RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-03465
COUNSEL: NONE
HEARING DESIRED: NO
________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:
His Fitness Assessment (FA) dated 19 Jun 2012 be removed from
the Air Force Fitness Management System (AFFMS).
________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT:
He had a medical condition during the FA which was validated by
a medical evaluation.
His section commander requested the FA in question be removed
from the AFFMS.
The applicant's complete submission, with attachments, is at
Exhibit A.
________________________________________________________________
STATEMENT OF FACTS:
The applicant is currently serving in the Regular Air Force in
the grade of staff sergeant (E-5).
________________________________________________________________
THE AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
AFPC/DPSIM recommends denial. DPSIM states that on 15 Aug 2012,
a memorandum was sent to the applicant requesting additional
documentation. Specifically, AF Form 108, Physical Fitness
Education and Intervention Processing; AF Form 422, Notification
of Air Force Members Qualification Status; AF Form 469, Duty
Limiting Condition Report, signed score sheet and questionnaire
for the contested FA. The member did not provide the requested
documentation.
The complete DPSIM evaluation, with attachment, is at Exhibit B.
________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF THE AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
On 9 Nov 2012, a copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded
to the applicant for review and comment within 30 days. As of
this date, no response has been received by this office (Exhibit
C).
________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:
1. The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by
existing law or regulations.
2. The application was timely filed.
3. Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to
demonstrate the existence of error or injustice. After
thoroughly reviewing the evidence of record and noting the
applicants contentions, we are not persuaded the contested FA
is in error or unjust. The memorandum from his section
commander is noted; however, in the absence of the documentation
requested by AFPC/DPSIM in their 15 Aug 2012, memorandum to the
applicant, we find insufficient evidence to warrant disturbing
the record. However, should the applicant provide such
evidence, we would be willing to reconsider his request. In
view of the above and in the absence of evidence to the
contrary, we find no basis to recommend granting the relief
sought in this application.
________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT:
The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did not
demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; that
the application was denied without a personal appearance; and
that the application will only be reconsidered upon the
submission of newly discovered relevant evidence not considered
with this application.
________________________________________________________________
The following members of the Board considered this application
in Executive Session on 18 Apr 2013, under the provisions of AFI
36-2603:
Panel Chair
Member
Member
The following documentary evidence pertaining to Docket number
BC-2012-03465 was considered:
Exhibit A. DD Form 149, dated 11 Jul 2012, w/atchs.
Exhibit B. Letter, AFPC/DPSIM, dated 29 Oct 2012, w/atch.
Exhibit C. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 9 Nov 2012.
Panel Chair
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC-2012-05779
A resume of the applicant's FA results is as follows: Date Composite Score Rating *28 Nov 12 38.40 Unsatisfactory 31 May 12 85.90 Satisfactory 13 May 11 93.90 Excellent 23 Nov 10 80.10 Good 5 May 10 79.25 Good 2 Nov 09 85.00 Good * Contested FA The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the letter prepared by the appropriate office of the Air Force at Exhibit C. ________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: 1. They...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC-2012-05716
Beyond the cardio exemption, there is no evidence that the applicant should have been exempt from any other component. The complete AFPC/DPSIM evaluation, with attachment, is at Exhibit C. ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: In his response the applicant states that after receiving the Air Force advisory opinion it was clear that he did not provide the supporting medical documents, therefore he submits a copy of his...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC-2012-03521
________________________________________________________________ THE AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPSIM recommends denial of the applicants request to exempt the cardio component of his FA dated 24 July 2012. The medical evidence provided in support of his request is noted; however, in the absence of a copy of his fitness score sheet for his FA dated 24 July 2012 and his AF Form 108, stating that he had a medical condition precluding the achievement of a passing fitness score, we find...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 01591
On 29 Nov 2011, a medical evaluation letter was signed by the same provider who issued the previous AF Form 469s. The letter states, There are medical conditions that preclude this member from achieving a passing score on the Air Force fitness assessment. On 1 Dec 2011, an AF Form 469, Duty Limiting Condition Report, was initiated from his Medical Provider, which could exempt the applicant from the cardio and push-up components of the FA. On 27 Mar 2012, a medical evaluation letter was...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 03033
The applicants complete submission, with attachment, is at Exhibit A. If the FA is invalidated, the Airman will be required to retest on all non- exempt FA components within five duty days from original FA test date. A complete copy of the AFPC/DPSIM evaluation, with attachments, is at Exhibit C. APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: A copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to the applicant on 21 Feb 14 for review and comment within 30 days.
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2012 03257
________________________________________________________________ THE AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPSIM recommends the sit-up component of the contested FA reflect "exempt" in the AFFMS. ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF THE AIR FORCE EVALUATION: On 29 Aug 2012, a copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to the applicant for review and comment within 30 days. In this respect, we note that while the applicant requests the entire FA be...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 02592
from the Unit CC; and Atch 1, Para 13 If the medical evaluation validates the illness/injury, the Unit Commander may invalidate the test results. The applicants last 5 FA results are as follows: Date Composite Score AC Measurement Rating 2 Aug 2013 82.20 38.00 Satisfactory 15 May 2013 16.50 39.50 Unsatisfactory 6 Nov 2012 83.30 38.50 Satisfactory *24 Oct 2012 0.00 40.00 Unsatisfactory 30 Jul 2012 74.10 39.00 Unsatisfactory *Annotates Contested FA: On 7 Jan 14, a similar request was...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-01534
_________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPSIM recommends updating the push-up component of the applicants fitness assessment to reflect exempt in AFFMS; which would change her overall composite score to 88.33 (Satisfactory). The complete DPSIM evaluation, with attachment, is at Exhibit B. AFPC/DPSID recommends approval of the applicants request to remove her contested EPR. The complete DPSID evaluation is at Exhibit...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-00425
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-00425 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO IN THE MATTER OF: _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His Fitness Assessment dated 30 Nov 11 be removed from the Air Force Fitness Management System (AFFMS). _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: A copy of the Air Force evaluation...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 00756
The board should still consider whether the Control Roster which was issued not only for the contested FA failure, but also for two additional FA failures should be removed. HQ AFPC/DPSIDE administratively corrected the applicants EPR (by voiding the report) for the period 12 Aug 08 through 11 Apr 10, and replacing it with an AF Form 77 stating not rated for the time period, report was removed by order of Chief of Staff of the Air Force. Additionally, this action resulted in the...