RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-03597
COUNSEL: NONE
HEARING DESIRED: YES
________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:
His record be corrected to reflect eligibility for the Enlisted
Incentive Program bonus at the time of his enlistment on
17 June 2010.
________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT:
1. When he enlisted in the Air Force Reserves he chose a
career field that included a $15K enlistment bonus with the hope
of providing the much needed financial assistance for his
family. It was his understanding that the Air Force would
provide half of this bonus after completion of his required
training, and half throughout the remainder of the six-year
commitment. He enlisted, completed training, and continued to
train and serve in good faith that he would receive the
enlistment bonus upon completion of basic training and technical
training schools.
2. He achieved Warhawk status for fitness excellence in basic
training and he was an Airman Leader as well as President of the
Airman's Council at technical training school. He graduated
both schools with honors. In December 2010, upon completion of
training and returning home, he was told by word-of-mouth that
he was not going to receive his enlistment bonus until
June 2011, the 1-year anniversary of his enlistment. He
inquired about this within his chain of command but was not
able to get confirmation.
3. In May 2011, he began to send his Chief e-mails inquiring
about the bonus and asking what else needed to be done to begin
the process. In June 2011, he sent a letter of request for
assistance to his congressman and received a response back which
included the written response from the Air Force to his
congressman. A discrepancy in the Air Force letter stated that
in December 2010, he declined the offer to submit the incentive
bonus application to the Personnel Division of AFRC just in
case. He had no official notification of his ineligibility for
the incentive bonus until the June 2011 e-mail.
The applicants complete submission, with attachments, is at
Exhibit A.
________________________________________________________________
STATEMENT OF FACTS:
According to copies of documents extracted from the Automated
Records Management System (ARMS), the applicant signed an
initial enlistment contract on 17 June 2010, agreeing to serve
in the Air Force Reserves for 6 years. Effective
28 February 2012, the applicant was relieved from assignment
with the Air Force Reserves. He enlisted in the Maine Air
National Guard on 29 February 2012 and is currently serving in
the grade of Senior Airman, E-4.
According to documentation submitted by the applicant, in
addition to the 17 June 2010 enlistment contract, he also signed
a DD Form 1966/4, Record of Military Processing Armed Forces
of the United States, stating that based on documentation
furnished, he met the initial eligibility requirements for the
Enlisted Incentive Program in Duty Air Force Specialty Code
(DAFSC) 3D0X3. However, entitlement to the incentive is
contingent upon his meeting all eligibility requirements on the
date HQ AFRC/A1BR approves the entitlement to bonus payments.
The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are
contained in the letter prepared by the appropriate office of
the Air Force at Exhibit C.
________________________________________________________________
AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
AFRC/A1K recommends denial. A1K states in accordance with AFI
36-2638, Air Force Reserve Enlisted Incentives, para 1.1.1.,
non-prior service personnel must enlist in a bonus Duty Air
Force Specialty Code (DAFSC) in effect on the date of their
enlistment in order to be given the entitlement incentive. The
applicant enlisted as a 3DOX3, Cyber Systems Surety Helper, on
17 June 2010, at Westover Air Reserve Base (ARB) for six years.
This DAFSC was not authorized an incentive for Westover ARB
during Fiscal Year (FY) 2010 (1 Oct 09-30 Sep 10). Furthermore,
the documentation the applicant provided does not substantiate
his request for an incentive bonus. Thus, due to the lack of
documentation to support approval of the applicant's request,
the basis for recommended disapproval is established.
The complete AFRC/A1K evaluation is at exhibit C.
________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
A copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to the
applicant on 6 November 2012 for review and comment within 30
days (Exhibit D). To date, a response has not been received.
________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:
1. The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by
existing law or regulations.
2. The application was timely filed.
3. Sufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate
the existence of an injustice. After a thorough review of the
evidence of record and the applicants complete submission, we are
persuaded relief is warranted. We note the comments of the Air
Force office of primary responsibility indicating the 3DOX3, Cyber
Systems Surety Helper, DAFSC was not authorized an incentive bonus
for Westover ARB during Fiscal Year (FY) 2010. On the other hand,
the applicant selected the 3D0X3 DAFSC from the units Master
Incentive List presented to him. Had the applicant been advised
the DAFSC he selected would not pay a bonus, he would have been
able to select one that did. However, neither the recruiter nor
the mission support squadron personnel were aware of the AFRC
determination that the incentive eligibility for airmen in 3DOX3
positions would be based on the original DAFSC of the assigned
position, prior to the conversion. We are persuaded that the AFRC
determination deprived the applicant of necessary information in
order to properly consider his enlistment options. It is
significant in this case that the applicant relied to his
detriment on the representations of Air Force personnel.
Therefore, we believe it is in the interest of justice to grant
the applicant the enlistment incentive bonus he would have
received for the time served in the Air Force Reserve had he held
an approved DAFSC on the day he signed the agreement. We believe
this constitutes full and equitable relief based on the total
circumstances of his case. Therefore, we recommend his records be
corrected as indicated below.
________________________________________________________________
4. The applicant's case is adequately documented and it has not
been shown that a personal appearance with or without counsel
will materially add to our understanding of the issue(s)
involved. Therefore, the request for a hearing is not favorably
considered.
________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT:
The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air
Force relating to APPLICANT, be corrected to show that he
enlisted for 6 years on 17 June 2010, for a $15,000 incentive
bonus and, based on his participation in an approved Air Force
Specialty Code, he is entitled to be paid $8,625.00.
________________________________________________________________
The following members of the Board considered this application
in Executive Session on 16 April 2013, under the provisions of
AFI 36-2603:
, Panel Chair
, Member
, Member
The following documentary evidence was considered in AFBCMR
Docket Number BC-2012-03597:
Exhibit A. DD Form 149, dated 9 July 2012, w/atchs.
Exhibit B. Applicant's Master Personnel Records.
Exhibit C. Letter, AFRC/A1K, dated 30 October 2012.
Exhibit D. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 6 November 2012.
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-04145
His complete response, with attachment, is at Exhibit E. ________________________________________________________________ ADDITIONAL AIR FORCE EVALUATION: HQ ARPC/DPD recommends denial of the applicant's request for a corrected OSB, and SSB consideration for CY10 and CY11 Lt Col Promotion Boards. According to AFI 36-2504, Officer Promotion Continuation and Selective Early Removal in the Reserve of the Air Force, Paragraph 9.2, only Air Force Board for Correction of Military Records...
AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 05680
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2013-05680 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His date in rank (DOR) to the grade of airman first class (A1C/E-3) be changed to reflect his date of enlistment (DOE). The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are described in the memorandum prepared by the Air Force office of primary responsibility (OPR), which is included at Exhibit C. AIR...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-02908
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-02908 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: The 2T211, Air Force Specialty Code (AFSC) be removed from his military personnel records. ________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFRC/A1K states in accordance with Air Force Instruction 36- 2101,...
AF | BCMR | CY2010 | BC-2010-03998
The complete AFRC/A1K evaluation is at Exhibit C. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: The applicant states he was not provided the necessary information regarding the transfer of benefits to a dependent prior to his retirement. While we note the steps the Air Force office of primary responsibility indicates were taken to inform eligible personnel of this new benefit, it appears that through no fault of the applicant,...
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-04469
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2011-04469 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: He be paid $20,000.00 bonus over the course of 3 years as stated in his agreement. At the time of his enlistment, the applicant was eligible for the $7,500.00 bonus for his 3 year enlistment. ...
AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 01117
Prior to departing for his deployment in Jan 2011, the applicant was on the extension which provided sufficient retainability for his deployment. As of this date, no response has been received by this office. Therefore, we recommend the applicant's Air Force records be corrected as indicated below.
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 04974
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2013-04974 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: She be awarded an enlistment bonus for her Duty Air Force Specialty Code (DAFSC)/7-skill level and she be awarded the rank of airman first class. The applicant initialed and signed the DD Form 1966 continuation sheet that states both Stripes for Unit Bonus Skills and Enlisting with Stripes for: sections were...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 03925
He was finally able to schedule a meeting with the, then, Chief of the Air Force Reserve, on or about 18 May 2011 to attempt to have the decision reversed. Although an AGR personnel brief dated 8 April 2009, and the applicant's AGR Review Board Worksheet for the March 2011 Board reflected that he had attained career status, this data was incorrect at the time of the AGR Review Board in question. ________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: The...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 03396
________________________________________________________________ THE APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: He should be entitled to a Reserve Officer Affiliation Bonus since his Air Force Specialty Code (AFSC) 64PX/Contracting, was listed on the 13 Jan 12, Air Force Reserve Command (AFRC) Fiscal Year 2012 (FY12) Critical Skills Officer Incentive Eligible Skills memo. AFRC/AlKP appears to have interpreted Title 37 USC Section 308j in a manner that allowed them to add a caveat to the Commander's program...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 01665
The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are described in the letter prepared by the Air Force office of primary responsibility, which is attached at Exhibit C. ________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFRC/A1K recommends denial indicating there is no evidence of an error or an injustice. Per AFI 36-2638, Air Force Reserve Enlisted Incentives, service members who wish to reenlist with an incentive must be within six months of...