Search Decisions

Decision Text

AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC-2012-03638
Original file (BC-2012-03638.txt) Auto-classification: Approved
 

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS 

 AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS 

 

IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-03638 

 COUNSEL: NONE 

 HEARING DESIRED: NO 

 

________________________________________________________________ 

 

THE APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: 

 

He be placed on medical continuation (MEDCON) orders from 
17 Jan 12 to 8 Feb 12. 

 

________________________________________________________________ 

 

THE APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: 

 

He should have been placed on MEDCON orders for a Line of Duty 
(LOD) injury he incurred during his activation/involuntary 
mobilization in support of Operation ENDURING FREEDOM. He was 
injured while on active duty for more than 30 days; however, his 
LOD determination was not completed in time for him to receive 
MEDCON orders for the period of his surgery and convalescent 
leave. 

 

He initiated paperwork with his unit and the Air Force Medical 
Operations Agency (AFMOA); however, they did not review his 
request because the Military Treatment Facility (MTF) had not 
completed his LOD determination. 

 

The applicant’s complete submission, with attachments, is at 
Exhibit A. 

 

________________________________________________________________ 

 

STATEMENT OF FACTS: 

 

The applicant, a member of the Air Force Reserve, was issued 
activation orders for a tour of active duty in support of 
Operation ENDURING FREEDOM from 3 Jan 11 to 18 Jun 11. 

 

________________________________________________________________ 

 

THE AIR FORCE EVALUATION: 

 

AFMOA/SGHI recommends denial, stating, in part, that the 
applicant did not provide sufficient evidence to support his 
claim. The reason his care and medical orders were not approved 
is due to the LOD not being completed prior to his surgery date 


and the primary office that would need to explain the delay in 
the LOD processing is the assigned Medical Unit (452 AMDS). 

 

SGHI notes that according to the timeline narrative regarding 
the applicant’s injury and LOD, written by the 452 AMDS dated 
10 Aug 12, states that on 16 Mar 11, he was injured during his 
activation from 3 Jan - 18 Jun 11. An LOD for the injury was 
initiated on 9 Jul 11; however, it was not finalized as In the 
Line of Duty until 19 Jun 12. 

 

The complete SGHI evaluation is at Exhibit B. 

 

________________________________________________________________ 

 

APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF THE AIR FORCE EVALUATION: 

 

The applicant provides a letter from the MTF, Health Services 
Management office summarizing the chronological events which led 
to his LOD determination being delayed (Exhibit D). 

 

________________________________________________________________ 

 

THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT: 

 

1. The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by 
existing law or regulations. 

 

2. The application was timely filed. 

 

3. Sufficient relevant evidence has been presented to 
demonstrate the existence of error or injustice warranting 
corrective action. We note the comments from the Air Force 
office of primary responsibility; nonetheless, the serving MTF 
provided evidence that the administrative delay with the LOD 
processing was due to no fault of the applicant. Therefore, in 
view of the above, the applicant has provided substantial 
evidence that he has been the victim of an error or injustice. 
Accordingly, we recommend the applicant’s record be corrected as 
indicated below. 

 

________________________________________________________________ 

 

THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT: 

 

The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air 
Force relating to APPLICANT, be corrected to show that he was 
not released from active duty on 16 Jan 12, but on that date was 
continued on active duty until 11 Feb 12, on which date he was 
released from active duty. 

 

________________________________________________________________ 

 


The following members of the Board considered AFBCMR Docket 
Number BC-2012-03638 in Executive Session on 11 Jun 13, under 
the provisions of AFI 36-2603: 

 

All members voted to correct the records, as recommended. The 
following documentary evidence was considered: 

 

 Exhibit A. DD Form 149, dated 11 Feb 12, w/atchs. 

 Exhibit B. Letter, AFMOA/SGHI, dated 28 Feb 13. 

 Exhibit C. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 1 Mar 13. 

 Exhibit D. Letter, 452nd AMDS, dated 28 Mar 13, w/atchs. 

 

 

 

 

 Vice Chair 

 



Similar Decisions

  • AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-04716

    Original file (BC-2011-04716.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    From 1 Mar 10 to 6 Oct 11, he should have been on medical continuation (MEDCON) orders for his injuries. Per SAF/AA Memo, Return to Active Duty of Air Force Reserve Component Members Unable to Perform Military Duties, dated 8 Dec 06, “Entitlement under this policy shall begin when the condition renders the Airman unable to perform military duties, not when the injury occurred or when the Airman was released from active duty.” In this instance, the surgical date would be considered the date...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC-2012-03639

    Original file (BC-2012-03639.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    There is no evidence of a Command Man-Day Allocation System (CMAS) request for MEDCON during any time the applicant was on AD orders or prior to his retirement date of 1 Jun 12. While we note the recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility to deny the applicant’s request, the evidence reflects the applicant was treated for a medical condition in Dec 11 and, contrary to the AF Form 348, Informal Line of Duty Determination, dated Mar 12, wherein the military medical...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2012 05257

    Original file (BC 2012 05257.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the letters prepared by the appropriate offices of the Air Force, which are at Exhibits C and D. _________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFMOA/SGHI recommends denial, indicating the applicant’s initial request for MEDCON orders ended due to him failing to provide further documentation for his medical condition. Additionally, the applicant may have been receiving VA...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-03992

    Original file (BC-2011-03992.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    In this respect, we note the applicant was on active duty orders in support of Operation ENDURING FREEDOM and was diagnosed with a medical injury. While the applicant requests continuation of his active duty orders for the period 18 Jun 11 to 9 Sep 11, we concur with the recommendation of AFMOA/SGHI to correct the record to reflect the applicant was retained on active duty orders for the period 19 Jun 11 to 27 Jul 11. ________________________________________________________________ THE...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-02507

    Original file (BC-2011-02507.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2011-02507 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: YES ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His records be corrected to reflect he was retained on active duty for the purposes of Medical Continuation (MEDCON) during the period 17 May 10 through 30 Aug 10. The medical provider recommended surgery at that time and the applicant indicated, per...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-02179

    Original file (BC-2012-02179.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    ________________________________________________________________ STATEMENT OF FACTS: Based on the available evidence of record and the letter provided by the Air Force Medical Operations Agency (AFMOA), the applicant was recalled to EAD during the period of 27 Aug 10 to 24 Feb 11. The applicant was approved for INCAP pay; documents show a start date of 11 Jun 11 through 21 Aug 11. The requirement for MEDCON orders, at the time he was requesting an extension of his orders, is that the...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC-2012-01680

    Original file (BC-2012-01680.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    On 3 Oct 11, the applicant reported for follow-up where his physician continued his restrictions and directed follow-up after the second surgery. SAF/AA Policy Memorandum, Return to Active Duty of Air Reserve Component Members Unable to Perform Military Duties, dated 8 Dec 06, provides that members who are released from active duty, but subsequently become unable to perform military duty as a result of an LOD condition, will be voluntarily returned to active duty until they are fit for duty...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 00118

    Original file (BC 2013 00118.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The Medical Consultant states that the applicant may be eligible for at least periodic restoration of active duty orders to receive treatment for his medical condition on the dates he was required to take leave from his civilian employment, but finds the evidence insufficient to establish MEDCON orders along the entire continuum requested; noting the evidence suggesting that his medical condition waxed and waned while under treatment with epidural and sacroiliac steroid injections; allowing...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC-2013-00637

    Original file (BC-2013-00637.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2013-00637 XXXXXXX COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ THE APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: He be entitled to Medical Continuation (MEDCON) orders starting on 20 Sep 12 vice 10 Oct 12, based on his injury he sustained In the Line of Duty (INLOD). ________________________________________________________________ THE APPLICANT...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-01088

    Original file (BC-2012-01088.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Medical Continuation, Eligibility for Medical continuation, the ARC member will be eligible for Medical Continuation orders when an injury, illness, or disease is incurred or aggravated while serving on active duty and that condition renders the member unable to perform military duties." We took notice of the applicant's complete submission in judging the merits of the case; however, we agree with the opinion and recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt its...