AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-04621
The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application extracted from the applicants military personnel records are contained in the letter prepared by the appropriate Air Force office of primary responsibility at Exhibit C. ______________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: 1. The applicant's supervisor non-recommended her on an AF IMT 418, Selective Reenlistment Program Consideration on 22 Feb 2011 listing numerous disciplinary infractions and her...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-04626
________________________________________________________________ THE AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPFFF recommends approval, stating, in part, there is no evidence of Air Force error in this case and absent a competing claimant, DPFFF recommends the decedent's record be corrected to reflect on 1 Feb 94, he elected to change SBP spouse to former spouse coverage based on full retired pay, naming the applicant as the former spouse beneficiary. Considering the applicant failed to execute a deemed...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-04628
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-04628 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: Her entry-level separation with uncharacterized service be upgraded to an honorable discharge. On 30 May 2002, the applicant was furnished an entry-level separation with uncharacterized service with a narrative reason for separation of Entry-level...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-04634
________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: He was not provided guidance or advice regarding the need to adjust or transfer his Post-9/11 GI Bill entitlement prior to his retirement. To date, a response has not been received (Exhibit C). ________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT: The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air Force relating to APPLICANT be corrected to show that he...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-04635
AFBCMR BC-2012-04635 MEMORANDUM OF CONSIDERATION OF APPLICATION BEFORE THE AFBCMR SUBJECT: Having carefully reviewed this application, we agree with the recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt the rationale expressed as the basis for our decision that the applicant has been the victim of either an error or an injustice. Therefore, we recommend that: The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air Force relating to the APPLICANT be corrected to...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-04644
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-04644 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His record be corrected to reflect he was retained on the Inactive Status List Reserve Section (ISLRS) for only three years so that his Mandatory Separation Date (MSD) may be extended. ...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-04645
AFBCMR BC-2012-04645 MEMORANDUM OF CONSIDERATION OF APPLICATION BEFORE THE AFBCMR SUBJECT: Having carefully reviewed this application, we agree with the recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt the rationale expressed as the basis for our decision that the applicant has been the victim of either an error or an injustice. Therefore, we recommend that: The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air Force relating to the APPLICANT be corrected to...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-04647
The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the letter prepared by the appropriate office of the Air Force, which is at Exhibit C. ________________________________________________________________ _ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPSIM recommends partial approval. In view of the medical documentation submitted in support of this appeal indicating the prescribed inhaler contributed to his failure during the cardio component of the contested FA, the Air Force...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-04650
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-04650 XXXXXXX COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ THE APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His general, under honorable conditions discharge be upgraded to honorable. ________________________________________________________________ THE AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPSOR recommends denial, stating, in part, that based on the...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-04658
Manner and time of election, such an election must be written, signed by the person making the election, and received by the Secretary concerned within one year after the date which that person marries or acquires that dependent child. Because the applicant contacted this headquarters outside of the one year window, he cannot now add his spouse to his RCSBP. Title 10 Subsection 1448(a)(5)(B), the applicant had one year from the date of marriage to add his spouse to his RCSBP election. ...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-04659
Upon completion of the sit-up assessment, the counter identified to the Fitness Assessment Cell that his sit- up count was off by 4. We took note of the applicants complete submission in judging the merits of the case; however, we find insufficient evidence of an error or injustice to warrant removal of the contested FA in its entirety. We took note of the recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility to correct the sit-up component of the contested FA to reflect 45 and...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-04662
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-04662 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His home of record (HOR) be corrected to reflect Beaumont (Jefferson County), Texas (TX). His DD Form 4/1, Enlistment/Reenlistment Document Armed Forces of the United States, reflects APO, AE 09036 (Wuerzberg, Germany) as his home of record at the...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-04663
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-04663 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ _ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: Her Fitness Assessment dated 27 Jul 12 be removed from the Air Force Fitness Management System (AFFMS). At that time she stated that she could not continue due to cramping in her leg, but was advised that the score was not official until put into...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-04667
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-04667 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His records be corrected to show he is entitled to 4-5 additional Air Medals (AM). AFPC/DPSID states after a complete review of the applicants military personnel record (MPR), they have verified the applicants entitlement to the VSM and his record...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-04670
The concurrence must be signed, dated and notarized to be valid. We took notice of the applicants complete submission in judging the merits of the case; however, we agree with the opinion and the recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt its rationale as the basis for our decision the applicant is not the victim of an error or injustice. ________________________________________________________________ The following members of the Board considered AFBCMR...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-04672
________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPAPP recommends that the applicants DD Form 214 be corrected to reflect Foreign Service time. Upon the final Board decision, administrative correction of his official military personnel record will be completed by AFPC/DPSOR. Accordingly, we recommend his records be corrected as indicated below.
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-04673
Air Force Outstanding Unit Award (AFOUA). The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are described in the letter prepared by the Air Force office of primary responsibility, which is attached at Exhibit C. ________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPSID recommends denial indicating there is no evidence of an error or an injustice. The PUC is conferred on units of the armed forces of the United States and of cobelligerent...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-04675
The medical provider released the applicant without limitations. The medical provider also indicated the applicants weight was unhealthy and documented the applicant was previously seen for a recommendation to nullify an FA, at which time the medical provider did not find anything which would prevent his passing the FA. We took notice of the applicants complete submission in judging the merits of the case; however, we agree with the opinion and recommendation of the Air Force office of...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-04676
The applicant has not provided evidence to support a probable error or injustice. We note the applicant contends he procured his move prior to the issuance of orders since there was insufficient time to obtain orders as his father was terminally ill. Consequently, he was not entitled to reimbursement for any expenses he incurred for the DITY move as the governing regulation requires prior transportation authorization. Exhibit B.
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-04677
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-04677 COUNSEL: NONE (DECEASED SERVICE MEMBER) HEARING DESIRED: NO (APPLICANT) ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: Her deceased spouses Line of Duty (LOD) determination for his active duty period of 3 Jan 11 to 18 Mar 11 be changed to reflect in LOD-Yes or LOD-Existed Prior to Service (EPTS)/Service Aggravated, versus EPTS-LOD...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-04682
In the PRF for his 0309C promotion board, the applicants senior rater recommended that he not be promoted this board based on both the adultery and the violation of the no contact order. The commander included the information in the PRF before the LOR response was even due and also before, the investigation was completed. Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate the existence of an error or injustice concerning the applicants requests to remove the Letter of...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-04685
DPSIDEP states that on 27 Jul 2012 and 1 Aug 2012, he initially filed an appeal through the Evaluation Report Appeals Board (ERAB) under the provisions of AFI 36-2401, Correcting Officer and Enlisted Evaluation Reports. After thoroughly reviewing the evidence of record and the applicants complete submission, we find no evidence which would persuade us that his records should be corrected as requested. ________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD DETERMINES...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-04687
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-04687 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ _ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: Her Fitness Assessment dated 29 Aug 12 be removed from the Air Force Fitness Management System (AFFMS). She destroyed the official testing score sheet because she was told the test on 29 Aug 12 would not count because of what had happened. She was...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-04689
He was also told that there was a delay with FY 12 ACP (as there had been in years past) but that the delay would not have an effect on his receiving ACP. While we note the comments of the SAF/MRB Legal Advisor indicating an applicant must prove by sufficient evidence that he or she is the victim of a serious injustice not shared by other, similarly situated officers, it is the opinion of the Board, that because the applicants AGR advisor told him that he met all eligibility requirements,...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-04690
On 24 March 2011, the applicant was issued an AF Form 422, Notification of Air Force Members Qualification Status, which exempted him from the 1.5 mile run and sit-up components of the FA, until 10 May 2011. On 17 May 2011, the applicant was issued an AF Form 422, which exempted him from the 1.5 mile run and sit-up components of the FA, until 10 June 2011. We took notice of the applicants complete submission in judging the merits of the case; however, we agree with the opinion...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-04692
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-04692 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His DD Form 214, Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty, Item 13, Decorations, Medals, Badges, Citations, and Campaign Ribbons Awarded or Authorized be corrected to reflect he was awarded the Air Force Commendation Medal (AFCM). The...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-04693
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-04693 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His Home of Record (HOR) be changed from West Virginia to Germany. The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are described in the letter prepared by the Air Force office of primary responsibility (OPR) which is attached at Exhibit...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-04694
The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are described in the letter prepared by the Air Force office of primary which is attached at Exhibit C. ________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFLOA/JAJM recommends denying the applicants request due to untimeliness or on its merits, indicating the applicant has not supplied any evidence of injustice. The Air Force Court of Military Review approved and affirmed the findings...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-04697
For this misconduct the applicant received an Article 15. d. On or about 17 October 2002, the applicant failed to report on time to his assigned duty location. On 6 October 2005, the Air Force Discharge Review Board (AFDRB) considered and approved the applicants request that his general (under honorable conditions) discharge be upgraded to honorable, to change his narrative reason for separation from drug abuse to misconduct and his reentry code changed to 3K (Exhibit B). The applicant...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-04699
________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: His AF Form 7 states that he was TDY to SEA (Southeast Asia) for 85 days. ________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT: The applicant be notified the evidence presented did not demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; the application was denied without a personal appearance; and the application will only be reconsidered upon the submission...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-04700
________________________________________________________________ _ STATEMENT OF FACTS: The Air Force Overseas Ribbon was authorized to be awarded to Air Force and Air Force Reserve members credited with completion of an overseas tour on or after 1 September 1980. The ribbon is awarded for completion of a short tour or completion of a long tour as defined by the governing instructions. We took notice of the applicant's complete submission in judging the merits of the case; however, we agree...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-04705
On 21 April 2008, his commander notified him that he was recommending him for discharge from the Air Force for Misconduct: Minor Disciplinary Infractions and Misconduct: Drug Abuse, under the provisions of Air Force Policy Directive (AFPD) 36-32, Military Retirements and Separations and Air Force Instruction (AFI) 36-3208 Administrative Separation of Airmen, paragraph 5.50.2. and 5.54. Subsequent to the file being found legally sufficient the discharge authority approved the recommendation...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-04708
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-04708 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: YES ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: Her records be corrected to reflect that she completed her first (12-year) Operational Flying Duty Accumulator (OFDA) gate. The applicant contends that having completing 95 months of flying toward the required 96 months to meet her 12-year flying...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-04709
AFBCMR BC-2012-04709 MEMORANDUM OF CONSIDERATION OF APPLICATION BEFORE THE AFBCMR SUBJECT: Having carefully reviewed this application, we agree with the recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt the rationale expressed as the basis for our decision that the applicant has been the victim of either an error or an injustice. Therefore, we recommend that: The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air Force relating to the APPLICANT be corrected to...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-04710
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-04710 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NOT INDICATED ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His DD Form 214, Report of Separation from Active Duty, be updated to reflect award of the Vietnam Service Medal (VSM), the Small Arms Expert Marksmanship Ribbon (SAEMR) and any other awards he may be eligible to receive. The remaining...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-04711
AFBCMR BC-2012-04711 MEMORANDUM OF CONSIDERATION OF APPLICATION BEFORE THE AFBCMR SUBJECT: Having carefully reviewed this application, we agree with the recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt the rationale expressed as the basis for our decision that the applicant has been the victim of either an error or an injustice. Therefore, we recommend that: The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air Force relating to the APPLICANT, be corrected to...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-04712
________________________________________________________________ STATEMENT OF FACTS: The relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the letter prepared by the Air Force office of primary responsibility (OPR), which is attached at Exhibit C. ________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPFFF recommends approval. There is no evidence either party submitted a valid election to change spouse to former spouse coverage within the...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-04714
________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: At the time of her enlistment, she had enough college credits to enlist in the grade of A1C. The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are described in the letter prepared by the Air Force office of primary which is attached at Exhibit C. ________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: NGB/A1PO recommends denial, indicating there is no evidence...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-04719
At the time of the FA, he suffered from multiple serious medical conditions which warranted exemption from the full FA; however, he was required to take the AC portion. On 22 Nov 10, the applicants Wing Medical Group issued a memorandum, Clarification of AC Exemption Recommendation for FA, establishing the Exercise Physiologist working with the Senior Profile Officer as the only authorities who could recommend to commanders medical exemptions from components of an FA for a member with Duty...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-04721
AFBCMR BC-2012-04721 MEMORANDUM OF CONSIDERATION OF APPLICATION BEFORE THE AFBCMR SUBJECT: Having carefully reviewed this application, we agree with the recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt the rationale expressed as the basis for our decision that the applicant has been the victim of either an error or an injustice. Therefore, we recommend that: The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air Force relating to the APPLICANT be corrected to...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-04722
However, we also note that federal law makes the election unavailable when the deemed election is not timely effected, and no evidence has been presented which shows a deemed election was made within the one-year time period mandated by the law. We are aware that in extraordinary circumstances, it is within the authority of the Board to correct a record if it finds it necessary to prevent an error or injustice. The following members of the Board considered AFBCMR BC-2012- 04722 in...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-04733
________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPSID recommends denial of the applicants request for award of the Vietnam Service Medal (VSM), indicating there is no evidence to verify he had boots-on-the-ground. A complete copy of the AFPC/DPSID evaluation is at Exhibit C. AFPC/DPAPP recommends denial, indicating that based on the evidence provided by the applicant and his military personnel records, there is nothing to reflect he served in...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-04735
AFBCMR BC-2012-04735 MEMORANDUM OF CONSIDERATION OF APPLICATION BEFORE THE AFBCMR SUBJECT: Having carefully reviewed this application, we agree with the recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt the rationale expressed as the basis for our decision that the applicant has been the victim of either an error or an injustice. Therefore, we recommend that: The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air Force relating to the APPLICANT be corrected to...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-04737
The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are described in the letter prepared by the Air Force office of primary which is attached at Exhibit C. ________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPSOE recommends denial, indicating the applicant became ineligible for promotion and did not hold the grade of senior master sergeant prior to her retirement. Wing commanders or equivalent have authority to grant or deny waivers of...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-04741
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-04741 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His records be corrected to reflect he enlisted in the grade of airman first class (E-3), instead of airman basic (E-1). Under the provisions of AFRCI 36-2001, Air Force Reserve Recruiting Procedures, Table 5.1, Note 5: Documents presented after...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-04744
The basis for the discharge was supported by the evidence. The applicants 2C RE code is required based on the entry level separation with an uncharacterized service and he does not provide any evidence of an error or injustice. The complete DPSOA evaluation is at Exhibit D. ________________________________________________________________ _ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: Copies of the Air Force evaluations were forwarded to the applicant on 21 Dec 12 for review and comment...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-04745
Due to the limited time between implementation of the Post-9/11 GI Bill TEB on 1 August 2009 and his retirement on 1 September 2009, he was not afforded sufficient information or opportunity to apply for and receive a Certificate of Eligibility and request transfer of benefits to his dependents. The complete AFRC/A1K evaluation is at Exhibit C. ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: In his response, the applicant states...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-04749
The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the letter prepared by the appropriate office of the Air Force, which is attached at Exhibit C. ________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPSOA recommends denial, indicating there is no evidence of an error or injustice. He was discharged for failure in the WMP, which warranted an involuntary discharge with an honorable character of service and an RE code of 2C in...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-04750
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-04750 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His record be corrected to reflect he was awarded the following: a. The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are described in the letter prepared by the Air Force office of primary responsibility (OPR) which is included at Exhibit...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-04755
________________________________________________________________ THE APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: He was not given the opportunity to transfer the benefit prior to his retirement in 2006 because he was not aware of the benefit at that time. The program for the Transfer of Education Benefits (TEB) started 1 Aug 09. We took notice of the applicant's complete submission in judging the merits of the case; however, we agree with the opinion and recommendation of the Air Force office of primary...