AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC-2012-03705
On 2 Jul 09, the ARPC/DEERS Project Office changed her back to Selected Reserve, once again making her eligible for TRICARE. On 22 May 12, the applicant's record was incorrectly updated a third time to Selected Reserve status by the ARPC/DEERS Project Office, and then immediately changed back to the IRR. _______________________________________________________________ THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT: The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air Force relating to APPLICANT, be...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC-2012-03709
On 8 Jul 11, a Medical Evaluation Board (MEB) referred the applicants case to an Informal Physical Evaluation Board (IPEB) for Obstructive Sleep Apnea. The complete Medical Consultants evaluation is at Exhibit D. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: Copies of the Air Force evaluations were forwarded to the applicant on 19 Feb 13, for review and comment within 30 days. Therefore, we agree with the opinions...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC-2012-03743
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-03743 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ______________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His general (under honorable conditions) discharge be upgraded to honorable. On 28 Sep 2009, the Air Force Discharge Review Board (AFDRB) denied the applicants request for a discharge upgrade. In the interest of justice, we considered upgrading the...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC-2012-03753
DPSIM further notes the support memorandum provided by the applicant was not signed by his commander and; therefore, does not confirm its validity. The unsigned memorandum from the applicants commander is noted; however, in the absence of a signature and a copy of his signed fitness score sheet from the FA in question, we find insufficient evidence to warrant disturbing the record. Exhibit C. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 8 Feb 13.
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC-2012-03814
On 7 Jul 86, the applicant was discharged with service characterized as honorable and narrative reason for separation as Pregnancy in the grade of airman first class. The applicant has not provided any facts warranting a change to her separation code or narrative reason for separation. We took notice of the applicants complete submission in judging the merits of the case; however, we agree with the opinion and recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC-2012-03849
However, there is no evidence in DEERS which reflects the former service member was divorced at the time of his death. The complete DPSIAR evaluation is at Exhibit B. ________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: The applicant be notified the evidence presented did not demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; the application was denied without a personal appearance; and the application will only be reconsidered upon the...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC-2012-03854
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-03854 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His Fitness Assessment (FA), dated 29 December 2011, be removed from the Air Force Fitness Management System (AFFMS). ________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT: The pertinent military records of the...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC-2012-03870
________________________________________________________________ THE AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AETC/SGPS recommends denial of the applicants request to change his reentry (RE) code. The complete SGPS evaluation is at Exhibit C. AFPC/DPSOR recommends denial of the applicants request to change his character of service and narrative reason for separation. ________________________________________________________________ The following members of the Board considered Docket Number BC- 2012-03870...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC-2012-03875
As of this date, no response has been received by this office (Exhibit D). While we note the comments from the Air Force OPR indicating the applicant has not substantiated the contested EPR was not rendered accurately by all evaluators at the time, we believe the documentation submitted by the applicant, specifically, the replacement EPR signed in 2009 by all three of the official signatories on the EPR in question, as well as signed memoranda from every member of his chain of command at...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC-2012-03948
His corrected record, be considered for promotion to the grade of major by a Special Selection Board (SSB). In support of his request the applicant submitted copies of his DLAB and DLPT scores, USCENTAF Form 1, Air Medal (AM) and Aerial Achievement Medal (AAM) Mission Information Justification Sheet, citations for the Air Medal Second and Third Oak Leaf Cluster, a memorandum from his commander and supporting documents. The complete AFPC/DPSOO evaluation is at Exhibit...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC-2012-03965
On 17 Jul 1995, the applicant was notified by his commander that he was not recommending him for reenlistment in the Air Force. DPSOR states that the applicant did not provide any evidence of an error or injustice that occurred in the discharge processing. Based on the documentation on file in the master personnel records, the discharge to include his separation code was consistent with the procedural and substantive requirements of the discharge instruction and was within the discretion...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC-2012-03966
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-03966 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: YES _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: 1. ________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did not demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; that the application was denied...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC-2012-03968
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-03968 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His 15 Dec 2010, 15 Mar 2011, and 13 Jun 2011, Unsatisfactory Fitness Assessments (FAs) be removed from the Air Force Fitness Management System (AFFMS). However, the applicant has not provided similar evidence to support that his FAs should be...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC-2012-03994
The applicants last five FA results: Date Composite Score Rating 28 Aug 12 00 Unsatisfactory 13 Mar 12 39.63 Unsatisfactory 23 May 11 n/a Exempt 28 Apr 11 10.38 Unsatisfactory 22 Oct 10 49.40 Unsatisfactory The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are described in the letter prepared by the Air Force office of primary responsibility, which is included at Exhibit C. ________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPSIM recommends...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC-2012-04038
The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the letters prepared by the appropriate offices of the Air Force at Exhibits C and D. Accordingly, there is no need to recite these facts in this Record of Proceedings. The member had a medical evaluation board on 20 Nov 2008, for atrial fibrillation. The Medical Consultant states that it could not be established that the applicant was unable to reasonably perform his military duties as a result of OSA.
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC-2012-04058
This period allows him to enter into a 4-year FY12 ACP agreement per paragraph 2.1 of the Air National Guard FY12 ACP Policy. Based upon the published policy guidance, the fact that the applicant met all eligibility requirements and that the delay in release of the FY12 ACP policy was through no fault of his, they recommend approval of the applicant's request. The majority of the Board took notice of the applicant's complete submission in judging the merits of the case and agree with the...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC-2012-04155
Therefore, they recommend the AC component of the FA dated 31 Jul 2012, be updated to reflect "exempt" in AFFMS. The complete DPSIM evaluation, with attachment, is at Exhibit C. ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF THE AIR FORCE EVALUATION: The facts support his assertion that the entire FA should be removed from his record and that he should be granted the opportunity to re-test immediately. ...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC-2012-04158
Based upon the published policy guidance, the fact that he met all eligibility requirements and that the delay in release of the FY12 ACP policy was through no fault of the member, we recommend approval of the above member's request. To date, a response has not been received (Exhibit C). Exhibit C. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 1 October 2012.
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC-2012-04161
The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are described in the letters prepared by the Air Force office of primary responsibility and SAF/MRB Legal Advisor attached at Exhibits B and D. ________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: NGB/A1PF recommends approval. While we note the comments of the SAF/MRB Legal Advisor indicating an applicant must prove by sufficient evidence that he or she is the victim of a serious injustice not...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC-2012-04166
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-04166 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: YES ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: 1. ________________________________________________________________ STATEMENT OF FACTS: The relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the letter prepared by the appropriate office of the Air Force at Exhibits B and...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC-2012-04171
The narrative reason for separation was NON-SELECTION, PERMANENT PROMOTION. The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the letter prepared by the appropriate office of the Air Force at Exhibit C. ________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPSID recommends denial of the applicants request to correct his AF Form 709. The complete DPSOO evaluation is at Exhibit...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC-2012-04220
Since the applicant was in the Retired Reserve and not yet receiving retirement pay, he argues that he was not retired, and therefore is not eligible to be recalled to EAD under 10 USC § 688a, which pertains to the recall of "retired members." Had Congress intended to include 10 USC § 688a as service entitling a member to early retirement pay eligibility, it certainly could have done so. In this respect, we note the applicants argument that his recall to EAD under 10 USC § 688a must be...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC-2012-04276
The applicant's complete submission, with attachments, is at Exhibit A. The complete DPSIM evaluation, with attachment, is at Exhibit B. ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF THE AIR FORCE EVALUATION: On 16 Apr 2013, a copy of the Air Force evaluation, with attachment, was forwarded to the applicant for review and comment within 30 days.
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC-2012-04384
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-04384 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His Time in Service (TIS) and Time in Grade (TIG) be corrected. On 18 Oct 2011, he enlisted into the Regular Air Force through the Air Force Recruiting Service for a period of 4 years as a non-prior service (NPS) applicant. We took notice of the...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC-2012-04451
The Vietnam Service Medal (VSM). The ribbon was awarded to Air Force and Air Force Reserve members credited with completion of an overseas tour on or after 1 Sep 80. _________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did not demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; that the application was denied without a personal appearance; and that the application will only be reconsidered...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC-2012-04452
On 16 Aug 1991, the applicant was discharged from the Air Force, with service characterized as general (under honorable conditions). Based on the available evidence of record, it appears the discharge was consistent with the substantive requirements of the discharge regulation and within the commander's discretionary authority. In the interest of justice, we considered upgrade of his discharge based on clemency; however, while the applicant states he has been an outstanding citizen since...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC-2012-04464
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-04464 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His Fitness Assessment (FA), dated 7 Sep 2012, be removed from the Air Force Fitness Management System (AFFMS). On 21 Sep 2012 he took an official practice test and completed 50 push-ups (22 more than during his failed FA) and his overall...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC-2012-04489
In other words, JA is not prepared to conclude that this time on administrative hold was not without justification. Consequently, JA recommends that the application be denied. ________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did not demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; that the application was denied without a personal appearance; and that the application will only be...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC-2012-04556
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-04556 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His Distinguished Graduate (DG) honors from Instructor Navigator (IN) School in June 2002 be included in his official transcripts and on his Promotion Recommendation Forms (PRF), specifically his in-the-zone and one above-the-zone PRFs. The complete...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC-2012-04629
Therefore, we recommend the applicant's records be corrected to show that: The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air Force relating to APPLICANT, be corrected to show that: a. The applicant has been advised of the recommended relief and agrees that it is full and fitting. Members of the Board, considered this application on 18 June 2013.
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC-2012-04631
The Board reviewed the member's personnel record and it appeared that he was not provided the opportunity to make the election to transfer into the ISLRS and was therefore discharged from the TDRL with severance pay. ________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did not demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; that the application was denied without a personal appearance;...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC-2012-04726
AFBCMR BC-2012-04726 MEMORANDUM OF CONSIDERATION OF APPLICATION BEFORE THE AFBCMR SUBJECT: Having carefully reviewed this application, we agree with the recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt the rationale expressed as the basis for our decision that the applicant has been the victim of either an error or an injustice. Therefore, we recommend the applicant's records be corrected to show that: The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC-2012-04731
________________________________________________________________ STATEMENT OF FACTS: The relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the letter prepared by the appropriate office of the Air Force. As of this date, no response has been received by this office (Exhibit C). We took notice of the applicant's complete submission in judging the merits of the case; however, we agree with the opinion and recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC-2012-04738
AFBCMR BC-2012-04738 MEMORANDUM OF CONSIDERATION OF APPLICATION BEFORE THE AFBCMR SUBJECT: Having carefully reviewed this application, we agree with the recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt the rationale expressed as the basis for our decision that the applicant has been the victim of either an error or an injustice. Therefore, we recommend the applicant's records be corrected to show that: The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC-2012-04934
AFBCMR BC-2012-04934 MEMORANDUM OF CONSIDERATION OF APPLICATION BEFORE THE AFBCMR SUBJECT: Having carefully reviewed this application, we agree with the recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt the rationale expressed as the basis for our decision that the applicant has been the victim of either an error or an injustice. Therefore, we recommend the applicant's records be corrected to show that: The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC-2012-04996
AFBCMR BC-2012-04996 MEMORANDUM OF CONSIDERATION OF APPLICATION BEFORE THE AFBCMR SUBJECT: Having carefully reviewed this application, we agree with the recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt the rationale expressed as the basis for our decision that the applicant has been the victim of either an error or an injustice. Therefore, we recommend the applicant's records be corrected to show that: The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC-2012-05055
Consistent with the regulations of their respective service, members of the National Guard of Arizona who have twenty creditable years of service for retirement shall be separated from state service upon expiration of any issued Notice of Appointment unless a new Notice of Appointment is timely issued. The complete NGB/A1PO evaluation is at Exhibit E. 1. ANGRC/JA does not provide a recommendation but states the applicant attributes his separation from the AZANG and the resulting...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC-2012-05090
AFBCMR BC-2012-05090 MEMORANDUM OF CONSIDERATION OF APPLICATION BEFORE THE AFBCMR SUBJECT: Having carefully reviewed this application, we agree with the recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt the rationale expressed as the basis for our decision that the applicant has been the victim of either an error or an injustice. Therefore, we recommend the applicant's records be corrected to show that: The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC-2012-05210
He completed the required application to transfer his Post- 9/11 GI Bill TEB to his dependent. On multiple occasions in the months of January through March, his network administrators worked on his computer multiple times a week sometimes even several times a day. ________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT: The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air Force relating to APPLICANT be corrected to show that on 22 February 2010, he...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC-2012-05226
The complete NGB/A1PP evaluation is at Exhibit D. NGB/A1PF does not provide a recommendation but states that upon review of the applicants debt generated against his Aviator Continuation Pay agreement, they have concluded that, as it currently stands, the debt is valid. Additionally, the applicant has not provided supporting documentation to establish a basis to extend his MSD or show that he was treated in an unjust manner with respect to his promotion and repayment of ACP. ...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC-2012-05293
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-05293 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NOT INDICATED ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: He be awarded the Purple Heart (PH). This could result in an injustice to the applicant if the Purple Heart Review Board made a decision without allowing the applicant an opportunity to provide the missing documentation. Based on their...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC-2012-05347
DPSIM states that on 15 April 2012, the applicant took an FA and received a composite score of 79.20, an unsatisfactory fitness level, because the applicant did not meet the minimum time for the cardio portion of the FA. This allows time for reconditioning, if exempted for greater than 30 days. The applicant did not provide the AF Form 422 nor AF Form 469 indicating when she was placed on profile, what her profile restrictions were, or when she was released from her profile. The complete...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC-2012-05444
His official military record be corrected to reflect his time as the 171 Security Forces Squadron Commander from 27 November 1995 through 21 March 2003. Therefore, they recommend the referral OPR not be removed from the applicants record. With regard to the applicants request for his record to reflect his time as the Security Forces Squadron Commander, we note his OPRs indicate duties, responsibilities, and comments reflecting that of a commander in spite of his duty title of Security...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC-2012-05462
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-05462 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His Re-entry (RE) code 4C Approved Involuntary Separation for Concealment /Physical Standards/Less than 9.0 RGL, be changed to allow him to reenlist in the Air Force. AFPC/DPSOY will provide applicant a corrected copy of his DD Form 214 with RE...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC-2012-05498
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-05498 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His DD Form 214, Report of Separation from Active Duty, Item 26, Decorations, Medals, Badges, Commendations, Citations, and Campaign Ribbons Awarded or Authorized be corrected to reflect he was awarded the Meritorious Service Medal (MSM). Therefore,...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC-2012-05543
He inquired into transferring the benefit to his daughter and received a letter that stated he was not able to transfer the educational benefit. ________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPSIT recommends denial since the program for Transfer of Educational Benefits started on 1 August 2009, which is after his retirement. After a thorough review of the evidence of record and the applicant's submission, we agree with the opinion and...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC-2012-05626
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-05626 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His DD Form 214, Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty, be corrected as follows: 1. DPSIDR states after a thorough review of the applicant's official military personnel record they were unable to verify any additional awards he may have...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC-2012-05637
On 3 October 1989, the applicant acknowledged receipt of the notification of discharge and that he understood approval of the recommendation for his discharge could result in his receiving an other than honorable conditions separation. On 4 October 1989, after consultation with military legal counsel, the applicant submitted a written statement offering a conditional waiver of his rights associated with an administrative discharge board hearing. Subsequent to the file being found legally...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC-2012-05655
Additionally, the applicant did not provide an AF Form 469, Duty Limiting Condition Report, which is required to be completed when a medical condition impacts fitness activity or when an FA is due in accordance with AFI 36- 2905, Fitness Program, paragraph 1.18.3. The Medical Condition Determination memorandum from the medical provider is noted; however, in the absence of an AF Form 469, Duty Limiting Condition Report, it is unclear to what extent the medical condition affected his 19...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC-2012-05714
His current Air Force (AF) Information Management Tool (IMT)) 131, Application for Transfer to the Retired Reserve, should have reflected that he was medically disqualified to perform his duties and that he was not recommended for reenlistment due to his Line of Duty injury. Although the applicant's more recent testimony suggests that he reportedly experienced chronic recurring back pain and paresthesias of the bilateral upper and lower extremities, there is also evidence that the applicant...