 31 Mar 86.  His contract 
states, “USUHS Reserve officers will be subject to most of the 
same laws, regulations, and policies that apply to other Reserve 
officers on active duty.  Exceptions are that service performed 
while a member of the program is not counted: (1) in determining 
eligibility for retirement, other than by reason of years of 
physical disability incurred while on active duty as a member of 
the program; (2) In computing years of service creditable for 
basic pay; and (3) In computing date of rank, promotion service 
date or total years service date.”  His contract is in 
compliance with Title 10, U.S.C., Section 2126 (Atch 3), Section 
2114 (Atch 4), and Public Law 92-426, (Atch 5).  Consequently, 
he was not given active duty credit on his DD Form 214.

Based on the law, time served as a member in USUHS is not 
creditable service for retirement eligibility; therefore, the 
applicant is not entitled to receive active duty credit towards 
his total federal active duty service nor have it included on 
his DD Form 214.

The complete DPSIPV evaluation, with attachments, is at Exhibit 
C.

APFC/DPSOR recommends the applicant’s DD Form 214 be corrected 
to read, “Attended Uniformed Services University of the Health 
Sciences in student status from 3 Aug 86 to 18 May 91 and time 
not creditable as active service.”  DPSOR denies his request to 
correct his DD Form 214, Block 12d, to reflect his USUHS time as 
credible active duty service.  

The complete DPSOR evaluation is at Exhibit D. 

________________________________________________________________
_

APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION:

His case represents a straightforward request to recognize his 
time spent at the USUHS as a student.  Once he achieved 20 years 
of active duty service, his retirement pay should be computed 
using the additional time served at USUHS.  

The applicant’s complete submission, with attachments, is at 
Exhibit F.

________________________________________________________________
_

THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:

1.  The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by 
existing law or regulations.

2.  The application was timely filed.

3.  Sufficient relevant evidence has been presented to 
demonstrate the existence of error or injustice that warrants 
corrective action.  While we note the opinions and 
recommendations of the Air Force offices of primary 
responsibility, we do not agree.  In this respect, the Deputy 
Assistant Secretary for Military Personnel Policy memorandum 
provides specific guidance with regard to the “Credit for Time 
Served at the Uniformed Services University of the Health 
Sciences (USUHS) in Computing Military Retired and Retainer 
Pay”.  The memorandum states that, “Section 2114(b) of title 10 
United States Code [10 U.S.C. 2114(b)] provides that USUHS 
medical students ‘shall serve on active duty in pay grade 0-1.’  
Thus, such service must be credited under any provision of law 
based on active service unless such service is explicitly 
excluded.”  As such, since there are not exclusions in this 
case, the applicant’s years of service at USUHS as a medical 
student are creditable in computing his retired pay rate.  
Consequently, the applicant should receive 62.3 percent of 
retired pay based on 20 years of active duty service, rather 
than receiving 50 percent of retired pay based on 20 years of 
active duty service.  Therefore, we recommend that the records 
be corrected as indicated below.

________________________________________________________________
_

THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT:

The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air 
Force relating to APPLICANT be corrected to show that the DD 
Form 214, Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty, 
issued in conjunction with his 31 July 2011 retirement, be 
amended in Item 18, Remarks, to include the statement “the 
member was awarded constructive service for the time spent while 
attending USUHS from 3 August 1986 to 18 May 1991”.

________________________________________________________________
_

The following members of the Board considered AFBCMR Docket 
Number BC-2013-00774 in Executive Session on 17 Oct 13 and 19 
Nov 13, under the provisions of AFI 36-2603:

, Panel Chair
, Member
, Member




All members voted to correct the records, as recommended.  The 
following documentary evidence for Docket Number BC-2013-00774 
was considered:

    Exhibit A.  DD Form 149, dated 8 Feb 13, w/atchs.
    Exhibit B.  Applicant's Master Personnel Records.
    Exhibit C.  Letter, AFPC/DPSIPV, dated 3 May 13.
    Exhibit D.  letter, AFPC/DPSOR, dated 14 Jun 13.
    Exhibit E.  Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 7 Oct 13, w/atchs.




                                   
                                   Panel Chair






4





Similar Decisions

  • AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-01425

    Original file (BC-2012-01425.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    DPSIPV states that according to 10 USC, section 2126 the applicant will not be given active duty credit on his DD Form 214 because time spent in USUHS is not counted in determining eligibility towards retirement. In addition, Air Force Instruction 36-2604, Service Dates and Dates of Rank, defines EAD for the purpose of determining service dates as duty on the ADL of an armed service for 90 days or more. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 03546

    Original file (BC 2014 03546.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2014-03546 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: Her records be corrected to reflect that she entered the Uniform Services University of the Health Sciences (USUHS) on 14 Sep 81 per Directive Number 974 (Docket No. STATEMENT OF FACTS: The relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the memorandums prepared by the Air Force offices of...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2010 | BC 2010 02795

    Original file (BC 2010 02795.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2010-02795 COUNSEL: HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His DD Form 214, Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty, be corrected to reflect his time as a student at the Uniformed Services University of Health Sciences (USUHS). At the time of the applicant’s service and per the statement of service...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-01291

    Original file (BC-2012-01291.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-01291 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: YES IN THE MATTER OF: ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: Block 12c of her DD Form 214, Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty, be corrected to reflect she was credited with seven years of active service, rather than three. The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2005 | 20050006021C070206

    Original file (20050006021C070206.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    Counsel states the applicant reentered the Army in the Medical Corps and was given active duty credit for the four years he spent at USUHS, as he had been upon his discharge in March 1994. Title 10, U. S. Code, chapter 105 (Armed Forces Health Professions Financial Assistance Programs), section 2126 (Members of the program: service credit), subsection 2126a states service performed while a member of the program shall not be counted (1) in determining eligibility for retirement other than by...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 03278

    Original file (BC 2014 03278.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    On 19 Jul 12, AFPC/DPAME administratively corrected the applicant's record by adjusting his ADSC for his time in the Air Force Reserve Officer Training Corps (AFROTC) by 3 months and 15 days, with a new Active Duty Service Commitment Date (ADSCD) of 5 Feb 15. Even though his DD Form 214 states that he served on active duty from 10 May 96 to 14 Jul 99, the law states that this time in the program is not creditable towards retirement (active duty) or pay. We took notice of the applicant’s...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080017821

    Original file (20080017821.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    On 5 July 1981, the applicant was notified that he had been appointed as a Reserve commissioned officer in the rank of second lieutenant, effective upon his acceptance. The applicant contends that he should be granted active duty credit for retirement for the time he spent as a student at the USUHS. Since there is no evidence in the available record nor has the applicant provided any evidence that shows that he is retirement eligible, there is insufficient evidence that would warrant...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100010294

    Original file (20100010294.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests correction of the computation of her retired pay by: a. correcting her retirement order to show inclusion of her years in the Health Professions Scholarship Program (HPSP) as service credit for longevity and percentage for retirement pay purposes; and b. requesting the Defense Finance and Accounting Service (DFAS) complete a thorough audit of her retired pay computations to include recalculation of retired pay commencing 1 October 2007, payment of the difference in...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2010 | BC-2010-02313

    Original file (BC-2010-02313.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    On 17 Oct 09, he was assigned duties in an Air Force office and his OPR for this period proves he fulfilled his service commitment. As of this date, this office has received no response (Exhibit Q). The MRB Legal Advisor states that according to AF/JAA, if an officer is appointed in another competitive category, both the time spent as an enrolled student at the USUHS and time after disenrollment would count toward credit for promotion.

  • AF | BCMR | CY1998 | 9601097

    Original file (9601097.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    The Air Force has awarded such officers JA briefly addressed the provision in the USUHS contract the applicant signed that excludes USUHS active duty service time "[i]n computing date of rank, promotion service date or total years service date." Before concluding, we briefly address the provision in the USUHS contract the applicant signed that excludes USUHS active duty service time “[iln computing date of rank, promotion service date or total years service date.”I2 In the case of officers...