RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-03623
COUNSEL: NONE
HEARING DESIRED: NO
________________________________________________________________
THE APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:
He be given credit for 20 years of active service toward
retirement.
________________________________________________________________
THE APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT:
He was disability retired on 1 Jun 95 (sic) just 45 days short
of a full 20 year retirement. He was provided inaccurate
information when he was initially notified of the Physical
Evaluation Boards (PEB) findings. He wanted to delay his
concurrence until he had completed 20 years; however, he was
advised that he would receive full credit for 20 years of
service. He believes because of this injustice he should be
credited with the 45 days of service in order to qualify for the
Concurrent Retirement Disability Pay (CRDP).
The applicants complete submission, with attachments, is at
Exhibit A.
________________________________________________________________
STATEMENT OF FACTS:
On 7 May 75, the applicant was discharged from the Delayed
Enlistment Program (DEP) and as a member of the US Air Force
Reserve (USAFR). On 8 May 75, the applicant enlisted in the
Regular Air Force and entered Extended Active Duty (EAD), on
1 Jul 75. On 7 Aug 80, the applicant was released from EAD and
transferred back to the USAFR.
On 1 Oct 80, the applicant reenlisted in the Regular Air Force
and served honorably until his discharge on 9 Jun 86, on
10 Jun 86, he was commissioned as a second lieutenant.
On 1 Nov 94, the Medical Evaluation Board (MEB) diagnosed the
applicant with Metabolic Myopathy and referred his case to the
Informal Physical Evaluation Board (IPEB). On 25 Nov 94, The
IPEB diagnosed the applicant with Metabolic Myopathy with
possible Phosphorylase B Kinase Deficiency and recommended the
applicants name be placed on the Temporary Disability Retired
List (TDRL) with a compensable disability rating of 60 percent.
On 13 Dec 94, the applicant concurred with the IPEB findings
with a compensable rating at 60 percent and his case was
referred to the Secretary of the Air Force Personnel Council
(SAFPC) for consideration. On 2 Feb 95, SAFPC concurred with
the findings of the IPEB and directed the applicants name be
placed on the TDRL with a retirement effective date of
16 May 95. At the time of his placement, he was credited with
19 years, 10 months, 15 days of active service toward
retirement, with 45 days of earned accrued leave.
On 6 Dec 96, the applicants name was removed from the TDRL and
he was permanently disability retired with a compensable
disability rating of 60 percent and his name was placed on the
Permanent Disability Retired List (PDRL).
On 1 Jul 12, the applicant was rated at 80 percent employable by
the Department of Veterans Affairs (DVA) and is in receipt of
disability compensation from the DVA. As a result his military
retired pay is currently offset by $1478.00.
________________________________________________________________
THE AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
AFPC/DPSD recommends denial, stating, in part, that the
preponderance of evidence reflects that no error or injustice
occurred during the disability process or at time of separation.
DPSD notes that the applicant is seeking to have his service
dates changed in order to qualify for the CRDP Program. CRDP
or "concurrent receipt" as it is sometimes referred to-is a
phased-in restoration of the retired pay deducted from military
retirees' accounts due to their receipt of DVA compensation.
Those retired military members entitled to CRDP automatically
began receiving these benefits as of 1 Jan 04. Eligibility for
CRDP requires at least 20 years of creditable service (10 USC, § 1414(b) (1)). On 6 Dec 96, the applicant was removed from the
TDRL and permanently retired with a disability rating of
60 percent. Time spent on the TDRL does not count towards
active duty time. Special Order ACD-0282 was issued 26 Nov 96,
reflecting he had 19 years, 10 months, and 15 days of active
service. The applicant does not have the required 20 years of
active service time to apply for CRDP. All service dates on
Special Order ACD-0282 are correct.
The complete DPSD evaluation is at Exhibit C.
DFAS recommends denial, stating, in part, that the applicants
record indicates that he completed 19 years, 10 months, 15 days
of total active service. No provisions of the law allow members
who retire by reason of physical disability with less than
20 years of total active service or 20 years of qualifying
service for members of the Air Reserve component to receive
CRDP; therefore, the applicant is not entitled to CRDP.
In addition, they advised the applicant that he may be entitled
to Combat-Related Special Compensation (CRSC) Pay and provided
an application to submit to the Air Force for review.
The complete DFAS evaluation, with attachments, is at Exhibit D.
________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF THE AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
Copies of the Air Force evaluations were forwarded to the
applicant on 30 Oct 12 for review and comment within 30 days.
As of this date, no response has been received by this office
(Exhibit E).
________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:
1. The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by
existing law or regulations.
2. The application was not timely filed; however, it is in the
interest of justice to excuse the failure to timely file.
3. Sufficient relevant evidence has been presented to
demonstrate the existence of error or injustice warranting
corrective action. After careful review of the available
records and the evidence submitted in support of the applicants
appeal, it appears that he has been credited with all active
service creditable under the governing instruction and laws at
the time of his retirement. Notwithstanding the above, we note
that the applicant was retired for disability just 45 days short
of completing 20 years of active service. We further note that
at the time of his separation, he had 45 days of accrued leave.
It is our opinion that if the applicant had thought that not
completing 20 years of service could possibly impact any future
entitlements, especially when he was so close to the 20-year
point, he would have chosen to remain on active duty until he
had completed 20 years. In view of the foregoing, and to
preclude any injustice to the applicant, we believe that his
records should be corrected to reflect that he completed
20 years of active service before being disability retired.
Accordingly, we recommend that the records be corrected as
indicated below.
________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT:
The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air
Force relating to APPLICANT, be corrected to show that he was
not relieved from active duty on 15 May 95, but was continued on
active duty until 29 Jun 95 and was relieved from active duty
and placed on the Temporary Disability Retired List on
30 Jun 95.
________________________________________________________________
The following members of the Board considered AFBCMR Docket
Number BC-2012-03623 in Executive Session on 11 Jun 13, under
the provisions of AFI 36-2603:
, Vice Chair
, Member
, Member
All members voted to correct the records, as recommended. The
following documentary evidence was considered:
Exhibit A. DD Form 149, dated 7 Aug 12, w/atchs.
Exhibit B. Applicant's Master Personnel Records.
Exhibit C. Letter, AFPC/DPSD, dated 5 Sep 12.
Exhibit D. Letter, DFAS-JBJR/CL, dated 19 Oct 12, w/atchs.
Exhibit E. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 30 Oct 12.
Vice Chair
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-03839
_________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPFD recommends denial. _________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did not demonstrate the existence of error or injustice; that the application was denied without a personal appearance; and that the application will only be reconsidered upon the submission of newly discovered relevant evidence...
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-02259
The complete DPSD evaluation is at Exhibit C. The BCMR Medical Consultant recommends the administrative adjustment of the applicant's AF Form 356, Findings and Recommended Disposition of the USAF Physical Evaluation Board, to reflect his thyroid condition was considered by the IPEB, but with denial of its inclusion as an unfitting condition in the military disability rating computation; neither initially or at the time of his removal from the TDRL. The complete BCMR Medical Consultants...
AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2006-00117
_________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: She took her oath of office and became a member of the Air Force on 29 Mar 63, which would credit her with over 20 years of service for purposes of qualifying her for the CRDP. We took notice of the applicant's complete submission in judging the merits of the case; however, we agree with the opinion and recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt its rationale as the...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 03593
The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are described in the letter prepared by the Air Force office of primary responsibility, which is attached at Exhibit C. ________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPFD recommends denial indicating there was no evidence of an error or injustice that occurred during the disability process. The applicant does not have the required 20 years of active service time to apply for CRDP. ...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-01759
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-01759 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His medical retirement effective date be changed from 1 Dec 11 to 6 Dec 11, in order to qualify for the Concurrent Retirement Disability Pay (CRDP) entitlement. ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT CONTENDS...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 03698
In view of the fact that her career was cut short due to malpractice, she should be credited with the 20 years of active service that she planned to perform and entitled to full concurrent receipt of her military disability retired pay and disability compensation from the DVA. The applicant contends she should be awarded a longevity retirement (as if she had served 20 years) since it was her intent to complete the required service for retirement from active duty. While she may have...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-01117
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-01117 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO IN THE MATTER OF: _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His removal from the Temporary Disability Retired List (TDRL) and discharge with entitlement to disability severance pay, effective 8 September 2010, be changed to a permanent retirement with a minimum 40 percent disability rating. The DPSD complete...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-00097
Since he had over 19 years and 6 months of active duty service the personnel officer assured him that he would be credited with a full 20 years of service. As of 9 February 2011 the VA advised him that his disability rating had been determined to be 70 percent based on a number of factors and his VA pension would no longer be withheld from his Air Force retirement pay, however, Defense Finance and Accounting Service (DFAS) did not agree and he was advised that he did not qualify for...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2011-04143
The Medical Consultant states the applicant's request for a change from a 30 percent to a 100 percent disability rating with medical retirement must be considered in view of the medical evidence available at the time of separation from active duty service and release from the TDRL. Hence, the Medical Consultant identifies no medical basis for the recommendation to retroactively assign a 100 percent disability rating for the applicant's ulcerative colitis. After thoroughly reviewing the...
AF | BCMR | CY2010 | BC-2010-01299
He was progressively promoted to the grade of captain effective 26 June 1985. Once a member is placed on the TDRL, they are in a retired status and are not eligible to meet a promotion board. DPSOO states that no evidence has been presented to demonstrate the existence of an error or injustice.