Search Decisions

Decision Text

AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC-2012-03468
Original file (BC-2012-03468.txt) Auto-classification: Denied
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS 

AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS 

 

IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-03468 

 COUNSEL: NONE 

 HEARING DESIRED: NO 

 

______________________________________________________________ 

 

APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: 

 

1. His Reentry (RE) code 2C, which denotes "Involuntarily 
separated with an honorable discharge; or entry level separation 
without characterization of service," be changed to allow his 
reentry in the military. 

 

2. His separation code of JFX, which denotes, “Personality 
Disorder,” be changed. 

 

3. His narrative reason for separation be changed from 
“Personality Disorder” to “Hardship,” along with the 
corresponding separation code. (In an email dated 15 Aug 2012, 
the applicant amended his request to disregard changing his 
narrative reason for separation). 

 

________________________________________________________________ 

 

APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: 

 

He should have been issued a hardship discharge due to his 
mother's deteriorating health conditions. Since his mother 
passed away he is free to restart his military career. 

 

His first sergeant attempted to assist him with obtaining a 
hardship discharge; however, he found out that it could take up 
to two years. A mental health counselor told him he could be 
discharged more quickly with a mental health discharge. He was 
told that he would have no problem reenlisting. 

 

He has attempted to re-enlist in all branches of the service; 
however, he was not given a waiver. 

 

The applicant’s complete submission, with attachments, is at 
Exhibit A. 

 

________________________________________________________________ 

 

STATEMENT OF FACTS: 

 

On 20 Jun 2006, the applicant enlisted in the Regular Air Force. 

 

On 13 Nov 2007, his commander notified him he was recommending 
his discharge from the Air Force for mental disorders. The 
commander recommended he receive an honorable discharge because 


he was diagnosed by the Behavioral Health Services as having a 
mental disorder as contained in the Diagnostic and Statistical 
Manual of Mental Disorders. Specifically, he was diagnosed with 
an Adjustment Disorder with depressed mood and Schizoid 
Personality Disorder. The Behavioral Health Services determined 
his disorder was severe enough that his ability to function in 
the military was significantly impaired. 

 

On 14 Nov 2007, he acknowledged receipt of the discharge 
notification and waived his right to submit statements. 

 

On 19 Nov 2007, the Staff Judge Advocate found the discharge 
legally sufficient. 

 

On 28 Nov 2007, he was honorably discharged from the Air Force 
with a RE code of 2C. He served 1 year, 5 months, and 9 days of 
total active service. 

 

________________________________________________________________ 

 

THE AIR FORCE EVALUATION: 

 

AFPC/DPSOA recommends denial of the applicant’s request to 
change his RE code. DPSOA states his RE code of 2C is required 
per AFI 36-2606, Reenlistments in the USAF, based on his 
involuntary discharge with an honorable character of service. 

 

The complete DPSOA evaluation is at Exhibit C. 

 

AFPC/DPSOR recommends denial of the applicant’s request to 
change his separation code and narrative reason for separation. 
DPSOR states they found no evidence of an error or injustice in 
the processing of his discharge. Based on the documentation on 
file in the master personnel records, the discharge to include 
the narrative reason for separation and separation code was 
consistent with the procedural and substantive requirements of 
the discharge instruction and was within the discretion of the 
discharge authority. 

 

The complete DPSOR evaluation is at Exhibit D. 

 

________________________________________________________________ 

 

APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF THE AIR FORCE EVALUATION: 

 

On 26 Nov 2012, copies of the Air Force evaluations were 
forwarded to the applicant for review and comment within 
30 days. As of this date, this office has received no response 
Exhibit E). 

 

________________________________________________________________ 

 


THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT: 

 

1. The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by 
existing law or regulations. 

 

2. The application was not timely filed; however, it is in the 
interest of justice to excuse the failure to timely file. 

 

3. Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to 
demonstrate the existence of error or injustice. We took notice 
of the applicant's complete submission in judging the merits of 
the case; however, we agree with the opinions and 
recommendations of the Air Force offices of primary 
responsibility and adopt their rationale as the basis for our 
conclusion the applicant has not been the victim of an error or 
injustice. Therefore, in the absence of evidence to the 
contrary, we find no basis to recommend granting the relief 
sought in this application. 

 

________________________________________________________________ 

 

THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: 

 

The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did not 
demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; that 
the application was denied without a personal appearance; and 
that the application will only be reconsidered upon the 
submission of newly discovered relevant evidence not considered 
with this application. 

 

________________________________________________________________ 

 

The following members of the Board considered Docket Number BC-
2012-03468 in Executive Session on 18 Apr 2013, under the 
provisions of AFI 36-2603: 

 

 Panel Chair 

 Member 

 Member 

 

The following documentary evidence was considered in AFBCMR BC-
2012-03468: 

 

 Exhibit A. DD Form 149, dated 11 Jul 2012, w/atchs. 

 Exhibit B. Applicant's Master Personnel Records. 

 Exhibit C. Letter, AFPC/DPSOA, dated 17 Sep 2012. 

 Exhibit D. Letter, AFPC/DPSOR, 8 Nov 2012. 

 Exhibit E. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 26 Nov 2012. 

 

 

 

 

 

 Panel Chair 



Similar Decisions

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 03763

    Original file (BC 2013 03763.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Other service members in similar situations have been successful with having the narrative reason for separation changed and their RE code upgraded to Secretarial Authority and RE-3K, respectively. However, in the case before us the applicant’s RE code of 2C, assigned at the time of his separation is correct based on his entry-level separation with an uncharacterized character of service. In this respect, we note the applicant had only completed 20 days of service in the Air Force when...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-03860

    Original file (BC-2012-03860.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-03860 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: 1. On 17 Apr 09, the applicant was notified of her commander’s intent to recommend that she be discharged from the Air Force under the provisions of AFI 36-3208, Administrative Separation of Airmen for Fradulent Enlistment. ...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2012 03017

    Original file (BC 2012 03017.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Her narrative reason for separation does not have an effect on her RE code, as her RE code is driven by her involuntary discharge and honorable character of service. However, by a majority vote, the Board recommended denial of a change to the reentry code. AFPC/DPSOR has admitted that her discharge reason for separation and the corresponding separation code should be corrected.

  • AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-02850

    Original file (BC-2012-02850.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-02850 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: YES _______________________________________________ ____________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His narrative reason for separation, Reentry (RE) code, and separation program designator (SPD) code be changed so that he can be eligible to re-enlist. While the applicant’s narrative reason for separation and SPD code should be corrected, the...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 00970

    Original file (BC 2014 00970.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2014-00970 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His Reentry (RE) code of 2C which denotes “Involuntarily separated with an honorable discharge; or entry level separation without characterization of service” be changed to allow him to reenlist in the Air Force. On 10 Jan 13, his commander recommended he be given an entry level discharge for mental disorders under...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 00925

    Original file (BC 2014 00925.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the memorandum prepared by the Air Force office of primary responsibility (OPR), which is attached at Exhibit C. AIR FORCE EVALUATION: HQ AETC/SGPS finds no evidence of an error or an injustice. Based on the documentation on file in the applicant’s master personnel record, the discharge to include the SPD code, the narrative reason for separation and character of service was consistent with the procedural and...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-02748

    Original file (BC-2012-02748.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    His narrative reason for separation be removed and expunged from his military personnel and medical records. The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the letters prepared by the appropriate offices of the Air Force, which are attached at Exhibit C, D, and E. AIR FORCE EVALUATIONS: AFPC/DPSOR recommends denial of the applicant’s request to change his narrative reason for discharge, indicating there is no evidence of an error or injustice. A complete copy...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC-2013-00184

    Original file (BC-2013-00184.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2013-00184 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: 1. ________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPSOR recommends denial of the applicant’s request to change her type of separation, narrative reason for separation and separation code. Based on the...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2012 03643

    Original file (BC 2012 03643.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-03643 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His Reentry (RE) code 2C, which denotes "Involuntarily separated with an honorable discharge; or entry level separation without characterization of service," be changed to allow his reentry in the military. On 7 Aug 2007, his commander notified him...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-03972

    Original file (BC-2012-03972.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    On 4 Apr 07, the discharge authority directed the applicant be discharged from the Air Force with an uncharacterized entry-level separation. DPSOR states a review of the applicant’s record reveals there was an error in his separation record. Specifically, the applicant’s DD Form 214, Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty, incorrectly reflects he was discharged with a separation code of “JFX” and a narrative reason of “Personality Disorder.” Since the applicant was diagnosed...