Search Decisions

Decision Text

AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC-2012-03621
Original file (BC-2012-03621.txt) Auto-classification: Denied
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS 

AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS 

 

IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-03621 

 COUNSEL: NONE 

 HEARING DESIRED: NOT INDICATED 

 

_________________________________________________________________ 

 

APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: 

 

Her late father’s records be corrected to reflect he was awarded 
the Purple Heart (PH) medal and she be provided a replacement 
medal. 

 

_________________________________________________________________ 

 

APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: 

 

Her father was awarded the Purple Heart for an injury he received 
sometime between 1948 and 1953, she would like the medal replaced 
due to a theft. 

 

She has the lapel pin and the bar that goes with the medal but 
the actual Purple Heart medal is missing. 

 

In support of her request, the applicant provides a photo copy of 
the lapel pin and bar. 

 

The applicant's complete submission, with attachments, is at 
Exhibit A. 

 

_________________________________________________________________ 

 

STATEMENT OF FACTS: 

 

The former member served in the Air Force for 23 years, 9 months, 
and 20 days. 

 

Block 27, Wounds Received as a Result of Action with Enemy Forces 
(Place and Date, if Known), of his DD Form 214, Armed Forces of 
the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge, reflects 
“None.” 

 

AFPC/DPSID was able to verify the member’s entitlement to the 
Good Conduct Medal (GCM), and the Asiatic-Pacific Campaign Medal 
with One Bronze Service Star (APCM w/1BSS), and his DD Form 
214 will be administratively corrected to reflect these medals. 

 

_________________________________________________________________ 

 

AIR FORCE EVALUATION: 

 

AFPC/DPSID recommends denial. DPSID states there is no 
documentation in the former member’s official military personnel 
record, nor was any provided, to verify award of the Purple 


Heart. Without specific evidence concerning the injury and 
pertinent medical information, there is nothing to substantiate a 
wound. 

 

The Purple Heart is awarded to members of the United States Armed 
Forces who have been wounded, killed, or who have died or may 
hereafter die of wounds received in action against an enemy of 
the United States or opposing force as a result of an act of any 
such enemy or opposing armed force, an international terrorist 
attack or during military operations while serving as a part of a 
peacekeeping force. A wound for which the award is made must 
have required treatment, not merely examination, by a medical 
officer. Additionally, treatment of the wound shall be 
documented in the service member’s medical and/or health record. 
Award of the Purple Heart may be made for wounds treated by a 
medical professional other than a medical officer, provided a 
medical officer includes a statement in the service member’s 
record that the extent of the wounds were such that they would 
have required treatment by a medical officer if one had been 
available to treat them. 

 

The Purple Heart Review Board (PHRB) has the authority, on behalf 
of the Secretary of the Air Force, to determine a veteran’s 
entitlement to the Purple Heart. Each request is considered 
based on the policies and criteria in use at the time the veteran 
was injured, and the determination is dependent on the 
documentary evidence presented. In order to present a request to 
the PHRB the required documentary evidence and information is 
required. 

 

The complete DPSID evaluation, with attachments, is at Exhibit B. 

 

_________________________________________________________________ 

 

APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: 

 

On 26 Nov 12, a copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to 
the applicant for review and comment within 30 days. To date, a 
response has not been received (Exhibit C). 

 

_________________________________________________________________ 

 

THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT: 

 

1. The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by existing 
law or regulations. 

 

2. The application was not timely filed; however, it is in the 
interest of justice to excuse the failure to timely file. 

 

3. Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to 
demonstrate the existence of error or injustice. After 
thoroughly reviewing the evidence of record and noting the 
applicant’s contentions, we are not persuaded the requested 
relief should be granted. Therefore, agree with the opinion and 


recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility 
and adopt its rationale as the basis for our conclusion that the 
applicant has not been the victim of an error or injustice. We 
are not unmindful or unappreciative of her late father’s service 
to his Nation; however, in the absence of documentary evidence to 
corroborate her claim, we have no basis on which to favorably 
consider this application. 

 

_________________________________________________________________ 

 

THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: 

 

The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did not 
demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; that 
the application was denied without a personal appearance; and 
that the application will only be reconsidered upon the 
submission of newly discovered relevant evidence not considered 
with this application. 

 

_________________________________________________________________ 

 

The following members of the Board considered Docket Number 
BC-2012-03621 in Executive Session on 18 Apr 13, under the 
provisions of AFI 36-2603: 

 

 , Panel Chair 

 , Member 

 , Member 

 

The following documentary evidence was considered: 

 

 Exhibit A. DD Form 149, dated 24 Aug 12, w/atchs. 

 Exhibit B. Applicant's Master Personnel Records. 

 Exhibit C. Letter, AFPC/DPSID, dated 3 Nov 12, w/atchs. 

 Exhibit D. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 26 Nov 12. 

 

 

 

 

 Panel Chair 



Similar Decisions

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 02611

    Original file (BC 2013 02611.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Although the applicant contends he received shrapnel to side of his face and nearly lost his right eye, there is no medical documentation to support this injury. After a thorough review of the available evidence and applicant’s complete submission, we find no evidence that his records should be corrected to show he was awarded the PH. ________________________________________________________________ _ THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 02375

    Original file (BC 2014 02375.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The available records provided by the applicant indicate the following. The applicant’s request was not boarded by the Purple Heart Review Board as it does not contain a detailed personal account, supporting eyewitness statements or medical documentation showing an injury incurred by enemy action. After a thorough review of the applicant’s limited official military personnel record, they were able to verify award of the European African Middle Eastern Campaign Medal, the World War...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC_2013 02262

    Original file (BC_2013 02262.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are described in the letters prepared by the Air Force offices of primary which are attached at Exhibits C and D. ________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPAPP recommends denial of the applicant’s request for credit for Vietnam Service. The treatment of the injury should be documented in the service member's medical or health record. A complete copy of the AFPC/DPSID evaluation...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-05131

    Original file (BC-2011-05131.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    At the time of his discharge, he was furnished a WD AGO Form 53-96, Military Record and Report of Separation Certification of Service, stating he received no wounds in action. DPSID was unable to locate any official medical documentation within the applicant’s official Military Personnel Records or medical records substantiating the applicant received and/or was treated for a shrapnel wound while serving in WWII, nor has the applicant provided any such documentation to support his claim. ...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC 2012 03097

    Original file (BC 2012 03097.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are described in the letter prepared by the Air Force office of primary responsibility, which is attached at Exhibit C. ________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPSID recommends denial indicating there is no evidence of an error or an injustice. Although the applicant provided medical documentation, it was provided eight months after the injury occurred. We took notice of the...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 00354

    Original file (BC 2014 00354.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Additionally, DPSID noted the following awards and decorations will be corrected administratively after final Board action: • PH • PWM • PUC, w/2BOLCs • Philippine Republic Presidential Unit Citation (PHRPUC) • ACPM, with one Bronze Service Star (APCM w/lBSS) • WWIIVM • ADSM, w/Overseas Clasp • PDM, with one Bronze Service Star (PDM w/1 BSS) • Good Conduct Medal (GCM) Based on information from the Air Force Office of Primary Responsibility (OPR), the applicant initially entered the...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2007 | BC 2007 02244 3

    Original file (BC 2007 02244 3.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    On 18 Aug 10, the Board considered and denied the applicant’s request, determining the evidence presented by the applicant was not sufficient to conclude he incurred an injury as a direct result of enemy action. He believes the Board denied his request because it may have used another veteran’s records in determining his case (Exhibit E). Each request is considered based on the policies and criteria in use at the time the service member was injured, and the determination is dependent on...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2006-00507

    Original file (BC-2006-00507.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2006-00507 INDEX CODE: 107.00 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO MANDATORY CASE COMPLETION DATE: 20 AUGUST 2007 _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: Her late father’s records be corrected to reflect award of the Purple Heart (PH). The Purple Heart Review Board (PHRB) considered and denied the request for PH. The documentation...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 04309

    Original file (BC 2013 04309.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    An entry in his medical records dated 7 Feb 69, reflects a left ankle injury. A detailed personal account of how the injury occurred, medical documentation substantiating he received an injury which required medical treatment at the time the injury occurred, and eyewitness statements from individuals who saw the applicant receive the injury were not provided. There is no medical documentation in his military personnel record to substantiate any injuries he may have received were enemy...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC-2013-00228

    Original file (BC-2013-00228.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2013-00228 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His father be awarded the Purple Heart (PH). ________________________________________________________________ The following members of the Board considered AFBCMR Docket Number BC-2013-00228 in Executive Session on 7 Nov 2013, under the provisions of...