RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-03413
COUNSEL: NONE
HEARING DESIRED: NO
________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:
His reentry (RE) code 6H, which denotes Pending Discharge in
accordance with ANGR 39-10 Involuntary (ANG Only), be removed
from his records.
________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT:
He would like to reenlist in the military.
The applicant's complete submission, with attachments, is at
Exhibit A.
________________________________________________________________
STATEMENT OF FACTS:
The relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained
in the letter prepared by the appropriate office of the Air
Force at Exhibit C.
________________________________________________________________
AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
NGB/A1PP recommends denial. A1PP states his discharge was
accomplished in accordance with Air Force policies and
procedures, and no evidence was provided to show an error or
injustice has occurred. The RE code 6H is an Air Force
sanctioned and recognized code and is found in the Military
Personnel Data System. This code applies to the Air National
Guard and is used when a member is not selected for further
retention in accordance with ANGI 36-2002, Enlistment and
Reenlistment in the Air National Guard and as a Reserve of the
Air Force. This is not a derogatory code. Therefore, should
the applicant wish to enlist with another branch of service, it
will not be a barrier to his enlistment.
The complete A1PP evaluation is at Exhibit C.
________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
On 9 Nov 2012, a copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded
to the applicant for review and comment within 30 days. As of
this date, no response has been received by this office (Exhibit
D).
________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:
1. The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by
existing law or regulations.
2. The application was timely filed.
3. Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to
demonstrate the existence of error or injustice. We took notice
of the applicant's complete submission in judging the merits of
the case; however, we agree with the opinion and recommendation
of the Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt its
rationale as the basis for our conclusion the applicant has not
been the victim of an error or injustice. Therefore, in the
absence of evidence to the contrary, we find no basis to
recommend granting the relief sought in this application.
________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT:
The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did not
demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; that
the application was denied without a personal appearance; and
that the application will only be reconsidered upon the
submission of newly discovered relevant evidence not considered
with this application.
________________________________________________________________
The following members of the Board considered AFBCMR BC-2012-
03413 in Executive Session on 28 Mar 2013, under the provisions
of AFI 36-2603:
Panel Chair
Member
Member
The following documentary evidence was considered in AFBCMR BC-
2012-03413:
Exhibit A. DD Form 149, dated 27 Jun 2012, w/atchs.
Exhibit B. Applicant's Master Personnel Records.
Exhibit C. Letter, NGB/A1PP, dated 21 Aug 2012.
Exhibit D. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 9 Nov 2012.
Panel Chair
AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 00592
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2014-00592 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: YES APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His Reenlistment Eligibility (RE) code 6H (Pending Discharge - Involuntary) be corrected. STATEMENT OF FACTS: According to the applicant's military personnel records, he initially entered the Air National Guard on 4 Aug 11. Therefore, we recommend the applicants records be corrected as indicated below.
AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 02692
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2014-02692 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His reentry (RE) code of 6H reflected on his NGB Form 22, Report of Separation and Record of Service, be changed to allow him to reenter the military. The recommended separation was determined to be legally sufficient and the discharge authority directed the applicant be discharged with an entry level separation....
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 01112
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2013-01112 XXXXXXX COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: Her Reenlistment Eligibility (RE) code of 6H, which denotes (Air National Guard (ANG) pending discharge in accordance with ANGR 39-10 involuntary) be changed to an eligible code. ...
AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 00490
APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: His current RE code was based on the fact he did not have a valid Security Clearance; which caused him to not be world-wide deployable. The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the memorandum prepared by the Air Force office of primary responsibility (OPR), which is attached at Exhibit C. AIR FORCE EVALUATION: NGB/A1PP recommends denial indicating there is no evidence of an error or an injustice. We took notice of the applicant's...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-00396
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-00396 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO IN THE MATTER OF: _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: Her reenlistment eligibility (RE) code of “6H” (Pending Discharge IAW ANGR 39-10 – INVOL (ANG Only)) be changed to allow her to enlist in the Army National Guard. On 12 Apr 08, the applicant’s commander notified her that he was recommending her...
AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 01432
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2014-01432 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: YES APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His Reenlistment Eligibility (RE) code of 6H (Pending Discharge-Involuntary) on his National Guard Bureau Form 22, Report of Separation and Record of Service, be upgraded so he may reenter the Air National Guard (ANG). The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the memorandum...
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-04827
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2011-04827 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His reenlistment eligibility (RE) code 6H, which denotes Pending Discharge in accordance with ANGR 39-10 Involuntary (ANG Only), be removed from his records. The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application, extracted from the...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-03670
Members may be discharged when the member has accumulated nine or more unexcused absences from UTA within a 12-month period. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: On 26 November 2012, a copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to the applicant for review and response within 30 days (Exhibit D). We took notice of the applicants complete submission in judging the merits of the case; however, we agree with the...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-02149
________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: The record should be changed because it was created through an administrative error by the finance office and through no fault of her own. The Air Force Financial Services Center Debts and Remissions Branch directed the collection rate of $350.00 per month for seven months until the member's current expired term of service (ETS) date of 20 Nov 2012. After thoroughly reviewing the evidence of record...
AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 00027
On 20 Nov 13, the applicant was promoted to the grade of E-3. As such, he was never eligible for promotion to the grade of E-3, effective 21 Jun 13, as requested. A complete copy of the NGB/A1PP additional evaluation is at Exhibit E. APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF ADDITIONAL AIR FORCE EVALUATION: He argues a change to the FY13, R&R Initiatives added his AFSC 2T2X1 to the critical skills AFSC list, effective 1 Oct 12, as verified through his Force Support Squadron (FSS).