Search Decisions

Decision Text

AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC-2012-03366
Original file (BC-2012-03366.txt) Auto-classification: Denied
 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS 

AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS 

 

IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-03366 

 COUNSEL: NONE 

 HEARING DESIRED: NOT INDICATED 

 

________________________________________________________________ 

 

APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: 

 

Her Fitness Assessment (FA), dated 21 Jun 2012, be removed from 
the Air Force Fitness Management System (AFFMS). 

 

________________________________________________________________ 

 

APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: 

 

She completed the run portion of the FA; however, the test 
administrator incorrectly counted the number of laps she ran, 
which caused her to fail the FA. 

 

The applicant's complete submission, with attachments, is at 
Exhibit A. 

 

________________________________________________________________ 

 

STATEMENT OF FACTS: 

 

The relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained 
in the letter prepared by the appropriate office of the Air 
Force. Accordingly, there is no need to recite these facts in 
this Record of Proceedings. 

 

________________________________________________________________ 

 

THE AIR FORCE EVALUATION: 

 

AFPC/DPSIM recommends denial. DPSIM states the applicant 
completed her FA on 21 Jun 2012, with a composite score of 
34.1 (unsatisfactory). According to the score sheet provided by 
the applicant, the lap count for the run stopped at 13; the 
Fitness Assessment Cell documented a score of “0” for the cardio 
component, indicating she did not complete the component. In 
accordance with AFI 36-2905, Air Force Fitness Program, “Trained 
personnel will monitor participants, ensuring all members 
complete the entire course and are continuously observed for 
course completion, safety, counting laps if required and run 
times.” The applicant has not provided any documentation that 
substantiates her claim. DPSIM states that she has provided a 
memorandum that states her case; however, there is nothing that 
corroborates her statement. Additional documents were 
requested, but none were received. 

 


The complete DPSIM evaluation, with attachment, is at Exhibit B. 

 

________________________________________________________________ 

 

APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF THE AIR FORCE EVALUATION: 

 

On 15 Mar 2013, a copy of the Air Force evaluation, with 
attachment, was forwarded to the applicant for review and 
comment within 30 days. As of this date, no response has been 
received by this office (Exhibit C). 

 

________________________________________________________________ 

 

THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT: 

 

1. The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by 
existing law or regulations. 

 

2. The application was timely filed. 

 

3. Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to 
demonstrate the existence of error or injustice. We took notice 
of the applicant's complete submission in judging the merits of 
the case; however, we agree with the opinion and recommendation 
of the Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt its 
rationale as the basis for our conclusion the applicant has not 
been the victim of an error or injustice. Therefore, in the 
absence of evidence to the contrary, we find no basis to 
recommend granting the relief sought in this application. 

 

________________________________________________________________ 

 

THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: 

 

The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did not 
demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; that 
the application was denied without a personal appearance; and 
that the application will only be reconsidered upon the 
submission of newly discovered relevant evidence not considered 
with this application. 

 

________________________________________________________________ 

 


The following members of the Board considered this application 
in Executive Session on 18 Mar 2013, under the provisions of AFI 
36-2603: 

 

 Panel Chair 

 Member 

 Member 

 

The following documentary evidence pertaining to Docket number 
BC-2012-03366 was considered: 

 

 Exhibit A. DD Form 149, dated 20 Jul 2012, w/atchs. 

 Exhibit B. Letter, AFPC/DPSIM, dated 5 Mar 2013, w/atch. 

 Exhibit C. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 15 Mar 2013. 

 

 

 

 

 

 



Similar Decisions

  • AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-03068

    Original file (BC-2012-03068.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    By letter dated 31 July 2012, AFPC/DPSIM requested the applicant provide additional supporting documentation to substantiate her claim; specifically, her signed score sheet, signed questionnaire for the FA in question, and a signed memo from the PTLs administering the test stating details of what happened on the date in question (Exhibit B). The complete AFPC/DPSIM evaluation, with attachment, is at Exhibit D. ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-02511

    Original file (BC-2012-02511.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    In support of his request, the applicant provides copies of the FAC’s lap count sheets from his 16 Feb 12 FA and his retest on 13 Mar 12. The applicant’s last five FA results: Date Composite Score Rating 13 Mar 12 85.70 Satisfactory 16 Feb 12 72.20 Unsatisfactory 12 Jul 11 83.10 Satisfactory 23 May 11 75.80 Unsatisfactory 16 Nov 10 77.80 Satisfactory The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are described in the letter prepared by the Air Force office of primary...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-02387

    Original file (BC-2012-02387.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBERS: BC-2012-02387 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _____________________ _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His Fitness Assessment (FA) dated 5 October 2011, be removed from the Air Force Fitness Management System (AFFMS). The complete DPSIM evaluation, with attachment, is at Exhibit...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 01302

    Original file (BC 2013 01302.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2013-01302 XXXXXXXXX COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: The Fitness Assessment (FA), dated 09 Jan 13 be declared void and removed from the Air Force Fitness Management System (AFFMS). On 09 Jan 13, the applicant participated in the contested FA and attained a composite score of 70.88,...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-04891

    Original file (BC-2012-04891.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: Her fitness assessment score sheet has an incorrect run time of 16 minutes and 23 seconds. After a thorough review of the evidence of record and the applicant's submission, we see no evidence of error or impropriety in the administration of the contested FA and subsequent score. ________________________________________________________________ The following members of the Board considered this...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-05047

    Original file (BC-2012-05047.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-05047 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His 12 Oct 12 Fitness Assessment (FA) be declared void and removed from the Air Force Fitness Management System (AFFMS). ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: The fitness monitor incorrectly counted...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC-2012-03753

    Original file (BC-2012-03753.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    DPSIM further notes the support memorandum provided by the applicant was not signed by his commander and; therefore, does not confirm its validity. The unsigned memorandum from the applicant’s commander is noted; however, in the absence of a signature and a copy of his signed fitness score sheet from the FA in question, we find insufficient evidence to warrant disturbing the record. Exhibit C. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 8 Feb 13.

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2012 03753

    Original file (BC 2012 03753.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    DPSIM further notes the support memorandum provided by the applicant was not signed by his commander and; therefore, does not confirm its validity. The unsigned memorandum from the applicant’s commander is noted; however, in the absence of a signature and a copy of his signed fitness score sheet from the FA in question, we find insufficient evidence to warrant disturbing the record. Exhibit C. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 8 Feb 13.

  • AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-03846

    Original file (BC-2012-03846.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The airman indicates the applicant completed the run portion of the FA ahead of his 12:59 run time. He again entered the track to provide support to the airman in completing the run by running with the airman and when they crossed the finish line the Fitness Assessment Cell (FAC) personnel incorrectly recorded his time as 13:34. In this respect, we note the applicant has provided a supporting statement from a fellow participant indicating the time recorded for the applicant must be...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-02441

    Original file (BC-2012-02441.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-02441 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: The Fitness Assessment (FA) dated 12 Mar 12 be removed from the Air Force Fitness Management System (AFFMS). The complete DPSIM evaluation, with attachment, is at Exhibit B. Exhibit C. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 28 Aug 12.